Policie System: Analysis And Use Of The Frankpledge System

723 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: History of policing in the usa

Frankpledge System: An early policing method where ten homes would be grouped together into a parish with every adult male being in charge of one another, then several parishes would form a shire under the watch of a shire-reeve. An example of the use of the Frankpledge system would be how the kings decide which shire-reeve would be in charge of which shire. Sheriff: The word sheriff derives from the old English word “shire-reeve”, which back then were in charge of a single shire under the authority of the king. When observing the similarities between a shire-reeve, and a sheriff, is that a shire back then is about the same size as a county which sheriff is elected to enforce the law. Shire-reeve: A shire-reeve is based off an old English term which means …show more content…

An example of its use was as an example for early American law enforcement. Private Security: An industry which provide security to the public which can cover three areas the employment of security guards, security equipment, and consulting services. To differentiate private security and private policing is that in private policing is the use of private security services. Chapter Two Crime Control Model: A model of law enforcement which emphasizes an importance on reducing crime rates at the expense of some personal liberties. To better remember the crime control model is to compare the model to an assembly line. Due Process Model: A model of law enforcement which emphasizes on a person’s individual rights that earning a conviction. A better way to remember the due process model is to think about an obstacle course that the legal system must overcome before they can hand out a decision. Confederation: A confederation is a system of government which lacks a central government. An example of a confederation would to look back to the US Articles of Confederation and the result of lacking a central

Show More
Related

  • The Writ Of Henry I On Local Courts

    500 Words  | 1 Pages

    From a jurisdictional perspective, Henry I dictates to the great men of Worcestershire how pleas concerning the division or occupation of lands would be handled henceforth: feuding lords, as his tenants in chief, were to appear in the King’s Court, feuding vassals were to either appear before the Lord’s Court or the County Court depending on whether they shared a common lord. As a secondary issue, the writ is, to some extent, integrating the local court system as an extension of royal influence through this separation of jurisdiction. While Henry is, in a sense, respecting the baron’s authority over his vassals, the king is, in effect, enrolling the localities to hear specific land disputes, deemed not fit to be heard in seigniorial courts, on his

    Read More

  • Articles of Confederation vs. Constitution

    1404 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation was the nation’s first Constitution. The articles created a loose Confederation of independent states that gave limited powers to the central government. Each state would have one vote in the House of Congress, no matter the size of the population. Members of the one-house Congress, such as Pennsylvania, agreed that the new government should be a unicameral legislature, without an executive branch or a separate judiciary. Under the article, there wasn’t a strong independent executive.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Federalist Federal And Confederate Government

    1036 Words  | 3 Pages

    Confederation- a group of individual states that are in an alliance, but the independent states each have more power than the central government

    Read More

  • Jocelin Of Brakelond's Chronicles of the Abbey of Bury St. Edmonds

    1287 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...hat the abbey could make money for use for the abbey, the abbot, the land, and for the king. The abbots response was to threaten Herbert and force him to destroy the mill that he had built.

    Read More

  • Due Process vs. Crime Control Model

    465 Words  | 1 Pages

    Some of the differences between the due process model and the crime control model are in the due process model people that are arrested are perceived to be innocent until proven in a court of law. The crime control model believes that the people that are arrested are guilty and need to be punished by the government. Another difference with both models is the due process model believes that policing within the criminal justice system is essential to maintaining justice within society. The crime control model believes that the arresting of people in the criminal justice system has a negative effect and slows down the process of the criminal justice system. One more difference is the due process model believes in the rights of the defendants and proving their guilt is essential to keep the government in control. The crime control model believes that the rights of the defendant cost too much and the criminal justice system should be spending more money on recruiting police officers and building prisons.

    Read More

  • The Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution

    1052 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation was the United States first attempt at creating a democratic government. Instead of giving power to the central government they divided it up among the states (Kelly). This fact left the Articles with many weaknesses that ultimately led it to fail. The lack of a strong central government led to economic disorganization, no central leadership and an ineffective legislative, all which led to its downfall (Brackemyre). Leaving power to the states left the nation in a state of economic disorganization. Without the national government having the power to levy taxes, it was left with the states (Murphy). The legislature only had the right to request taxes, and it was left up to the states how they wanted to raise them, but they oftentimes weren't (Brackemyre). There was also no uniform system of currency which made trade between states difficult. The fact that states instead of Congress regulated trade led to a lack...

