Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Power greed and ambition in julius caesar shakespeare
Power greed and ambition in julius caesar shakespeare
Analysis of Julius Caesar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Natalie Anne Vargas Vargas 1
Mr. Lyman
English II
20 November 2013
The Plan
In Shakespeare's, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony's persistence, anger towards the conspirators, and powerful words was why the crowd changed its mind so quickly. His persistence started as he imposed himself to Brutus to let him speak in the funeral. Antony finally accepted with the condition that he would speak at the pulpit after Brutus' speech. He also agreed that he should not speak bad of the conspirators. Antony agreed to these terms and patiently waited his turn to speak after Brutus.
The speeches given by both Brutus and Mark Antony in William Shakespeare’s, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar are very persuasive to the audience. Mark Antony delivers a strong funeral oration in Caesar's honor. Antony was a trusted friend of Caesar and he manipulated the conspirators in thinking that he was fine with their deed. Antony uses a kind of mode of persuasion in order to convince the audience that Caesar is worthy kind of man. Antony then must use pathos in order to call the emotion of the audience. He must have to understand the nature of the audience to successfully induce his audience that Caesar really was not an ambitious man. After Brutus's speech ended it was Antony’s turn but Brutus made a big mistake by leaving as Antony started his speech. Antony starts his speech by saying, "friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears! I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him" (3. 2. 70). He immediately starts using rhetoric and calculated dramatic words to incite the crowd into a frenzy.
...
... middle of paper ...
...ulsion and hate. Antony's dramatic speech won the crowd over and resulted in a downfall.
In conclusion, Antony is a far more condescending speaker compared to Brutus in William Shakespeare’s, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Antony was able to persuade the audience into feeling sorrow toward Caesar and anger toward Brutus. Antony's speech carries the pieces of emotion and intellect making it an overall more powerful speech than Brutus. All Antony ever wished for and wanted was to win over the crowd. On the other hand, Brutus does not try to persuade the crowd but only wished to express his reasoning and instead, he actually announces he will kill himself if they wish to. Brutus made a big mistake by letting Antony speak at Caesar's funeral. Finally, Antony shows his superiority by clearly making Brutus look like a trader, a back stabber and a bad friend.
The book Julius Caesar is full of happiness, conspiracy, power, and betrayal. The people of Rome deeply loved julius Caesar and wished to make him their king. A group of senators however were not so fond of this idea and formed a conspiracy. The leader of this group was a man by the name of Cassius. In order to make sure that his scheme of killing Caesar would work and would look honorable he had to convince a senator by the name of Brutus to help. After being convinced that they had to kill Caesar to protect Rome from a tyrant Brutus joined the conspiracy and soon became the principal conspirator.On the day in which Caesar was to be crowned king he was on the way to the senate when he was stabbed by all the conspirators panic ensued and to convince Rome of their honorable intentions Brutus gave a funeral speech. Mark Antony, a very close friend of Caesar, gave his speech after Brutus had given his. Mark Antony’s speech is more persuasive to the Roman people because of his outstanding use of pathos, sarcasm, and logos.
Brutus vs Antony The most predominate and important aspect in the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare are the speeches given to the Roman citizens by Brutus and Antony, the two main characters, following the death of Caesar. Brutus and Antony both spoke to the crowd, using the same rhetorical devices to express their thoughts. Both speakers used the three classical appeals employed in the speeches: ethos, which is an appeal to credibility; pathos, which is an appeal to the emotion of the audience; and logos, which is an appeal to the content and arrangement of the argument itself. Even though both speeches have the same structure, Antony’s speech is significantly more effective than Brutus’s. Both speakers used an ethical appeal to the crowd and established their credibility.
Each ruler of Rome seemed to have made poor decisions, and this is exactly what occurred with Brutus. Brutus became very naïve. All of the conspirators confronted Brutus with the idea of killing Mark Antony. They believed he would continue Caesar’s legacy but Brutus thought differently. Brutus added, “And for Mark Antony, think not of him, for he can do no more than Caesar’s arm” (Shakespeare, 24). He proposed that Antony was too weak for them to worry about while this was actually what brought about his fall. When the murder of Caesar had concluded, Antony wished to speak in honor of Caesar. Brutus agreed with the idea but Cassius was hesitant. Cassius insulted, “You know not what you do. Do not consent that Antony speak in his funeral. Know you how much the people may be moved by that which he will utter” (Shakespeare, 44). Cassius feared that Antony’s persuasive speech would turn the citizens against the conspirators. Brutus continued to ignore Cassius’s warning, but was proven wrong immediately. The locals were influenced by Antony and led an angered march to end the conspirators. Brutus caused their arrangement to fail by lack of
Yahoo.com. Yahoo.com. Yahoo.com Outline I. Introduction- What Antony wanted to happen. A. Stir the listener's anger.
