Political Correctness Is Wrong

910 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Political correctness and freedom of speech

Back then when political correctness had a different meaning on what it used to be now has a totally new meaning to it. It originally meant as an ideal of fairness and open-mindedness in politics, but it has now turned into a worldwide catchphrase that everyone uses to gain popularity and attention. Political correctness, or PC, basically means to avoid offending a certain group of people, and with many people being sensitive about a certain topic, it prohibits some topics to be discussed. Although political correctness can bypass racial discrimination, in reality, it prevents people from expressing their thoughts and opinions. When people discuss topics to each other, some of them tries to be politically correct by avoiding discrimination …show more content…

Not only does people hold their opinions but have a stronger belief that political correctness is much worse than it already is. Furthermore, those conservatives who are with political correctness will always hold onto what they believe is true. For example, they will say it is politically incorrect to say that humans have contributed to climate change, create more gun laws, and/or abortion is admissible (Newell). Last but not least, no matter how much political correctness tries to think it is wrong to do specific actions, people will always hold their belief that being politically correct is wrong. Overall, political correctness now has a different meaning from what it was suppose to be, and with many people being overly sensitive about a certain topic, people can’t do any anything about it except to see that there are sensitive people in this world. Even if political correctness prevents discrimination onto a group of people, it also prevents people to express how they feel towards a topic and their opinion on a certain subject. If it's one thing that political correctness is doing is nothing but changing this world into a whole different

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of You Can T Say That By Diane Ravitch

    1097 Words  | 3 Pages

    Words are capable, and now and then the words we utilize affront individuals. The right to speak freely is very esteemed yet what happens when your opportunity gets to be destructive or rude to another person? There are such a large number of various types of individuals and diverse things that insult every individual. In this day where we are more disposed to say whatever we need, we see more offense being taken to the words that get said. It's difficult to comprehend why certain words can affront to somebody when it may not appear that approach to you. We need to ask ourselves, why do we mind what other individuals say and would it be advisable for us to censer everything that goes into general society just so individuals don't get annoyed?

    Read More

  • Irwin Toy Limited Case

    1473 Words  | 3 Pages

    Allowing freedom of expression to everyone was not an easy step to take, because some thought that depending on someone's colour, and or race their opinion did not matter. The beginning steps began with the expression of religion allowing everyone to practise their religion in peace, with reasonable limits, soon all colours around the country were expressing their opinions to problems that took place in their society, and government. This human right may easily be more important than the other human right, saving lives from discrimination, and hate. The near future looks well organized as “freedom of expression” is passed on and used by everyone, prevents arguments due to the fact that everyone has a say, not considering one's class. Freedom of expressions is a fundamental right, which in most times is greatly used over all the other human rights. The right to speak plays a vital role in the healthy development of any society, without it the rich become richer, and the poor become more poor. The days of that have passed, now freedom of expression has moved on from Canada, and travels around the world to countries, where people are put to work against their will. The change will be drastic for the better and freedom of expression provides importance for the other human rights in the near

    Read More

  • We Are Free To Be You Me Stupid And Dead Summary

    1357 Words  | 3 Pages

    If this were the case, freedom of expression could not exist at all because someone is always going to be offended by what another person says. Possessing freedom of expression means being tolerant and accepting of others who have differing opinions, or even offensive ones. This might not always be easy, but is what one has to deal with in order to voice their own voice and opinions. Accepting and tolerating others does not mean that one has to agree with them. Every individual is given the liberty to exercise their right to free speech.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Change By Tony Hoagland

    1574 Words  | 4 Pages

    From a very young age, we are taught to be color and racially blind and to be “politically correct”. We are no longer able to have our own view and opinions without having someone bash one with the word “racist”

    Read More

  • Crash Applied Concept And Theme Analysis In 'Crash Jean Cabot'

    1172 Words  | 3 Pages

    White privilege refers to unearned advantages meaning the people of lighter skin receive all kinds of perks because of their skin privileged. Whereas people of color do not have perks or advantages based on their skin meaning people of that color have to actually earned it by working. For example, in the movie Crash Jean Cabot’s judgment of the locksmith and the film maker who demands Cameron to reshoot the scene because the actor needs to be “more black”. It is in these unobtrusive demonstrations of prejudice in conjunction with the power hole between these characters that shows how bigotry is innately interlaced into individuals’ attitudes. At the point when these same individuals are in places of power they are not able to comprehend the consequences that their modest, biased action can

    Read More

  • Campus Hate Speech Should NOT Be Regulated

    318 Words  | 1 Pages

    How much we valuse the right of free speech is out to its severest test when the speaker is someone we disagree with most. Speech that deeply offends our morality or is hostile to our way of life promises the same constitutional protection as other speech because the right of free speech is indivisible: When one of us is denied this right, all of us are denied. Where racist, sexist and homphobic speech is concerned, I believe that more speech - not less - is the best revenge. This is particualrly true at universities, whose mission is to facilitate learning through open debate and study, and to enlighten. Speech codes are not the way to go on campuses, where all views are entitled to be heard, explored, supported or refuted. Besides, when hate is out in the open, people can see the problem. They can organize effectively to encounter bad attitudes, possibly to change them, and imitate togetherness against the forces of intolerance.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Speech Codes

