It is 1787, a little over ten years have passed since our nation gained its independence. We desperately needed a Constitution, even with James Madison’s efforts to organize something to get us started, nothing worked until the plan for the Constitutional Convention came into action. The Constitutional Convention, also known as the Philadelphia Convention, was set to begin on May 13th, 1787. It took longer than expected for all the invited delegates to arrive, so the date was pushed back. On May 25th, 1787 there were twenty-nine delegates present. Some wanted to wait for the others to show up, but Madison urged them to begin the meeting. Over the course of the four month long convention, fifty-five delegates had made an appearance for at least …show more content…
one of the days. Every state from all of the thirteen colonies had sent no less than one member to attend except for Rhode Island, who refused the invitation. Rhode Island was not in attendance because they believed due to their size, no one would listen to what they had to say.
"The fifty-five delegates who came to the Philadelphia Convention between May 25th and September 17th, 1787 represented a political elite with years of experience in the affairs of their states and nation." Over this course of time, our nation’s Constitution was drafted, the men in attendance had many important orders of business to discuss, the first thing they did was issue a “gag order.” This decreed that nothing spoken at the convention would be published or discussed outside of the House. Madison later justified the order saying, “No Constitution would ever have been adopted by the Convention if the debates had been made public.” At the Convention, members in attendance were able to freely express their views, listen to one another’s arguments, and even change their minds without fear of immediate public scrutiny of their work. They started off with less pressing issues, but everyone knew that it was only a matter of time before they would need to discuss some incredibly important things. For instance, how the process for electing a president would …show more content…
go. Many ideas arose about this topic, perhaps the president should be elected by congress, there should be a direct popular vote, we should allow each state’s governor to decide, and so many others. Some ideas raised interest, like Madison’s original idea for the popular vote. However, many knew that this idea would not work because small states would have no influence in it. “Delegates realized that direct election, even if physically possible, meant disregarding geographical and political boundaries, which identified Americans as citizens of states with distinctive problems and interests.” Other ideas were shot down almost immediately, but every proposal in the end had too many flaws to ever be seen as successful.
Amidst all the discussions, delegates began to listen to the idea of creating presidential electors. Some were still hung up on the popular vote, many worried that the position of an elector was not very significant, and no respectable man would want the job. When someone suggested that the electors be appointed by the members of congress, it passed with substantial support. Although this idea did not escape without lots of criticism, once everyone realized it was the only option they had that would not only work, but still allow the people to have a say in the election, the framers began working out all the details. On July 19th, Oliver Ellsworth of Connecticut proposed that electors be appointed based on the population of a state. Any population with less than one hundred thousand people would only receive one elector. If the state had between one hundred thousand and three hundred thousand, they would be awarded two
electors. Finally, if the population exceeded three hundred thousand, the state would be allowed three electors. The process for having the electors vote proved to be a little tricky. At first, it was thought that all of the electors would meet in one location, but the framers decided that if the electors were to meet in their respective state capitals, it would be far more convenient. This option would also eliminate intrigue, combination, corruption, and allow a “free and pure election of the President of the United States made perpetual.” On September 17th, 1787 the Constitution was signed by the remaining thirty-nine delegates. After this, there wasn’t any turning back. The Electoral College would be the way the United States would elect our president. “Ultimately, the decision to vest the selection of the new president in an Electoral College was embraced by the delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787 not because it was the best way, but because it was better than the two alternatives: direct election, or appointment by congress.”
In the “Speech at the Virginia Convention” Patrick Henry tries to persuade colonists to fight a war against the English; he uses several main rhetorical strategies such as; parallelism, metaphor, and rhetorical questions.
The delegates, also known as the Framers of the Constitution, didn't exactly agree on how to create a new system of government, with two sides emerging both with contrary, but comparable motives on how to keep their country running efficiently. First there were the Federalists, who favored a stronger national g...
“Land of the free and the home of the brave.” This line has represented the United States for decades. These words were captured in The Star Spangled Banner by Francis Scott Key and since 1913, the United States has adopted The Star-Spangled Banner as its national anthem. We have used the Red, White, and Blue as one of our nation’s symbols. It has fifty stars, to represent the number of states we have in our Union. The military pledges its allegiance to the flag and the country which it represents at all costs. We are the land of the free and the home of the brave, and we are proud to show it.
The Electoral College started in 1789, even then controversy arose. Key factors supporting the Electoral College are representation in states with a small population, prioritizes the organization of campaigns, and provides equality throughout the United States. Candidates would campaign in the major populous regions, overlooking rural area. Virtually placing emphasis in the major cities, neglecting small towns leaving them obsolete. Keep America a two-party system intact in important, how could a candidate win the majority with four or five parties. The South would vote their candidate, California their candidate, East Coast their candidate, causing an enormous problem, avoiding a recount, saving time and
How many Americans recognize the man on the back of the one hundred dollar bill? Do you know who he is and why he is on the back of that bill? If you said George Washington then you are right! It is said that when one begins something that others will follow behind you and in George Washington's case that is correct. George Washington paved the way for many other presidents that followed after him up until the one we currently have today. Without our first president we would not have our current president. George Washington made huge contributions and achievements to our country that still stand today.
