Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial disparities in prison sentencing
Federalist vs republican party
Features of federalism within the USA
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Racial disparities in prison sentencing
The US political system and how it is, flawed. The goals of the US. Political system are to support the economic system, protect rights, common defense, provide public services, and maintain laws. Now with these goals in mind, it is clear that to efficiently accomplish these goals, political power should not be divided. It was best stated when Abraham Lincoln said “A house divided amongst itself cannot stand” meaning, so long as there are parties fighting in the political system it is fragile and these problems need to be rectified first. Furthermore if neither party is without its flaws then neither one can be followed and if combining them will not compensate for the others flaws then a whole new alternative must be presented. The US …show more content…
Inside these parties are many different goals to cover as much of them as possible we'll break it down little by little. A big goal of the Republican party is to increase the power of the U.S government as a whole which can lead to many problems. One problem that comes from this is some individuals problems and concerns are not met. Also, a majority of the government is run by Republicans so we need not wonder why they are eager to increase the power of the government. In the end, an easy way to look at the Republican party would be as the heartless elephant. A big goal the Democrats is to increase the individual states power however this can be a problem to. One way this is a problem is because some states can make laws that aren't beneficial to its community. Additionally this can also lead to further separation, in other words making the United States less united. On top of this Democrats get most of their support because the Republican party's so bad making them the best of a bad situation. So to sum up the symbol for the democrats would be the spineless …show more content…
According to the American Civil Liberties Union, “The racial disparities resulting from this system have been staggering. Black individuals are imprisoned at nearly six times the rate of their white counterparts — and Latinos are locked up at nearly double the white rate. Most of this racial disparity is a result of the War on Drugs. While these groups engage in drug use, possession, and sales at rates comparable to their representation in the general population, the system disparately impacts people of color. Now with this ugly fact in mind they are dealing out harsh penalties to one time offenders ruining their chances of getting other jobs, not evening trying to give them a better chance of getting another job and eliminating their opportunity to vote. While taking away an ex-convict's ability to vote may seem like a good idea they have been in prison for quite awhile thinking about what they've done wrong and the American judicial system seeing the other side of it seems like who better to vote then them. Even more disturbingly, one must wonder if race plays a part in the sentence some offenders receive because a study was conducted with a man name Jose Zamora. Now he dropped one letter from his name changing it to Joe a name commonly given to a caucasian man, and the experiment was to see who would get more job reponses joe or jose the answer obviously being joe. In short police
The Republicans are against the federal government. In result, they are ruining the concept of the foundations of self- rule in a representative democracy. They use objection, obstruction, and filibustering to block not only the process of government but also in order to make Americans deeply cynical about Washington. According to the book, legislating has become “war minus the shooting”. Eric Cantor, the House Republican leader, said he would shut off major legislation which further on could potentially affect our economic recovery an entire congressional session. Another example of a Republican who isn’t exactly fit for the political job is Newt Gingrich. Newt Gingrich saw the House as a rotten and corrupt institution largely because it was run by democrats. When Gingrich won control over the House, it only resulted in wasted money and stationary committee nameplates. He also decimated the traditional committee system, and reduced the power of the committee chairman. When he stepped down and the other Republic...
As stated above, the party’s doctrine was based on more than three ideologies. The Democratic-Republicans called for extensive radicalism and nationalism. They dreamt about the country made of people with radical views who knew their rights. Their procedures are very democratic, fair, and transparent.
Red is a symbol of Republican Party. According to Diffen website, red states are the strongest in the South and West, and weakest in the Northeast and the Pacific Coast. Moreover, the philosophy of Republican Party is conservative and right-leaning. They tend to a favor a limited role for government in society, and they against regulations and bureaucracy. Its platform involves support for free market capitalism, fiscal conservatism, and restrictions on labor unions. However, the Democrat Party’s symbol is blue. Due to Diffen website, one dominant in the Southeastern United States, is now strongest in the Northeast, and Democratic candidates have been faring better in some southern states. Also, Democrats are liberal and left-leaning. They tend to favor an active role for government in society. The party has united with smaller liberal regional parties throughout the country, such as the Farmer-Labor Party in Minnesota.
