Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Who is the hero in Frankenstein
Analysis of chapter 5 frankenstein
Social control and freedom in Frankenstein
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Who is the hero in Frankenstein
Phillip Pullman explores power, rejection and revenge in Frankenstein by using characterisation, point of view, and conflict. The audience have their ideas, values and beliefs challenged because they may have different views as to who the protagonist and the antagonist are. Power and characterisation are utilised to show how power can make someone delusional and not think straight, this causes the characters to change throughout the play. Rejection and point of view help show the story from the perspective of the antagonist. Revenge and conflict help make the audience question who is the real protagonist and who is the real antagonist. Power, rejection, and revenge are used to make the play have more depth and make it more interesting for the …show more content…
Every time The Monster encounters someone new, they try to kill him because they think he is hideous. The Monster is confronted by Felix in the forest and Felix is horrified at the sight of The Monster so he shouts “Dear God! He’s here –“and then proceeds to shoot at The Monster. Everybody rejected The Monster and this has slowly made him become more and more enraged. When Frankenstein first creates The Monster he realises what he has done was wrong and is disgusted by the sight. He rejects The Monster and makes him an outcast. When The Monster comes to life Frankenstein says “No! This isn’t what I wanted.” This is shows the audience how Frankenstein really feels about The Monster. The way The Monster sees the world through his own eyes is explored by Pullman by showing the ways people react to seeing him. The audience may show empathy for the monster and think that he could be the protagonist even though at first he seems to be the …show more content…
After being rejected by Frankenstein and by anyone that he met, the monster wanted revenge and killed Frankenstein’s brother. The Monster thought that killing living things was wrong but he felt he had to do it in order to get revenge on Frankenstein. Killing people is against The Monster’s morals and he is conflicted with the choice to get revenge or be rejected for all his life. Frankenstein agrees to create a bride for The Monster but Clerval kills The Monsters bride and enrages him even further, “Murderer! Destroyer! My bride – you’ve killed my bride.” The Monster kills Clerval for revenge even though it is against his morals. The Monster gets revenge by killing people who have hurt him or his loved ones, even though it conflicts with his morals because he thinks it is the only way he can hurt the humans. This makes the audience question whether The Monster is good or bad because the way he acts keeps on
When Victor Frankenstein breaks his promise to the monster, it threatens him by saying that he’ll return on Victors wedding. Victor assumes that it’s his life that’s being threatened but the night of the marriage, Victor finds his Elizabeth. “She was there, lifeless and inanimate, thrown across the bed, her head hanging down, and… running with the swiftness of lightning, plunged into the lake.” (Chapter 23) This quote conveys that the monster didn’t feel bad for killing Victor’s bride, he believed that it was a justified murder because he was repaying the heartache that he felt for his lost mate. This act of cruelty helped develop the monsters sense of right and wrong. The monster was born innocent but after being treated so cruelly for so long, his moral compass was corrupted. He felt as if it was his right to do this to this to Victor.
The monster tells Frankenstein of the wretchedness of the world and how it was not meant for a being such as himself. At the end of his insightful tale the creature demands a companion of the same hideous features but of the opposite gender to become his. Victor only has the choice to make the monster or suffer a lifetime of horror his creation would bring upon him. Which the creator ultimately agrees to make the female monster to save the lives of his family but gains a conscious that fills with guilt of all the destruction he has created and creating. When the monster comes to collect the female he tears her apart and the monster vows to destroy all Victor holds dear. The monster’s emotional sense is consumed with rage against Victor, murdering Frankenstein’s best friend. Though when the monster’s framing ways do not work to lead to Victor being executed, he then murders Frankenstein’s wife on their wedding night. This tragedy is the last for Victor’s father who becomes ill with grief and quickly passes within a few days, leaving Victor with nothing but his own regret. Shelley doesn’t give the audience the monsters side of the story but hints that the remainder of his journey consisted of being a shadow to that of his creator. It is at the graves of the Frankenstein family when the creature makes an appearance in the solemn and
Do not judge a book by its cover. Those are the words of a famous American proverb that says a person’s character cannot be judged based on their appearance. This proverb is very fitting in regards to the monster from Frankenstein. On the outside, he has a terrible appearance, and as a result is victimized and made to suffer by those who cannot see past his looks. Yet he has a kind soul and is simply looking for happiness and a little compassion from others. Both the book and the play present him as a sufferer in a cruel world but ultimately the book does a better job portraying his pain and eliciting empathy from the reader. The monster in the book details his suffering in greater detail, is more eloquent and persuasive and also experiences a more tragic ending, and as a result the reader feels more sympathy towards him than an audience member would feel towards the monster in the play.
...e seeking help and strength to take care of problems in their lives. Victor Frankenstein is a man with a loving and caring family. Family and friends are an important part of his life. He has his whole life in front of him, when creates his monster. He creates the monster in the likeness of man with same need of love and affection as man. Although, this is his creation, he lets the monster down and does not care for him. The monster begins to feel neglected and lonely and wants desperately to have a human relationship. The monster turns angry and revengeful because he is so sad and abandoned. He wants Victor to feel the way that he does, all alone. The monster succeeds and Victor ends up losing all the important in his life and his own life. In the end, the monster dies and the need for human relationship becomes the destruction for both the monster and Victor.
Most people agree that Victor Frankenstein holds the most power in the text. In creating the monster, he not only has the power to create life but also the power to, indirectly, save or destroy others lives. Critics of his character speculate that Justine could have been saved had be only confessed his actions in Ingolstadt.
