Police Brutality

1790 Words4 Pages

Some cops who commit the offense do not get caught and feel untouchable which leads them to brag to other officers and friends. The criminal act is never told or publicized because no one will speak out, not even other officers who have witness the acts. They refuse to speak out or they just cannot speak out because they are afraid. According to recent statistics 99% of cop brutality cases that go uninvestigated. You would think that the 1% that does get investigated would receive good news, but that is not true. On the other hand, when they do get caught it resolves them to say something similar to this, “I felt threatened, I felt afraid, the victim struggled with me, and he reached for my gun.” This is the same old story from officers who …show more content…

For instance I found a statement that was said in this article, “Amnesty: U.S. Doesn't Meet International Standards for Deadly Police Force.” It talks about an issue that the Amnesty International USA has presented about the United States and the District of Columbia, based on how the United States has not yet met the international standards for the use of lethal force by law enforcement officers. According to Steven Hawkins, Executive Director of Amnesty International USA he states, "Police have a fundamental obligation to protect human life”…"Deadly force must be reserved as a method of absolute last resort. The fact that absolutely no state laws conform to this standard is deeply disturbing and raises serious human rights concerns."(Alcindor)In this statement it address how police officers are not respecting the right of citizens and/or human rights. In life, there are no two situations alike and neither are there two officers. In a potentially threatening situation, an officer will quickly tailor a response and apply force, if necessary. Situational awareness is essential and officers are trained to judge when a crisis requires the use of force to regain control of a situation. In most cases, time becomes the key variable in determining when an officer chooses to use force and what amount of force. As seen recently, officers tend to gradually use more unnecessary force and then try to justify it later. When you look at the situation, there is no justification and that is what Steven Hawkins is saying. Throughout the article, Hawkins argues that states across the country must change and create laws dealing with lethal force. His group believes state laws are too broad and that state legislatures and Congress should introduce or amend statutes that authorize the use of lethal force. He later states, “The use of lethal force by law enforcement officers raises serious

Open Document