Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Use of Symbolism
Use of Symbolism
Significance of symbolism in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Use of Symbolism
These are actually a struggle for me because it is hard for me to comprehend stories even if I read them a few times. Question 1: Discuss the ways in which point of view function in both "Cask" and "Killings" to cause us to react very differently to Montressor and Matt even though they both kill. What, specifically, do the characters do and say that makes them sympathetic or unsympathetic? The point of view in both stories from the characters are both seeking revenge but they both have different reasons for seeking revenge. Montressor I see is could both be sympathetic and unsympathetic because he says “Heart grew sick on account of the catacombs” and “Piece may he rest” meaning that he did and didn’t have an internal conflict which could make him sympathetic and unsympathetic. Just like Montressor, I see that he could both be sympathetic or unsympathetic only because Matt killed Richard to get revenge on Frank. Frank only got killed because he was dating Mary-Ann. …show more content…
There is both tension between Frank and Richard. Frank is twenty-one years old. He seemed to be smart because he graduated from a university. Frank starts to date Mary-Ann. Richard is twenty-six. He seemed to be athletic because he got scholarships to play football at a university. Richard was married Mary-Ann. The last question kind of answered this question if I view him as sympathetic or unsympathetic. Matt has a good point why he should kill Richard but then again Richard has a good reason why he killed Frank. Question
In Andre Dubus’ “Killings” and Flannery O’Connor’s “A Good Man is Hard to Find” the theme of death is apparent throughout both of the short stories. Both have a plot that revolves around death and murder. They differ because in Dubus’ story the theme of death is obvious because the whole plot revolves around murder, but in “A Good Man is Hard to Find” there are numerous symbols of death as well as a major theme of death. Also, the endings of the stories are of an interesting comparison because they both end in the perspective of a murderer. In “Killings” the reader is left with a depressed feeling and an irresolvable ending, while in “A Good Man is Hard to Find” the reader is left feeling like the story was somewhat resolved even after all the gruesome fatality. The endings of these stories leave the reader with opposite feelings and Dubus and O’ Connor show their different outlooks on the world through these endings.
...s sometimes they have a very set meaning to what that story is supposed to be about and sometimes they don’t but in almost every case you can read further into what they are saying by just paying attention to how it makes you feel as you read it.
The Murderers Are Among Us, directed by Wolfe Gang Staudte, is the first postwar film. The film takes place in Berlin right after the war. Susan Wallner, a young women who has returned from a concentration camp, goes to her old apartment to find Hans Mertens living there. Hans took up there after returning home from war and finding out his house was destroyed. Hans would not leave, even after Susan returned home. Later on in the film we find out Hans was a former surgeon but can no longer deal with human suffering because of his traumatic experience in war. We find out about this traumatic experience when Ferdinand Bruckner comes into the film. Bruckner, Hans’ former captain, was responsible for killing hundreds
...chard for the murder of their son. After murdering Richard and burying the body, Matt returns home. Ruth is aware of what Matt has done, and she is relieved and proud of her husband Matt after learning of the revenge. Matt also becomes a different person.
Young journalists can learn a lot from Malcom’s book because it presents some troubling issues. A main issue would be the author-subject relationship and where the writer-friend line exist. The Journalist and the Murderer tells the story of Joe McGinnis and Jeffrey MacDonald. McGinnis is an author looking to write a book on MacDonald who is convicted of murdering his wife and two daughters. MacDonald wanted his voice to be heard, and he wanted to get his side of the story out to the world.
The narrators in both works prove to be similar in several ways. In “The Tell-Tale Heart” the story is told through a psycho narrator; both stories contain apparent psychological imbalances within their story tellers, “ -his central character or narrator so psychologically obsessed with a mysterious phenomenon that everything in the story irresistibly revolves around it...”(May, Charles E.) There really is no motive for the murder of the old man; just his eye that he cannot stand. He repeats himself frequently, trying to assure the reader, and himself, that he is sane; leading to believe he may not be psychologically stable. In “The Cask of Amontillado” the narrator can also be considered a mad man by the way he plays games with his victim. Montressor says to Fortunato that they should go home because “his health is precious.” This conversation is ironic because Montressor does not really want to protect Fortunato's health, but to kill him in the catacombs. Both of the narrators are proud of their murders and brag about them within the stories. Not only are the narrators similar but the settings are alike once the murders take place, both locations of the victims are buried in a dark place with no escape.
