Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Huxleys brave new summary
Huxleys brave new summary
Huxleys brave new summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Huxleys brave new summary
Of all of the world’s ironic masterpieces, Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World is one of the most commonly banned. It is a political satire set far after the time it was written. This satire has not prevented a long list of bans from being placed on it. The book has been challenged a multitude of times for its inclusion of sexual content, drug use, and anti-theism. The book opens on a large establishing section that goes into detail in how advancements have allowed for mass production of humans. The controversial character of World Controller Mustapha Mond is introduced here. The latter half of the section establishes the variety of hypnopedia (Sleep-Teaching) that is used on each caste to teach them about civilized life. The story later shifts to that of Lenina Crowne, a civilized Londoner whose friend Fanny is complaining at how non-promiscuously Lenina acts. Lenina only wants to be with a man named Henry Foster, but, as monogamy is a prime sin of civilized life in 2540 (632 A.F.), Lenina agrees to talk with an alpha named Bernard Marx. Bernard is alienated by his alpha peers for being short and having distinctly non-civilized ideas about life …show more content…
and love. Lenina and Bernard decide to take a trip to a “savage” reservation called Malpais, a place analogous but slightly changed from that of America’s Native American reservations. After losing their soma at the reservation, our “heroes” meet two civilized people, Linda and John. Linda is a civilized woman who became pregnant on a trip to Malpais and was lost in a storm. Afterwards, she gave birth to and raised John in Malpais, where, despite his enthusiasm for Jesus and Pookong, the natives disliked him for his skin color. After leaving behind the reservation, Bernard talks to the Warden of Malpais and the controllers in London and gains permission to bring John and Linda back to London for an experiment. When the protagonists return to London, they are each overloaded with the indulgence they have been denied for so long. Lenina takes large quantities of Soma and travels the city enjoying herself. John experiences London’s city life and learns of all the things his birth denied him. Bernard is overwhelmed by the amount of praise and appreciation he receives from his peers for his experiment with “Mr. Savage” and changes his ways in a way that John, for the most part, loses his respect and empathy for the outcast Marx. Linda takes such large quantities of Soma that her entire body shuts down and she dies in the hospital. John is horrified when he sees children undergoing death-teaching running around Linda’s corpse and offering her no respect. This is the point John has his first outburst at the sins of the society in his blood. He yells at the kids and manages to make them leave Linda’s corpse alone. When a nurse confirms that Linda will truly never return from her trip, John loses his mind and attempts to stop the problems of his brave new world at their source, Soma. John finds a troupe of Delta-Minus workers being given their soma rations and attempts to show the workers his truth, but this does not work and John dumps all of the Soma into the river. This starts a riot that causes the police to be called in with gaseous Soma. John is then brought to talk directly to World Controller Mustapha Mond instead of simple imprisonment or execution. Here the two characters explain the main moral quandaries of the plot of the novel and Mond delivers two “merciful” sentences: Bernard and his associates are deported to Iceland to live in isolation with all other radicals, and John the Savage is made to stay in London, with no repercussions to his actions. John is a broken man and isolates himself in a lighthouse by the country. Here John attempts to repent for his sins by drinking a mixture of water and mustard in between sessions of self-flagellation. John plans to become self-sufficient and live out his years alone, but problems begin to arise when the press finds him and begins to report on his actions. John trades insults with the civilized people and threatens them with violence. Unfortunately for John, his actions just excite the Londoners who begin to chant derogation at him until the crowd erupts into a “cleansing orgy” and John is sucked in in one of the most controversial scenes of the novel. The next morning, the press return to the lighthouse only to find that John, filled with grief for the sins of the world he cannot change, escaped the world of depravity he has entered in the only way of which he is capable, by taking own life, his feet turning, “Slowly, very slowly, like two unhurried compass needles… north, north-east, east, south-east, south, south-south- west; then paused, and, after a few seconds, turned as unhurriedly back towards the left. South-south-west, south, south-east, east...” (Huxley 176) Despite the far more extensive themes of drug use Brave New World, sexual themes are a more common rationalization for banning the book. This is reasonable, considering the general groups that attempt to ban books fall into certain categories, almost none of which will ever accept that sex is a common topic of literature both as a metaphor and literally. The use of Soma in London orgies only exacerbates the problem of PTA demographics, though. Brave New World largely falls into the category of books that use sex as part of an extended literary device. London’s orgies and “Feelies,” specifically the “Cleansing Orgy” at the end of the story are representative of the prime sin of ultimate indulgence in the belief of John (Allegory of modern man’s perspective on the idiomatic hellscape of London) and are largely the reason that John takes his life. Many censors, however, are unable to see past the night of drug-fueled promiscuous sex to grasp fully the importance of the scene in the establishment of the novel’s plot, theme, and characters. One group of such censors banned Brave New World from teaching in Miller, Missouri for “Making promiscuous sex look like fun.” (Wolf) Theses demographic issued also go hand in hand with bans from religious sources due to many modern religions’ beliefs about sex and drugs. The most plentiful evil mentioned in Huxley’s great satire is in fleeing reality through use and abuse of the addictive drug, Soma. Apart from aforementioned use in countless sexual acts, Soma is also used to control the populace of London. The caste system implemented at birth and during youth through concoction and hypnopedia can only be enforced to death (which is always at 60 years old, with no previous degradation) through the distribution of Soma. This lulls the population into a state