Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Movies and violence research paper
Difficulties faced by Vietnam veterans
Movies and violence research paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Movies and violence research paper
Oliver Stone's Oscar-winning film "Platoon" brought the true horror of the Vietnam War to the big screen. Based on Stone's own experiences as a soldier in the conflict, the film captivated millions of viewers all over the world. "Platoon" tells the story of Chris Taylor (Charlie Sheen) who leaves his university studies to enlist in combat duty in Vietnam in 1967. Taylor faces a moral crisis and not to mention, imenint danger. The movie expresses many themes and ideals concerning war: cruelty, selfishness, hate, but also, brotherhood, bravery, courage, sympathy and others. Platoon portrays Americans as antagonists rather than the classic heroes; which in turn prevented it from being released by big name movie companies in the U.S.
One main
…show more content…
question whose answer can be inferred from the film is, "How does war strip away and diminish a person's humanity?" At the beginning of the film, the men in the platoon stationed off the Cambodian border had their differences but ultimately were willing to defend and fight beside one another in war. Throughout the course of the film, the men change, their morals poisoned by violence and fear. The platoon splits into two sides in a conflict, half siding with the hardened and cynical Staff Sergeant Robert "Bob" Barnes, and the remaining with the more idealistic Sergeant Elias. Next, the once sane and reasonable men turn to means of extreme violence while interrogating the chief of a Vietnamese village about whether the villagers have been aiding the NVA,(North Vietnamese Army; aka Vietnam People's Army) and cold-bloodedly shoots his wife dead when she snaps back at him. Taylor later prevents a gang-rape of two girls by some of Barnes' men. Near the end of the film, after multiple altercations between the two; Sergreant Elias goes off near a river to prevent the soldiers from being completely surrounded. Barnes who begins finding the soldiers and tells them to fall back, finds Elias alone and shoots him, then returns and tells the others that Elias was killed by the enemy. While the platoon is extracted via helicopter, Elias can be seen below, mortally wounded, emerging from the treeline and being chased by a group of North Vietnamese soldiers, who kill him. The first sign the mens' humanity was tarnished by war was that after living and fighting together, they lost sight of their true enemies and rather began fighting each other, divided and under separate leaders.
The main altercation that leads to this is the fight that broke out between Sgt. Elias and Sgt. Barnes when Barnes,while questioning the village chief, loses his patience and senselessly kills the man's wife despite his denials that they are aiding the Viet Cong. He is about to murder the man's young daughter to force him to tell them to where the enemy is when Elias intervenes and attacks him out of anger and disgust at the ruthless killing. From this point on, the two butt heads and have resentments toward each other. The soldiers take their sides and there was "a civil war in the platoon. Half with Elias, half with Barnes." (Taylor) Each side focuses mainly on themselves rather than the task and common enemy at hand. Men who once laughed and smoked and drank together now were willing to sacrifice one another, their brotherhood shattered by the …show more content…
conflict. There are many violent scenes in the film, granted the topic it covers. But, two scenes stick out most for their heinous cruelty. Acts committed by once normal, loving men against human beings with skin no different than their own. After Elias and Barnes' major conflict, Lieutenant Wolfe, who ended the fight, relays orders from his own superior officer to burn the village. As the men leave, a group of four soldiers, drag a young Vietnamese girl into the bushes with the intention of raping her. Taylor comes upon them and stops the group from raping the girl. They ridicule him for stopping them. The men were willing to traumatize a girl and violate her beyond reason just because they could. They didn't even see her as a human being, just an object with which they could do whatever their hearts desired. Taylor himself was appalled by their intentions while the men laughed it off as no big deal, as if Taylor was overreacting. One of the final scenes in the movie portrays the most inhuman act of all. As the North Vietnamese soldiers ambush and begin taking out the platoon soldiers one by one, Sgt. Elias takes a few of his men to intercept troops. Elias, realizing they will be cut off at the river, goes alone to combat these troops and give his men a chance. Barnes orders the rest of the platoon to retreat, to be airlifted from the area, and goes back into the jungle to find Elias' group. After sending his men back, Barnes finds Elias. The two stare at each other for a few moments and then Barnes fires three rounds into Elias' chest and leaves him for dead. Barnes runs into Taylor and tells him that Elias is dead and that he'd seen his body nearby. Barnes, shot his fellow man in cold blood for no other reason than that he still had resentments towards him for insulting his authority and capability to lead a group of soldiers as a sergeant. Perhaps, before all of this happened, Barnes might have been willing to aid his brother of war. But now, he simply couldnt overlook their differences. He had the chance to save him, to bring him along to be evcuated but he shot him without even giving it a second thought. One question brought to mind after watching Platoon is, "How does war strip away and diminish a person's humanity?" It is evident now that there are many things that can do this to a person, killing someone or something, severe emotional or physical trauma and extreme resentments to name a few.
