Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Body cameras for police officers essay
Body cameras for police officers essay
Body cameras for police officers essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Body cameras for police officers essay
Telonia S. Nance
The Advantages of Police Technology “How do we really know what happened?”, “Should they have taken that person’s life?”, “Couldn’t they have done something else to handle the situation?” These are the key questions that are connected to the police and the use of deadly force. The answers aren’t undemanding. Where do we start? Attempting to capture evidence about specific incidents involving police officers, additional agencies are considering the completion and feasibility of department-issued body cameras. Chief of Police Jason Parker of Dalton, Georgia stated, “Unlike in-car cameras, body-worn cameras capture everything that happens as officers travel around the scene and interview multiple people. The body-worn cameras have been incredibly useful in accurately preserving information.”
I believe body worn cameras can improve the high quality public service, strengthens police performance,
…show more content…
Their footage can provide valuable evidence in cases where police and civilian accounts of events differ. “In court, the jury can see what exactly happened,” explains Richard Beary, president of the International Association of Chiefs of Police. “It’s a very factual depiction of what transpired.” “There are a lot of false accusations, and the videos prove the officers right about 99 percent of the time,” said Beary. That’s one reason Jason Parker, head of the police department in Dalton, Georgia, believes the majority of law enforcement officials in the U.S. are in favor of body cameras. “They want to demonstrate to the public that they’re doing things in a professional manner and that by and large, they are using a great deal of restraint” ("Considering Police Body Cameras”). Without cameras, officers can write their narratives as they see fit. Police officers, often when they are writing their reports, write how they wish they had behaved rather than, in fact, how they behaved (Feige,
Police officers with their body cameras: a history and back ground paper to answer the question if should all police officers wear body cameras, it is important to first look at the history and back ground of the topic. According to article of Journal of quantitative criminology, writers Ariel, Farrar, Sutherland, Body cameras have been given a new eye opener to people about the excessive use of force against their community members. Arial, Farrar, and Sutherland in the article state “The effect of police body warn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: A randomize controlled trial” describe their observation as:
There have been lots of modern technologies introduced in the United States of America to assist law enforcement agencies with crime prevention. But the use of body-worn cameras by police personnel brings about many unanswered questions and debate. Rising questions about the use of body cam are from concern citizens and law enforcement personnel. In this present day America, the use body cameras by all law enforcement personnel and agencies are one of the controversial topics being discussed on a daily base. Body worn cameras were adopted due to the alleged police brutality cases: for instance, the case of Michael Brown, an African-American who was shot and killed by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, on August 2014, Eric Garner died as a result of being put in a chokehold by a New York police officer, and John Crawford, shot and killed by a police officer at a Walmart in Beavercreek, Ohio.
In the article “New Study Casts Doubt on Effectiveness of Police Body Cameras. But Is That Fair?”, Nick Wing analyzes if cameras have an effect on police behavior. Wing focuses on a study in Washington D.C., that concludes body cameras do not have an effect on the police force or complaints made. Wing uses research to state that the issue surrounding body cameras revolves around if they are worth it or not. Wing’s article expresses the public’s confusion on whether to agree if body cameras do not affect police behavior, if they are worth it, or if they are helping better the police force altogether. Wing advocates body cameras are an asset to the decreasing police force and crude behavior and that the cameras will allow for a progressive method of surveillance.
The article by Loricchio describes a story of how police issued body cameras helped keep an innocent man from going to prison. In Carroll, Taneytown a police officer was released and found not guilty after shooting and killing a drunk driver. Evidence from a camera worn by the officer helped to exonerate him (Loricchio). Police body cameras are like the dashboard cameras on police cruisers, which captures and shows the events that happened. However, body cameras have a distinct advantage over the dashboard cameras. They are able to move with the officer throughout the entire chase instead of only sitting in the car. All police officers should be required to wear body cameras. Body cameras help provide
Recently there have been many controversies and talks about body cameras going on police officers uniforms to help stop crimes. Birmingham, AL has given their police officers 319 body cameras this July, causing the use of force to drop 30 percent and complaints from public by 70 percent. Here we can tell, that body cameras can give justice and fairness to the public by stating how high percentages raise for safety. Their procedures and policies change for the officers that take their duty as a joke and misuse their power and position. Policies tends to change, because the police officers will have to control their temper and despite how rude a civilian is behaving they will have to give full cooperation and kindness. They will not be
A major issue in today’s society is police brutality. Everyday we come across videos on the internet showing policemen using excessive force on citizens and sometimes even police shooting and killing people who might seem innocent. The problem with the videos that are posted online is that they don’t show the whole story behind what is occurring and they give off a bad reputation to all cops. Body cameras for officers were first recommended in 2013 after many reports accusing officers of racial profiling and in 2014, police departments received a big federal fund in order begin equipping police officers with body cameras after many protests over a shooting of a young black teenager. Body cameras
Having police officers wear body cameras improves how they interact with the citizens every day. It lowers the need for police force as well as it lowers the amount of complaints towards police. Per Katz, Choate, Ready, and Nun`o (2014) when the deployment of body cameras started in Phoenix, Arizona the amount of arrests increased by 17 percent, and complaints towards police dropped down 23 percent. Per that statistic
