Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast autocratic and democratic leaderships
What are the similarities of the different leadership styles
Examples of different leadership styles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
There is a range of different types of leadership styles. You have Autocratic leadership where an individual makes all the decision making allow and does not consider what input others have. This type of leadership is where an individual is concerned with the task only. Then there is Democratic leadership where everyone is able to have an input in the decision making process. This is a balanced concern concerning a task but also with the employees. Laisse-Faire style is the last type of leadership where the task is not a concern, the employees are the only concern in this type of leadership.
Leadership Style
I consider myself having democratic leadership. This is a type of leadership where all the individuals take more of a participative role in the decision making process. I do not like to make decisions alone; I like when everyone is able to put their input into the decision process. I believe that the policies for the agency need to be followed at all times in order to keep everyone safe. I do not like to be pushy or act like I am better than everyone, I feel like everyone should share the responsibility to to get the job done. Over all I feel like it takes the whole time to work together as a whole in the decision process.
Problem-Solving Approach (Plan) I would sit down and write out all
…show more content…
This type of leadership requires everyone to work together as a team. Each member of the team is encouraged to set goals that are reachable with this type of leadership in the work environment. When the democrat leadership is the type used the employer is more likely to keep their employees for longer periods due to employees feeling like they are important and able to have input in decision making.
Negative Characteristic of Leadership
To think one style of leadership is the only style seems rather pompous. You have several different types and brands of blood pressure pills to lower the blood pressure depending on the cause, therefore why would we think we only need one type of leader. At times I am needed to make a decision that I do not ask for outside participation. For example the attendance policy. I decided what would be a fair policy, how many points would be assigned for each call off and how long each point would stay active for. The situation did not need a meeting, it did not need input for others. I utilized a laisse fair style when the nurses were complaining about medication pass times. I simply gave them the task to develop a standardized medication time and let me know. When I hold a risk meeting I have several nurses and other disciplines present to assist at problem solving risk behaviors and that also means trying new techniques. Every situation is different and it is my responsibility, as the leader, to know which style would work best in each situation; sometimes it also depends on the people involved. Some staff need a leader to stand back more, others need one to effectively manage them. So not only do I have to know the situation, I also need to be sensitive to the persons involved, why it is important for me to know the staff I work
I generally perceive myself as a quiet leader, someone who leads by example. I demonstrated leadership during my experience in the People to People program and Rutgers Biz Ed. The People to People program took place at Harvard University. It was a week long program taught us leadership qualities, how to prepare for college admissions, and learn how to serve our community. During the time I was in the program I participated in team work activities such as, rock climbing. The activity was done to show that we trusted our team to hold us up and for us to encourage others to climb higher than they thought could be possible.
This style has been defined as ( Abdicates responsibilities avoid making decisions)(Robbins 2001). That would mean leaders are not involved in taking decisions at all and they are available only to provide their employees with materials and answering questions, the subordinates have complete freedom to take decisions and set objectives (Chaudhry and Husnain 2012). In other words, this theory lacks any kind on powerful leadership. Hence, there would be lack of motivation, low levels of performance, and poor work practices(Packard 2009). However, if the employees are already motivated and have full understanding and high level of knowledge regarding the mission at hand, Lassies- Faire model might works fine (Gustainis and Roosevelt 2004) .
My style of leadership according to the quiz by Cherry (n.d.) is participative leadership which is a type of leadership that engages the members of the team to participate in decision making and problem solving while the leader makes the final judgment in the deliberation process. This style of leadership allows members who are experts in their fields provide input to reach a more effective and accurate decision. This fits exactly into my leadership style. I always believed that in every aspect there is a greater or lesser person than you are, so, why not focus on the best in others and tap on their expertise in knowledge or skill to get the best results.
The only challenge I may have is the slow decision making process when trying to include members in the decision making process. However, the advantage is that I would work with team members to make decisions which in return should increase their productivity because they are more involved in the process. The democratic leadership is also my preferred style because I’m more of a team player versus an autocratic leader. I would not demand my followers to do any task, I prefer to motivate my followers to success.
