Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Psychology 1001
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Psychology 1001
Death today is accompanied by extra baggage. The family and friends of those who passed now must deal with the consequences of grieving on social media, most specifically Facebook. The bereaved should not use Facebook to express grief. Individuals who know the deceased should refrain from communication with other grievers or the deceased himself. Facebook creates unnecessary problems such as having a hard time moving on, extra hardships for the bereaved, devaluation of the deceased’s worth, and conflict between grievers. Online grief makes it difficult to create a reality where one must continue day-to-day grieving. Facebook is the main source for online grieving because it offers a space for two types of grief. It displays loss-oriented grief, …show more content…
Online grief affects the family in two specific ways: when strangers publicly grieve and when false information is spread on Facebook. When strangers bombard the family/loved ones on Facebook, it makes grieving for the family more difficult. Alec D, a participant in the Wandel study, said when he was checking in on a deceased friend’s Facebook, “I noticed the people that were really close to her hadn’t posted anything. This may make me sound like a bad person, but my feeling is that if those that loved her didn’t write things on her wall, why do other people? You don’t need a Facebook page to remember someone in your heart” (Wandel, 2009). When strangers post on Facebook of the deceased, the family get overwhelmed with the large number of people who are grieving over their loved one. They might have not even known that their loved one knew all the people posting, which causes them to get defensive about their own personal relationship with the deceased. They may feel obligated to thank each person who posted on the deceased’s …show more content…
Overshadowing the deceased comes from many sources, but specifically from Facebook amenities such as “likes”. The study by Marwick and Ellison describes the situation where “likes” are compared with the quantity, not necessarily quality, of love for the deceased. The example comes from the Beth and Cord Memorial Page. Someone posted on the page saying “I just noticed there are over 3,300 people who like this page- that speaks volumes about how many hearts Beth and Cord have touched.” A more extreme example comes from a post on the Bethany Harlen Memorial pag:; “I’m not going to bed until this page gets 1,000 likes!” (Marwick and Ellison, 2012). Although many people “like” the page, likes do not correlate with the quality of love people had for the deceased. The deceased may have only had a small family and friend circle, but was loved immensely by this circle. Having 1,000 or more likes does not accurately describe the quality of love, therefore masking the deceased’s true
The audience can empathize easily with Sue and the death of her youngest and this allows the audience to understand the usefulness of Facebook “friends”; however, Dailey’s shift to present the other side of the argument with Bugeja’s forward truth of the flaws in online social networks. Bugeja convinces the reader that reality provides a more intimate level of support that the virtual world can never offer. Dailey could have ended the article on a stronger note that Facebook “friends” only serves as an additive to friendships to reality. In reference to Henry Adams infamous quote, Facebook “friends” cannot be made but built from existing
She recalls a disagreement that took place on Facebook between her and a close friend over a few comments placed on her timeline. Wortham describes how she felt embarrassed over the pointless argument. She discloses “I’m the first one to confess my undying love of the Web’s rich culture and community, which is deeply embedded in my life. But that feud with a friend forced me to consider that the lens of the Web might be warping my perspective and damaging some important relationships” (171). Introducing her personal feelings and perspective of how she feels Facebook is taking over her own emotional response online weakens her argument. Wortham reasons that others feel the same as she does. She says, “This has alarmed some people, convincing them that it’s time to pull the plug and forgo the service altogether” (171). Wortham does not bring in other testimonies of those who feel the same as she does, therefore the readers are only introduced to her personal
In “Friends with Benefits: Do Facebook Fiends Provide The Same Support As Those in Real Life?”, Kate Dailey argues about whether the Facebook social scene could replace that of real life or it just mimics the likely course of friendship if people would still be close. The narrative begins with Dailey sharing an anecdote about a personal situation concerning a friend who just went through a hard time, the nonchalant friendship which the essay gravitates towards. While realizing the tragic news, her argument comes into place: is Facebook a great place to spread negative news or is it unable to beat the warmth in people’s physical reaction?.
“In most human society's death is an extremely important cultural and social phenomenon, sometimes more important than birth” (Ohnuki-Tierney, Angrosino, & Daar et al. 1994). In the United States of America, when a body dies it is cherished, mourned over, and given respect by the ones that knew the person. It is sent to the morgue and from there the family decides how the body should be buried or cremated based on...
As technology progress, humans evolve to the advanced technology and enhance our lives via technology. We connect to our families, friends and others through social media such as Facebook. Social media takes up a huge part in our lives. Social media infest us with information that are relevant and irrelevant to us. Marry Marrow wrote, “It was Facebook that changed the face of e-communication; in fact, it was the first electronic social media” (para 1). She assumes that Facebook is playing a huge role in electronic communication. In the journalist Maria Konnikova, “How Facebook makes us unhappy?”, Konnikova divulges many aspects of people on social media through researching and experience, and finds how social makes us unhappy. I agree with Konnikova findings after reading her article. In addition, she concludes that if you are engaged, active, and creative you will not sorrowful on Social media, however if you are passively browsing and defuse to engage, you
“The Facebook Sonnet” by Sherman Alexie brings up ideas and controversy over social media because it decreases face-to-face communication. Though Facebook allows people to contact old and new friends, it renders away from the traditional social interaction. Online, people are easily connected by one simple click. From liking one’s status to posting multiple pictures, Facebook demands so much attention that it’s easy for users to get attach. They get caught up in all the online aspect of their lives that they fail to appreciate real life relationships and experiences.
