Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Legal and ethical issues of abortion
Abortion : the fight for abortion
Issues associated with abortion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Should abortion be restricted? According to, Marco Rubio 70 -75 percent of people believe there should be some sort of restraints to be able to abort their pregnancy. Hardly anybody is pro-abortion. That said there are people that are pro-choice. While some people think that pro-abortion and pro-choice are the same, they are not. Pro-choice people believe that people have the right to choose, but they do not necessarily like abortion. Could there be a common ground for pro-life and pro-choice? There is room for compromise, but first there needs to be firm data about when the life of the baby actually begins. This needs to be proven universally and there will never be compromise unless it is medically necessary to have an abortion. Both sides …show more content…
The biggest question that needs to be asked according to Marco Rubio is how to resolve the conflict of right to choose and right to live – two fundamental rights – that are in conflict with each other. Marco Rubio acknowledged, “The fact of the matter is that we as a society, as a nation, from a political realm, have always understood that my rights, as important as they may be, end where other people’s rights begin.” The women’s right to choose ends when she is choosing to end the life of an innocent person. This person gets the right to live. The woman’s rights end where the baby’s rights begin. There have been multiple court cases for abortions. The two most famous cases are Roe vs. Wade and Stenberg vs. Carhart. In the Roe vs. Wade case went in favor of Roe. This said that women have the right to terminate a pregnancy before signs of viability. Viability is such a vague term. Viability is when someone can sustain on their own. As Marco Rubio pointed out some nineteen-year old’s aren’t viable. There needs to be universal proof of when life starts in order for this case to have a point. The Stenberg vs. Carhart case overturned a Nebraska law on partial birth abortion. This law allowed a partial birth then the baby would be killed by the doctor. When the court overturned the law there were critics, but there were also people that agreed with the court. Society has to decide which right is more important, the right to choose or the right to
... There has been much debate not only on freedom of speech and where to draw the line, but also whether or not abortions should be allowed. Abortions cause a social and economic concern, and there is a significant value based on the decision.
For starters, Mr. Hickerson is it really fair to throw out an example of abortion that is probably the most rare case? ("What about the 14-year old girl who gets raped by her father…") Under Governor Bush's pro-life stance, only extreme cases such as rape, incest and mother endangerment would be considered for an abortion. From the way I see it, there are two qualifiers for an abortion right there; rape and incest. Governor Bush supports parental notification and banning use of taxpayer's funds to proceed with an abortion. Abortion is probably the most difficult issue that politicians will have to ever deal with. Nobody seems really sure of what the answer is, and every situation seems to warrant a different approach, but next time you try to attack a person's view on an issue such as abortion, Mr. Hickerson, I urge you to do some research.
The conservative argument asserts that every person has a right to life. The foetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what happens in and to her body. But surely a person’s right to life is stronger than the mother’s right to decide what shall happen to her body, and so outweigh it. So the foetus may not be killed and an abortion may not be performed (Thomson, 1971)
One of the most debatable topics even in today’s society is the right to abortion. Some people believe that life starts at conception and that even an unborn child deserves the same legal protections as an adult. Pro-life advocates argue that ending its life is similar to murder (POLS210, n.d.). Mean while, others also known as Pro-Choice believe it begins at birth and that with laws that restrict abortion it gets in the way with the right of a woman to make a decision of what is in her own best interest (U.S. History, n.d.).
Is there some common ground which both the pro-choice proponents and the pro-life proponents would find palatable? Presently, the situation in the United States, nearly three decades after abortion became legal throughout the nation, seems to be at an impasse. Canada, presented with abortion (now on demand) throughout that nation four years earlier, has a similar situation. It is obvious that the issue of abortion will not just evaporate or go away. So where can both sides find a common ground for overcoming this seeming impasse?
Should abortion be legal? This debate is a strong issue in the U.S. Many people are for it, and many are against it. However, it seems people have extreme viewpoints on the issue. It is either all or nothing. The moderate position on abortion is it should be legal only under certain circumstances. According to the essay "Three positions on abortion" by Thomas Shannon and Nicholas Kockler, the moderate position would limit a consideration on the health of the fetus, risks to the life of mother, rape and incest. It also considered as moral position, or a compromise between the pro-choice movement and pro-life movement. The moderate position accepts both of the pro-choice and pro-life. In Shannon and Kocklers' essay says "This position sees both the fetus and the woman as having rights and entitlements and recognizes that attempts to resolve such conflicts of rights will entail suffering and pain"(82). This means the fetus has a right to life and the mother has a right to absolute control over her body.