It is the nature, vision, and upbringing of the leader which helps them to determine which leadership theory fits them the most. A leader is the one who helps others to accomplish the goals. If there is any kind of intervention in the leadership style then most probably it would fail as the employee would be no more interested to work under the leader. A leader is someone who inspires others, helps them to view a goal and motivates them to achieve the goal. In a workplace, leaders come and go but the important thing is that leader who inspires others will leave a mark for the lifetime. Being a leader is not a difficult job, but leadership faces a jeopardy situation when a leader is incapable to answering the why and how questions. So, one should be very careful while acting as a
Democratic leadership styles can be persuasive or consultative. Persuasive – this is where a leader has already made a decision, but takes the time to persuade others that it is a good idea. Consultative – this is where a leader consults others about their views before making a decision. The decision will take into account these views. A laissez-faire type of leadership style allows employees to carry out activities freely within broad limits.
Leaders come forth depending on the kind of situation, in which they are need. This type of leadership is typically known as “situational leadership,” where the key concept is every situation is different, so each situation requires a specific, unique leader. For a person to be a great leader, one does not have to necessarily assume a “bossy” persona, which is stereotypically characterized with all leaders, but being a leader based on listening. Being this background leader is known to many as, “servant leadership.” Servant and situational leadership is how I can characterize my leadership style so far since I have joined the student leadership community at Hillwood High School.
Visionary leadership qualities help their project teams understand the true objectives and goals, as well as, how their contributions are important to achieve these goals (Preston, Moon, Simon, & Kossi, 2015). This very statement makes the visionary leadership style my number one go to style and my most beloved way of leading. To take a vision and to be able to correctly motivate and inspire your team with each individual contribution to get a job done and to further your project to the next level is amazing to me. Visionary will be the style I strive to work toward as a future leader. My number two style would be the Democratic style, mainly because Democratic leaders bring individuals together in order for everyone to give their thoughts, ask questions, and be involved in the entire project and its processes (Preston, et al, 2015). Getting teammates involved in all aspects of the project gives them a sense of
= = Democratic Leadership is the third kind or style of leadership. This is seen as a moderate type of leadership, between two extremes. This is said to have the best of both worlds.
Democratic leaders listen and act on the opinions of the group. This type of management is good as it makes the employees happy and productivity is high. This is very good because employee's thoughts and suggestions are listened to by the business. This makes the employees seem as if they are respected and that their thoughts are valid.
In this paper I will look at the four major leadership styles, their characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, and in what situations a particular leadership style is desired. Additionally, I will look at my leadership style and how I acquired this style throughout my career.
Participative leaders or better known as democratic leaders include team members and others, but making the final decision is up to the participative leader. Participative leaders build confidence and knowledge within team members because their inputs matter within decision making. It helps team members think their opinions help with decisions. If there is change that needs to be implemented a participative leader helps team members understand the change in positive way. I would definitely consider myself a participative leader because I love gathering as many opinions from people just in case I don’t see the situation from another point. It helps me put everything in a good perspective.
I have experience democratic leadership through being the secretary of the student government and being a part of class presentations in college. Leadership role is a responsibility that is extremely important in society. Through the course of this class my leadership knowledge has increased in numerous ways, I now have a better understanding of the importance of being a leader. Being a leader requires one to be a positive role model. Most leaders are people orientated person, a leader should always have a good communication with others, it is vital to maintain a good relationship. In my leadership role I have the responsibility of coordinating and influences others around me.
There are a few different types of well known leadership styles, authoritarian, delegative, and democratic. To assess my leadership style I used two online tests to help me determine my style. I felt the results were accurate and I fall into a democratic style/participative style. If I am leading I prefer to include the group and get their feedback on solving issues. However, I still make the final decision after listening to the thoughts of the group on a particular topic. This is considered to be a positive style of leadership that is inspiring to the group involved. The leaders decision making tends to be more accurate due to the input of other experts. (Cite)