In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare wrote two different speeches that characters Mark Antony and Brutus delivered. Both had different objectives. Antony and Brutus were both good friends of Julius Caesar. Antony was a Roman and general. Brutus was a senator. After the assassination of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony prepared a speech on the behalf of Caesar's death. Brutus went first, then Antony followed after him, and both of speeches had different reactions from the citizens of Rome. Brutus and Antony's speeches had as to their intentions and its outcome.
The first and most obvious difference in the two funeral orations is their lengths. Brutus's speech is composed of 403 authoritative words; whereas Antony's speech makes an immense impact with 1097 words. Brutus is over-confident and only says what he needs to in order to get his point across. He does not expect anything more than a tear-filled eulogy from Antony, therefore shortening his explanation of Caesar's murder. Brutus is also having some regrets about his murderous deed, and he does not want to sound as if he is defending himself or his motives, simply interpreting them. Antony, on the other hand, has much more to say than Brutus anticipates. His speech is split into six lengthy sections. First, Antony counters what Brutus says by proving that Caesar was not ambitiou...
In the wake of Caesars assassination, Marc Antony speaks on behalf of his friend at his funeral. Antony persuades the hostile crowd to listen to his ideas, to disprove Brutus’ claim, and urge them to seek revenge for Caesar. Antony hides his sarcasm under the guise solemnity and appeals to the romans ethics, ideas, and emotions in order to manipulate them into following him.
The Shakespearean play, Julius Caesar, is a complete drama in which the use of rhetoric and the various styles used in famous speeches. One being in Act 3 scene 1, the gloriously spoken Antony’s Lament. In this speech Antony remarks on several bad things that will fall onto Rome because of this bloodshed of Caesar. Those being a civil war, gruesome blood and destruction, and finally Caesar’s spirit seeking revenge with the Goddess Ate. In the passage Antony uses a swift but powerful delivery to tap into the emotions of the audience. This use of pathos really makes it more interesting to examine and break down his statement to the maximum extent.
Dear Fellow Senators, I am present today to share with you that I believe Julius Caesar should live. I support this opinion because Julius was one of the greatest generals and leaders in ancient history. Also, he made many improvements in society. Finally, Julius was considered a military genius. I assure you that after I am finished with this speech, you will support my position that Julius should live.
He reads Caesar’s will and he also shows them the dead body which really wins the crowd over. This then shows the human morals they have and they want to kill Brutus and the conspirators. This happens so much so that the citizens go away to try and find Brutus and the other conspirators and, kill them. Which means that Mark Antony won them over and, that’s because he was very smart using his words. Finally, at the end of his speech he says he is going to get back at them and, the crowd wants to also.
The tragedy of Julius Caesar Brutus may have had a good speech, but it wasn’t even as good a speech as Antony’s. Brutus and Antony are good friends of Caesar, Brutus talks about how Caesar was ambitious and how he needed to be killed for Rome while Antony defends Caesar and tells everyone how Caesar was not ambitious. Although Brutus speaks about the reasons Caesar would be Rome’s downfall, Antony delivers the more effective speech because he tells everyone the positive side of Caesar, and speaks his heart out about him. Antony had a better speech than Brutus. Because Antony’s speech was about how Caesar wasn’t ambitious and was more effective than Brutus’s speech.
After Caesar was killed, Antony and Brutus both gave rhetoric speeches at Caesar’s funeral. Both Antony and Brutus used many different methods of speaking to make their speech persuasive. Antony’s speech definitely won the people over and had the most effect on them. Overall I think that Antony’s speech was better and more persuasive than Brutus’s speech.
Antony utilizes his skill in pathos during his funeral speech. Knowing that the crowd was very emotional following Brutus's speech, he riles them up once more. For example, Antony asks, "You all did love him once, not without cause:/What cause withholds you then to mourn for him?” This rhetorical question makes the mob remember when it loved and celebrated Caesar. Furthermore, Antony creates
Brutus uses very formal language. He needed to sound professional, proper, and important. Mark Antony used mostly formal language, but also used some jargon. He used more emotional words instead of trying to impress the Romans like Brutus. Brutus feels he needs to show his worth to the people in order for him to “win” the argument. Brutus gets his point across clearly, but does not expand on why Caesar was ambitious or why everything Caesar did was so bad. He continuously says he loved Caesar but never explains his relationship with him. Mark Antony does a similar thing in which he continuously says Brutus is honorable, but never explains why. This helps emphasize the insincerity in the statements. Mark Antony uses tone and language to persuade the crowd without telling them what he wants them to do. His ability to make the people think they came up with ideas makes them more committed to
Actions at some moments in Julius Caesar speak louder than words. A prime example is when Cassius wants the men to make a pact to follow through with the murder, but Brutus speaks up and says that the pact is unnecessary. Brutus feels as though every man is a true Roman and each man is as trustworthy and noble as he. As for Antony's speech, this is a whole different story. The words Antony spoke to the public helped motivate the people to go against the conspirators. Thought the action of killing Caesar was a publicized one, Antony's speech was far from being unnoticed.