Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pit bulls banning argument
How to train your dog essay
How to train your dog essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Pit bulls are known as dangerous and non coward. I Once had a pit bull and never had any trouble with him. He was very friendly and never showed any sign of aggression, But people still criticize these dogs. This means that by banning pit bulls it could lead to many different problems that people are not expecting. And cause chaos for Pit bulls and their owners. Although pit bulls seem to be dangerous, people should be able to own pit bulls in the united states. Historically, many dogs have been defined as pit bulls, and dogs identified as pit bulls have been held responsible for attacks.pit bulls have been known as dangerous , vicious, dogs, and some people think that they should be banned. Also people say that they can’t be trained. But this …show more content…
isn't true , According to an article “The term "pit bull" often refers to a group of breeds including the American Pit bull Terrier, the American Staffordshire Terrier, the Staffordshire Terrier, the American Bulldog, the Bull Terrier, and the Miniature Bull Terrier” (Botkin). What this is trying to prove is that people look at pit bull as dangerous and in reality it isn't just one type of breed it is a whole family, and they shouldn't be banned because of what people think. Another example is that they are in a category and that separates them but most of the time the identifications are not correct . According to National Geographic “People who have studied these cases, ... , have shown that when it comes to fatalities caused by pit bulls, the breed identifications are often not accurate. The title “pit bull” has expanded so dramatically over the years that people are lumping any dog with a large head and short coat into that category rather than separating out each of the pit bull breeds” (Worrall). This means that people have been discriminating against pit bulls as dangerous for a long time and most of the time it is not accurate. When it comes to pit bulls they seem to be the biggest target when it come to dog breeds. This should not be happening in the era we are in now. Pit bulls should not be discriminated by what they look like. One reason why pitbulls should not be banned is because , Banning pit bulls would cause them to got to animal shelters and wait longer than other dogs to be adopted. Also it would cause more pit bulls to be put down. For example a study showed that dogs are in shelters longer than other dogs. Dogs that are labeled as pit bulls are most likely to wait 3 times longer than other dogs (Botkin).Dogs that are the breed Pit bull are likely to wait 3 times longer to be waiting to be adopted than a dog that isn't a Pit bull, But looks or acts like one. But just because they are labeled a different breed they are off the hook. Another example is that if they were not labeled as dangerous they would not be banned causing them to be in shelters longer and could cause them to be put down because they have been in the shelter too long. According to one study, “researchers found that adoptions of pit bulls rose from 52 percent to 64 percent at a shelter that had decided to do away with breed labels. That corresponded with a 12 percent drop in the number of pit bulls euthanized “ (Botkin). Banning pit bulls would cause them to be in the shelters longer and if they are in the shelter without being adopted they will be put down but if we removed that bann there would be a 12% increase of them being adopted.Because some pit bulls tend to be dangerous it doesn't mean all pit bulls are dangerous also they have to wait longer and have a higher percentage of being put down. Pit bulls should not be put down based on their breed. Another reason pit bulls should not be banned is because , Pit bulls are discriminated against and treated unfairly as a dog breed because of negative stereotypes. Pit bulls tend to be dangerous it doesn't mean all pit bulls are dangerous also they have to wait longer and have a higher percentage of being put down. Pit bulls should not be put down based on their breed. Discrimination on pit bulls would put a negative effect on them causing people to think they are dangerous. And leading to them not being adopted or put down. For example a James A. Serpell who is a director at an Animal Society In Pennsylvania he believes that people stereotype Pit bulls like we stereotype humans. "As human beings we tend to stereotype dog breeds just as we stereotype people," (QTD in Botkin-Kowacki). This means that people are discriminating Pit bulls just as humans would with other humans based on race, Looks,and Religious beliefs. This is not okay because if dogs were human this would be a discrimination issue, which means that the dogs are being treated unfairly or unequally for something that they have no control over. People should not ban pit bulls just because just because they are labeled as dangerous. Stereotyping pitbulls would be discrimination and unfair. Another example is that people see that pitbulls are muscular and have a different body figure than other dog breeds. According to Alanna Devine she says people just see the muscles and they say it is a pit bull. “People tend to characterize pit bulls by how they look -- muscular, with blocky heads and square jaws -- and associate them with personality traits including dominance and aggression” (Jacey).This shows that people see that pit bulls are very muscular and therefore they think that they are dangerous. pit bulls are stereotyped and judged by their looks, which leads to them being treated unfairly compared to other dog breeds This is also unfair to the owner because he he is just a dog owner but they are being punished just for owning a pit bull. Because people support discrimination against pit bulls they will be banned and it would be unfair for the owner and the dog. Lastly Pit bulls should not be banned because it causes people to give up their dogs to the shelters or pay legal fees to keep their dog and forced to wear a muzzle.