There have been many different parties surface since the beginning of the American political system. They all have had different thoughts, policies, and motivations. Each party has their own agenda some have made significant contributions and others have not. The first split, and beginning of the party system, came with the variation between the Federalists and the Democratic Republicans. These two parties were extremely different in thought, strategies, and status of people involved such as their leaders and believes on how to run the government. The Federalists worked to create a stronger national government, supported British in foreign affairs, and favored a national bank. The Democratic-Republican Party operated to advocate states’ rights, supported the French in foreign affairs and opposed a national bank. These are some of the differences that set apart these two major government Parties.
In today's day in age, the Democratic and Republican parties seem to be completely diverse. These two parties have completely opposing views on topics ranging from social issues, health care, tax policy, labor and free trade, foreign policy, crime and capital punishment, energy and environmental issues, and even education. Once upon a time however, these two groups were not as polarized as they have become. Both were once a single party known as the Democratic-Republican Party, formed by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in 1791. This sole party favored the idea of a decentralized, democratic government. They despised the idea of the U.S government becoming anything similar to England's monarchy system at the time. They also supported states’ rights as well as the literal and strict interpretation of the U.S Constitution. The group's purpose was to stand against the Federalists who were
system produces conflicts between the Congress and the President and promotes very outdated beliefs that stem from the Constitution. A vast majority of the American population has the stern belief that the Constitution does not need to be changed in any way, shape, or form. This belief, however, is keeping the country from progressing along with other countries around the world. These single parties are holding control of multiple branches of government at once and monopolizing the power during their respective terms. The government “faces an incapacity to govern since each party works as a majority party” and believes there is no reason for innovation (Dulio & Thurber, 2000). The two parties are seemingly always clashing about one thing or the other, making it difficult for things to get accomplished, and proves the thesis correct that the two-party system is ineffective for a growing country.
Nationwide, blacks are incarcerated at 8.2 times the rate of whites (Human Rights Watch, 2000).” This difference in proportionality does not necessarily involve direct discrimination; it can be explained by a number of combined factors. Correctional agencies do not control the number of minorities who enter their facilities. Therefore, the disparity must come from decisions made earlier in the criminal justice process. Law enforcement, court pre-sentencing policies and procedures, and sentencing all have a direct effect on the overrepresentation of minorities in the correctional population.
In the United States there are only two main political parties to choose from. The two main parties are the Democrats and the Republicans. There are also many other political parties to choose from which are called third parties. Third parties may include political parties such as the Socialist Equality Party and the Peace and Equality party. People can choose to be a part of any party they want but most go with the common two main parties the Democrats and Republicans. Democrats and Republicans have many similarities and differences. These mainly occur in international, social, economic, and domestic issues.
2010, “Racial Disparities in Sentencing: Implications for the Criminal Justice System and the African American Community”, African Journal of Criminology and Justice Studies 4(1): 1-31, in this Albonetti’s study is discussed in which it was found that minority status alone accounted for an additional sentence length of “one to seven months.” African American defendants were “likely to receive pretrial release but were more likely to be convicted, and be given harsher sentences after conviction than white defendants charged with the same crimes.” One of the reasons behind this are the sentencing laws, it is seen that these laws are designed in a way that they tend to be harsher towards a certain group of people, generally towards the people of color than others thus leading to inequality with the sentencing
The articles have shared some light on the topic “Does our Voting System Need to be fixed?” In these two articles by both man have to very different point of views which make one really think a more about it. The arguments they made based on the voting system where very much concerning issues and should be examined further throughout this paper.
The US Justice Department statistics 2003 and onwards demonstrates significant disproportion in the incarceration rate of minority African American and Hispanic men between the ages of 25 and 29 years as compared to the rate associated with White men of the same age. Bell (2007), proposes that as minority groups grow in numbers within the dominant group they will experience greater equality. However, rate of incarceration among minority males remains alarmingly high and as compared to their White counterparts. As with health care there are racial disparities that will influence outcomes when an individual is brought before the criminal courts. Additionally, there is significant correlation between a person’s level of education and the likelihood of his involvement in criminal activities. Studies and statistics have shown that among male high school dropouts there is high incidence of unemployment, low income and rate of illicit drug use as compared to men with degrees from four year colleges. Further to this, although the rate of school dropout and even arrest is not significantly different across the race lines, literature alludes that African American men have a higher rate of conviction for the same crime committed.
