Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary devices and language in animal farm essays
Literary devices and language in animal farm essays
What are the themes in Animal Farm
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literary devices and language in animal farm essays
Question 1. – Persuasive prose
The extract taken from the book Animal Farm is a very persuasive and convincing piece of writing because it portrays what could really go through an animal’s mind while humans are blind fully torturing them. I am going to have a look at a specific piece of writing from this novel, analyzing the content in this specific paragraph as a persuasive text.
This extract is about animals having a conversation. The conversation is started by who may seem like the “alpha animal” just by the phrase “I do not think, comrades, that I shall be with you for many months longer…” This phrase also infers that he is very wise and possibly the oldest as it is suggested that he may die soon. This paragraph is about him explaining
…show more content…
“No animal in England is free.” emphasizes the brutality that those animals are feeling although there will still be wild animals that are indeed free, for them it feels like there life is basically over as soon as it has began. “…so much food as will keep the breath in our bodies” is also a metaphor because you don’t really keep breath in your bodies, it is just trying to emphasize that they are not fed nearly enough before they are worked “to the last atom of [their] strength” which could also be seen as a …show more content…
The words may be over exaggerated but that’s the whole point, to make the reader feel the animals pain, make them feel what it would be like having to live in their shoes. This piece of writing is trying to persuade the reader to stop and think about animal cruelty and what is truly happening to the animals out there. It is trying to persuade the reader to stand up for what is right.
This all shows that this is a very persuasive piece of writing, trying to persuade the reader to agree with what is being said. It gives the reader in great detail of what could possibly be going through an animals mind while being blind fully tortured. The animals don’t have a say and cannot do anything about it so therefore it would be up to the people to try and make a difference so that is what this specific persuasive piece of writing is trying to
This shows how humans being cruel to those innocent animals, killing them for their own
...n be considered suffering. Many people exclude animals because they cannot speak or reason. Jeremy Bentham argues that animals can obviously suffer because they feel pain. Enzo, the dog narrating the book, feels endless pain and suffering. He feels just as much as humans do, if not more. When Enzo passes away in the end, it is obvious that he feels pain. Having the book be told through the eyes of a dog, even if it is fiction, really puts life in perspective.
He discusses "animals subjected every year to agonizing research center experiments"(Rifkin) and "raised under the most heartless conditions." He additionally cites that animals are "for butcher and human utilization." These words, words like subjected, coldhearted, and butcher have staggeringly negative meanings and infer thoughts of ruthlessness and viciousness. On the off chance that we take after Rifkin 's reasoning, and animals resemble individuals, and we butcher (for eating no less) and place needles in their eyes in a lab- - that is essentially unsatisfactory. This is the thing that Rifkin need us to get it. For Rifkin, this is the present circumstance however it doesn 't need to be. On the off chance that people comprehend that animals are particularly similar to us, we will need them to be treated with the same admiration and poise. Right now, we are not doing this. However, we can.
At the beginning of George Orwell’s Animal Farm, an aging pig named Old Major gives a speech to the rest of the animals. In his speech, he explains to them how awful their lives are in order to shows them that the Rebellion against Man, their one true enemy, will come soon. Old Major appeals to the animal’s emotions by using rhetorical questions and fear to effectively persuade the animals of the coming Rebellion.
The introduction page of the website touches base with rhetorical appeal of pathos with unpleasant features meant to effect the reader's emotions. For instance, the introduction page has pictures of some criminals who kill many dolphins, and the sea turned red because there is blood-stained water everywhere with the caption, ''Stop slaughter''. This is a good way to make the reader feel melancholic for what happens in real life. Then they will convince the readers to donate to them to encourage stopping killing animals. When the reader sees these kinds of pictures, they are going to be motivated to support the Sea Shepherds. In this way, the Sea Shepherds appeal to the readers' emotions to help them stop the extinction of sea animals.
In June Robison’s article,”Frosty’s story illustrates scope of animal cruelty”, she argues that animal cruelty is wrong and attempts to persuade the reader to feel sympathy for animals. Animal cruelty is indeed wrong and it must stop. The author made some strong points in her editorial; however, she left out several substantial sources. This evaluation will review Robison’s article and state the main points.
...inder of the cost of our lifestyle, for no one can live a totally cruelty free life. Cruelty will happen whether we wish it to or not—even people who abstain from animal sourced or tested foods and products will inevitably cause some cruelty by simply going about innocent daily life. For example, nearly any driver will eventually hit some animal no matter how hard they try to avoid it. The best one can do is make an honest effort to reduce his or her own impact on other creatures, whether that be by excluding animal products from their diet or seeking out foods from humane farms. Animal narratives are unique in their ability to allow the reader to experience these stories vicariously through the perspective of the animal, encouraging reflection and introspection on how humans treat others, and accordingly promoting empathy towards humankind’s fellow earthlings.
