Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Youth gangs and theory
The relationship between culture and behavior
Youth gangs and theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Youth gangs and theory
The Social Learning Theory “suggests that much human behavior is learned from modeling others” (pg 118, Thompson). According to Winfree in his article Social Learning, “the theory specifies [on] the general social learning mechanisms by which the rationalizations, norms, rules, and motivations of non-normative behavior are learned but it also specifies the riles of positive and negative social mechanisms, all of which work to condition the ‘learner’ towards or away from crime...behavior is ‘acquired or conditioned by the effects, outcomes or consequences it has on the person’s environment.” (149). According to (Social Learning Winfree) the behavior of these gang members are reinforced depending on the response from others. A positive response from others results in the delinquent …show more content…
Another sociological theory under the social learning theory is the differential definitions, which “conceived to be a product of the process whereby the individual, through interactions with others, learns evaluations of behavior as good or bad. Deviant behavior is more likely to result when individuals develop definitions that are favorable rather than unfavorable to that behavior. The pro-deviance differential-definition measure used in this study was grounded in the ‘gang experience” (158, winfree, social learning). “Placing minority-group gang membership in a theoretical context is crucial if the goal is to develop a broader understanding of youth gangs…one theory that has shown promise as a culture-free explanation of youthful misconduct is Akers’ social learning theory rests entirely on the ‘assumption of conflict between cultures and that one always obeys the norms of one’s group” (106-107, Winfree, Hispanics). There is a Gang Resistance Education and Treating programs which is a “school-based gang-prevention curriculum that has demonstrated evidence of effectiveness. Law enforcement officers middle school students a 13-week curriculum that
Social behavior responds to a complicated network of rewards and punishments. The more a behavior is rewarded, the more likely it is to continue. On the flip side of this, the more a behavior is met with negative consequences, the more it is likely to stop. In any given social situation, whether someone commits a crime is largely dependent on his past behavior, or whether someone has received a positive reinforcement to a that crime. According to Social Learning Theory, crime is a direct response to this reinforcement. So in other words, if rewards are greater than punishments, the crime will be committed. Social Learning Theory is meant to operate as a general theory of crime.
Spergel, I., Chance, R., Ehrensaft, K., Regulus, T., Cane, K., Laseter, R., . . . Alexander, A. (1994, October). Gang Suppression and Intervention: Community Models Research Summary. Retrieved March 23, 2014, from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/gangcorr.pdf
The Cocaine Kids: The Inside Story of a Teenage Drug Ring is an intriguing narrative of the experiences Terry Williams witnessed first hand while observing the lives of “The Kids” and their involvement in the cocaine trade. Throughout this piece, there are numerous behaviors displayed by the drug dealers that are each examples of and can be attributed to well-defined criminological theories. This paper will explore how such criminological theories are associated with how and why individuals are introduced into the world of drug selling, as well as, why they leave it. I will elaborate on this by revealing the motivations and conditions that seem to pressurize these individuals to be drug dealers. Although there are multiples shown, the specific theories I will explore are all based on the same idea that an individual becomes a criminal by learning how to be one through experiences, examples, role models, etc. Such theories include the theory of Differential Association, Subculture of Violence Theory, and the Social Learning Theory.
In 2003 as a response to communities with a large amount and growing number of youth gangs the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), a branch of the U.S. Department of Justice, initiated the Gang Reduction Program (GRP) (U.S. Department of Justice 2008). The formation of gangs is seen as a response to system failures and community dysfunction. As a result, one of OJJPD’s anti-gang initiatives is to make communities safer and have a pro-social environment (U.S. Department of Justice 2008). Furthermore, OJJDP plans to provide economic and social opportunities that gangs often promise to new recruits which are often obtained in an illegal and dangerous fashion (U.S. Department of Justice 2008). OJJDP believes that the GRP is capable of addressing the underlying issues for the increasing popularity and intensity of gang activity in specific suburban and rural neighborhoods (U.S. Department of Justice 2008). The program takes an integrative approach to dealing with the issue of increasing membership and participation with gangs. The following will discuss the program’s goal, theoretical basis, methods of operation, and overall effectiveness. After reviewing these major aspects of the GRP I will personally assess the value of this program and conclude whether or not the evidence supporting the program’s efficiency is strong enough for me to recommend it for implementation.
