Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Topics of abuse of power policing
Police use of force essay
Police use of force essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Topics of abuse of power policing
For many years the public has had their own views and beliefs about the concept of the use of force when used in certain situations by law enforcement officers. The Association of Chiefs of Police describes the use of force as “ The amount of effort required by police to compel compliance by a unwilling subject”. According, to the National Institute of Justice the use of force should only be used in certain necessary situations. Such as, self defense and/or in defense of another person or a group. In the case Tennessee v. Garner the U.S. supreme court ruled that a “police officer who has a probable cause to believe that a suspect poses a threat of serious harm to the officer or others may use deadly force to prevent escape”. There are many …show more content…
Police officers are entitled to endure training, to better understand the use of force. Police officers are trained to determine if a scenario needs the involvement of force in order to gain control of a situation. According, to the National Institute of Justice officers are also trained to acknowledge the fact that time plays a major role in the use of force. Time balances life and death when determining whether the use of force should be of use. According to the article When are police justified in using deadly force by Los Angeles Times the article states, that “deadly force occurs in less than 1% of the millions of encounters police have with people each year”.The use of force is a method and tool law enforcement uses when an officer feels his or other lives are in danger. Officers are trained to take steps and follow the force …show more content…
When the suspect who was suspected of being a cocaine dealer pointed a shotgun at officer Nolte. Officer Nolte quickly withdrew his weapon and shot at the suspect which disarmed him. That was the “official story” told by the Los Angeles Police Department since officer Nolte followed the policy of the use of force he was clean and faced no charges. A couple years later the suspects case went to trial his trial reopen new information that shocked everyone. New evidence unravel, evidence not seem but the commission's showed that the suspect Leonard Robinson was not holding any weapon and was not a threat. Evidence showed that Robinson had his hands in the air trying to surrender when officer Nolte fired. Officer Nolte did not have any reason to pull his weapon and fired at the suspect. That year Leonard Robinson was granted two million dollars in damages. This cased showed an example where the use of force was excessively used and not
Facts: On October 3, 1974, Memphis Police Officers Hymon and Wright were dispatched to answer a “prowler inside call.” When the police arrived at the scene, a neighbor gestured to the house where she had heard glass breaking and that someone was breaking into the house. While one of the officer radioed that they were on the scene, the other officer went to the rear of the house hearing a door slam and saw someone run across the backyard. The suspect, Edward Garner stopped at a 6-feet-high fence at the edge of the yard and proceeded to climb the fence as the police officer called out “police, halt.” The police officer figured that if Garner made it over the fence he would get away and also “figured” that Garner was unarmed. Officer Hymon then shot him, hitting him in the back of the head. In using deadly force to prevent the escape of Garner, Hymon used the argument that actions were made under the authority of the Tennessee statute and pursuant to Police Department policy. Although the department’s policy was slightly more restrictive than the statute it still allowed the use of deadly force in cases of burglary. Garner’s fathers’ argument was made that his son was shot unconstitutionally because he was captured and shot possessing ten dollars that he had stolen and being unarmed showing no threat of danger to the officer. The incident was then reviewed by the Memphis Police Firearm’s Revie...
The Tennessee v. Garner case impacted law enforcement agencies today by utilizing the Fourth Amendment right of not using deadly force to prevent a suspect from fleeing unless the officer is in imminent danger of their life. Consequently, before this was set into place, an officer had the right to use deadly force on a fleeing suspect by all means.” The first time the Court dealt with the use of force was in Tennessee v. Garner, in Garner, a police officer used deadly force despite being "reasonably sure" that the suspect was an unarmed teenager "of slight build" who was running away from him” (Gross,2016). Whereas, with Graham v. Conner case was surrounded around excessive force which also has an impact on law enforcement agencies in today’s society as well. “All claims that law enforcement officers have used excessive force deadly or not in the course of an arrest, investigatory stop, or other “seizure” of s free citizen should be analyzed under the Fourth Amendment and its “reasonableness” standard” (Doerner,2016).