This punishes the owner of the dog just for owning a pit bull. This means that if the owner of the pit bull does not want to turn in his dog to the shelters he will be forced to pay a legal fee and he/ she has to keep the dog with a muzzle. According to Begin a pit bull owner he said it isn't easy to keep a pit bull once they have been banned “According to Critics of the bylaw said it was unfair, costly and confusing. Mr. Begin said the $150 permit and the muzzle were too expensive, especially for people who owned more than one pitbull . And he noticed that after the provisions were put into effect, people seemed more afraid of Stella than they had been before”(Jacey). This shows that once pit bulls have been banned People have to get a permit that cost 150 dollars and they have to agree to keep their dog on a muzzle in order for them to have it out in public. Also Begin says that he had to buy a muzzle for his dog and it was not cheap. Banning pit bulls causes stress for the dog and the owner. Another example on how banning pit bulls causes the owner to turn him in or let the dog be put down is by banning them out of nowhere for example a pit bull owner by the name MR.Begin said that he never got any notice that his dog was not allowed in this city anymore. At first he was so stressed he was about to take her …show more content…
into the animal shelter. Also the city gives too much paperwork and makes it very stressful for the owner to fight for the rights to keep the dog.“He said that he complied but nevertheless got a letter from the city in August notifying him that he was in danger of losing Stella if he did not file the proper paperwork. ''I didn't sleep well,'' Mr. Begin said in a phone interview on Friday. ''I almost didn't eat for a few days because i was stressed (Jacey)''. This means that when Pit bulls are banned the city or state that is banning Pit bulls makes the laws out of nowhere and make it very stressful without some time notice. Mr.Begin a pit bull says that when his pit bull was banned he had no time notice to try to fix the situation causing him to be stress full when he found out that his Pit bull could be taken away from him. This could of caused him to think he could not fight for the rights to keep his pit bull and he would of probably turned him into the shelter. Banning pit bulls and making strict laws causes people to turn in their pit bull into the shelter or put the dog down because they cant fight for the right to own the dog. on the other hand people say that pit bulls are dangerous and that they kill innocent people, but In order for a pit bull or any dog to act dangerous or show signs of aggression the must not have any training or the dog must be abused.
According to a news article a 4 year old boy was mauled to death by a pit bull “The uncle of a 4-year-old British boy mauled to death by an illegal pit bull dog has been arrested on suspicion of manslaughter, police say”( “Pit bull kills 4-year-old, uncle held” ).People that agree with pit bulls being banned say that people are getting murdered or attacked by pit bulls which is why they should be banned. In that piece of evidence the pit bull killed the 4 year old child and the child was innocent. According to a article a blind person was walking with his pit bull when all of a sudden they spotted a pit bull. The pit bull ran towards them and attacked both the dog and the owner. “A savaging by a pit bull has left Perry the guide dog nursing his wounds and his owner worried whether he will be able to work again”( “Pit bull savages blind visitor's guide dog” ). According to the article a Blind person was walking with his dog and minding his own reason when all of a sudden they spotted a pit bull. They minded their own business but did not know it would lead to them being attacked by the pit bull. Pit bulls attacking people may be a concern but that does not mean that something can’t be done without banning them or that they can be trained so
that they don’t attack people. Pit bulls can be trained to be safe or they can be taken away from a bad owner who causes them to be dangerous. By taking away these unfair laws pit bulls won't have to wait longer to be adopted and the owners won't have to be charged a great amount of money to keep their Pit bull. Pit bulls are not born aggressive they act based on how the owner treats them. Although there are some reports of pit bull attacks that does not mean that every single pit bull is dangerous. In order to bing a change in this problem there needs to be free training for dogs and we as humans have to take care of our dogs with care and make sure that they are not abused. Also we need to stop criticizing the pit bulls based on what we hear and see not every pit bull is dangerous. Although pit bulls seem dangerous to humans that does not mean it is necessarily true. Also that does not mean that something can’t be done in order to reduce this problem. Banning pit bulls causes great stress for the owners and some money to come out of their pocket. People should not be blaming Pit bulls for something they have no control over. And People should stop overreacting .
