Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The goals of the interrogation
Psychological tactics interrogation
Interrogation techniques
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The intellectual battle between police officers and suspects has been ongoing since laws were created. Who did it? Being one of the most popular questions around the globe. There is a multitude of different way to figure out who did it, but one of the most common, and often the only, piece of evidence and investigator can gather is a confession. To get these confessions investigators often use a harsh and aggressive method of interrogation known as the Reid technique. The Reid technique uses a multitude of morally questionable methods to gather a confession such as intimidation, telling the suspect that there is evidence placing them at the scene, and continually refusing to accept the denial of the suspect. These interrogations can also last …show more content…
It focusses mainly on obtaining a truthful confession based on a relationship of trust between the interrogator and suspect. This model introduces a more encouraging, cooperative interrogation instead of a threatening and often coercive interrogation. In a study done by Dave Walsh and Ray Bull (2011) the analyzation of 44 police interrogations was conducted. Walsh and Bull used interviews that had less aggressive interrogation techniques, and found that these interrogations resulted with quick confessions. Interrogations that resulted in denials had an average duration of about 33 minutes, whereas interrogations that resulted in the suspect confessing found that they lasted about 23 minutes. Having said that, the shortest interview lasted 7 minutes and the longest interview lasted 75 minutes (Walsh & Bull, 2011). Interestingly, no one changed their position from admitting to the crime to recanting their statement, however 25 of the 28 suspects who confessed initially denied that they had done anything wrong. Based on this, it would seem that about 64% of suspects confessed without being put under the duress that the Reid technique would have induced; in comparison to the King and Snook (2009) analysis, it would seem that the PEACE model would be more successful, as it resulted in more confessions …show more content…
The PEACE model allows officers to learn from their failures and maintain their success while the Reid technique only allows an investigator to become more deceptive and deceitful, which does not benefit anyone in the end. The PEACE model also produces more confessions, 64%, in less time than the Reid technique, 50%, which were obtained with less confidence. The PEACE model also produces a trustful environment where confessions are more truthful, and actually help investigators instead of being the sole basis for prosecution. If I ever had to be interrogated, I know that I would much rather be interviewed using the PEACE model, entering a police station is scary enough, seeing a police officer in uniform is also scary even if you have not done anything wrong, being yelled at and constantly told you are remembering wrong by an officer would get to anyone after a few hours. Being coerced is never fun, but confiding in an officer can be made to be not as dreadful if the PEACE model is
In addition, Chapman (2013) also argued that there are a lot of factors that determine whether a suspect make a false confession or not. In fact he indicated that :“ those who make false confessions do so because of a combination of mental elements, personality, intelligence, and the environment of the interrogation,” ( Chapman, 2013, p.164) The author also explained that the police usually isolate, accuse, and convey sympathy to the suspect ( Chapman,2013,p.165). Though, Ford, in the Norfolk Four, used
In “The Interview” by Douglas Starr, He talks about the different techniques they use when interrogating suspects to determine whether the suspect is lying. One technique they use is called the Reid Technique and that is when
Because police investigators are usually under pressure to arrest criminals and safeguard the community, they often make mistakes. Sometimes, detectives become convinced of a suspect 's guilt because of their criminal history or weak speculations. Once they are convinced, they are less likely to consider alternative possibilities. They overlook some important exculpatory evidence, make weak speculations and look only for links that connect a suspect to a crime, especially if the suspect has a previous criminal record. Picking Cotton provides an understanding of some common errors of the police investigation process. During Ronald Cottons interrogation, the detectives did not bother to record the conversation “But I noticed he wasn 't recording the conversation, so I felt that he could be writing anything down”(79) unlike they did for Jennifer. They had already labelled Ronald Cotton as the perpetrator and they told him during the interrogation “Cotton, Jennifer Thompson already identified you. We know it was you”(82). Jenifer Thompson 's testimony along with Ronald Cotton 's past criminal records gave the detectives more reason to believe Ronald committed the crime. Ronald Cotton stated “ This cop Sully, though, he had already decided I was guilty.”(84). Many investigative process have shortcomings and are breached because the officials in charge make
I wanted to look at the investigative and criminal procedures following the arrest of an alleged criminal and the powerful effects via testimonies and evidence (or lack thereof) it can have on a case.There is an importance of the courts in regards to crime that can’t be over looked. The primary function of the criminal justice system is to uphold the established laws, which define what we understand as deviant in this society.
