Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History of drugs and criminalisation
Effects of illegal drugs Essay
The effect of illicit drugs on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Do you take medications without paying attention as to where they come from? Medicines such as those made of bugs or other seemingly odd things should be used as long as it does its job, it is used to an extent, and only by the patient's consent. These medications can be brought to use be medical teams to help fight diseases and ailments. These medications should only be used if the patient agrees, if it is used only to an extent, and only if it work. No one wants to eat poop or the brains of bugs for no purpose, that just does not happen.
If you were to eat poop pills or ground up roach brains, would you want it to work? Poop pills were designed to help cure clostridium difficile, “c. diff” bacteria that causes diarrhea, as stated in ,“Frozen poop pills fight life-threatening diseases”. Almost the same as the poop pills, cockroach brains are being used
…show more content…
to fight infections such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and E. coli. When a drug is designed, it is designed to work. Medicines such as cockroach brains and poop pills should only be prescribed at the patient's consent .
People do not particularly enjoy things that don't taste or seem very good. Gastroenterologists should allow patients to pick and choose out of the medicines that best fit to their needs. The physician should always allow the choice as a possibility though in case it is necessary.
As the third paragraph states, the medicines should only be used to a patient's consent, it should also be used only to an extent. If a patient has chosen to take the odd side of the medicinal route, the strange medicines should only be used until the patient is healthy enough to be placed on a more desireable treatment. If a different medicine could be used, then the physician should not use this, to the patient's wills of course.
Opposers would say these medicines shouldn't be used because they might transfer unknown or untreatable diseases to the already infected. These medicines also would disgust the patient. This may be true but the items used in creating these are screened as best as possible for harmful
bacteria. These very controversial medicines can and should be used because of the benefits, but only to an extent and at the patient's consent. These medicines could be used for diseases that are difficult to treat. These medicines should ultimately be used in medical practices dealing with hard to treat diseases.
In Amira’s case, an issue of consent is arisen that her GP has not explained to her much about the conditions she is suffering and the medication that he prescribed. Amira was left a little confused because she did not has the chance to ask questions. For obtaining consent, it must be informed and capacity which means that Amira must be given all of the information of the treatment and they understand the information provided by the doctor and they can use it to make a decision (13). Obtaining consent will lead to enhancement of the efficiency to the treatment because Amira is happy and showing agreement to the
Patients are ultimately responsible for their own health and wellbeing and should be held responsible for the consequences of their decisions and actions. All people have the right to refuse treatment even where refusal may result in harm to themselves or in their own death and providers are legally bound to respect their decision. If patients cannot decide for themselves, but have previously decided to refuse treatment while still competent, their decision is legally binding. Where a patient's views are not known, the doctor has a responsibility to make a decision, but should consult other healthcare professionals and people close to the patient.
does not mean it is perfectly safe. Some medicine may have side effects, but the FDA considers
...d how these determinations effect a physician’s approach to various types of critically ill patients? These types of questions come in to play when one attempts to critically analyze the differences between the types of terminally ill patients and the subtle ethical/legal nuances between withholding and withdrawing treatment. According to a review by Larry Gostin and Robert Weir about Nancy Cruzan, “…courts examine the physician’s respect for the desires of the patient and the level of care administered. A rule forbidding physicians from discontinuing a treatment that could have been withheld initially will discourage doctors from attempting certain types of care and force them prematurely to allow a patient to die. Physicians must be free to exercise their best professional judgment, especially when facing the sensitive question of whether to administer treatment.”