I believe that all people should be allowed to have any type of dog that they want. It’s just odd how people think that pit bulls are dangerous or vicious.
They have twisted the dogs mind into thinking that they have to fight to protect something all the time. Pit bulls are classified as vicious and harmful animals. This is discrimination and is because of media skewing stories, ignorant people that refuse to listen to hard facts, and public attitudes and opinions. These laws against breeds are unconstitutional; there is no legislative basis for these laws. Pit bulls, like any other dog, grow in their temperament.
According to the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), there is a “great deal of confusion associated with the label ‘Pit Bull,’” as it does not refer to a single breed of dog, but rather to a group of breeds with similar characteristics1. These characteristics include short hair, a wide skull and shoulders, muscle definition, stocky build and a deep jawline, the combination of which create a dog that manages to strike fear into a perfect stranger. The term ‘Pit Bull’ is derived from the bulldog, which was originally bred as a hunting dog for large game, but has since developed into a “loyal companion rather than a working dog.”1 Their history as “gripping dogs” for hunters follows them into modern society, as many of these dogs have been inhumanely pitted against one another as well as other animals for sport and for human entertainment1. It is because of these illegal fighting rings that ‘Pit Bull’ type breeds have become the subje...
What words come to mind when one hears the words “pit bull?” How about aggressive, violent, or dangerous? In many cases, this isn’t actually true. Because of the negative media attention for attacks on humans and other dogs that pit bull breeds receive, many Americans place a stigma on pit bulls, tagging them as dangerous and vicious. This stigma typically applies to all pit bulls, not just the ones that are actually dangerous. To remedy the issue of dangerous dogs attacking other beings, the legislative act known as breed-specific legislation is being debated throughout the United States. Gary J. Patronek, a veterinary doctor, defines breed-specific legislation as a law than “bans, restricts, or imposes conditions on ownership of specific breeds or dogs presumed to pose greater risk of biting people” (788). Breed-specific legislation is commonly debated in communities that have recently experienced a dog-bite related injury or fatality (Patronek, Slater, and Marder 788). However, this law would ban all dogs of the pit bull breed or any related dog based solely on their breed, rather than disposition. Therefore, breed-specific legislation should not be enacted throughout the United States because is biased against pit bulls and is ineffective in reducing dog-bite attacks by ignoring other aggressive dog breeds.
One reason Pit Bulls should not be banned is because they can be very helpful to humans. For example, pit bulls were once kept as hunters and guardians. Today, they are even being used as service dogs for people in need. There was also a pit bull named, Stubby, who saved his entire platoon from a poisonous gas attack. (“Pit Bulls Haven’t Always Had a Bad Rep”). Pit bulls are also great dogs for companionship and to improve your quality of life. As you can see, pit bulls can be useful in many ways.
A menace to society, lurking in the streets, just waiting for its next victim? This couldn’t be further from the truth for most pit bulls. These fantasised versions plague the breed, outlawing them in many cities, states, and even some countries entirely. These bans are called Breed Specific Legislation (BSL), and in over 700 American cities these laws are in effect. They are in place to decrease the number of attacks by dogs.
By being uneducated we blame dogs for what owners do to them. With that being said bad pet owners will continue to get dogs, if Pitbulls are banned they will switch breeds. This teaches nothing. The reason most of these dog’s attack is because they were brought up to do so. Whether they are used as guard dogs, fighting dogs or trained poorly it will continue on with any breed. Banning one breed sends an upswing in popularity to other breeds of dogs to attack people or other animals. So when will this stop? When will people understand that this wont change with banning breeds but with how we educate ourselves on facts and stop
In 18 August, 2011, the source of this event is from Herald Sun. A four-year-old lovely child named Ayen Chol was mauled and killed by a pit bull cross while she was playing in her home. The vicious pit bull escaped from a neighbour’s yard and mauled Ayen in a sudden attack. The dog rushed inside the house and set upon Ayen and some other children who were watching television. Ayen’s mom tried to beat the dog away from the children with a table, but she failed. Then the dog turned on Ayen and the vicious injuries caused Ayen’s death. Dr Cam Day, who is the RSPCA’s Queensland pit bull expert, has claimed that American pit bull terriers are ‘head, shoulder, feet and everything else above other breeds’ in terms of their capacity to injure and maim. If the government doesn’t ban pit bulls, these tragedies would continue to happen and children’s lives would be threatened all the
To say “pit bull,” however, is a vague reference to several pit bull types, which are considered separate breeds by registries like the American Kennel Club (AKC). Each type has a slightly different breeding history; many began with the breeding of bulldogs with terriers to produce a loyal, compact and tenacious breed (“American Pit Bull Terrier”). The standard three pit bull types most often mentioned by name in breed-specific legislation include the American Pit Bull Terrier, the American Staffordshire Terrier, and the Staffordshire Bull Terrier. That is not the extent of the legislation, however, which also includes dogs that “substantially conform to the breed standards established by the American Ken...