Ferdico, J. N., Fradella, H. F., & Totten, C. D. (2009). Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice Professional (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
...igations today has a huge impact on false confessions. The Reid Technique is being criticized in the media because of its guilt-presumptive, aggressive, and psychologically manipulative nature. It is based on a series of assumptions that lack scientific support, and by using it they are creating hostile and coercive environment for the interrogation. The fact that they try to pass these confessions off as voluntary should also be an issue against using them since we know they are usually coerced. There are two alternatives to the Reid technique being used to interview suspects. These do not use coercion and manipulation to get confessions. The first is the PEACE Model, which is an interview technique that is more ethical, and the other technique is Cognitive interviewing which is used by police as a memory technique used to enhance the retrieval of their memory.
Police brutality during interrogation is still happening, though some are lucky not to experience it. The power placed on the interrogators helps them not only physically, but mentally manipulate the suspect. The conditions of an interrogation room, small and dark, make it easy for the interrogators to get in one’s head. “He eventually confessed, but investigators had to ‘spoonfeed’ him the details”(Patrick). The suspects feel uncomfortable and scared of the interrogators; therefore, they feel the need to please the police, even if the idea did not come from them.
In situations when a high profile case is public, police investigators undergo amounts of severe pressure to convict a suspect and is often led to convict the first suspect who is involved. Pressure from victims, the community, media and police supervisors often induce speed as the overriding factor when investigating a case. Police officers have human tendencies when trying to reach the overall goal of justice when solving a case. Tunnel vision is often the result of police officers having a narrow theory towards a suspect, drawn to conclusions about who is responsible early and disregarding evidence that points to the suspect as innocent.
People face ethical dilemmas every day. But it is perhaps, most prevalent in the law enforcement profession. Law enforcement officers face ethical dilemmas constantly. Some of the ethical issues that police face each day are: racial profiling, officer discretion, police officer loyalty, police officer abuse, and interrogatory deception. This paper will discuss the purpose of interrogatory deception, ways in which it is used, some of the current debates over the practice, and a landmark ruling in the Miranda case of 1966 which attempted to cease the use of intimidation and coercion practices of the police.
False confessions have always played a big part when it comes to flaws within the justice system. So many people are constantly found guilty, when in reality, they have done nothing wrong and are completely innocent. But a simple question remains. Why confess to a crime if you did not commit it? Many blame the Reid Technique. A technique used to question people who are thought to be guilty. But in fact the Reid Technique has been used for over 50 years, so if it does not work why are we using it? The Reid Technique is an ineffective way of interrogation if it is not done properly and the person conducting the interrogation does not oblige the strict steps.
Roesch, R., & Rogers, B. (2011). The cambridge handbook of forensic psychology. Canadian Psychology, 52(3), 242-242-243.
I participated in a police ride-along with the Fairfax County Police Department on October 30th. I chose the Fair Oaks District Station for the ride since my home falls within that particular district’s boundaries. At 8 p.m., I was introduced to Officer Crutchman; the police officer I would be accompanying for the night. We headed out after a brief overview of some safety rules and expectations. Over the course of the shift I was able to observe many of the routine duties of a FCPO such as responding to calls, setting speed traps, performing traffic stops, assisting fellow officers, and patrolling neighborhoods and public parks. Officer Crutchman provided valuable insight into police work, beyond the procedural knowledge that Mason classes
Leo, R and Ofshe R. The Social Psychology of Police Interrogation: The Theory and Classification of True and False Confessions. 16 Studies in Law, Politics and Society 189,
This paper is intended to examine ethical issues in Criminological research and criminal justice. This paper will analyze the multitude of ethical concerns, as well as discuss the confidentiality requirements as it pertains to criminological research.
Police psychology is broadly defined as the application of psychological principles and methods to law enforcement. With the popularity of television shows like Criminal Minds and Law & Order: SVU, the job of a police psychologist has become more well known and even popular. As seen on these shows, a police psychologist can be helpful in profiling a criminal, but they also provide many other services to the members of a police department. Although the development of this field has a long history, police psychology as a separate entity is still relatively recent and growing. This intimate relationship between psychology and law enforcement can be traced back to almost a century ago.[1] It first developed out of a need for a variety of psychological services in the law enforcement field, including screening applicants and counseling during grief and stress situations. In the time that it has been around, it has proved to be a valuable resource for the law enforcement profession.