In America, one of the most controversial topics today is abortion. The issue sparks heated debates between people who are pro-life and those who are pro-choice. While pro-life main argument is that abortion unjustly takes away the life
Abortion is a highly debatable subject that splits people into one of two categories; pro-choice or pro-life. People that support a pro choice feel that women should have the right to either keep or terminate their pregnancy. For them not being able to have that right is unconstitutional and results in women thinking that they have no control over their reproductive lives. On the other hand, those who are pro-life feel that abortion is a right that should never be exercised because the practice of abortion is murder of an innocent life. Most of this debate stems from the difference in the definition of life between the two groups. Pro-lifers believe that life starts at conception whereas pro-choicers believe that life does not begin until birth. Since 1973, when abortion was declared legal in the case Roe vs. Wade, the debate has intensified and has become a popular topic in all arenas from the classroom to the national presidential debates (Misra and Panigrahi, 1998).
Abortion is one of the most controversial issues in the United States today. According to oxford dictionary, abortion is the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, most often performed during the first 28 weeks. The two factions involved in this controversy are poles apart in their views on abortion: where as the pro-choice movement contends that a woman’s right to abortion is absolute, the pro-life movement asserts that a fetus’s right to life is indisputable. The argument has become very pronounced since the U.S Supreme Court ruling in the year 1973 in Roe V. Wade, which legalized abortion. According to the ruling, a woman’s right to abortion outweighed the rights of a nonviable fetus and prohibited the State interference. In addition to the fact that pro-choicers have always praised Roe for recognizing that a woman’s right to control her body is more important than a fetus’s right to life, this idea is also supported by different organizations such as Alan Guttmatcher Institute (AGI) whose mission is “to protect the reproductive choices of all women and men in the United States and throughout the world.” (Par 1) While some people believe that abortion is immoral others argue that it is a woman’s right to have full control of her body.
“In contemporary American political debate, usually treated as conflicts between rival interpretations of individual rights. Those who favor abortion most often invoke the "right to choose" of the woman who has conceived the fetus. Those who oppose abortion focus on the "right to life" of the fetus.” (Muller, 1997: 27-28)
Abortion has been a controversial topic in the U.S ever since it became legal in 1973 after the Roe v. Wade case. Abortion is defined as the, “the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, most often performed during the first 28 weeks of pregnancy.” Pro-life supporters believe that abortion is unethical and argue that it is the mother’s responsibility to own up to her actions. They also argue that there is always the option of adoption, and that abortion could be very dangerous. I am pro-life and believe that the government doesn’t have the right to decide what a woman can or can’t do with her body.
Abortion is one of America’s most controversial subjects. The participants in this debate have fixed beliefs on the matter at hand. On one side of the debate are people who believe in pro- choice. They argue that choice of a woman is more important than an unborn fetus. They point out that an unborn child is not on the same level of importance as the mother. Also, the pro-life group declares that choice is the sole purpose behind their argument. They believe that if a woman cannot chose to abolish a pregnancy, then she looses one of her basic human rights. The other side of the debate is the pro-life group. Their main concern is that the fetus is a person; therefore, having the same human rights as the mother. As a result, when states pass laws that enable abortions, these states are legalizing murder. When considering an individual’s ethics and values, killing is morally wrong. Therefore, the termination of unborn children is wrong, as well. Abortion, the unethical expulsion of an embryo or fetus, in order to purposely end a pregnancy, should be forbidden because human life begins at conception, economics is not a justification for abortion, and an unwanted child does not justify abortion.
Abortion is the expulsion of an embryo or fetus from the uterus. This can be done naturally and spontaneously, also known as a miscarriage, or induced medically. It’s no secret that abortion has become a major debate over the past few years as well. Depending on the person some seem to be okay with this process and some are completely against it. There has been a decrease in abortion rates because some states have taken it as far as restricting access to abortion but also because there has been an overall decline in pregnancy rates. The link I provided will give an explanation for some reasons of why abortion should be illegal. To give some examples listed in the article; one states that it’s killing a child, another gives the option of adoption,
One of the most controversial issues in this day and age is the stance people take on abortion. The two main positions that people take are either of pro-choice or pro-life; both sides, although polar opposites, tend to refer to both the issue of morality and logical rationale. The pro-life side of the debate believes that abortion is an utterly immoral practice that should be abolished. On the contrary, abortion should remain a legal procedure because it is a reproductive right; its eradication would not only take away the pregnant person’s autonomy, but would also put more children in financially unstable homes and the adoption system, and would cause an increase in potentially fatal, unsafe abortions.
Women should have the right to decide whether or not they would like to have an abortion. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines abortion as; “the termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, resulting in, or closely followed by the death of the embryo or fetus.” The idea of a woman’s right to have an abortion being taken away is merely incomprehensible.