These three triggers were clearly evident throughout the movie, more throughout the second half. No one, not even Taylor remained completely unchanged by the war. A scene where he taunts and shoots at a mentally dissabled villager proves this. The men of the platoon were once reasonable people who were only trying to make it through their 365 days. But the violent acts they had to comit and the extreme fear and trauma they were put through caused them to do unspeakable things. They butted heads with one another and bickered rather than working together to take out the Vietnamese troops. Sergeant Barnes shot a woman in cold blood and almost did the same to an innocent girl. Four of the men, some Barnes' and some Elias' tried to rape an innocent and scared girl. And Sergeant Barnes, even after months if not years of fighting alongside Sergeant Elias, shot him and left him to
die.
The Vietnam War was a controversial conflict that plagued the United States for many years. The loss of life caused by the war was devastating. For those who came back alive, their lives were profoundly changed. The impact the war had on servicemen would affect them for the rest of their lives; each soldier may have only played one small part in the war, but the war played a huge part in their lives. They went in feeling one way, and came home feeling completely different. In the book Vietnam Perkasie, W.D. Ehrhart describes his change from a proud young American Marine to a man filled with immense confusion, anger, and guilt over the atrocities he witnessed and participated in during the war.
The war had a lot of emotional toll on people it destroyed their personal identity, their moral/humanity, the passion to live was lost and the PDS they will suffer post war, resulting in the soldiers to understand what war is really about and what is covered up. There are scenes that support the thesis about the war like "As for the rest, they are now just names without faces or faces without names." Chapter 2, p. 27 which show how the soldiers have emotional detached themselves from life. Also, when the novel says “I saw their living mouths moving in conversation and their dead mouths grinning the taut-drawn grins of corpses. Their living eyes I saw, and their dead eyes still-staring. Had it not been for the fear that I was going crazy, I would have found it an interesting experience, a trip such as no drug could possibly produce. Asleep and dreaming, I saw dead men living; awake, I saw living men dead.” Which to me again shows how the soldiers are change throughout the war losing the moral and humanity. Lastly what he says “ I’m not scared of death anymore and don 't care whether I live of die” is the point where I notice Phillips change in
The second theory, I will be talking about involves the Salem Village and Salem Town . This is also one of the theories because even though Salem Village and Town have similar stuff. The areas were still considered one in the late 1600s . But they still did have there differences such as, Salem Village people had more farmland , they were generally poorer, and had more conservative values that the people in Salem Town. In Salem Town people were educated, prosperous, and were more respected. But besides their differences and similar stuff, both Salem Village and Town had a resentment of each other which was why Salem Village asked for independence from Salem Town .Salem Village produced the food in the area, but at the end the businessmen
Most war novels center on themes of valor and heroism. Some concentrate on the opposites of these virtues in an attempt to display raw realism. Harrison, right from the beginning of his novel, shows us both. The narrator of this first-person narrative paints a picture of a totally un-heroic bunch of soldiers preparing for debarkation. The drinking and debauchery are followed the next morning by a parade that the suffering soldiers must march through, while the people watch their ‘heroes’ leaving to bravely fight the good fight. While this clearly demarcates the innocent civilians from the savvy soldiers, it also shows the reader that the narrator is going to try to tell the real story.