Locked in a perpetual struggle for dominance, both struggle to gain internal peace. Victor Frankenstein feels obligated to destroy his creation for the good of society, and the Monster wishes to come to terms with his abandonment – both are unable to find happiness. Here there is a contrast of power: Frankenstein’s intellectual power contrary to the Monster’s physical power (this is however, not to say the Monster lacked intellectual power, only that Frankenstein possesses greater fear of the physical aspects of the Monster). The first instance of this battle for power can be seen when the Monster demands of Frankenstein to “create a female…with whom [he] can live in the interchange of those sympathies necessary for [his] being.” (p174) – here Frankenstein is in control. He is the only one that has the knowledge to create another being like the Monster, and thus, when the Monster asks this favour of Frankenstein he places his happiness in the hands of another. The Monster is dependent on the actions of another. However, there is a power reversal when Frankenstein denies the monster his ‘female’ (p174). Frankenstein dashes the Monster’s last hope at happiness, so the Monster threatens the life of his loved ones. Here, Frankenstein is at the mercy of his creation. For though “[Frankenstein is the] creator… [the Monster is his master” (p205) – here the Monster establishes his dominance over Frankenstein by outwardly stating his power over his creator. This power struggle is most effectively culminated in the chase around the globe. Yet it must be seen that neither Frankenstein and his Monster are in control. The Monster leaves clues for Frankenstein, demonstrating his need for Frankenstein to follow him, for without Frankenstein the Monster has no purpose in life. On the other hand, Frankenstein is following his creation all over the world, through desert, sea, and cold. Thus, it is clear that as a
middle of paper ... ... Generally in the novel, most readers tend to sympathize with Frankenstein because of the way in which he is mentally and physically harmed by his creation. However, one must also realize that while Frankenstein is a victim in the novel, he also exhibits features that make him a monster. These monstrous qualities, however, stem from his passion for science and his desire to create life. Not only does the reader criticize and pity Frankenstein, but the reader also empathizes with Frankenstein’s creation.
Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein centers around a creator who rejects his own creation. The plot thickens as Victor Frankenstein turns his back on his creation out of fear and regret. The monster is cast out alone to figure out the world and as a result of a life with no love, he turns evil. Shelley seems to urge the reader to try a relate with this monster and avoid just seeing him as an evil being beyond repentance. There is no doubt that the monster is in fact evil; however, the monster’s evilness stems from rejection from his creator.
The monster of the novel is often misattributed with the name, “Frankenstein.” However, Victor Frankenstein can ultimately be considered the true monster of this tale. His obsession would lead to the corruption of his soul and the creation of two monsters—one himself, and the other, the creature. In attempting to take on the role of God, nature would become a monster to Victor and destroy his life. These elements of monstrosity in Frankenstein drive the meaning of its story.
In Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, many similarities can be seen between the creature and his creator, Victor Frankenstein. While Victor and the creature are similar, there are a few binary oppositions throughout the book that make them different. The binary oppositions in the novel serve as thematic contrast; and some of the most illustrative oppositions between the two characters are on the focus of family, parenthood, isolation and association with others.
At first, The Monster is very kind and sympathetic. He has a good heart, as shown when he collected firewood for the family on the brink of poverty. Like every other human creation, he was not born a murderer. All the Monster wanted was to be accepted and loved by Victor Frankenstein and the other humans but instead he was judged by his appearance and considered to be dangerous. The Monster says, “like Adam, I was created apparently united by no link to any other being in existence…many times I considered Satan as the fitter emblem of my condition; for often, like him, when I viewed the bliss of my protectors, the bitter gall of envy rose within me” (page 105). This line is an important part of the novel because the Monster lets it be known how like Adam he was created into this world completely abandoned and like Satan he is angry with those people who have found contentment and satisfaction in their lives. The rejection and unwelcome feeling he is faced with, is the main reason the Monster becomes a killer. Watching another family show love towards each other made the Monster realize how alienated he truly was. He did not know how to deal with his pain and emotions so he murders as
The book goes into greater detail regarding the monster’s hardships, has a more eloquent and persuasive monster and has a more heartbreaking ending. As a result a reader feels greater sympathy towards the monster in the novel rather than in the play. The monster begins his journey a purely innocent and kind being, but because he has to suffer the misfortune of having such a monstrous appearance he is condemned by society. Frankenstein tells the story of a benevolent being persecuted by man, and has the reader questioning who the real monster is.
This meant to both console and hurt Frankenstein because Frankenstein losses both sons (the creature and second son) to the psychical abortion of death and the emotion abortion of abandonment. Although the second son experiences death and the first son experience the cutting open of flesh, the first son's true pain is identified as the rejection to his own birth from Frankenstein (9:23). This abandonment fuels the creature's yearning for revenge with the need to live and causes any thought of the creature's existence to be a mere mistake in Frankenstein's eyes to vanish during their (Frankenstein and the creature) reunion. The horrific visuals of the creature slapping his bloody hands on Frankenstein's face, glazing his fingers coated with the second son's blood over Frankenstein's lips are a powerful moment (8:00) as the creature is able to take back some of the life he's loss due to abortion. Where revenge is about the death for the creature, it is merely about life for Frankenstein as the creature says, "if you seek to threaten me, do not threaten me with death, threaten me with life"
“How does Phillip Pullman explore the themes of power, rejection and revenge and analyse how the audience’s ideas, values and beliefs are challenged by the presentation of these themes in the play Frankenstein?”
Victor Frankenstein's successful closeness with Henry Clerval plays a valid foil to the Creature's unrequited passion for a comrade. Their intimacy is extremely obvious when Victor relates that, "Nothing could equal my delight on seeing Clerval;…I grasped his hand, and in moment forgot my horror and misfortune;"(p.44). The close friendship between these two grown men prospers and expands up until Clerval's tragic death, which is caused by the Creature. The actual termination of this particular companionship works symbolically to show the final path of destruction the Creature has chosen to take. His greed for revenge ...