Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Plato's immortality of the soul
The idea of form and truth plato
Plato's theory of knowledge
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Plato's immortality of the soul
“If the truth of all things always existed in the soul, then the soul is immortal” (The Philosophical Journey 89). This states that since the soul has all knowledge integrated, one recollects this knowledge through situations in an individual’s life and use one’s reasoning. With the dialogues of the Meno and Phaedo, Plato discusses the ideas of recollection and immortality of the soul in general. As well, the Republic, through the three different situations shown, Plato shows the ideas of the forms and what is real and what is not.
In the dialogue of Meno, Socrates explains the idea of recollection with the question and answer period between himself and the boy. Meno asks Socrates, “What do you mean by saying that we do not learn, and that what we call learning is only a process of recollection” (The Philosophical Journey 86). He questions on how one can have knowledge without learning about said knowledge first. Socrates then, through a series of questions and answers with the boy, helps him discover the knowledge that has been hidden inside him all along. This is explained where Socrates states,
He did not know at first, and he does not know now, what is the side of a figure of
eight feet: but then he thought that he knew, and answered confidently as if he knew,
and had no difficulty; now he has a difficulty, and neither he knows nor fancies that
he knows (The Philosophical Journey 88).
Basically, through this event, Socrates has assisted the boy in discovering the truth through only one method of recollecting stored knowledge. Even though the boy may seem confused by the questions, it is only because he has not realized that he had this knowledge and has been obtained.
As well, this process of recollection can be ta...
... middle of paper ...
...of the Good, which is only seen through effort and understanding. This is something I also stand by because if you do not try and understand a particular belief or question it, then you cannot have knowledge for or against it.
In general, Plato’s theory discusses how recollection, immortality of the soul, and the Forms are essential to understand and reason knowledge. The reader believes that his theory has a strong foundation, where one recollects knowledge and if that is the case, then said knowledge is eternal. As well, the reader also believes with Plato that knowledge can only be obtained through understanding and reasoning and using the forms to see the knowledge that we have. Intelligence is within all; it just has to be discovered.
Work Cited
Lawhead, William. The Philosophical Journey: An Interactive Approach Fifth (5th) Edition, McGraw-Hill, 2010
Due to the lack of free will, he recognizes that no person can change fate. As well as a
...n who obviously showed no signs of knowing it themselves. Moreover, this was perhaps his primary purpose.
By using the opposition he made to think about a real truth. Maybe not everything is so simple as it looks like? The narrator wants to warn the reader against false truth. It could have the advice to stop deceiving yourself or it may be a warning to pull lessons from the past, as shown by “flowing past windows”. It is important to learn from previous experiences, because we should not make the same mistakes. Also, sometimes, we do not see some things because we do not want to see them. It is more convention to skip some facts. The narrator would like encourage us to thing wider about all aspects of particular
Seeing as both Socrates and himself do not know what virtue is, Meno declares that they are unable to recognize or even discover it. After that Socrates refutes by stating the theory of recollection, and the immortality of the soul. Since Socrates believes that a soul is immortal, any knowledge can be recollected, which is what the theory of recollection is. He proves this through Meno’s slave, who had no prior learning of math or geometry. Through a series of questions, the slave boy is able to determine all of the lengths of the squares that Socrates draws, which explains to Meno that virtue can be recollected if they take enough time to find the
In this paper I will give an in depth analysis of Socrates argument in Plato’s Republic and in Plato’s Phaedo. First I will begin with the analysis of the Republic, a discussion between Socrates and Glaucon on morality of the human being. The argument first defines morality within a good community and proceeds with the application of this definition in the human person. Then I shall analysis Phaedo, Socrates argument of immortality of the soul. Using his argument of death, reincarnation, change and invisibility, I shall explain Socrates rejoice of death. In conclusion, I will compare Socrates notion of immortality, apply it to his definition of morality and prove a contradiction between the two.
It is thought that Meno's paradox is of critical importance both within Plato's thought and within the whole history of ideas. It's major importance is that for the first time on record, the possibility of achieving knowledge from the mind's own resources rather than from experience is articulated, demonstrated and seen as raising important philosophical questions.