This document can be said to have been given based upon a clear appreciation and understanding of the facts, implications, and future consequences of a treatment by a health professional. Before this document was put into place, the thought was such that if an individual is receiving free healthcare, the physicians treating them are able to do whatever they want to them without their prior knowledge. This placed the treating physician in a paternalistic mindset, allowing them to decide what is best for their patient based on what could potentially help science and medicine down the road. With a “father knows best” approach, the patients were unable to practice their own autonomy and self-determination to decide what procedures and treatments would be best for themselves and their families. These patients were viewed as lesser of a person because they could not afford healthcare. Because of this, many physicians and scientists alike treated them as if they were lab rats. Informed consent also put forth guidelines for relaying information from patient to provider. This document has made it so that the parties involved are well aware and clearly understand what is going on and what will likely happen as a result. Before this, families and patients were left in a gray area, which allowed the physician to sputter off medical jargon to eventually confuse them and be able to do
...y we are eating food from place that we have no clue where it came from, and diarrhea is mainly cause from eating something you don’t normally eat and eating something you don’t know where it came from. This is just my opinion on Pepto-Bismol, but everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
When I sought out what it is used for I was amazed. The first things that I found it is used for made sense. Low melting solder, fusible alloys and fire sprinkler systems (Bismuth). Those make a lot of sense. However, it’s the next items that will surprise you. Pepto Bismol, gets its name from Bismuth. Some cosmetics, the coloration in glass, hair coloring dyes and is also found in hemorrhoid creams (Bismuth,
The right to refuse treatment and express freedom of choice has been a long-standing practice. This principle has been a part of English Law for centuries (2). Life expectancy has continued to increase owing to the help of modern medicine, as shown by the drastic increase in years of life expected at birth from between 20 to 30 years of age prior to 1820, to an average of 60 years of age starting after 1820 (3). However, the quality of life is believed to be depreciated by medicine. Many f...
As a physician, it is your sworn duty to protect those that are being treated under the Hippocratic oath. Although there are different dictations of the original oath, they all have the same context. When the law comes into play, physicians should remain true to the oath. When physicians take this oath, they have an obligation to keep their patients from harm and injustice. As a Hippocratic oath pledgee, one is also vowing to neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor make a suggestion to this effect. In modern times, society’s pressure can cause physicians to conform, but as a future physician, forcibly medicating a patient for a progression to death will never be a portion of my practice.
Once a person has freely made his choice, health care providers are required to respect the patient’s decision as part of the patient’s autonomy. A patient’s family might demand doctors to keep a patient alive living off of either machines or pain medication, even after doctors established such methods would not be effective anymore. Even though, the patient’s family knows that the treatment is no longer achievable, they may still expect doctors to do everything under the patient’s autonomy. However, the true reason is that the family is not ready to let go of a loved one. Therefore, they are willing to put the patient through pointless pain and suffering at the end of his or her life. In such cases, it would be easy for a doctor to obey the family’s request, but it would not be the right thing to do for the patient. Doctors must educate and instruct patients and their families about patient autonomy, and the principle of “do no harm” in
For instance, as we know every bio drugs goes through many stages before the marketing , Among these stages is the clinical stages, this new medicines should be tested on the animal sample before being marketed , sometimes there are a shortage and lack of this animal samples because there are some associations and Animal Rights Authority which consider the use of some animals in clinical tests or other scientific purpose can torture and give pain to that animals and consider this as an unethical issue, this resulting the rise of use human sample during doing clinical tests, this is a big challenge which the biopharmaceutical innovation is facing
The ethical dilemma of covert medication administration doesn’t come from the consent, or lack-of, itself, but of the decision made regardless of patient consent. Provided that there is no legal implication, the nurse must abide by the patient’s decision regardless of whether they agree with the patient’s decision or
People with an illness could take away their pain by choosing this decision. Doctors and pharmacists are making the patients suffer even more if they keep them alive, “Forcing the terminally ill to suffer and live or allowing them to die
Nowadays, there are more kinds of medicine than we had before. With the development of economics, many industry factories are established surrounding the cities. As we all know, the development of economics will influence the environment directly. More and more people are easily to get disease. Whenever people want to cure the disease, the first choice they can figure out is using medicine to treat disease. However, by giving the surveys, I know that not too many people know that medicine contains some harmful materials which can accumulate in the human body and influence apparatus indirectly. For example, phthalate is a kind of chemical which is used as a regulating materials to control the speed of releasing of medicine in the digesting tract...
.... It is the best tonic to nourish the digestive organ and help create a normal balance between food particles and digestive acidity.