Michelle Carr uses the rhetorical mode of argumentation for the purpose of persuasion in her article, “The Reality of Zoos.” Carr focuses on the issue of the imprisonment and maltreatment of zoo animals in her article. She effectively presents her points by using the persuasive methods of pathos and logos. Carr establishes an emotional connection with the reader by recalling an occasion she noticed how unhappy zoo animals were during a childhood memory. Carr also uses logic and reasoning; she appeals to the reader by using facts and figures about the suffering zoo animals experience, for instance, the animals developing “zoochosis” and the animals being forcibly inseminated for money-making purposes. By establishing an emotional connection
Throughout Animal Farm, George Orwell stresses the importance of thinking for oneself and always questioning the authority, especially in the face of the myriads of propaganda tactics that are constantly used. In this modern day and age, propaganda techniques continue to flourish amongst the governments of the world, ensuring that one must always be on their guard against tactics such as revisionist history, black-white fallacy, and scapegoating. Only those who do not fear to question can ever be truly free to think their own thoughts.
Regan begins the essay by stating that " Not a few of people regard the animal rights position as extreme, calling, as it does, for the abolition of certain well-entrenched social practices rather than for their “humane” reform " ( Regan 619 ) . The writer also compares animal rights with humans based on extreme moral positions, such as rape, child pornography and racial discrimination, claiming that “. . . when an injustice is absolute, as is true of each of the example just cited, then one must oppose it absolute. It is not reformed, more humane child pornography than an enlightened ethic calls for: it is abolition that is required “(Regan 620). The writing is totally against hunting animals for sport, dressing in animal skins, and breeding of animals for slaughter. In his view any animal sacrifice is no different from a crime perpetuated a human being. Sacrifice any animal should stimulate the same emotional reaction that a crime a human being. This belief is considered by many as a vision "extremist” of animal rights and generally not widely accepted.
Should animals have to go through pain and suffering? Should they have to go without food and/or water? The answer is no. Animal abuse happens everyday and it happens because people are barbarous or because they don’t know how to take the best care of an animal that they have. Whatever the reason it’s still not right and will never be okay. This paper will cover a brief history of animal abuse, the statistics, the signs of animal abuse, and what can be done to stop animal abuse. Animal abuse needs to end for the animals that can’t speak for themselves.
“There can be many reason for animal cruelty, like any other form of violence, is often committed by a person who feels powerless, unnoticed, or under control of others. Some who are cruel to animals copy acts what they have seen or that have been done to them, others see harming an animal as a safe way to get revenge against--or threaten-- someone who cares about that animal”. (“Animal… Statistics”) Concerns towards abusing animals have gone up in the past. Although there are not many cases on animal abuse, many have occurred. Abusers are charged with Criminal Animal Abuse and then sentenced to life in prison. Some animals that are physically abused are sometimes rescued by Animal Control, and are taken it to an animal shelter. However, many shelters have not had the space to keep the animals so the workers would have to put them down (Carol Roach). Researchers have shown that the main animals getting abused are dogs, chickens, horses, and livestock (“Animal...
The purpose of the argument was from an informational appeal coming from Vergan Organization. This Organization basically uses (Ethos) Information using statistics and (logos) by the stance of the argument. Appealing to emotion causes the reader to feel sympathetic for the audience who consumes a great amount of meat. The main focus of this goal is to prevent further slaughter of animals in factory farms and educate the populous on the understand of cruelty with the visualization of images. A chief Counsel, Jonathan Lovvorn implements that “many of the nation's most routine animal farming practices would be illegal if perpetrated against cats and dogs”.“Even If You Like Meat” basically is an unanswered question arising the argument of this
Although the animals follow a gradual decline, Animal Farm is written in a friendly style with a matter-of-fact tone. Orwell’s characterisation connects the reader emotionally to the characters through simplistic descriptions which draw upon sympathy when labelled as “feeble” (Orwell, Animal Farm, 1945). Alongside this simplistic style, Orwell’s matter-of-face tone reflects the characters inability to respond to events and depicts the severity of the outcome. Boxer, often used as a figure for sympathy due to his hard work, is taken away from the farm and “rapidly disappears down the road” (Orwell, Animal Farm, 1945) while the others watch on in despair. This becomes a pinnacle moment in the narrative and contrasts with the friendly style Orwell had been using to heighten the readers emotional engagement. Although directed towards a younger audience, Orwell ensures that his views are not altered and finds methods within his work to convey the lies he wishes to expose more
All in all, emotional pain, physical pain, or the extent of the abuse, is mistreatment towards any animal and should not be tolerated but instead be brought awareness to. It is our job to be the voice for the creatures who cannot speak up for themselves. Followed by the empathy of humans, especially that of children, I believe that by bringing awareness to this social injustice will result in a more thoughtful and compassionate community who will have the power and responsibility to make choices in the best interest of animals. It will give the community a sense of pride to stand up for something so important to society. Finally, the actions that we can take in order to bring about the awareness of animal cruelty will have a significance to ensuring the safety of pets and other animals across the globe.