of constant high where all castes will not question the world controllers and will even work happily knowing they will receive their Soma afterwards. Another controversial corollary of the social castes controlled by drug use is the government’s distribution of Soma. Soma is manufactured almost solely to be used by lower ranks. This does not mean alphas will not enjoy the occasional trip, but that they need Soma much less than an epsilon working in a coal mine. It also is implied that most world controllers do not even use Soma. As if religions were not already under enough fire with the numerous references to sex and drug use in Brave New World, the book’s latter portions include the world controller of London’s very direct opinion on religion’s role in society, including why he is proud to avoid it in London. Mond expresses the sentiment that, “Apart from any such terrors or imaginings, the religious sentiment tends to develop as we grow older; … now that phenomenal existence is no more bolstered up by impressions from within or from without, we feel the need to lean on something that abides, something that will never play us false-a reality, an absolute and everlasting truth. Yes, we inevitably turn to God; for this religious sentiment is of its nature so pure, so delightful to the soul that experiences it, that it makes up to us for all our other losses.” The book also makes a harsh criticism of religion through the religion of the Natives in Malpais, and with John wanting to perform a ritual to “make the rain come” and “to pleases Pookong and Jesus.” (Huxley 79) This contention had the book removed from Foley High School. (Banned Books: Brave New World) Brave New World is one of the most banned books in history.
There are many reasons, with varying validity, for this, but these reasons are also part of why many consider the book Huxley’s best work and why it is still relevant to this day. Censors attempt to cover up the book due to the promiscuity of the characters, the consistent use of Soma, and many of the characters’ hatred of religion, but, in doing this, they overlook much of the literary value of one of the most highly acclaimed satires written in all of human history, an act of hypocrisy whose logical conclusion is best summarized in the words of writer Richard H. Beckham, “If we try to prevent people—especially young people—from being exposed to the tragic, we would have to eliminate much world literature which has been universally proclaimed great.”
(Beckham)
Jett Phillips 07.02.2017 Dearing AP Lit & Comp A.3 Aldous Huxley’s Satirical Ironic World There is no novel more synonymous with irony and satire than Aldous Huxley’s 1932 novel Brave New World. Throughout the novel, Huxley takes advantage of irony and satire to bring about his message, in an attempt to criticize those who would like to see the expansion of the state and proliferation of promiscuity, by showing those how such a world would look like, through his depiction of the “World State.” As presented in the novel, the World State’s citizens are designated by birth into genetically engineered classes, controlled throughout life through drugs and endless promiscuity, and pushing the never-ending production line forward in the satirically stated year of 632 “After Ford.” However, Huxley’s use of irony shines brightest through the names of his characters, such as Lenina Crowne, Bernard Marx, and John the Savage. The former two names are in reference to Vladimir Lenin and Karl Marx, and the latter being an ironic name based on how, essentially,
BNW Literary Lens Essay- Marxist Since the primitive civilizations of Mesopotamia and the classical kingdoms of Greece and Rome, people have always been divided. Up to the status quo, society has naturally categorized people into various ranks and statuses. With the Marxist literary lens, readers can explore this social phenomenon by analyzing depictions of class structure in literature. In Aldous Huxley’s novel Brave New World, readers are introduced to a dystopian society with a distinctive caste system.
Merriam Webster’s definition of satire is a type of literary work used to ridicule human vices and follies. This type of work is presented in Aldous Huxley’s, Brave New World, when criticizing the power and control of the World State through the use of advanced technology towards the members of the World State. Throughout the novel the World State is portrayed as a totalitarian government controlling every aspect of its citizens lives. This controlling is made possible through all the advanced technology available within the World State. Set hundreds of years after Henry Ford, the renowned auto maker, the government’s technology is highly advanced, a folly Huxley is trying to expose in order to prevent a technological takeover in the life of people in the real world. Conditioning is one technological method used by the government in order to establish individuals to participate in a variety of tasks. Also entertainment is another factor used by theWorld State to keep power. Censorship is also illustrated in the novel presenting the governments ability to control, what is released in the World State.
“Twenty-seven years later, in this third quarter of the twentieth century A.D., and long before the end of the first century A.F., I feel a good deal less optimistic than I did when I was writing Brave New World. The prophecies made in 1931 are coming true much sooner than I thought they would.” Resting anxiously and awaiting the Final Revolution in his psychedelic afterlife, Aldous Huxley still echos an invaluable wisdom to the generations of today and the future. The prophecies he made in Brave New World, written in 1931, are some of the most compelling ever made through the medium of fictional prose narrative. The previous pessimistic postulation though was not made in his opus, but rather it is from Huxley 's non-fiction work Brave New World Revisited, written in 1958, in which he concluded
There were quite a few changes made from Aldous Huxley’s, Brave New World to turn it into a “made for TV” movie. The first major change most people noticed was Bernard Marx’s attitude. In the book he was very shy and timid toward the opposite sex, he was also very cynical about their utopian lifestyle. In the movie Bernard was a regular Casanova. He had no shyness towards anyone. A second major deviation the movie made form the book was when Bernard exposed the existing director of Hatcheries and Conditioning, Bernard himself was moved up to this position. In the book the author doesn’t even mention who takes over the position. The biggest change between the two was Lenina, Bernard’s girlfriend becomes pregnant and has the baby. The screenwriters must have made this up because the author doesn’t even mention it. The differences between the book and the movie both helped it and hurt it.