I believe that police should not be required to wear a body camera while on patrol. Some believe that police should be required to wear a camera while questioning a suspect. “Proponents argue that body cameras will provide accurate and contemporaneous records of events, thereby both enhancing the transparency and accountability of the police by protecting members of the public and improving the ability of the police to gather evidence and prosecute suspects.” (Tsin 2). I think that it is a bad idea to wear for police to wear body cameras. These cameras will not save the victim. Video evidence can be interpreted in different ways from the viewer. If police are required to wear body cameras it will look like we do not trust our own police system. The use of body cameras may also prevent witnesses to come forward and help assist with investigations, due to fear of retaliation or fear of exposure. Others, like myself, argue that police should not be required to wear this equipment. “On the other hand, skeptics are concerned that camera footage cannot provide full and accurate details of incidents, that the increasing use of video technology raises privacy concerns, and that the adoption of body cameras fails to address the underlying causes of social problems.” (Tsin 2). Wearing a body camera will not stop the suspect from doing what they intended to do, if anything he or she would act out more in aggression. In most cases, body cameras show that it was the suspect that is the one who is unwilling to comply with the officers commands. Body cameras are seen an invasion of privacy. “The use of video technology has also raised concerns about privacy of both citizens and police officers.” (Tsin 4). The camera captures footage from everyday civilian and police behavior that should not necessarily be recorded. Bystanders and all defendants are recorded without their
Back in August of 2014, an unarmed black teen was killed brutally by a police officer, but with no footage showing the officers accountability, he was found not guilty. If a body camera was equipped, as stated in the third source, “Video footage will provide police superiors with a potent
“When you put a camera on a police officer, they tend to behave a little better, follow the rules a little better,” said Rialto Police Chief William A. Farrar “And if a citizen knows the officer is wearing a camera, chances are the citizen will behave a little better.” The sense of security causes citizens to not just have trust in their police force, but to also be on their best behavior. This is very important because even with the misuse of justice by our police forces, we cannot blame it all on them. The citizens also have a large role in police brutality, and if they are on their best behavior, there is less opportunity for police brutality. The second reason body cameras are a good idea is proper convictions. In many cases of police brutality there have been little to no witnesses and therefore we do not know what actually happen. For example, a cop could have been approached and attacked by someone, then been accused for police brutality. With the body cameras we would be able to have a proper conviction and would know exactly what had happened, protecting the innocent and convicting the criminal. With all of this information, it proves that body cameras would be a great solution to the misuse of justice by the police
In the article, “Candid Cameras,” award-winning journalist Kevin Davis argues that police body cameras are huge assets to officers when retrieving information about their physical interactions with criminals. Davis aids his main statement when he asserts, “For police, the plus side is that cameras can improve how officers capture evidence. The camera can also provide a record of interrogations and arrests, how officers conduct themselves and what they witness at crime scenes” (15). Soon after, Davis then provides a deeper understanding as to why police body cameras benefit officers when he asserts, “It eliminates the ‘he said, she said’, and it will be easier for police to defend their conduct in the routine case” (15). These quotes do an exceptional job of showing the reader the way in which the use of police body cameras are in fact positive additions to law enforcement. In the end, police body cameras have shown to be nothing but positive additions to society as a
The use of body cameras will decrease the rates of violence, accountability for inappropriate misconduct, as well as improve the way the public view law enforcement officials. There are many benefits that come with the use of body cameras by officers. While the view on the use of body cameras by officers may be deemed as an invasion of privacy rights, the use of body cameras is an implementation to the usage for recoding audio and physical interactions between the officers and the public, assist with building trust within communities and officers, promote a safer environment for both officers and citizens, and provide evidence needed to solve a case when the witness/individual is not present (Bakardjiev, 2015). Increasing the use of body cameras by law enforcement officials will decline the rates in crimes, and citizens behavior will become positive as they view that law enforcement officers are there
If the footage taken from the body cameras is considered public record, hours of footage of innocent civilian’s interactions with the police is available. If the police enter a person's home and they are wearing a body camera, this can show private information and possibly reveal embarrassing things to the public. Many people have been worried about the kind of surveillance measures that the government use with the types of technology. One major issue people have is when should the police officers have their body cameras turned on because there are many instances involving personal cases such as domestic violence and rape cases. Footage from the dash-cam on the police cars have been exploited for many years for entertainment purposes. There have been many times that dash-cam videos have been posted on entertainment websites such as Youtube and TMZ have exposed many people during these interactions with the police. If officers wear body cameras, this could put the public eye into someone's living room or bedroom. With all these challenges, there has been no policy regarding the body cameras. In a survey for 63 law enforcement agencies regarding body cameras said “nearly a third of the agencies had no written policy on the devices.” Most of these agencies are just putting body
The proponents of the body-worn camera will argue their perceived advantages (Macari, 2015). They cite body-worn camera promote better behavior from both the public and the officer due to the fact that they know they are being recorded. The proponents also cite the cameras
In the year of 2016 there were many cases of police brutality in the U.S. There were over 1,000 people killed due to police brutality. Many of these cases resulted in a police officer not being convicted. Someone is killed every 7 hours by a police officer which is a crazy statistics. In this essay you’ll realise why installing these cameras will help reduce police brutality rates across the U.S. In this essay you will see how it is possible that if cops use body cameras and why cars should have dashboard cameras and how this can help reduce police brutality rates across the U.S.