When O’Brien first arrives to Vietnam, the men of the platoon show him how the grief of war can be covered up by humor. As the men were patrolling near a village off the South China Sea they suddenly started to encounter sniper fire. The firefight only lasted a few minutes but Lt. Cross decided to order an airstrike on the village anyways. After the strike was over, the platoon proceeded to the smoldering village to find nothing but “…an old man who lay face up near a pigpen at the center of the village. His right arm was gone. At his face there were already many flies and gnats.”(). To many, this image of a destroyed village and the mutilated old man would cause horror and plight. Instead of that normal reaction, “Dave Jensen went over and shook the old man’s hand. “How-dee-doo,” he said.”(). The other men of the platoon also went up to the dead man’s body and shook his hand while adding a comment. This disturbing response the men have to the dead old man isn’t one of disrespect, it is their coping mechanism for realizing what they just did. Because O’Brien was new to Vietnam he had yet to understand why the men were all doing this. He was awestruck by the actions...
Throughout our lives, it seems when we have no one else to help us, our most challenging problems occur leaving ourselves to use our wit and emotion to persevere. People can have test or a big game where we have teachers and coaches to help us prepare and succeed. However, in the movie, High Noon, a Marshall named Will Kane is faced with a challenge of an arriving Frank Miller looking to kill. In the short story, "The Most Dangerous Game", a hunger named Rainsford is deserted on a island after he fell off his yacht, and he would soon find out a sociopath with the unique taste for hunting down humans was out for him. With the two characters in these suspense-building products somewhat trapped we can take out many lessons and ideas from the action packed movie and short story. The movie, High Noon, and the short story, "The Most Dangerous Game, are alike and at the same time very different.
The violent nature that the soldiers acquired during their tour in Vietnam is one of O'Brien's predominant themes in his novel. By consciously selecting very descriptive details that reveal the drastic change in manner within the men, O'Brien creates within the reader an understanding of the effects of war on its participants. One of the soldiers, "Norman Bowler, otherwise a very gentle person, carried a Thumb. . .The Thumb was dark brown, rubbery to touch. . . It had been cut from a VC corpse, a boy of fifteen or sixteen"(O'Brien 13). Bowler had been a very good-natured person in civilian life, yet war makes him into a very hard-mannered, emotionally devoid soldier, carrying about a severed finger as a trophy, proud of his kill. The transformation shown through Bowler is an excellent indicator of the psychological and emotional change that most of the soldiers undergo. To bring an innocent young man from sensitive to apathetic, from caring to hateful, requires a great force; the war provides this force. However, frequently are the changes more drastic. A soldier named "Ted Lavender adopted an orphaned puppy. . .Azar strapped it to a Claymore antipersonnel mine and squeezed the firing device"(O'Brien 39). Azar has become demented; to kill a puppy that someone else has adopted is horrible. However, the infliction of violence has become the norm of behavior for these men; the fleeting moment of compassion shown by one man is instantly erased by another, setting order back within the group. O'Brien here shows a hint of sensitivity among the men to set up a startling contrast between the past and the present for these men. The effect produced on the reader by this contrast is one of horror; therefore fulfilling O'Brien's purpose, to convince the reader of war's severely negative effects.
...ust deal with similar pains. Through the authors of these stories, we gain a better sense of what soldiers go through and the connection war has on the psyche of these men. While it is true, and known, that the Vietnam War was bloody and many soldiers died in vain, it is often forgotten what occurred to those who returned home. We overlook what became of those men and of the pain they, and their families, were left coping with. Some were left with physical scars, a constant reminder of a horrible time in their lives, while some were left with emotional, and mental, scarring. The universal fact found in all soldiers is the dramatic transformation they all undergo. No longer do any of these men have a chance to create their own identity, or continue with the aspirations they once held as young men. They become, and will forever be, soldiers of the Vietnam War.