Many have attempted to explain gang involvement in today's society. However, there is an underlying activity of youth joining gangs that does not seem to have enough media coverage or thorough explanations. As the name suggests, youth gang membership is about the juvenile population creating and joining gangs. Research indicates that youth gang membership exists in contemporary north America (Bernburg et al. 2006; aLilly et al. 2011; Maclure and Sotelo 2004; Sims 1997; Wiley et al. 2013; Yoder et al. 2003). This paper will examine the factors associated with youth gang membership using Karl Marx's conflict theory and labeling theory in comparison. Although conflict theory helps explain why a troublesome economy and coming from a low-socioeconomic status contributes to gang involvement, the theory has its limitations. On the other hand, labeling theory is unable to fully explain youth gang involvement based on the aforementioned factors. That being said, it can give a better explanation based on the factor of government intervention in the lives of citizens such as the context of stop-and-frisk which lead to unwarranted searches.
Give the kids and teens after-school programs such as sports and mentoring programs. The government should not waste money funding useless laws, instead it should build more boys and girls clubs in the neighborhoods where gangs are likely appearing to organize. Most people who join a gang are just looking for a sense of belonging. These programs will show them they are smart and talented. It is that sense of belonging when they’re in an after-school group.
however, many studies have looked at ways in which why people turn to gangs and why they commit delinquent activities. Therefore, a further examination in how gang membership and being involved with juvenile delinquents is connected to delinquent behavior is explored. Children learn early on right from wrong and they are taught this content from their parents. In addition research have shown the relationship gang members and peers have on the youths of our society. These influences are not always good, in fact results show that when youth joins a gang and become a member they end up committing more delinquent behavior then they did before their involvement. In similar results claims the same to be true for affiliation with delinquent peers. As a society we must be aware of the needs of our youth or more and more youths will choose the friends wrong friends to hang around as well as the wrong group to associate
Statistics show that school-based programs as well as community-based prevention programs minimize gang involvement. School-based programs address substance abuse and violence, which reduces the risk factors for gang involvement. For example, in the article “What Can Schools Do to Prevent Gang Involvement,” by Gary D. Gottfredson, he states, “universal programs in kindergarten through secondary school, which [is a] rewarding educational environment im...
Wong, I. W., Toh, D. P., Hung, P. P., & Ang, R. P. (2013, December). Delinquency in gangs - Selection or socialization?Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(6), 784-791. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2013.10.001
Akers, R. L. (2009). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. New Brunswick [N.J.: Transaction Publishers
Ones’ socio-economic environment serves to predetermine the possibility of achieving ones’ financial success through legitimate means, which are available to the middle and upper classes, or illegitimate means, which is the only choice for the lower class. For instance, if children grew up in a poor neighborhood, where there aren’t many available financial means to allow them to achieve their dreams the legal way, such as paid for college, health insurance, etc. So, as a way to make money, children in a poverty stricken area are more likely to commit criminal acts like stealing, selling drugs, prostitution, etc. Furthermore, the degree of integration in a community is a main factor for delinquent subculture. In lower class area, the degree of integration of business, politics and organized crimes, control the social organization in that community thus, creating three types of delinquent gang. The first type, the criminal gang, arise in areas where conventional as well as non-conventional values of behavior are integrated by ages as well as illegitimate and legitimate groups. Older criminals serve as role models to the youngsters and teach them the necessary criminal skills. The second type, the conflict gang, is unstable and non-integrated, where there is a lack of criminal organization causing instability. This gang display uncontrolled