The 'doctrine of recollection' states that all true knowledge exists implicitly within us, and can be brought to consciousness - made explicit - by recollection. Using the Platonic concepts of 'Forms', 'particulars', 'knowledge' and 'true opinion', this essay explains what can or cannot be recollected, why all knowledge is based on recollection, and why the doctrine does not prove the soul to be immortal.
Therefore, through the soul, that has been born before being placed into a physical human body, the human has knowledge. As a result of the soul being immortal and knowing everything, Socrates ties that idea of immortality with the theory of recollection, which claims that our knowledge is inside of us because of the soul and it never learns anything new, only remembers, consequently, serving as an evidence that the soul is pre- existent. Socrates uses the knowledge of the soul to explain that there is no such thing as learning but instead there is discovery of the knowledge that one has and does, by himself, without receiving new information. However, most knowledge is forgotten at birth since we are born without knowing, for example, how to add, subtract,talk, etc. Nonetheless, the knowledge we have, has to be recollected with the help of a teacher. Socrates is able to prove this argument to a degree by using Meno’s slave, who had no prior knowledge of geometry before, as an example of how humans have the knowledge inside of them, through the soul, and they know everything but all they need are a sort of guidance to be able to “free” the knowledge they didn’t know they had inside them all this time. (Plato,
For Plato, Forms are eternal and changeless, but there is a relationship between these eternal and changeless Forms and particular things we perceive by means of our senses in the world. These particular things change in accordance to the perceiver and the perceiver’s environment and this is why Plato thought that such things do not possess real existence. For Plato, onl...
Socrates believes knowledge is way better than true belief. He uses the slave boy to prove his knowledge. He calls one of Meno’s slaves to show Meno that even that slave boy does not have any knowledge, he can recollect it. Socrates starts asking geometrical question to the slave boy. With each wrong answer, Socrates asks him another question to lead him to the correct answ...
In fact, these three arguments are related to each other and cannot stand on their own to draw Plato 's final conclusion that the human soul is immortal. The recollection argument is the most interesting one because of Plato 's way to draw the final conclusion of the argument. Plato 's premises for the recollection argument follow an irrefutable logic. Therefore, the argument is logically valid. However, the soundness of the argument can be put into question since there are gaps and some degree of vagueness to the premises.
Plato believes the soul is an immortal separate entity that is entrapped in the body until one dies. The soul is what possess knowledge and remembers what was known from previous lifetimes. He illustrates this with the story of Socrates and the slave boy. With this, he showed that while the slave boy was an unschooled individual, he was still able to solve the problem of doubling a square. Plato attributes this accomplishment to the soul as remembering a previous encounter with an eternal knowledge.
My paper takes as the starting point for its argument the traditional interpretation (and classic criticism) of Platonic metaphysics as a two worlds view of reality: one world, that which includes this room of people, i.e., the here and now which is characterized by change, disorder, conflict, coming to be and passing out of being, corruption, etc.; and another world, located who knows where, but certainly not identical to what we see around us at present, the realm of changelessness and order, ontological perdurance, harmony, unity: Plato's "plain of Truth", the residence of the forms. In light of these two worlds, the Platonic philosopher's wisdom, whatever it may be, must be a wisdom not of this world. Indeed, did not Plato's Socrates himself say that his life— the philosophical life— was the art of practising death? Should that Socrates— or anyone who professes to be a Platonic philosopher— show up at, let us say, the World Congress of
In conclusion, Socrates used his own method also known as the Socratic Method in order to help Meno understand more of what virtue is. Socrates provides questions to Meno because Socrates knows that the answer could be found with one's self. Socrate's three solution to the paradox of inquiry which are the clenetic reply,thesis that learning is recollection, and the demonstration with the slave boy provides excellent help to determine of what cannot be learned but instead recollected or recovered from the soul of the human.
When Socrates was brought to trial for the corruption of the city’s youth he knew he had done nothing wrong. He had lived his life as it should be lead, and did what he ne...