Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay minority report
Concept of power in literature
Concept of power in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay minority report
Power and control are universal themes in literature. Steven Spielberg in Minority Report and Tom Rob Smith in Child 44 explore a different interpretation of these themes to attempt to explain their role in society. The authors display this by contrasting societies; one set in 2054 while the other in 1953. Free will and Fear; are the two key ideas which are expressed through the texts. Spielberg sets Minority Report in a dystopian universe, where freewill is at a minimum and control over society is at an all time high, while Tom Rob Smith uses the Soviet Union, another dystopian society to investigate the relationship between fear and it’s use to gain power and control.
Spielberg presents the reader with a world, which is idealistic, and a utopian society, with factors such as a 0% murder rate. The city is under constant surveillance, with each and every moment tracked through cameras placed within the city, which entices concepts such as consumerism and also limiting freewill of the citizens. Tom Rob Smith portrays Russia within Child 44 in a similar way, except he aspires for the readers to acknowledge the restrictions that are placed upon the citizens. As Child 44 uses the historic setting of Soviet Union Russia, the Soviet Union itself becomes a surveillance system. It is a government that refuses to acknowledge murder; it has the foundations of an idealistic society. Throughout the novel Tom Rob
…show more content…
Smith depicts an eerie feeling, this feeling is due to the rules and regulations, which the Soviet Union places upon its citizens. The author uses historical context to set the scene for the novel, within the novel thoughts against the system were considered a capital offense, the MGB would arrest others on the premises that those who displayed any doubts for the system or voiced their opinion were an enemy of the state “Enemies of the Party were not merely saboteurs, spies…. but doubters of the Party line, doubters of the society which awaited them”. However Tom Rob Smith questions this idealistic view through the murder of a child and the journey of the protagonist Leo Demidov. Spielberg uses the Pre-Crime unit and the actions, which occur within to display the many flaws of the system and governmental control. Through characters such as Danny Witwer and Lamar Burgess Spielberg interrupts a message in regards to human fatality and the system: “There’s a flaw, its human, it always is”. Another important aspect of the society, which Spielberg signifies with the city of Washington DC, is the little free will citizens who reside within the city have. The protagonists are used by the authors to show how patriotic characters within the two texts are used to explore the theme of power and control. Spielberg characterizes John Anderton as a man who demonstrates a high belief in the Pre-Crime program, the program itself becomes like a religion to him; holding a belief that the actions and movements he undertook for the program were for the greater good. Similarly in Child 44 Tom Rob Smith characterizes Leo Demidov as patriotic, just like John Anderton he believes the polices which the state inflicts on the citizens of Russia, are for the greater good, he is proud of the Russia that has been created; “ all these horrors seemed small when placed beside the magnitude of the greater good”. Spielberg portrays John as a hero; yet he holds a shadowed existence as shown through the actions of taking elicit drugs and the mess of his apartment. However Spielberg displays John Anderton as a man who was blinded by his righteous, holding a one-eyed perspective. A man who was psychologically blind to the truth and morality of the department. Likewise Tom Rob Smith displays Leo Demidov as the poster boy of the Soviet Union “His level headedness, military success…absolute and sincere belief in his country had resulted in him becoming a poster boy”. Leo Demidov shares another similarity to John Anderton; in that he was psychologically blind to the true meaning of the actions of the Soviet Union. As Leo Demidov becomes an enemy of the state, he is able to see the state in a new perspective; he begins voicing the opinions he kept buried within. In addition to this Tom Rob Smith demonstrates an almost split identity within him, shown within the novel as Leo Demidov battles between his moral obligations and his professional duties. A message relating to Power and Control is show through the concept of the split identity, through Leo the author presents that all individuals have a mask which hides their true self, it is a protection mechanism which adjusts to the environments they are exposed too. Within Minority Report, John Anderton replaces his eyes releasing him from a one eyed perception, causing him to see the Pre-Crime program in a new perspective; he began to see the corruption and the problems that plagued the system. Spielberg uses another character Lycon to revile the idea that it is the inner vision, which gives clarity “In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king”, solidifying the notion that the one eyed perception and oblivion is what will secure an individual a place within society. As opposed to