Currently, pit bulls have been reported by the media with very horrific and disturbing news of having attacked a child or being shot by a police due to aggression while some are reported to have been abused or neglected by its owners (Forderer and Unkelbach 534). And because the reports keep coming with heated discussions, more and more people have forged a frightening image of pit bulls even to the extreme of refusing to take care of such breed. Pit bull advocates claim that the dogs get a bad reputation considering that people should learn the dogs are not inherently aggressive. What the pit bull advocates would like to point is that the owners of the pit bulls should be considered guilty for mishandling of their own dogs. There are owners of pit bulls that even encourage the dog to be aggressive in order to fight and protect them in a wrong manner and wrong degree of training (Forderer and Unkelbach 536). Pit bull advocates claimed that a well socialized and well trained pit bull would be very intelligent and could be one of the gentle dogs imaginable.
Pit Bulls are without a doubt my favorite dog, I adore them. Pit Bulls are very well tempered, loyal, and resilient animals. Bred for big game hunting, Pit Bulls are strong, fierce animals and people who have the wrong intentions for ownership should never own them. I am a strong believer that a potential pet owner should do lots of research before getting any type of animal, without exception. Owners should do as much research before getting a dog as they do in planning for a new home or any other new family member. One of the main things to really think about and understand is your intentions for your selection of an animal with the breeding of the Pit Bull. If you choose a dog with the wrong intentions, specifically a Pit Bull, you will get a dog that behaves aggressively and is dangerous. This owner behavior is what has caused the current plight of the Pit Bull today, where laws have been passed in thirteen states and hundreds of municipalities, as well as every U. S. Military base, banning the ownership of the breed and forcing shelters to euphonize Pit Bulls within 24 hours. These laws are unjust and cruel, and victimize the breed based on the owners’ behavior. I also argue that the blame for the epidemic proportions that the laws have reached is 100% the fault of owners who purposely acquired the Pit Bull with the intention to abuse and fight the dogs, and that these owners are the ones who should be punished, not the dogs. (Davis)
Since then, there has been a constant argument about whether or not this breed should be allowed to be kept as a pet. No one looks at pit bulls as normal dogs anymore. They are viewed as monsters. They have a crazy amount of strength, speed, and stamina. This can be used against them or for them depending on who is debating the issue of their legality.
Should Pit Bulls be banned? Many people will argue that the pit bull breed should be banned due to its vicious and unpredictable nature. There is a belief that they are inherently evil creatures and that they have a genetic predisposition to be destructive killing machines. In many states and cities, this has brought about breed specific legislation. Breed specific legislation bans or regulates the ownership of specific breeds of dogs, which almost always includes pit bulls.
Pit bulls and several other breeds of dogs that are thought to be overly aggressive and violent are being banned in cities and towns. Are pit bulls a dangerous breed or are they just like any other dog? Many people believe that they are in fact dangerous and aggressive by nature but this is not true. Pitt bulls are being falsely accused for being a violent breed and because of the negative aspects associated with the breed, such as dog fights and vicious attacks, they are being unfairly targeted in breed specific bans.
Pitbulls were made to fight, but that does not mean they have to fight. From the time they were created to now people make it seem like they are just a violent killing dog and there not. It’s what get portrayed on the news and social media what makes them seem like a bad dog, but they won’t show the pit bulls that will protect the house or even be a comfort dog for people that have been in war. Pit bulls are so much more than just an attack dog or a do to fight and kill another dog.