Differential Reinforcement is defined to occur when behavior is reinforced by being either rewarded or punished while interacting with others (Siegel, 2003). With this said, the theory was developed as a way of labeling both positive, as well as negative aspects of individual action. This idea of reinforcement is a branch of the infamous Differential Association theory presented by Edwin H. Sutherland in 1939. Another commonly used term for this theory of reinforcement is called differential conditioning (Siegel, 2003). As mentioned, the types of reinforcement are either positive or negative, and operate on the results of specific crimes or random acts. Rewarding behaviors plainly urges such action to be repeated, while punishment often deters those offenders from repeating their same mistakes. Parenting practices, social groups, schools, television, and the community are just a few of the examples that are linked to this theory. According to Ronald Akers (1966), each behavior a person commits is a learned behavior, meaning some type of outside force paved the way to this various knowledge. This theory goes hand in hand with the ideology that he argued in his studies, but focuses on the after effects (or results), rather than prevention or control. This theory does not help support the effectiveness of deterrence, but it does give us a little insight on why people decide to engage in criminal activity. Perhaps the most influential group in shaping someone’s behavior is their peer group. Take for example, gang activity. Street gangs, though usually found in highly urbanized areas, still exist and even thrive throughout most of the United States. It is the safety, security, and power that effects these members with faulty, risky and distant thinking, which usually ends up in some type of negative reinforcement. Guilt is often by association, as well as socialization. Purely, this relationship dominates the theory of crime as a learned behavior. No one is born with the general knowledge of how to break the law or to simply be criminal by nature, but through life experiences and perceptions of the events that surround them, the criminal activity is learned. Use the professional art of safe (or vault) cracking, for example. To perform such a trick, one must be taught how to do it. Such information is never provided at birth, or thr...
In 1947 Sociologist Edwin Sutherland (and later Melvin DeFleur, Richard Quinney, Robert Burgess, and Ronald Akers; as seen in Burgess & Akers, 1966) posited that criminal behavior is at least partially learned and that our social networks play a vital role in this process. Later research provided empirical support to this (Akers, Krohn, & Lanza-Kaduce, 1979). In this view, criminal behavior is learned both socially and non-socially though operant conditioning. The individual’s social networks (e.x. family and friends) are the primary source for reinforcement of these behaviors (Burgess & Akers, 1966). In essence our social networks teach us both specific behaviors as well as the social norms of our (sub) culture. When we behave a certain way, our behavior is reinforced or punished. Behavior that is reinforced is more likely to continue.
Understanding the importance of what happen is not merely as important as figuring out why something happen. There are many different whys in the criminal justice world, which is known today as theories. One in particular is called the labeling theory. Rather than looking at why some social gatherings carry out more wrongdoing, the labelling theory asks why some people committing some actions come to be defined as deviant, while others do not. Labelling theory is also interested in the effects of labelling on individuals.
As kids grow up, they’re unable to fully align their actions with reason and conjure their own beliefs without outside influences. According to Shaw and McKay, younger people who associate with peers that are gang members or affiliates are more likely to partake in similar activities. Ultimately “criminal behavior is learned through social interactions.” (p.44). Although those who grow up in a disorganized community are more likely to develop a weaker sense of control, doesn’t necessarily mean they cannot develop a strong one. Similar to those who have grown up in a well-controlled neighborhood, there will always be both criminal influences and conventional influences. Sutherland introduces this idea though his theory of differential association. Whichever influence stand dominate over time, that particular person will embrace one side or the other. These idea of differential association gave inspiration to dig even further into this claim. With different sources of influences such as, relationships with family, organizations and public relations can either support the youth’s values or hinder them. So, looking at a well-organized neighborhood. In most cases, family members are well educated, formulate positive organizations and have little to no trouble with the law. As a result, impacts the youth in a way which we consider law-abiding. On the other hand, those who are part of an organized community are