viewing society in a different light, such viewing it in an individualized perspective. Spielberg also uses an additional character Lamar Burgess, the co-founder of Pre-Crime to display the lengths to which people in power would go to, to keep grasp on the power and control which they may hold over thousands of people. Tom Rob Smith uses the theme of fear in the general setting of Child 44 to successfully demonstrate how fear can be integrated with everyday life in order silence or provoke others. Meanwhile Spielberg uses a variety of cinematographic techniques in Minority Report such as lighting, characterization/character development and symbolism to represent various messages underneath the themes of Power and Control. Within the Film Minority Report the world of Pre-Crime can be perceived as black and white, characters either wear dark colours such as black or light colours such as white. The use of contrasting colours distinguishes the guilty such as the perpetrator and those associated with pre-crime from the innocent such as those in the public. Through manipulating the lighting, Spielberg creates an additional contrast of the light-dark concept. The exterior is lit brightly and is overwhelmed with sunlight, while the interior is continuously dark, with little light entering from the outside. Tom Rob Smiths manipulates two different settings within Child 44, rural Russia and the concrete Jungle; Moscow. Through manipulating the settings the author is able to display an indication of the effect that power and control has had on Moscow in comparison to rural Russia. Moscow is industrialized; the interrogation building is the image of the city “there was something about the building itself which made people uneasy, as though fear had been factored into the design”. The author uses this setting to create an unmistakable feeling of fear; another area where the idea of control over a society is evident is within the local school “None wanting to seem less dedicated than their neighbor”. Rural Russia provides a contrast to Moscow, communities are still built around culture and the sense of community, the author juxtaposes these two settings successfully and shows how even with a tight regime, control and power can be over turned. Spielberg also effectively contrasts the setting within Minority Report, showcasing two different cities. Washington DC is an industrialized wasteland; it is mechanized and filled with a dark underworld of crime. Spielberg uses this underlying setting of the underworld to suggest to the reader that the promise of safety and security comes with consequences. Just as in Child 44, Spielberg uses the countryside to provide a contrast to the city and yet the countryside is far from idyllic and is full of danger. Both of the authors display similar messages through the manipulation of the setting and the lighting of the texts, Spielberg interprets a message to the audience about how all individuals hold a darkness within them, yet it is the outside influences such as those in the environment which can determine the true actions of an individual. Meanwhile the message and concept of a split identity appears again within Child 44, Tom Rob Smith uses this as an underlying message throughout the novel. The author of Minority Report uses water as an important symbol; within the film Spielberg uses water to represent two worlds. One of positive imagery and the other of negative imagery, one a meditative creation and the other a world full of psychological destruction. Meanwhile Tom Rob Smith uses Andrei’s cats as a symbol within Child 44; he uses the relationship between Andrei and the cats to show the detachment he shares from the human race. He also uses this to establish the toughness of the Soviet Union rules. Spielberg presents the scenario “How dangerous is it to exchange individual freedoms for governmental assurances” within the film. He displays this through the actions of Lamar Burgess, specifically his ability to manipulate visions in order to assure and control the public. A game of chess was created; Spielberg uses this to demonstrate the scale of corruption within the system. Another concept that Spielberg addresses that has a direct link to the idea of power and control is vision. The vision of the public and those working within the program is distorted and blurred; the opening scene is blurred and distorted. From the opening scene Spielberg uses it as in introduction into the idea that the control from the Pre-Crime system has skewed the vision of the public. Key characters such as Agatha and Lamar Burgess have key lines such as “Can you see? The nation is upon us” and “ The eyes of the nation are upon us”. These lines demonstrate that the nation is under surveillance and control, that all actions are observed and recorded. Throughout history the theme of Power and control has been a universal theme.
Spielberg and Tom Rob Smith use different interpretations of these themes to explain the role, which they held within society. Through contrasting two societies both authors are able to express key ideas relating to the ideas of freewill and fear. Spielberg successfully explores how the use of fear is used to control masses of citizens while Tom Rob Smith uses the lack of freewill within Minority Report to investigate how control may affect society and individual’s behavior and
beliefs.