    1307 Words  | 3 Pages

    This occurs even when the regulations arent enforced souly because they fear being punished for what they may say. As shown in Silverglate and Lukianoffs essay, some campuses go to great extents when giving students permission to give free speeches. They claim that “as long as the policy exists, the threat of enfocement remains real and will inevitably influence some peoples speech” (636). This is a valid argument because they then proceed by saying that The First Amendment calls it a clinging effect. Another effect of these regulations would be that colleges are teaching their students that their opinions and beliefs should not be shared when they are even slightly controversial. Wasserman argues that word choice is an “essential component of free-speech protection”(640) because they allow one to express him or herself

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech On The First Amendment

    1261 Words  | 3 Pages

    Unlike many other countries America has freedom of speech. Even in other countries in Europe people are not allowed to use “hate speech” and they can be sent to prison for it. Fortunately, the American constitution defends people’s freedom of speech, no matter how controversial it is. Political correctness diminishes people’s free speech. It may not be direct but even indirectly the knowledge that someone might have adverse consequences; such as losing a job as a result of their speech is unacceptable. People have the right to state their opinions without others infringing on them, it was the principle in which America was founded. The first amendment of the constitution of the United States declares that: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” (US Const. amend. I, sec. i). While the first amendment only affects congress’s control over free speech, it indicates that free speech is a right that people must have. Some people are of the opinion that if something can be found offensive

    Read More

  • Political Correctness Has Gone Too Far

    1119 Words  | 3 Pages

    The “Politically Correct” movement’s purpose is to bring historically condescending terms, offensive music and art, and controversial educational content to an end and replace them with more positive and less-offending references. Offensive and demoralizing efforts are wrong, but the censorship and deletion of words and phrases that do not contain the intention to demoralize are taking political correctness too far. Politically correct (or “PC”) antics have created a social decline that is growing worse with each generation, specifically regarding areas of art, education, language, and our right to freedom of speech; the degradation they have brought to the American psyche has even led to name-changing.

    Read More

  • Negative Essay: Why Censorship Is Harmful To Society

    1036 Words  | 3 Pages

    People can stop talking to someone who they consider offensive, they can walk away. Words don’t hurt people, despite the current popular opinion. Free speech should not be limited by anything it should just be free. Some people will say horrible things, but when they say such things to other people, people will think that they are horrible, and not listen to them anymore. Laws against saying certain thing don’t protect anyone, all they do is hide the true nature of people, until it is too late to do

    Read More

  • Racism is Wrong

    1759 Words  | 4 Pages

    stretch to the other side of the world. It is also quick and easy, and

    Read More

  • Starbucks Political Correctness

    799 Words  | 2 Pages

    On one side, some view it as more of a positive force, conveying better intentions towards certain disadvantaged groups and setting a more unbiased approach to topics when brought up in conversation. On the other hand, there are those who see political correctness in a negative light, and feel it is unnecessary. They see the term as a way of saying that they are not allowed to speak their minds, just so they can avoid offending someone. Furthermore, many see political correctness as a way to curry favor with younger individuals, from a marketing and political point of view. This is especially evident in today’s times, with such events as the Black Lives Matter movement and the legalization of gay marriage.

    Read More

  • Censorship Is Harmful To Society

    608 Words  | 2 Pages

    People in society have the right to express themselves in their own way. They are also entitled to have their own intellectual freedom as shown in source C (west). Intellectual freedom is the right that every person that wants to seek or receive information from every point of view without restriction can. This is showing that everyone has a right to see and express what is going on in the society. Censorship is blocking them from having their own freedom of expression.

    Read More

  • We All Be Careful With the Words We Use

    1026 Words  | 3 Pages

    Words are very powerful, and sometimes the words we use offend people. Freedom of speech is highly valued but what happens when your freedom becomes hurtful or disrespectful to someone else? There are so many different kinds of people and different things that offend each person. In this day where we are more inclined to say whatever we want, we see more and more offense being taken to the words that get said. It's hard to understand why certain words can be insulting to someone when it may not seem that way to you. We have to ask ourselves, why do we care what other people say and should we censer everything that goes into the public just so people don't get offended?

    Read More

  • The Confident Man or Woman

    441 Words  | 1 Pages

    Why are so many people so thin skinned? If I don't feel anything negative towards someone, and therefore no hint of sarcasm or accusation should enter my words, and I am stating nothing but facts and agreed objectives, where is the justification to take offence? Are we so far down the road to political correctness that we can no longer even talk about areas that need work, without being accused of being insensitive, authoritative, etcetera?

    Read More

More about Political Correctness Is Wrong

Open Document