Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Power in conflict
Power in conflict
The relationship between conflict and power
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Power in conflict
As defined in the text, power is a fundamental concept in conflict theory. If only it were that easy to define or label power in conflict as "good" or "bad". Simply stated, in and of itself, it is both. Similar to "beauty being in the eyes of the beholder," Power is much the same way — it is in the hands of the beholder. The English word power comes from the Latin posse — “to be able”. Dictionary.com defines power as “a person or thing that possesses or exercises authority or influence.” Power has a number of meanings and means something slightly different to everyone, but essentially is gives us the ability to do something. It can enable us to have the capacity to affect change when faced with conflict. So in reality when we use our power …show more content…
in conflict, we are using our authority to get or achieve something. Three significant things about power in conflict I learned are power balancing, power currencies, particularly communication skills and the relational theory of power.
We can reduce the amount of violence, arguments and miscommunications by effectively balancing power. People can work together to make relationships more equal in creative ways and find outlets that will manage conflict better. This allows people to work together more productively for the good, particularly when faced with conflict. When power is balanced we can learn to reach agreements more effectively and fairly. It is necessary to continually even out the power balance in relationships whenever warranted. One way to avoid conflict at home is to balance out household duties. It is very important for one to not feel as they are contributing to more of the household chores than the other. Each of us is more productive with certain projects than others are. On that same note, each of us like doing things more than others. I always clean the kitchen, wash the dishes, load and unload the dishwasher, etc, although my partner does most of the prepping and cooking. It is a balance, therefore, we rarely argue over who is doing more than the other when it comes to cooking and cleaning. We appreciate our differences and use them to add value to our relationship. As stated in the text, everyone has potential currencies that can be used to balance or gain power in our relationships. Power Currencies define how much …show more content…
your particular resources are valued by the others in a relationship context. They are called power currencies because they are similar to money. There are four different types of power currencies that people can have over one another. They are Resource Control, Interpersonal Linkage, Communication Skills, and Expertise. Of the four, I found communication skills most significant. One power currency I have been communication skills. I can help lead a group in making important decisions and speak persuasively. I have always been able to form bonds with others quickly through caring, nurturing, empathy and understanding. These are all significant interpersonal communication skills. In interpersonal relationships, a relational theory of power can help explain an individual status of power. According to the text, this theory is not used to describe power status in situations concerning physical power or use of violence, but instead “power is a property of the social relationship rather than the quality of the individual.” In other words, power is not something we own, however, it is potentially something that develops in relationships with another individual. As Hocker and Wilmot concisely put it, “power is a product of the communication relationship.” • What behaviors does a feeling of high power lead to? Explain. Include examples. Length: 400-500 words. Power plays a role in most conflicts, resulting from struggles to either maintain or gain power. The need for power is simply a reality of life. We see people using or abusing and we see others claiming or denying. Whatever the struggle may be, many go through it to gain that feeling of control and power. This can lead to complete turmoil and conflict among others and oneself. Some would say power increases people’s sense of entitlement so that they feel they are more deserving than others despite not having done anything special.
