Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Accessibility to healthcare essay
Positives and limitations of motivational interviewing
Motivational interviewing case study paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Accessibility to healthcare essay
Principles of Practice Redesign Over the years healthcare leaders have worked to develop practice models that best support the needs of patients and communities alike. Practice redesign involves the methodical modification of current practices in order to improve the quality, efficiency, and effectiveness of patient care (Health Care System Redesign, 2015). Clinical decision support, risk stratification, patient engagement, building and tracking relationships, as well as measuring and improving over time are also important principles of practice redesign (Nash et al., 2016). Accessing the right care at the right time is another essential component of practice design. Healthcare delivery systems play an important role in access by ensuring …show more content…
The use of motivational interviewing techniques by staff facilitates open communication with patients and allows them to ascertain a patient’s willingness and readiness to participate in his or her care. Patient engagement best determined through patient satisfaction surveys and or outcome measures. As in the example above, a patient with a HgbA1C >10, who is pulled into the clinic by the nurse disease manager for education and assisted with coordinating provider follow ups may chose a progressive improvement in their glycemic control. Improved glycemic control is an indicator of patient engagement because the patient is eating better, taking medication appropriately, and likely keeping up with appointments and routine labs. Building and Tracking Relationships Due to our fragmented healthcare system patients are faced with visiting many different treatment entities. The inability to access information about a patient’s treatment plan makes care complicated to manage for both patients and providers alike. While some healthcare delivery systems have open information exchanges where information is readily available to any service provider within the network the information is not easily shared among those outside its network. Measuring and …show more content…
Focused on early chronic disease screenings, proper nutrition, immunizations, and reduction of high-risk behaviors these models curb the onset of costly chronic conditions. More recently these models extend beyond preventive screenings to include other important aspects of preventative care such as access and scheduling (Nash et al., 2016). Preventative health models improve long-term health outcomes and reduce costs associated with complications of chronic illness through active health promotion community outreach initiatives. Chronic care models aim to maintain and improve health for patients with chronic conditions. These models focus on patient centric care through a multidisciplinary team approach with the primary care provider centrally responsible for managing the patient’s care. In chronic care models, it is understood that optimal care is achieved through care balance of primary care, specialty care along with adequate community and family support. Both chronic and preventive health models are centered on proactive patient engagement and promotion of self-care (Nash et. al., 2016). They also rely on clinical support tools and the use of evidence-based guidelines to drive high quality cost-effective care (Nash et. al,
• Consumer Mediated Exchange – ability for patients to regulate the use of their health information among providers
The PCMH model promotes doctor-patient interaction and the personalized management of each patient by their primary care provider. The reimbursement system in particular sets this model apart from others. Physicians are reimbursed for the time spent with the patient in the clinic as well as for coordinating the patients’ health care team and communicating with the patient out of clinic. This means that, “doctors can be paid to send their patients a letter, or a link to a computer web site or a text message”.1 This will not only generate stronger patient-doctor bonds but also enable the patients to be more active in their health care plan. The model offers patients easier access to their health care team by providing more opportunities of communication outside the clinic in which they can receive medical counsel in a timely manner. This is made possible by the reimbursement system and its ability to compensate for out of clinic communications. The PCMH model therefore provides a preventive stance on medicine and ensures that the patient receives quality care on a regular
The health information networks factor into the enhancement of the patient-centered management system, in that they help with the implementation of the Electronic health record. The HITECH Act for example allocated “18 billion through the Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement systems as incentives for hospitals and physicians who are meaningful users of EHR systems”(About the HITECH, n.d.). This is a beneficial way to promote the use of electronic health records and have them become universally utilized across the nation. NHIN is also an excellent network that is more widespread and contains policies as well as standards that help with the safe trade of data. NHIN is the biggest network that all other health information networks hope to achieve. The NHIN is a contributor to the expansion of the EHR and it also further improves the patient-centered management system by having the policies they have. These policies assist with keeping the information in the system safe and also helping many different entities to become a part of its use. Some of the entities involved are the Center for Disease Control and prevention, Social Security Administration, Department of Defense and Kaiser Permanente among others. Both CHIN and RHINO implement the use of electronic health record, which makes it more widespread,
Patient Credentialing identifies people who have a certain diagnosis and have achieved certain levels of competency in understanding and managing their disease (Watson, Bluml, & Skoufalos, 2015). Patient Credentialing (PC) was developed to meet 3 core purposes: (1) enhance patient engagement by increasing personal accountability for health outcomes, (2) create a mass customization strategy for providers to deliver high-quality, patient centered collaborative care, and (3) provide payers with a foundation for properly aligning health benefit incentive (Watson et al., 2015). The goal is for patients to achieve a proficiency in managing their chronic conditions to promote chronic conditions competencies and self-management.
Unfortunately, the quality of health care in America is flawed. Information technology (IT) offers the potential to address the industry’s most pressing dilemmas: care fragmentation, medical errors, and rising costs. The leading example of this is the electronic health record (EHR). An EHR, as explained by HealthIT.gov (n.d.), is a digital version of a patient’s paper chart. It includes, but is not limited to, medical history, diagnoses, medications, and treatment plans. The EHR, then, serves as a resource that aids clinicians in decision-making by providing comprehensive patient information.