    Read More

  • Crime Control versus Due Process in Canada

    1075 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the benefits of due process is demonstrated in the Belshaw case. The inquisitorial system of justice is based on crime control; the Swiss police had a hard time in Canada with Mr. Belshaw, because of his right to due process, under Canadian law. Both systems of justice share common beliefs, for example, they both look for proof beyond a reasonable doubt. In Canada we fight about facts and laws, where-as the inquisitorial system searches for the facts. The adversarial system has a separation of powers with the police, crown, defense, and the judge. It is quite different for the inquisitorial system of justice, the police do the arrest, then they present the facts to crown, which then decide if they have a case and turn over the evidence to the judge. The only problem is that the judge decides what will lead them to the truth. How any evidence was collected is irrelevant. In due process if the police obtain evidence and violate the law or a persons charter of rights and freedoms the judge will exclude the evidence from the hearing, even if it would help or prove that the person is guilty. These two systems of justice are generated in democratic traditions.

    Read More

  • Anti-Federalist vs Federalist

    2017 Words  | 5 Pages

    According to the Federalists in the early stages of the American republic, a strong central government was necessary to provide uniform supervision to the states thus aiding in the preservation of the Union. This necessity for a more organized central government was a result of the ineffectiveness of the Article of Confederation’s government that was without a unifying government body. One component of this philosophy was the creation of an executive and other federal branche...

    Read More

  • Has the U.S. Lived up to its Founding Principles?

    1300 Words  | 3 Pages

    The central government could not regulate commerce between states, deal with foreign governments or settle disputes. The country was falling apart at its seams. The central government could not provide assistance to the state because there wasn’t a central army. When they realized that the Articles of Confederation was not up to par, they held a convention, known as the Constitutional Convention of 1787. As a result of this, the Constitution was written....

    Read More

  • Effectiveness Of The Articles of Confederation

    398 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation were incapable of providing the United States with an effective form of government. The Articles of Confederation presided weakly over the government as it allowed little or no power to tax, control trade, and branches of government were missing. In addition to this, the thirteen states acted as separate nations and the national government had little control over them.

    Read More

  • The Articles Of Confederation And An Effective Government

    1067 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation set up a government that consisted of a one house body of delegates, with each state having a single vote, acting collectively, could make decisions on certain issues that affected all states. There was no president or judiciary so any decision required nine of the thirteen states’ votes. At this point in time the United States of America ... ... middle of paper ... ... o consider the charms of liberty as imaginary and delusive.”

    Read More

  • Democratic and Undemocratic Aspects of the Constitutional Convention

    1373 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation was the first government of the United States. The Articles had created a very weak national government. At the time the Articles were approved, they had served the will of the people. Americans had just fought a war to get freedom from a great national authority--King George III (Patterson 34). But after this government was put to use, it was evident that it was not going to keep peace between the states. The conflicts got so frequent and malicious that George Washington wondered if the “United” States should be called a Union (Patterson 35). Shays’ Rebellion finally made it evident to the public that the government needed a change.

    Read More

  • The Creation Of The Constitution

    1073 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Constitution that was created had a strong central government and weaker state governments. Under the Constitution, Congress was given the power to levy taxes, regulate trade between the states, raise an army, control interstate commerce, and more. A three-branch government was established in which a judicial branch handled disputes in a federal court system, a President headed an executive branch, and a legislative branch. Conversely, the anti-federalists believed in weak central and strong state governments, as the way it was in The Articles of Confederation and believed in strict adherence to the writings of the constitution.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation

    730 Words  | 2 Pages

    Soon after the Revolutionary War in America, a new government was started when the Articles of Confederation were adopted by the Continental Congress. The Articles set up a democratic government that gave the States the power to make their own laws and to enforce them. However, the Articles were ineffective and failed to provide a strong government. During this critical period in the history of the United States, pandemonium and anarchy were growing due to: controlled public, nothing in the Articles that gave Congress the power to enforce laws, no solid monetary system, and also the country lacked unity and strength

    Read More

  • Does The Eu Have A Federal Character

    921 Words  | 2 Pages

    A Federal system is a system of government where power and sovereignty are shared constitutionally between a central authority and subunits. The central authority retains primary sovereignty while the subunits (state, province etc.) retain a degree of autonomy. Examples of federal countries include Ethiopia, Germany, and USA etc.

    Read More

More about Policie System: Analysis And Use Of The Frankpledge System

Open Document