Therefore, one could say that power makes people self-centered and this is the opposite of effectively resolving a conflict. When put to wise and judicious use, power can undoubtedly be considered as good. This positive use can be manifested in grand and noble actions benefiting many, or it can be simply recognized in a small, anonymous act benefiting one or few. Too often, we define power as some grand gesture or noble position of authority. When an issue arises that needs resolution, can we deem a simple act of kindness, no matter how seemingly insignificant, done for the betterment of another person by someone with the ability to do so, a good use of power? Is this not a representation of the "Power of Compassion" or "Power of Love" of "Power of Hope"? While at the same time, great men and women throughout history have exercised power in a good and positive way delivering enormous benefits to civilization, to our culture, to our environment,
etc. Conversely, the exact same thing can be said for power being a bad thing. Very few people would not crave to be in charge, especially men. There is now growing evidence that power is actually bad for people’s health and performance, and it turns them into less effective leaders. I read there is a good amount of evidence that having power shuts off your empathy system so that you become insensitive to other people’s emotions, even their suffering. Thus, power decreases empathizing and this is not what we want to see in our attempts to discover solutions in conflict. Power is important to many because it can be intended for reputation management, positional respect, and advancement. Wrong application of power is created by the attitude of people abusing their power. For example, dishonesties and unethical engagements can negatively affect an organization. When put to foolish and malicious use, power can undoubtedly be considered as bad. This negative use can be demonstrated in dramatic and questionable actions damaging many, or can be simply realized in a small, anonymous act damaging to one or few, causing conflict. Too often, we define power as some authoritative and broad position of authority. This can also be referred to as power denial when people dislike any discussion of power. Unfortunately, can we not deem a simple act of indifference, no matter how seemingly insignificant, done for the belittlement of another entity by someone with the ability to do so, a bad use of power? Is this not a representation of the "Power of Callousness" or "Power of Hate" of "Power of Despair"? While at the same time, men and women of challenging character throughout history have exercised power in a bad and negative way delivering enormous destruction to civilization, to our culture, to our environment, etc. Think of a situation where you have experienced a feeling of low power. Briefly describe the situation. How did you handle it? What could have been done to better balance the power? Be specific. Length: 400-500 words. Recently I have had my first experience of my child’s strong attempts at autonomy. It is a power struggle. I have felt extremely challenged and a feeling of low power, powerless at times. There is a constant battle of wills where emotions have run higher than the issues and this has lasted several months. I am sure I will experience similar struggles throughout childhood. To describe this as a trying time would be an understatement. To better balance the power I feel attempting to turn this time into a rewarding growth period for her by shifting my perspective somewhat. When is comes to her negative behavior, I can start becoming more clever and creative with my responses and not so frustrated. She will be very headstrong, stubborn, frustrated, and show negative behavior. I have learned that I truly need to be more patient and realize she has feelings too and at this age are very hard to figure out the best way to express them. Instead of viewing her independent behavior as bad and reacting in a way that overpowers her, I can view this behavior as a healthy positive sign of her development and find ways to empower her. When I react by overpowering her, it can cause her to feel powerless and discourages which is not effective. Allowing our children to practice at being powerful in useful and appropriate ways helps them become a self-reliant adult, one that can make good decisions and has the confidence to be whatever he or she chooses. We at sometimes have possessed different kinds of power depending on the situation or person that is involved. I believe in our relationships, our intentions in gaining power, if not properly in line with the relational purposes and goals, will not benefit us. Thus, the reality of power should be widely accepted that it is important to empower someone to contribute effectively to his/her relationships. The issue becomes what kind of power a person has and how someone uses that power.
Power is addressed in the book as something that Americans do not take seriously. The use of this power is not shown so much as who is in power. I will use three examples of this. Bubbah Offenhouse was in charge of making everyone aware of what to do in case of fallout. However, he chose not to even hand out information on this because he didn’t want to think about it.
Power. It is defined as the capacity or ability to direct or influence the behavior of others or the course of events. Throughout time, certain individuals have acquired power in their society as a way to govern and keep order among their community. Power is not a new concept; it was used in the past by many emperors, kings, and queens, and is still being used by presidents, prime ministers, and dictators. Although, it has been used to further progress societies into what the world is like today, not all power has been used for the best of mankind. But what goes awry to make power turn corrupt? In William Shakespeare's Hamlet, it is illustrated how power can turn corrupt, when authoritative figures, who possess power, abuse it for their personal gain, rather than for the common good of the society.
Power has been defined as the psychological relations over another to get them to do what you want them to do. We are exposed to forms of power from the time of birth. Our parents exercise power over us to behave in a way they deem appropriate. In school, teachers use their power to help us learn. When we enter the work world the power of our boss motivates us to perform and desire to move up the corporate ladder so that we too can intimidate someone with power one day. In Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness Kurtz had a power over the jungle and its people that was inexplicable.
Lately much ado is being made of the findings of Sean Gourley and his crew regarding power law relationships they’ve found in insurgency-based conflict. For some quick background, go here: http://seangourley.com/ and watch the 7 minute TED video.
Power is both a good and evil thing. With power, a person has the potential to change the world. With power, a person’s words would be so influential, that anything would be possible. But when a person uses power for evil, it could possibly provoke the most horrible events imaginable. One person who used power for evil was a character from the movie Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith created by George Lucas. The characters name was Chancellor Palpatine. In a span of about fifteen years, he was able to manipulate the political system of the Galactic Republic so that he would come to power. With various events such as the Clone Wars, he gained more and more power as Chancellor, so much so that the only thing that the Chancellor feared was to lose his power.