“An electronic health record (EHR) is a digital version of a patient’s paper chart. EHRs are real-time, patient-centered records that make information available instantly and securely to authorized users.” (healthit.gov) The EHR mandate was created “to share information with other health care providers and organizations – such as laboratories, specialists, medical imaging facilities, pharmacies, emergency facilities, and school and workplace clinics – so they contain information from all clinicians involved in a patient’s care.” ("Providers & Professionals | HealthIT.gov", n.d., p. 1) The process has proved to be quite challenging for providers. As an incentive, the government began issuing payments to those providers who “meaningfully use certified electronic health record (EHR) technology.” (hhs.gov) There are three stages that providers must progress through in order to receive theses financial incentives. Stage one is the initial stage and is met with the creation and implementation of the HER in the business. Stage two “increases health information exchange between providers.” ("United States Department of Health and Human Services | HHS.gov", n.d., p. 1) Stage three will be the continuation and expansion of the “meaningful use objectives.” ("United States Department of Health and Human Services | HHS.gov", n.d., p. 1) The hospital, where I work, initiated the HER mandate many years ago. In this paper, I will discuss the progression and the challenges that my hospital encountered while implementing the EHR mandate.
Today?s healthcare environment calls for continued cost containment while providing better, quality care. As a result of the advances of healthcare, life expectancies have increased resulting in a growing, aged population with more chronic conditions. Treatment options, outside the hospital, are the norm for most routine management of patient care, but when someone gets sick, and requires hospitalization, the combination of their age, chronicity of illness and increased comorbidity
Patient engagement is now seen as being increasingly important and there is a big push at the provincial level to see more progress on this issue, in order to have the potential benefits accrue. The 2009 Saskatchewan Patient First Review11 recommends that the “health system make patient and family-centred care the foundation and principal aim of the Saskatchewan health system”. As mentioned earlier patient engagement appears to be associated with fewer adverse events5, better self management6,7, fewer diagnostic tests8, decreased use of health services9, and shorter length of stay in
In efforts to address the health care needs of an individual with MCC, health care systems benefit from using the Chronic Care Model (CCM) and Transitional Care Model (TCM) when developing a patient care plan. The CCM predicts an increase in patients with self-management skills and tracking systems, by streamlining medical care through partnerships between health systems and local community assets (Mackey, Parchman, & et al., 2012). The TCM “emphasizes recognition of patient's’ health goals, coordination and continuity of care during acute episodes of illness, and development of streamlined plan of care to prevent future hospitalizations” ("Transitional Care Model," 2014, para. 1). Both models are successful with active participation of
The objective of the MCEG is to provide channels to exchange information between managed care/health plan information systems executives and to provide opportunity for personal networking. MCEG provides a forum to develop policy which relates to the use of information technology and healthcare. MCEG provides feedback to vendor sponsors and other vendors on the trends and types of technology needed to ensure that their products and strategies meet their customer’s present and future managed care needs. Additionally, their objective is to “educate executives on clinical and administrative trends in health care, new and emerging technologies, and other pertinent information to assist in achieving the key goals of cost containment, effective service and high quality health care.” (Why We Matter, 2011)
reimbursement determinations. As a result, the camaraderie among physicians has developed into a more aggressive approach to impede competition (Shi & Singh, 2012). Little information is shared with patients in regards to procedures or disease control. The subjects are forced to rely on the internet for enlightenment on the scope of their illnesses (Shi & Singh, 2012). Furthermore, the U.S. health care system fails to provide adequate knowledge on billing strategies for operations and other medical practices. The cost in a free system is based on supply and demand and is known in advance of hospital admission (Shi & Singh, 2012). The need for new technology is another characteristic that is of interest when considering the health care system. Technology is often v...
(2013). Chapter 15. Adapting the Chronic Care Model to Treat Chronic Illness at a Free
According to the Healthy People Database, in 2010 the aging population was estimated at 40 million, this number is expected rise to nearly 70 million by the year 2030 (National Center for Health Statistics, 2000). At the forefront of health concerns for this aging population will be the intervention, management and treatment of chronic diseases. This increase in both this specific population as well as the required medical care will place a significant amount of stress on an already distressed healthcare system, which in turn will affect the availability of recourses and costs. Including patients in their self care with strategic health promotion such as encouragement and education geared towards specific socioeconomic groups will be more cost effective and beneficial in the management of chronic disease. Studies indicate that patients involved in self management of disease processes often have better patient outcomes.
The chronic care model calls for an organizational change in the way individuals with illnesses are cared for, and the involvement of nurses, social workers and patients themselves. The challenge is moving in an effective way of improving quality from research carried out predominantly in health maintenance organizations to the mainstream of health care practice (Wielawski, 2006). Wagner’s explanation is to substitute the customary physician-centric office structure with one that supports clinical teamwork in association with the patient. The notion spreads outside the health care organization to collaborative associations in the community. Wagner et al. (2001) termed this approach the “chronic care model.” With this model, physicians, nurses, case managers, dieticians, and patient educators
...s in the health industry. It is set to change the way doctors and patient’s access information as it will make information more available in a clear and efficient way.