The loss of a loved one and the process of grief is one of the most traumatic experiences. It breaks down and pushes past the barriers of society, religion, and culture. It is one of the world’s great mysteries that are unavoidable and misunderstood. As universal as it is, grief often is experienced on a personal/individual level and the impact it takes weighs heavily on the psychological functioning of many. Distress comes not only to the person who lost something or someone, but also families, friends and communities. Everyone is affected by grief. Societies have developed a range of rituals and customs to enable grief support. The customs vary throughout cultures, religions and ethnicities. Some mourn through Funeral services (parlors) while others may bury right away and mourn Shiva in the comfort of their own homes. Some have burials, others prefer cremation. Eulogies, obituaries, biographies, there are multitudes of ways to celebrate and spread the news of the loss of a loved one and the celebration of life. There are also clinical and non-clinical forms of grief management. In recent years studies have shown that there has been a significant and fast growing addition to these historic rituals. The internet has supported new formations for the expression of grief. It provides a new found path to further share bereavement through social and occupational tools.
Social media is like a virus, you can’t stop people from going online. Depression itself has no remedy, people just have to balance it by therapy and medication. There is no solution to the growing rates of social media connecting to depression, but there has been many studies that proves it to be true. Counseling psychologist, Katey Baruth claims that “participants who did not believe their friendships were of great quality or value on social media sites were also found to be at much greater risk for the development of depressive symptoms”. She explains how social media users believes that social interactions are not valuable which is likely for them to experience the depressive symptoms. It goes back to personal perception, people can choose to use social media to connect with others or they can put themselves down. Of course, many older generations will probably disagree with this assertion that people can’t just choose how they feel. Older generations will blame social media itself, how everything is complicated because it’s easier to find resources and it decreases our social interaction. Marche mentions Moira Burke, a graduate student at the Human-Computer Institute at Carnegie Mellon who studied Facebook users, she believes that, “People whose friends write to them semi-publicly on Facebook experience decreases in loneliness… [Versus] scanning your friends’ status updates and updating the world on your own activities via your wall… correlates to feelings of disconnectedness”. She clarifies that choosing how to communicate online can affect the individual’s mood. It’s a tool for people to choose for socializing or just expressing their
This poem dramatizes the conflict between reality and our own world of social media. “The Facebook Sonnet” by Sherman Alexie illustrates how not just Facebook, but all of social media has isolated society in efforts to bring them together. The author talks about how the internet does not let people live out reality when they are stuck behind a screen. The author makes this clear when he states “For God become public domain. /Let Church.com become our church” (11-12). The speaker’s true meaning lies with the sarcastic tone behind every line. He focusses on how social media lets us grasp onto the past by using terms and phrases such as “endless high school reunion” (1) and “Let’s exhume, resume, and extend /Childhood” (7-8).
In her essay, Butler asks, “What makes for a grievable life (Butler 114)?” With this question, Butler is suggesting that, according to society, not all lives are grievable. Although in her essay, Butler’s definition of grief and having a grievable life extends beyond death, death can be used to show how people are valued differently. For example, take a celebrity. Society places great value on celebrities. If a celebrity dies, their death is mourned with extravagant memorials and most of society mourns. However, take someone that society does not place much value on, such as a homeless person or an unborn baby. If a homeless person dies or an unborn baby is aborted, most of society is not bothered in the least and does not even bat an
In the 2015 edition of Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, Terri Chan talks about , “Facebook and it’s Effect on Users Empathic
and family, and also “meet like-minded people” ( Metz, par. 1). In some cases, business people such as Ron West, claim that he uses Facebook “to become acquainted with new customers”( par. 8). Yes, these types of websites are great tools to stay in touch with old classmatesand faraway family members. It is a great source of communication, but there is always a con to every pro. Even though users are connecting with others, users of social networks never know exact...
Death is something that many people have a hard concept grasping. The fact that a loved
In Betty White’s opening monologue to Saturday Night Live, she said, “I didn’t know what Facebook was, and now that I do know what it is, I have to say, it sounds like a huge waste of time. I would never say the people on it are losers, but that’s only because I’m polite.” Originally intended for the use of students at Harvard University in 2004, Facebook grew exponentially to be an online phenomenon in the years following. In 2006, it became accessible to anyone and everyone with internet connection. Aside from the advantages that give the site its popularity, creating a profile comes with a number of significant disadvantages inherit to online social networks. What do more than 500 million active users use their Facebook for? Communicating with long distance friends and spreading awareness of causes are common responses. Unfortunately, Facebook has it flaws, from limiting the privacy of relationships to creating a form of almost unmanageable bullying, making one reconsider their involvement and think, “do I really want my Facebook account?”
A person’s life is reflected on Facebook. Because so much of someone’s life is on Facebook, anyone can have a sense of what is going on in their life. This is beneficial for parents away from their children in college or just away from the nest. A visual image is more attractive than reading a lengthy blog about an individual's day. With Facebook someone can post albums at a time and can share a special event that just recently occurred. Instant messaging has improved the speed that users can communicate with each other. If they see that their friend is online all that needs to be done is a message with the word “Hey.” Facebook allows for users to connect with friends time zones away.