Power allows people to do anything they want. They can use it in different ways, they can tell people to obey them, they can use it to hurt someone they hate, and even rob. They can also use it in a positive way, they can help people and do a lot of good things with it.
Power is a difficult concept to define conclusively or definitively however, Bourdieu explains power to be a symbolic construct that is perpetuated through every day actions and behaviours of a society, that manipulate power relations to create, maintain and force the conforming of peoples to the given habitus of that society (Bourdieu, 1977). Power, is a force created through the
The need for power is a reality of life; to use or abuse, to claim or deny, own or disown. However the struggle many go through to gain that feeling of control and power can lead to inner turmoil and conflict between others and one self. Set in the times of the tragic witch trials The Crucible is a drama that shows power resting on moral, legal and religious dynamics that lead to inner, social and religious conflicts. Marking Time an ABC miniseries explores the inner conflict of Hal as he struggles to maintain his power by being with a group he does not really fit into, it also shows how the youth of society challenge authority which leads to social conflict between the two groups. Lord of the Flies a novel by William Golding about the savageness in all innocence and explores the concept of fighting for power to gain status and attitude. Power can be gained, won and fought for but the struggle for it can cause inner, social and religious conflict is explored in all three texts some the concept more clearer than others.
Almost every conflict situation consists of one party having more power than the other. When the power differential is significant, this usually has a major effect on both the matter and process of the dispute. In order for the outcome of the conflict to be fair, both parties must be relatively equal when it comes to power if resolution of the conflict is to be fair. If one side is far more powerful than another, they are more likely to impose their solution on the weaker party, who in turn will be forced to acquiesce, because they have no other choice.
I have given you authority to trample on snakes and scorpions and to overcome all the power of the enemy; nothing will harm you. However, do not rejoice that the spirits submit to you, but rejoice that your names are written in heaven.” (Luke 10: 17-20, NIV). Power can be utilized in many different ways. In Luke Jesus sends the seventy-two out who overcame the power of the enemy to then have power over them. However; Jesus cautioned them in the end asking that they not rejoice in that power. Power can be a great tool to utilize in management if utilized properly and not for negative reasons.
Some theorists believe that ‘power is everywhere: not because it embraces everything, but because it comes from everywhere… power is not an institution, nor a structure, nor possession. It is the name we give to a complex strategic situation in a particular society. (Foucault, 1990: 93) This is because power is present in each individual and in every relationship. It is defined as the ability of a group to get another group to take some form of desired action, usually by consensual power and sometimes by force. (Holmes, Hughes &Julian, 2007) There have been a number of differing views on ‘power over’ the many years in which it has been studied. Theorist such as Anthony Gidden in his works on structuration theory attempts to integrate basic structural analyses and agency-centred traditions. According to this, people are free to act, but they must also use and replicate fundamental structures of power by and through their own actions. Power is wielded and maintained by how one ‘makes a difference’ and based on their decisions and actions, if one fails to exercise power, that is to ‘make a difference’ then power is lost. (Giddens: 1984: 14) However, more recent theorists have revisited older conceptions including the power one has over another and within the decision-making processes, and power, as the ability to set specific, wanted agendas. To put it simply, power is the ability to get others to do something they wouldn’t otherwise do. In the political arena, therefore, power is the ability to make or influence decisions that other people are bound by.
Power is how much control and support one has. Power can be controversial because the people who want it sometimes don't know how to handle it. In Julius Caesar, written by Shakespeare, many different people possess power. They gain the power in varied ways and react to having it differently. Since there are so many situations in Julius Caesar, power shifts are very common because diverse times call for the amounts of power to vary between different people.
Power is authority and strength, which is any form of motive force or energy, ability to act, or control. When too much power is given, a dictatorship government can form, in which all decisions are made by one authority. In the book Animal Farm, by George Orwell the author portrays how “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely” (Lord Acton).
Many human beings have been involved in a power struggle of some sort since the beginning of time. Between power in the business world, classroom, and government it is often clear who is subordinate and who is dominant. Subordinates may at times feel powerless; however, they can gain satisfaction out of aesthetics and hidden transcripts because of the personal freedoms it represents to them.
The term power has a variety of definitions. According to the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, the first definition of power refers to “the ability or capacity to act or do something effectively”, also include “a capacity, faculty, or aptitude,” (“power. (n.d.)