Most law enforcement agencies have policies that determine the use of force needed. The policies describe the escalating series of actions an officer can take to resolve a situation, first level is officer presence which means no force is used, and just the mere presence can reduce
With the articles and past research that I have collected, studies tell us that less than 3 percent of police-citizen contacts involve the threat of physical force by the police. The percentages are higher when the level of force is below lethal force, for instance 20 percent of arrests may involve some type of special or needed force to obtain and control the suspect in able to put him in custody. In the academy, police officers are taught to use equal or greater force to subdue the suspect and do what is necessary to protect the public and also look out for officer safety. Most incidents of force are low level applications such as using the arms, hands, legs, or their bodies to gain control of the suspect. Every police officer is supposed to be trained to a certain standard, and should be able to use the correct amount of force for the situation at hand. Police officers have situational training in the academy on what level of force to use if necessary. All police officers are equipped to handle most if not all situations or levels of force that is need to
Over the years, our nation has witnessed countless cases of police brutality. It has developed into a controversial topic between communities. For instance, deindustrialization is the removal or reduction of manufacturing capability or activity can lead to more crimes when people are laid off. Police officers are faced with many threatening situations day-to-day gripping them to make split second decisions; either to expect the worst or hope for the best. The police are given the authority to take any citizen away for their action that can ruin their lives. With that kind of power comes great responsibility, which is one main concern with the amount of discretion officers have is when to use lethal force. The use of excessive force might or
The case of Bryan v McPherson encompasses excessive use of force through the deployment of a Taser. The facts of the case are Bryan was operating a motor vehicle without using his seatbelt when Officer McPherson conducted a traffic stop for the infraction (Wu, 2010). When Bryan realized why he was being stopped he became angry with himself, and due to his overwhelming anger, he did not answer Officer McPherson question as to why he was stopped (Wu, 2010). Additionally, during the traffic stop Officer McPherson requested Bryan turn down his radio and pull his vehicle over to the curb and Bryan complied with both requests (Wu, 2010). As Bryan’s anger intensified he started hitting his steering wheel and screamed several obscenities to himself
Over the years, this country has witnessed many cases of police brutality. It has become a controversial topic among communities that have seen police brutality take place in front of their homes. Officers are faced with many threatening situations everyday forcing them to make split second decisions and to expect the worst and hope for the best. Police officers are given the power to take any citizens rights away and even their lives. With that kind of power comes responsibility, that’s one major concern with the amount of discretion officers have is when to use force or when to use lethal force. The use of excessive force may or not be a large predicament but should be viewed by both the police and the community.
As a result, “Nearly all agree that when an officer is facing a deadly threat, the proper response is to use deadly force”(Lind). Yes there are many people out there that can be a deadly threat to police officers because the way they are acting but, there are many innocent people that do not affect anyone and still have to be a part of the problem for no given reason. Although a police officer’s proper response is to use deadly force upon someone, there should be other alternatives or ways they can use before going into deadly force and possibly cause someone to lose their live. I certainly do understand that there are certain situations where a cop is coming across someone that is pointing a gun or knife at them and approaching towards them. So therefore them using deadly force would possibly be the right thing to do if they have too, but before using deadly force they should at least try deploying tasers or using bean bag guns to attempt in taking them
Police Brutality Police work is dangerous. Sometimes police put in situations that excessive force is needed. But, because some officers use these extreme measures in situations when it is not, police brutality should be addressed. The use of excessive force may or may not be large problem, but it should be looked into by both the police and the public. For those people who feel racism is not a factor in causing the use of excessive force, here is a startling fact. In Tampa Bay, Florida, five men died while in the custody of the
Attention Getter: Are all the officers who are intended to "Protect and Serve" really following through with that?
Normal force is distinct from legal and brutal force (Hunt, 1985). Legal force is taught in police academy. It pertains to being able to subdue, restrain, and control a suspect if the officer is threatened with great bodily harm. Legal force also encompasses the use of deadly force if justified. Normal force is learned when the officer hits the streets and is conditioned to buy more effective weapons, which produce more damage to the suspect. In the academy recruits are taught not to hit a person on the head or neck because of their vulnerability, but on the street officers must hit the suspect wherever they can to control them. Peer approval further justifies this treatment. Thus, when police use the necessary amount of force they are not held accountable for a needed increase, but in fact will be looked down upon by fellow officers if a rookie does not show the necessary aggression.
The two main circumstances would be: protecting someone (like a hostage), and the second would be protecting themselfs (like in a "shootout"). The officer who uses deasly force, will have to show why he/she thougt it was justified. For exmple the club that just had a shooting. Say you were standing face to face with him (after all the shooting), deadly force would be jestified because you know what he is there to do. The basic things an officer needs to show: are they in danger, was someone else in danger, and or was there percived danger.
Police use of force and so-called “Police brutality” have been a hot buttoned issue over the past couple years. Every police shooting and use of force case is reviewed and examined with a fine toothed comb by both the media and departments. However, what the media leaves out and the general public has no information on are the levels of force. According to an article written by George Godoy, there are 6 levels of force. These levels range from officer presence to deadly force. In this paper I will explain not only these 6 levels, but cases on use of force as well as whether or not officers do or don’t use too much force.
A police officer’s job requires them to use force during several situations. The use of force by law enforcement officers becomes essential, and they are permitted under certain conditions. For example, if used in self-defense or in protection of another individual or group, the permission is granted. Numerous officers receive preparation from their individual organization; however, there is no general set of laws that lets officers know when they should use force and how much.
Police psychology is broadly defined as the application of psychological principles and methods to law enforcement. With the popularity of television shows like Criminal Minds and Law & Order: SVU, the job of a police psychologist has become more well known and even popular. As seen on these shows, a police psychologist can be helpful in profiling a criminal, but they also provide many other services to the members of a police department. Although the development of this field has a long history, police psychology as a separate entity is still relatively recent and growing. This intimate relationship between psychology and law enforcement can be traced back to almost a century ago.[1] It first developed out of a need for a variety of psychological services in the law enforcement field, including screening applicants and counseling during grief and stress situations. In the time that it has been around, it has proved to be a valuable resource for the law enforcement profession.