The delegates who had made their way to Philadelphia to attend the Constitutional Convention had dealt with several issues prior to their coming to Pennsylvania in 1787. Just four years prior to the Convention, The Paris Peace Treaty with Britain was agreed upon and signed with the assistance of Benjamin Franklin as America’s first ambassador. Only months, before the convention was underway in February of 1787, Shays rebellion had started and would cause for issues. This conflict however, would be one of the major reason why the convention would come together to look at the Articles of...
The Electoral College has been the favored method by the United States to elect the president for many years. When the College was first created in 1787 it was seen as an efficient and reliable way to vote the president into office. It has been more than 2 centuries since this method of electing was chosen, and many things have changed in U.S. society. The Electoral College is failing to keep up with these advancements in society and a new method must be chosen soon. Throughout the almost 2 and a half centuries since the beginning of the Electoral College there has been a large change in population.
The 1787 Constitutional Convention was paramount in unifying the states after the Revolutionary War. However, in order to do so, the convention had to compromise on many issues instead of addressing them with all due haste. This caused the convention to leave many issues unresolved. Most notably were the issues of slavery, race, secession, and states’ rights. Through the Civil War and the Reconstruction, these issues were resolved, and in the process the powers of the federal government were greatly expanded.
The electors in each state are equal to the number of representatives that state has in Congress resulting in at least three electors per state regardless of population (McKenzie 285). Each state has two votes to correspond to the senators representing that state in Congress, and then each state has one vote to correspond to the House representative that represents that state in Congress. Smaller states comprise a higher percentage of the total electoral votes than would a popular vote for the president in those states (Muller 1257). The Founders intended the Electoral College to protect overshadowing the small states’ interests of the larger populous states by allowing at least three representative votes rather than none at all, and the smaller states were not willing to give control of the election process to the larger states, which was similar to their fight for representation in Congress (Muller 1250). However, it ignores the people who voted against the winner, since once the result is determined at the state level; the losing voters no longer have any significance nationally (Wagner 579). Wagner also points to the fact that the winner-take-all system can lead to selecting the minority candidate over the majority vote, as in the George
The Constitutional Convention of 1787 gave birth to the Electoral College system. The Electoral College system can be briefly described as a system where voters are able to vote for candidates(electors) on election day. Electors then cast their vote for a candidate in their respective party. Our Founding Fathers described the electoral college system in Article
The delegates chosen to represent their states on May 25, 1787 at the Constitutional Convention could never have imagined the lasting impact they would have on the nation for over 200 years. These men from diverse upbringings and unique educational backgrounds came together to forge a nation. From the chaos and change of the old world, they were able to bring forth a new nation founded on liberty. It is hard to overrate the amount of foresight and knowledge needed by the Framers of the Constitution in constructing a document that would guide a new nation through times of peace and upheaval.
Originating in 1787, the Electoral College was created as the official body within American politics that elects the president and vice president. The decision of who will win is based off the vote totals in each state, and “the founding fathers established it in the constitution as a compromise between election of the president by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens.” (U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, “What is the Electoral College?”). During this time, the job of the Electoral College was to make peace between differing states and federal interest groups, provide popular participation in elections, give a vote to less populated states, and keep the president’s powers separate from Congress.
U.S. Department of State Office of the Historian “Constitutional Convention and Ratification, 1787–1789” (December 22, 2013)
Since the advent of human government, one of the principle fears held by the constituents of the government has always been to prevent any form of tyranny or abuse within it. Tyranny can be loosely described as one person or a group of people having total power in a government leading to the subjugation and oppression of people’s rights. Many new nations wish to eliminate any aspect of their government that may eventually lead to tyranny. The United States was no different in this respect; the framers of the Constitution longed to have no signs of tyranny in their government because they had gone to war with Britain for that very reason. In 1787, a group of fifty-five delegates came from throughout the states to meet in Philadelphia to discuss the problems with the current government. The existing Articles of Confederation posed a monumental problem for these individuals; they recognized that the central government was almost entirely powerless under these articles. Besides this, another problem was that the government lacked a court system or a chief executive. The central government did not possess the power to tax the states either. These problems warranted change which prompted these men to get together. This new constitution they were to create was supposed to guard the people against all kinds of tyranny whether it be of a few, the many or majority, or even a single individual. This seemed virtually insurmountable a task to accomplish but was ultimately achieved. The Constitution guards against tyranny by having a central and state government that cannot overrule or have more power over the other, establishing the separation of powers to keep anyone from abusing it, and having a sys...
The Constitutional Convention took place on May 25 to September 17, 1787 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.George Washington presided over the convention. The purpose of the Constitutional Convention was to decide the way that America were going to be governed. The Convention was officially called to revise the existing Articles of Confederation. The Constitutional Convention acknowledged the complications of the frail central government that prevailed under the Articles of Confederation.