Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The consequences of zoos for animals
The consequences of zoos for animals
The zoo roles in conservation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The consequences of zoos for animals
Topic 1 The National Zoo should be closed and the animals should be released into their natural habitat.
Context: The National Zoo keeps exotic animals in captivity because of educational purposes and claims they are protecting and conserving endangered species. Long time ago, we saw news about the threat that animals are given there. For instance, in a timeframe of 10 years many animals have died in different circumstances, such as negligence, inadequate climate, sickness, etc.
Statement of our view: The National Zoo is incapable to protect the animals and it promotes to keep exotic animals in captivity affirming they look after them.
Supporting reasons:
First reason: The National Zoo has not the conditions necessaries to look after exotic
…show more content…
In many years, graffiti has been considered as vandalism but many local artists make the effort to change that image.
Statement of our view:
Graffiti is a form of modern art and many people appreciate the work that many talented artists make in Los Angeles downtown. At the same time, they promote to avoid drugs and gangs.
Supporting reasons:
First reason: Artists can express a broad range of feelings, emotions and even social and politics aspects in their murals. It is the only way some people communicate dissenting messages to the public without being censured. Evidence:
Second reason: Distinction between simple tags and more complicated pieces can make a big difference and should be considered as art because it requires planning, imagination, color composition, and the most important thing: they transmit a message to the public.
Evidence: There is a tour in Los Angeles, “The Dowtown Graffiti and Mural Tour” and it is organized by The Dejavita Art Boutique in which people make a walk to see many spots and murals made by local street artists and it costs $12.00 USD per person. People enjoy this trip and take pictures of the most beautiful pieces in LA
Have you ever seen an animal sitting in a cage all alone with nothing to do. Well, zoos are trying to change that fact. They will allow the animals to live in an environment that is like their home. Many people don't realize this, but zoo are keeping and breeding these animals because they would not survive in the wild alone. In the three passages, ¨The Stripes Will Survive,¨ ¨The Zood Go Wild from No More Dodos,¨ ¨Our Beautiful Macaws and Why They Need Enrichment.¨ All of these articles present one claim, that is that the role of zoos is no longer to keep animal, but to protect them.
Considering the many challenges animals face in the wild, it is understandable that people may be eager to support zoos and may feel that they are protective facilities necessary for animal life. In the article “ Zoos Are Not Prisons. They Improve the Lives of Animals”, Author Robin Ganzert argues that Zoos are ethical institutions that enrich the lives of animals and ultimately protect them. Statistics have shown that animals held in captivity have limited utilitarian function resulting in cramped quarters, poor diets, depression, and early death for the animals thus, proving that Zoos are not ethical institutions that support and better the lives of animals as author Robin Ganzert stated (Cokal 491). Ganzert exposes the false premise in stating
The first point of view from this issue is the side that believes humans, zoos and other facilities should be allowed to keep animals. The places that captivate animals believe that they are doing a favor to the creatures. They believe that they are saving them from being killed by humans. They say that if they would not have taken in these animals they would have died in the wild. They say they’re giving them a fresh new start and a place to live without worry. For example, in this article they state that zoos try and h...
Cope, Doris L. Week 2 Environmental Ethics Essays 1 Zoos are immoral because they capture wild animals from their native homelands, transport them to strange lands, and hold them captive for human amusement and entertainment for long periods of time while largely ignoring their intrinsic right. The only way zoos can possibly be moral is if zoos really put the interests of the animals first and if zoos found ways for us to observe them. (Sanger 2014). In response to the philosophically based animal rights movement of the 1980s, The Zoological Society of San Diego had to admit that concerns for humane treatment and quality of life within zoological institutions mirrored the attitudes of society toward human-animal relationships…and
There are many places where people can go to see live animals such as aquariums, zoos, and safari parks. A pleasant way to define a Zoo is to call it “an establishment that maintains a collection of wild animals”. (Google def) Another way to say that is a facility in which animals are “enclosed in cages for public exhibition”. I believe zoos are ethical; however, changes need to be made to eliminate problems I have discovered. In this argumentative essay, I will be arguing the ethics of zoos and certain problems that need to be addressed that people are not aware of. Zoos are great places to take the family out for the day to have entertainment; however, problems such as captive breeding, length of life, and animal stress need to improve.
"Do We Need Zoos?" : An All Creatures Animal Rights Article. N.p., n.d. Web. 03 May 2015.
The beauty of art is that everyone has a different opinion of what they consider art. A highly debated topic is if graffiti can be considered art. Technically speaking, it is usually vandalism but people believe it is also art. Although it is in fact vandalism, graffiti is still art because it is self-expression of the individual and can even convey powerful messages that can reach out and affect the everyday person.
No matter what the argument, wild animals are not meant to be kept in a small artificially stimulated environment all their life. The argument of zoos saving animals from extinction will put forward the reasoning on why a stimulated environment and zoos in general are not beneficial to these creatures. While Zoos are a popular source of entrainment today often people forget that our entertainment is at the expense of some beautiful creatures, who are not enjoying the Zoo experience as much as the
Zoos have the worst conditions for the animals. The cages are described as having feces in the water and having non real habitats. The animals are explained to not like the conditions that they live in. They have to endure these poor conditions just to be looked at for the people’s amusement.
Have you ever seen a beautiful tiger pace back and forth in its cage? It’s because there not supposed to be caged up it's not healthy for them mentally and physically. In the past year’s many animals have died from being in zoos. You may think the animals are being taken care of in the zoos but that’s not always the case. In my research, you will discover the horrifying facts about how they treat the zoo animals from around the world.
Zoos are an unsuitable environment for wild animals and should, therefore, be abolished. Firstly, zoo animals are kept in a very confined area compared with their vast natural habitat. Secondly, breeding programmes are far less successful than zoos claim. Thirdly, zoo animals are exposed to many diseases and other dangers.
Zoos have been around for quite some time; however not all the animals are being treated with the care they deserve. They should not be taken from their friends and family in the wild and be forced to live in cement cages for the rest of their lives. Some zoos in the world do go above and beyond to make sure their animals are satisfied, but something needs to change with those zoos who are only meeting the governmental requirements. There are animals around the world living in captivity that are starving, suffering, spending their days pacing, and all alone. Zoos that do not reach the space, care and social requirements for animals are not ethical and should not be allowed to continue forcing these animals to suffer.
The animals should not have to stay inside of these cruel zoos away from their natural habitat. There shouldn’t be zoos because zoo enclosures aren’t right for animals, keeping animals in spaces can make them angry, and zoos teach that humans control nature. The first reason is a zoo enclosure is not the right place for an animal. The animals that are being kept in some of these
The use of zoos and captive breeding does nothing to address these serious problems. Instead, it puts more than 7,000 animal species in jeopardy of extinction. In fact, if the millions of dollars used on the redesigning of enclosures that do nothing to improve animal welfare, such as the building of amusement rides and statues or creation of concession stands and gift shops went towards habitat-preservation projects, there would be more animals to see in the
Animals are confined in zoos for the sake of human entertainment, as well as constantly suffering from the lack of care, being abused, and even being killed for nonsensical reasons. Executive director Dr. Lesley