In the dystopian novel, Brave New World, Huxley uses symbols to create meaning and to get his agenda across. The use of sex and reproduction, and Shakespearian writing and religious texts, as symbols in the novel help to push Huxley’s agenda that total government control is devastating, and the inner human drive to be an individual can never be suppressed. Also, the fact that the novel was written in 1931 shows that Huxley was attacking the newly forming Socialist nations.
One major issue that helps maintain social stability in Brave New World is sex. It is thought of as normal for people to be completely open with their sexual nature. It is typical for children to run around naked during recess playing games that are sexual and sometimes homosexual in nature. Every adult is encouraged to sleep with as many different partners as possible. This outlook on sexual nature is quite different from actual accepted views. Today, sex is most widely accepted as a private, romantic event that should take place between monogamous couples. Because sex is a natural need of the human body, people of Huxley’s society feel pleased by being open with their sexuality. Indulging in their sexual pleasures eases their minds and keeps them from questioning the level of freedom they have.
Bernard Marx is a character that represents those that are different from the norm, a character still relevant in today’s culture. He is an archetype of those that are looked down upon as different. He signifies those that look and/or think uniquely. Bernard is the outcast who longs to belong.
Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World portrays a society in which science has clearly taken over. This was an idea of what the future could hold for humankind. Is it true that Huxley’s prediction may be correct? Although there are many examples of Huxley’s theories in our society, there is reason to believe that his predictions will not hold true for the future of society.
"Brave New World by Aldous Huxley : Barron's Notes." Brave New World by Aldous Huxley:
In 1932, Aldous Huxley first published the novel, Brave New World. During this time, the ideas that Huxley explored in his novel were not a reality, but merely science-fiction entertainment. Brave New World confronts ideas of totalitarianism, artificial reproduction, anti-individualism, and forever youth- ideas which were not threatening in the 30’s. In the 1930’s, the high ethical standards people maintained and the limited amount of scientific knowledge did not allow for the acceptance of the types of ideas found in Brave New World. These values include abstinance, family structure, and life-long marriages- issues that had little to no importance in the Brave New World. As we begin the new millenium, our increasing scientific knowledge has taken our curiousity beyond ethical consideration, and Huxley’s novel has become much closer to a reality than it was 65 years ago. Today, Huxley’s Brave New World parallels current advances in genetical engineering, cloning, the lowering of moral standards held by the general mass, and the obsession people have with looking young.
Conspiracy theories are brought about when people believe that there is something being covered up that could influence their lives or the lives of the human race. However, most people don’t believe in a ‘conspiracy theory’ because in our culture, we believe in the freedom of information. We are aware of what is happening around us and, although we very indirectly control what is happening, we do have the intelligence and freedom to react to the event. In Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, the World State doesn’t allow this freedom of information and suppresses anything that would make humans more aware of their pre-determined lives. Huxley portrays soma, alcohol in blood surrogates, and the suppression of old texts in an ironic tone to support the theme of the deterioration of human awareness in Brave New World.
However Huxley's judgement is felt throughout this paragraph as we can note a lot of irony. Using a dramatic writing style such as: “Lenina was left to face the horrors of Malpais unaided” And a depretiative lexical: terrible, awful, indecent …
In 1932; Aldous Huxley published the classic novel Brave New World. The novel is about a futuristic controlled utopian/dystopian society, which seems successful and stable, yet evil and uncompassionate. The regime of Brave New World strongly enforces the indulgence in drugs and casual sex, caste systems, along with other various issues that would be considered unethical in our present Western society. Although Brave New World has many literary values; the novel’s most apparent literary value lies in the concept of establishing a fake morality. This fake morality and its shallow values; dominate an authoritarian regime; where choices and real life experiences are denied of people. This situation creates a fake perspective, frustration and a highly manipulative existence. All of which causes destruction and confusion in the lives of people with individuality.
In today’s society a person is shaped by family, friends, and past events, but in Aldous Huxley’s classic novel, Brave New World, there is no such thing as family, history and “true” friends. The government controls every aspect of an individual from their creation in the hatcheries to their conditioning for their thoughts and careers. In this brave new world the ideas of stability and community reign supreme, and the concept of individualism is foreign and suppressed, “Everyone belongs to everyone else, after all,” (47). Huxley perverses contemporary morals and concepts in Brave New World, thus distorting the ideas of materialistic pleasures, savagery versus society, and human relationships. These distortions contribute to the effectiveness of Brave New World, consequently creating a novel that leaves the reader questioning how and why.