More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay second amendment to the us constitution
Essay second amendment to the us constitution
What is the 2nd Amendment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Whether, you are in McDonalds, Wal-Mart, or at the mall, you pass someone who is currently carrying a concealed weapon. Do not seem so shocked. This is possible because of the second amendment. The second amendment to the constitution protects the people’s right to bear arms. Even though this is stated in the constitution; congress is trying to pass stricter gun control laws. Forty-seven percent of Americans say they favor stricter laws covering the sale of firearms. Thirty-eight percent of Americans say these laws should be kept as they are now, and fourteen percent say they should be made less strict. I believe they should be kept as they are now. I believe this because humans today are more violent. We are capable of anything. Even killing someone. I am against gun control because if we are forced to give away our guns than we have no form of protecting ourselves against the criminals who get their guns …show more content…
illegally. If you were shopping at Wal-Mart and you saw a sign that read, “Gun Free Zone,” you would expect that no one would be carrying a firearm. Wrong! A criminal could be walking through Wal-Mart waiting for a perfect moment to start shooting. When that criminal starts shooting there will be no armed citizen because of a sign that notified them that it was a gun free zone. A dozen people could already be dead because of the time it takes for police officers to get to the scene of the crime. If you were carrying a concealed weapon than you could have stopped this criminal way before the police had arrived. From the statistics I have read, I assume about a dozen lives could have been saved if a civilian was carrying a concealed weapon. According to Wayne LaPierre, executive vice president of the NRA, states, “The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.” I agree with this statement. LaPierre also states, “Would you rather have your 911 call bring a good guy with a gun from a mile away or from a minute away?” I personally would choose a good guy with a gun from a minute away. Less people would be injured if a civilian would be carrying a firearm. The second reason I am against gun control is because when a criminal walks on a school campus and decides to attack, what will we have to protect ourselves?
A taser and bottle of pepper spray? Schools are considered as gun free zones, but not all schools are. “Public schools such as Colorado State, let students and teachers carry concealed handguns. There has been no evidence of this problem” (O’Neill 76). Amazing how we can have guns at this school and have no gunfights. We protect what we love, right? We have armed security at banks, stores, and football stadiums. We protect the President with heavy security. We do not have armed security at our schools. Colorado State has proven that teachers and students can be well trusted to carry guns to school. In elementary, middle, and high schools, there should be at least two to three police officers carrying a concealed weapon. If there was a shooting at the school you were in and you had a handgun, you could easily shoot and injure, or kill, the armed criminal. You would not have to wait on police to
arrive. The third and final reason I am against gun control is because if a burglar is trying to get inside your home, you will have a way to defend yourself. “Two thousand felons were interviewed. Forty percent of these criminals admitted that they had been deterred from committing a crime out of fear that the potential victim was armed” (Concealed 1). This statement proves that most criminals will not risk their lives breaking into a house if the homeowner has a weapon. If we keep a concealed weapon with us wherever we go, than criminals will be terrified to even show their faces. This can lower the crime rate in the United States. Whether, you are at Market Basket, Popeye’s , or walking down the street, someone near you is carrying a concealed handgun. We are able to do this because of the second amendment. The second amendment protects our rights to bear arms. We cannot have this right taken away from us because we need a way to defend ourselves from criminals. The government is trying to regulate gun sales, but that isn’t going to stop criminals from committing a crime. Guns can scare away criminals. If we don’t have guns, then criminals do not have a reason to be afraid of us. Criminals get their guns illegally. No matter what, criminals will always have guns. I am against gun control. I believe we should have guns with us where ever we go. “The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun,” Wayne LaPierre stated.
Then those who oppose gun control argue guns are a necessity: hunting in the wild, self-defense, and it is part of the American culture. Furthermore, gun violence is having a vast impact on loved ones; losing a family member can have enormous affects socially, physically and mentally.
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” is stated in the United States Constitution as the Second Amendment. Several Americans wish to rid of guns from citizens, disobeying and disrespecting the Constitution. I shot my first gun when I was young and have always been surrounded by them. My neighbor does not leave the house without carrying one, nor does my eighteen year old friend. Never once have I felt unsafe or uneasy knowing that there was a gun close to me. The right to bare arms has become a popular local battle in which some people want to reduce the freedom of one owning firearms while others wish for the
Some people will argue that the US Constitution allows citizens to bear arms only for a well regulated militia, A militia being an army composed of ordinary citizens. This is true that militia is necessary to the security of a free state. They also proclaim that the provision “The constitutional right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” the Second Amendment does not mention handguns by explaining that carrying a concealed handgun increases the chances of a confrontation escalating and turning lethal. Gun control supporters maintain the thought and believe that the use of handguns is not stated in the constitution and is considered dangerous. Many also believe that it is too easy to get a gun. Many believe this. but they are sadly mistaken.
The second amendment grants all Americans the right to bear arms. The ability to hold a firearm at any time as long as the firearm is registered. In the United states, all it takes to hold a firearm is a background check and a safety class. In a short reading from the “American Now” book a short article By Christina Tenuta called Responsible gun ownership saves lives she asks “do Americans really need guns?”, but are the guns really the problem? Although the second amendment requires some decent documents , the qualifications to obtain a firearm needs to be revised to a mental check, a family history check , and also to make it a priority for reinforcement to check on the registered firearm every six to twelve months.
Throughout the years of education, kids go to school to get an education, to hang with friends, to get excise, and many other things. America should have armed officers in in public schools. Since kids are spending a majority of their time throughout the day and year at school, they should feel safe in that environment. That can soon change with school security falling behind with this current growth of school shooting. Schools shootings have begun occurring more often in the United States from elementary schools all the way up to colleges. How should school systems fix this problem? One solution that could be the most effective is having multiple armed officers in schools. Let’s begin with some major school shootings that were lacking armed officers, when the resource officer successfully stopped a potential shooting, and reasons why we should have an armed officer.