In the wake of President Obama’s election, the United States seems to be progressing towards a post-racial society. However, the rates of mass incarceration of black males in America deem this to be otherwise. Understanding mass incarceration as a modern racial caste system will reveal the role of the criminal justice system in creating and perpetuating racial hierarchy America. The history of social control in the United States dates back to the first racial caste systems: slavery and the Jim Crow Laws. Although these caste systems were outlawed by the 13th amendment and Civil Rights Act respectively, they are given new life and tailored to the needs of the time.In other words, racial caste in America has not ended but has merely been redesigned in the shape of mass incarceration. Once again, the fact that more than half of the young black men in many large American cities are under the control of the criminal justice system show evidence of a new racial caste system at work. The structure of the criminal justice system brings a disproportionate number of young black males into prisons, relegating them to a permanent second-class status, and ensuring there chances of freedom are slim. Even when minorities are released from prisons, they are discriminated against and most usually end up back in prisons . The role of race in criminal justice system is set up to discriminate, arrest, and imprison a mass number of minority men. From stopping, searching, and arresting, to plea bargaining and sentencing it is apparent that in every phases of the criminal justice system race plays a huge factor. Race and structure of Criminal Justice System, also, inhibit the integration of ex offenders into society and instead of freedom, relea...
When a person of color is being sentenced the unjustness of sentencing is blatantly shown such as in the article Race Sentencing and Testimony which stated, “ These scholars conclude that black male arrestees “face significantly more severe charges conditional on arrest offense and other observed characteristics” and attribute this primarily to prosecution charging decisions” (Mauer 4). This piece of writing explains that for no other reason than race do these people get convicted far more significantly than others who have the same charge but are white, which continues as far as giving a person of color the max sentence that they can have on a certain charge just for the color of their skin. The justice system has turned into the opposite of what it claims to be and continues to grow as a racist overseer, bashing down on those that they believe should be punished as harshly as possible simply for the color of their skin. The system has gone as deep as to making it so that even if a person has not committed a crime, but are being charged for it they can agree to a plea bargain, which makes it so even though the person did not do it the system is going to have them convicted of it anyway (Quigley 1). “As one young man told me ‘who wouldn’t rather do three years for a crime they didn’t commit than risk twenty-five years
...l view. There are some sanctions for people who act against the general view. Therefore British parties are more disciplined and British two-party system is more strict. On the other hand American political parties are decentralized and less disciplined. Party discipline and ideology is more weaker than the Britain. For example the members of the parties can act in direction of their personal views. If they want, they can act without consultation of their own parties. This situation shows that there is an undisciplined part structure in America. On the other hand America is a larger country than Britain in terms of both population and geography. Therefore America’s population is more diverse and American representatives have to address to a wider mass. Much as the same party system is approved in the USA and the UK. They differ from each other in some points.
This means depending on your race in some areas of America you could possibly be sentenced differently. I view this action as completely immoral. Growing up in a multicultural area I saw everyone as the same with equal opportunities. This was not the real world. We live in a society where cocaine and crack are technically the same drug that produces the same chemical affects, but yet sentencing for crack is harsher. Interesting enough, crack is associated with poor minorities especially blacks while cocaine is associated with whites of upper status. This is not only for drugs, but other crimes as well. It has been proven that black offenders serve 10% longer sentences than white offenders( ). The reason behind this is that “prosecutors are about twice as likely to file charges against blacks that carry mandatory minimum sentences than against whites” ( ).It is interesting enough to realize how people even view people of certain races or ethnicity. Just to think that if you look a certain type of way there is a possibility of being be searched because of your physical appearance. This is all wrong. Just because you look a certain way or depending on the pigment of your skin you are more likely to be a viewed as a possible criminal. There should be no reason why there are studies that show that blacks and hispanics are more likely to be pulled over and having their vehicle search( )