Prenatal Genetic Testing Argument Essay

965 Words2 Pages

Improvements to prenatal genetic testing occurs everyday, allowing for cheaper and less invasive tests that allow parents to understand if their child will have any deadly diseases. I have compiled six resources in which I summarize, assess, analyze, and reflect to support and defend my argument about the pros and cons of prenatal genetic testing. Articles to Inform In the article, “Genetic Screening Before or During Pregnancy” by Phyllis Cooper, he provides mutual information and background about prenatal genetic testing. The author begins the essay by explaining what genetic screening is, before continuing on to describe when it is used, how to prepare, how it is done, and examples of such genetic screening tests (Cooper, 2013, pp.1-3). This is a useful source as it presents the basic, unbiased information on prenatal testing before and during pregnancy. This informative essay suggests what genetic screening is through the use of examples and rhetorical questions, offering a unique perspective when comparing it to various articles. While it does not include specific facts …show more content…

M. DiLascio, supports the idea that screening for diseases in babies is appropriate. The main argument of this article is that it is acceptable to produce genetically healthy babies through the use of genetic screening as there are now non-invasive tests available (DiLascio, 2016, p.1). A key topic discussed in the article is the difference between genetic screening and genetic engineering. While genetic engineering allows doctors and scientists to make artificial changes to a human’s genetic makeup, genetic screening does not interfere with or alter the fetus, as the goal of this is only to locate any potential diseases. This article favors these types of tests and provides information to strengthen this side of the argument in an attempt to sway

Open Document