Imagine enjoying a movie at Cinema 10, eating a meal at Taco Bell, or even sitting in a history class at Carman-Ainsworth High School while people all around you are carrying loaded guns! Although this may seem unbelievable, it is possible because the second amendment of the United States Constitution gives citizens the right to possess and carry guns. It is understandable that Americans would want to possess guns such as shotguns and rifles for the popular sport of hunting. However, it is ridiculous that our government would allow people to carry handguns. Handgun possession should be strictly limited, because they are made solely to kill people, they have increased the murder rate in the U.S., and they have even allowed children to easily kill other children.
People have questioned gun control long time. Many people wonder if anyone, aside from those who join the law force, should be allowed to carry guns. Benjamin Franklin once said, “Those who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety” (Wright 4). Franklin understood that taking guns away from law-abiding citizens would not uphold their liberty. Some people who argue for gun control state many violent crimes involve guns. Others believe a child could find the gun and something bad could happen to the child or others when a gun is unsafely stored. People who argue against gun control might say there is a huge psychological gap between citizens who shoot to protect themselves or their property and those who go into schools and shoot at others. Criminals will always find a way around gun control laws and will be able to obtain and use guns illegally. The second amendment protects gun rights for individual citizens. Reasonable gun control laws and educational steps can be taken to protect the majority of U.S. citizens. Gun control does not only take guns away from criminals, gun control also limits law-abiding citizens from protecting themselves and their families when necessary.
In current day society, it is frequently promoted as self-defense and our “duty” as Americans to own a gun of some sort. The second amendment to the constitution declares that “We the People” are allowed to bear arms because we live in a free State. Although these statements are true, at what cost? The question, “at what cost,” arises due to the recent push for an extension and enforcement of the second amendment. The people of the States have been pushing for desired concealed carry at public areas, such as schools. Statements and questions of concern have been on the as to whether or not this idea is “smart”. Contrary of it allowing some people to feel safe, the idea should be imposed. Guns are weapons and they have the history behind them
The second amendment to the US Constitution shows that it is unconstitutional to have complete and total gun control. The second amendment states that “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This means that it is the right of an American citizen, abiding by the constitution, has the right to bear arms. Currently, there are over three hundred and seven billion people residing as American citizens. Within the homes of these Americans, forty five percent have a registered gun in their household. As a diverse nation, there are many reasons why there are guns located within a household. Sixty percent stated the gun is used for protection against int...
Written on December 15, 1791 was the second amendment of the constitution. It states that "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."(Cite)? United States citizens have used guns for various reasons that include protection, hunting, and sporting reasons. The topic on gun control is a very complex topic that is discussed daily. It is such a big issue that it has both the democrats and republicans firmly established in their positions. One of the main reasons this has been such an important topic in recent years is because of all the murders and massacres that have happened recently in the United States. As our newly nominated president, Donald
Gun control is a highly controversial topic in today’s world where the fight is between the liberal and the conservatives. Many people believe that guns should be banned due to many recent massacres that have happened whereas others are wanting people to have background checks done before owning a gun. I am against gun control because banning handguns in the United States should not be allowed because handguns fail to protect the people and it is ineffective.
Are you willing to sit back and become a victim of violent crime or allow the government to tamper with your civil liberties? In recent years, anti-gun politicians have attempted to control guns in the name of crime prevention this is an assault on the Second Amendment rights of US citizens . The Second Amendment states, “ A well regulated Militia being necessary to the Security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Not only did our Founding Fathers focus their debate on the right of people to keep and bear arms, they devoted energy to encouraging future generations to defend theses freedoms. In defense of gun ownership, Alexander Hamilton said, “If circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rights and those of their fellow citizens.” During our country’s development hundreds of law-abiding citizens were able to take up arms against lawless mobs to defend themselves, their family, their homes, and their businesses. They did the job law enforcement simply could not do. Lives were saved. Robberies were prevented. Homes and businesses were defended and left intact, all thanks to the Second Amendment to our constitutional, the right to keep and bear arms.
There is one reaction that is always to be expected after a mass shooting, and that is the call for an increase in control. This can be defined in numerous different ways, and can include a great deal of different aspects. People who call for an increase gun control in the wake of mass shootings are, in general, people who believe that more guns means more crimes. Gun control advocates cite studies that state, “Higher gun prevalence is associated with an increase in homicides, and suicides, and possibly even more residential burglaries” (Ludwig 17). Often times, after mass shootings, those in favor of more gun control look to countries like Australia, Canada, Great Britain and Japan, and their strict gun policy and cite this as the direction
There have been numerous measures taken to ensure public safety in regards to who has access to firearms in the United States. The Brady Handgun Prevention Acts, enacted November 30, 1993, made it impossible to purchase a firearm from any store without first passing a background check headed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. These acts also made it illegal to conceal a handgun with the proper licensing as well as put restrictions on who can buy certain firearms. You must be 21 years of age to own a handgun legally, and you must be at least 18 years of age to own a rifle or shotgun. The F.B.I. keeps records of gun purchases and has access to the serial number and owner of every gun that is bought or sold in the U.S. The most crucial
Growing up in Brooklyn, NY I keenly became aware that in my own neighborhood there were educational disparities, street violence, and police brutality. Due to the widespread presence of these issues while walking home from school or going grocery shopping with my mother, I also learned there was internal conflict between the people that lived in the community and those who were appointed to represent them- the congressional representative of my district. My premature awareness of these issues caused me to question who had the ability to solve the problems of my community? I discovered that the television show “Law and Order” offered a possible answer. As the youngest child of my household, my older siblings affinity for the show naturally steered