I asked Student A eight comprehension questions about the text once she was finished reading. She did not have a problem with any of the questions. For example, one of the questions was “How old is Jessie now?” she responded right away with the correct answer “thirteen.” She did not even have to look back to the story to find the sentence; “Now that she is thirteen, Jessie competes with adults.” Student A was able to answer the “right there” questions with ease. Being able to remember key details from a text is crucial to developing the ability to comprehend what she is reading. She is already at a great stage when it comes to text comprehension and this will only help with further development. She had a purpose when she read and was reading for the details as opposed to reading to finish the text. She understood what was happening and if she continues to do this in the future, she will be able to understand more difficult texts by putting all of the key details together. Since Student A is able to recall key information from text, it will allow her to summarize and retell a text with ease. This strength will help Student A as she continues to develop as a reader because as the readings increase in difficulty she will remember the basic key details that she read and recount the story based on the main
Vengeance plays an important role in both books. “At first Granny had not wanted to be dead either but now she had begun to be reconciled. We unwrapped it from the jagged square of stained faded gray cloth and fastened it to the board. ‘Now she can lay good and quiet,’ Ringo said.” (Page 184) Bayard and Ringo would be considered cowards and shunned from their plantation if they had not gone out to hunt down Grumby. Killing the murderer was the only type of justice served and accepted in society back then. John Grady Cole felt a great load of pressure on himself for Blevins’ death, and he knew it would be everlasting if he did not avenge Blevins’ death. John sets out with a passion to kill the captain and regain the horses, but realizes that the captain will have a tougher time staying alive and John let’s him go. This relieves the tension that Blevins’ death caused.
When you ask a person to describe a perfect crime the first words that might come to their mind are “quick”, “easy”, and maybe even “silent”. In the short story of “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allen Poe the main character Montresor kills Fortunato, his arch enemy. Montresor state’s that the acts committed are his version of a perfect crime, or so he thinks. Montresor has his own set of rules to follow to commit his perfect crime, as would any other criminal. These rules are stressed in Montresor 's elaborate plan to ensure that he has committed the perfect crime he pictured it to be. But as you go deeper into the story you start to question some of these rules, and realize that Montresor has not committed what he believes is a perfect crime.
Montresor’s pride of self-respect and dignity is reflected from the very beginning of the story. He speaks about the frequent insults from Fortunato. While the details of the final insult are never revealed, it caused Montresor to seek revenge, to the point of murder. He
The major theme of Andre Dubus’ Killing,s is how far someone would go for the person they love. It is important to note the title of the story is killings and not killers, for the reasoning that the story does not just focus on two deaths or two murderers but rather the death of marriage, friendship, youth, and overall, trust.
His vow for revenge and deceitfulness to carry out his plan for murder makes the story flow along with the dark cold catacomb setting. Montresor gives countless clues like the family arms above Fortunato rheumy eyes (Stepp,1976). Montresor composed a system to get revenge at Fortunato, that lead to the making of a great story. Montresor is an introvert, that hides his feelings from the outside world. “The typical introvert is shy, contemplative, and reserved and tends to have difficulty adjusting to social situations. Excessive daydreaming and introspection, careful balancing of considerations before reaching decisions, and withdrawal under stress are also typical of the introverted personality”(Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2017). It was Montresor’s feelings that made his character dark, revengeful, and in pain and misery, while longing for revenge to Fortunato. Montresor is a person who doesn’t forgets about past dealings and must seek revenge when the opportunity is right. But it alls falls in line with his family’s beliefs also, according to his family
Criminals in stories tend to be cold hearted and ruthless- they never regret their crimes. In “The Cask of Allmontiado”, Montresor never feels guilty for his actions. In fact the author kind of trick us by saying that “My heart felt sick.” but then adding that it was because of the damp, not his actions. This quote is meant to make us see the lack of remorse because at the beginning of the line, we believe that Montresor realizes what he has done and that he is feeling guilty, but then the author adds that the sick feeling is caused by the dampness, not guilt. Montresor simply doesn’t feel guilt, proving that he can hide his crime very well. Some people may argue that other stories, like “The Utterly Perfect Murder” by Ray Bradbury contain
How does point of view affect your response to the characters? Well, first of all, it helps us to understand and figure out more about the characters in the story. In fiction, the point of view dictates what the reader knows or finds out about the events in the plot; Third person Omniscient and Limited. When you have an Omniscient point of view, you know more than just one character’s thoughts and feelings. In a Limited point of view, you’re focused on the perspective of one character. These two points change how the reader views the story.
This immediate familiarity helps the reader to see inside the calculating mind of Montresor, whom we later learn is a killer. When talking about the past insults of Fortunato, he takes on a cold, determined tone: “At length I would be avenged; this was a point definitively settled […] I must not only punish, but punish with impunity. A wrong is unredressed when retribution overtakes its redresser. It is equally unredressed when the avenger fails to make himself felt as such to him who has done the wrong” (Poe, 618).