Freedom is one of the many great qualities of life, but when it is taken away, life could turn out to be anything but great. Freedom to think, repent, and refuse should be incorporated in ones daily routine, but under an authoritarian dystopian society, these freedoms are only dreamt of. When society draws such attitudes and lifestyles upon its citizens, one adapts and accepts these requests, but not without a compromise. In Shirley Jackson’s masterpiece ‘The Lottery’ and Kurt Vonnegut’s exceptional story ‘Harrison Bergeron’, human life is so often sacrificed and withdrawn that is becomes a norm in society. Forcing people to agree with someone else’s ideology of harmony and success cannot be achieved without discarding the non-believers. Both dystopian societies possess excessive force on their civilians, with harsh consequences resulting in death. Traditional values and dictatorship laws forcefully overcome the mass population’s beliefs, resulting in obedience and respect to the laws of society. By comparing and contrasting the short story ‘The Lottery’ and ‘Harrison Bergeron’, it can be derived that these societies have strict rules and regulations, citizens of the society have become so adapted that they are afraid of change, and there is a severe lack of freedom.
Conclusively, dystopian texts are written to provide a warning about future times. Authors and directors use a variety of techniques to put their idea forward and have an impact of the audience. Rules that the chosen texts exhibit include that citizens have a fear of the outside world and all citizens adhere to a strict set of rules, but there is a main protagonist who scrutinises the governments or society’s nature. The rules that authors and directors use to put forward their messages of the moral issues human cloning and relying too much on technology and instinctively perusing traditions are evident throughout all three texts.
Monsters under the bed, drowning, and property damage are topics many people have nightmares about; nightmares about a dystopian future, on the other hand, are less common. Despite this, Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 and George Orwell’s 1984 display a nightmarish vision about a dystopian society in the near future. Fahrenheit 451 tells of Guy Montag’s experience in a society where books have become illegal and the population has become addicted to television. Meanwhile, 1984 deals with Winston Smith’s affairs in Oceania, a state controlled by the totalitarian regime known as the Party. This regime is supposedly headed by a man named Big Brother. By examining the dehumanized settings, as well as the themes of individuality and manipulation, it becomes clear that novels successfully warn of a nightmarish future.
Dystopia represents an artificially created society to where a human population is administered to various types of oppressions, or a human population lives under the order of an oppressive government. The novel Fahrenheit 451 and the film V for Vendetta both effectively display this dystopian concept in their works. The nature of the society, the protagonist who questions the society, and the political power that runs the society are examples of how the novel and the film efficiently capture the main points of a dystopian society. The authors of the novel and the film use their visions of a dystopian future to remark on our present by identifying how today’s society is immensely addicted to technology and how our government has changed over the past decades. Furthermore, the authors use our modern day society to illustrate their view of a dystopia in our
Two of the most iconic dystopian novels are 1984 by George Orwell and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury. These novels expanded the genre significantly and while having different details about Dystopian life, share remarkable similarities. Throughout the novels, similar themes such as media control and war demonstrate that both authors share common ideas about what would be important in Dystopian life. On the other hand, the way in which the authors approach each issue highlights a difference in both time period and values.
George Orwell’s haunting dystopian novel 1984 delves into the closely monitored lives of the citizens of Oceania as the Party tries to take control of society. In totalitarianism, propaganda and terrorism are ways of subjugation with a main goal: total obedience. He aimed to create a “what if” novel, what would happen if totalitarian regimes, such as the Nazis and Soviets, were to take over the world. If totalitarianism were to happen, the leader would be the brain of the whole system. Orwell emphasizes the theme of individualism versus collective identity through Winston, the protagonist, and his defiance to the Party and Big Brother, with a frightening tone, surreal imagery and a third person limited point of view.
Much can happen in a matter of minutes; a man can go from thinking he is happy to thinking his life is falling apart, or can change from hating someone to loving them. These experiences sound outlandish, but they happened to Guy Montag, the main character in Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, and Winston Smith, the main character in George Orwell’s 1984. These two dystopian novels are about the characters discovering major problems in their societies, and then trying to fix them. Montag lives in a society where television controls people’s lives and books have become illegal. On the other hand Smith lives in Oceania, a territory led by a totalitarian regime. This regime is headed by Big Brother and is referred to as the Party. By examining Fahrenheit 451 and 1984, it is seen, not only through the dehumanized nature of society, but also through the theme of lies and manipulation that both Orwell and Bradbury wish to warn of a horrifying future society.
Tragic events occur daily around the globe in 2015, these occurrences have become routine. The world has considerably changed in the past five years; this is mainly due to the Arab spring (A term that symbolizes the fall of oppressive regimes in the Middle East. While in the Middle East the Arab Spring is TAKING PLACE, in America gun control is a major issue. One of the many letters written by George Orwell in Nineteen Eighty Four is that of oppressive governments and the basic freedoms of humanity. This specific article and 1984 share similarities in how both discuss the nature of humans. The main themes they discuss are: Death, Loss of innocence, as well as hope.