The impact of the Vietnam War upon the soldiers who fought there was huge. The experience forever changed how they would think and act for the rest of their lives. One of the main reasons for this was there was little to no understanding by the soldiers as to why they were fighting this war. They felt they were killing innocent people, farmers, poor hard working people, women, and children were among their victims. Many of the returning soldiers could not fall back in to their old life styles. First they felt guilt for surviving many of their brothers in arms. Second they were haunted by the atrocities of war. Some soldiers could not go back to the mental state of peacetime. Then there were soldiers Tim O’Brien meant while in the war that he wrote the book “The Things They Carried,” that showed how important the role of story telling was to soldiers. The role of stories was important because it gave them an outlet and that outlet was needed both inside and outside the war in order to keep their metal state in check.
This film is set during the Vietnam War. It follows a group of friends from a small, industrial Pennsylvania town. Half of the men of the group goes to war, while the other half stays home. Michael (Robert De Niro), Steven (John Savage) and Nick (Christopher) are the three men who go to war. Stan (John Cazale) George Dzundza (John) and Chuck Aspegren (Axel) are the three who stay home, along with Nick’s girlfriend Linda (Meryl Streep) and Steven’s new wife Angela (Rutanya Alda). The film chronicles how war changes those who experienced it, including how they interact with their friends once they return.
I chose the movie clip entitled “King Kong”. It’s from the movie “Training Day” starring Denzel Washington. Training Day is a movie that follows a corrupted detective’s day to day mischief as he schools a rookie cop. Training Day depicts a product of the matchup between screenwriter David Ayer, who grew up in South Central Los Angeles, and director Antoine Fuqua, who grew up on the rough side of Pittsburgh. Both Ayer and Fuqua are highly familiar with the highly intensified relationship between police and criminals.
“Apocalypse Now” is a legendary war film directed by Francis Ford Coppola. The film’s main theme is devastation, violence, and horror. In this film Coppola thoroughly scrutinized the main characters ideas, behavior, and emotions to depict the darkness and the horror of war. His goal was to make the audience part of the horror. He wanted the audience to have a tremendous impact on this film and he succeeded with the perfect use of sound and editing in the ending sequence of his film. I will demonstrate how Coppola exploits a wide array of sound and editing to create suspense, intensity, and anxiety in the sequence to affect the audience’s emotions, using diegetic ambient sound effects, non-diegetic music, voice over and four editing types.
District 9 is a film that takes us into a realm of a different world from the one that we know now. It combines extraterrestrial life with immense science fiction to illustrate a story we could only imagine to ever actually occur. Although it was created for entertainment purposes, the motion picture can be compared to many different types of individuals and situations. District 9 displays many underlying concepts throughout the movie about racism, prejudice and discrimination. While studying and analyzing the plot and characters, these concepts became more translucent to me, the viewer. This paper will discuss the treatment of District 9 residents and equate their treatment to people with disabilities.
Full Metal Jacket is written and directed by Stanley Kubrick. The film was released in 1987 and it is starring Matthew Modine (Joker), Vincent D’Onofrio (Pyle), Adam Baldwin (Animal), and R. Lee Ermey ( Guy.Segr. Hartman).
The movie I chose to analyze for historical accuracy was War Horse. This movie was set in the First World War, starting in Britain but the story also explored France and Germany during this time period as well. Three scenes will be analyzed: the trench warfare scene between the British and the Germans, the scene where the British soldiers were gassed, and the scene where the British were getting patched up and nursed. War Horse does well to stick to the historical accuracy of what happened during the First World War due to the fact that the three scenes that I have chosen to analyze are not embellished and are close to what really happened.