As “The Blue Hotel,” “The Displaced Person,” “Bernice Bobs her Hair,” and In Dubious Battle demonstrate, the outsiders in each story, though instilling an initial fear in the eyes of society, experience a sudden and considerable downfall in the end. Each of these defeats, some more extreme than others, result from a clash of society’s fixed guidelines with an outsider’s challenge of these rules. Whether this rebellion against society constitutes a conscious or unconscious effort, and whether the punishment results in justifiable or unjustifiable consequences, one pattern emerges. The outsider instills fear in the mind of the community, and as a defense mechanism, society takes it upon itself to conquer the stranger, leading to his or her ultimate downfall.
As Madeleine L’Engle aptly said, “because to take away a man's freedom of choice, even his freedom to make the wrong choice, is to manipulate him as though he were a puppet and not a person,” taking away freedom of choice is equivalent to stripping off humanity. Mankind has evolved to have the ability to use the mind for reason and understanding, which separates humans from beasts and machines. It is this ability that allows man to analyze and formulate different choices, and have the freedom over them. Despite the knowledge that freedom of choice is fundamental in making humans human, social control has always been one of the leading reasons to justify the removal of that freedom. Through showing the need for the loss of freedom for social stability and the resulting problems, both The Unincorporated Man and A Clockwork Orange highlight the conflict between control and freedom.
“WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH.” Part 1,Chapter 1,pg. 6. These three principles were repeatedly emphasized throughout the book and helped lay the foundation of the dystopian society George Orwell imagined in his novel 1984. Fear, manipulation, and control were all encompassed throughout this dystopian society set in the distant future. The freedom to express ones thoughts was no longer acceptable and would not be tolerated under any circumstances. Humankind was rapidly transforming into a corrupt and evil state of mind.
In the novel 1984, George Orwell elaborates on the idea of an autocratic government. This novel describes Orwell’s views on the dark, twisted form of government that he believes will develop in future years. The culture he created for this story was the most horrifying, troubling place a person could reside. The goals of the Party consisted of keeping the citizens squared away and oblivious to the unethical actions taking place around them. This unrealistic society gave Orwell the opportunity to create a vision of what a future communist nation might resemble. The purpose of this work is believed to be informative to citizens of how the government impacts our way of thinking, living, and believing. Fear from the citizens is used as manipulation by the government; this means the government shapes the citizens that will not conform to their society. Throughout this writing, the author remains in a dark, cold mood; thus, creating the feeling of negativity and opposition to the government. Ethical appeal is revealed in this
1984, by George Orwell, depicts the psychological progression of Winston Smith, a rebellious citizen among an oppressive government. In such a government, each ministry deals with the polar opposite of its namesake, stupidity is as necessary as intellect, and Big Brother is always watching. Conformity is not the ultimate goal of the Party. It is a side effect of Two Minutes Hate, relentless torture, and a lack of meaningful relationships aside from the love of Big Brother. Orwell so vividly illustrates the crushing brutality of the Party in order to warn the reader that an absolute government with the power to drive a citizen to his or her breaking point will inevitably destroy the core of human drive and independence. Those with the power to exploit personal fears and control levels of commitment through torture can crush anyone, for “in the face of pain, there are no heroes” (Orwell 213).
...sely points out to the reader’s attention that “The state doesn’t seem to have much power either to limit unemployment or put down violence, what we have to fear is our own ignorance.” (Bloom) The real literary merit of “1984” is that although one might feel it to be exaggerated today; the idea that anything can happen, like the extermination of an entire race or the adoption of radical ideology is always a possibility and to prevent this one must always be vigilant so that history does not repeat itself.
The future holds a different meaning for everyone, for some it holds hope while for others it holds despair. This constant wondering about the future has influenced many works to be written about the future. Some of these works propose a blissful future, but the majority paint the picture of an unfortunate dystopian world. Recently I read Daughters of the North, a novel in which the dystopian future of England is shown. Shortly after reading Daughters of the North, I watched The Road. This film showed a similar view of the future, yet more grim and unappealing that Daughters of the North. In this essay I will be comparing and contrasting these two works to show two different points of view of what a dystopian world is. After watching The Road I realised there was a large amount of books and movies that believe the future will be grim. I believe this is because as humans we fear what may be in our future due to the conflicts that we face today and wish to warm the world.