Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Controversy of global warming
Controversy of global warming
Controversy of global warming
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Controversy of global warming
When we think of global warming, we think in the present. Not realizing this began centuries ago, which some scientist believe that earth has, ever so slowing, been warming up since the ice age. Still yet some claim the Industrial Age, of when coal, railroads and developing of lands, was responsible for the global warming. It was not until the 1970’s that global warming came into public awareness and even then it was not recognized as a serious issue. However, in 2004 global warming finally became a ’hot’ item, in September 2004 when it made the cover of National Geographic magazine, in May 2004 a smash hit movie, ‘The Day After Tomorrow’, and in December 2004, a best selling novel by Michael Crichton, State of Fear. However, it still remains …show more content…
On January 15, 2004, Al Gore gave a speech about global warming and the environment. He outlined for us what the scientific community has been warning us about the future of our planet. He won a Academy Award in 2006 for his movie, “The Inconvenient Truth” a documentary on global warming and in 2007 was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his work in climate change. He is also the founder of the Alliances for Climate Protection. Yet, there are some politicians who believe climate change is real, however human activity is not the cause. Climate has always changed throughout the years and will continue to do so, but we cannot change the climate. Until all politicians embrace that there is a global climate crisis, we cannot progress toward resolutions to reduce gas emissions into the atmosphere. It is a sad commentary, that our nations leaders have chosen to make climate change a political football. Most of the opposition stems from the Republican party and their refusal to accept that climate change is real and that mans activities are contributing to temperature rises and a shift in climate patterns. It is remarkable to note, that since 2005, our politicians affirmed that climate change was real and now that nearly a decade later, there is still no plan of action in place with a timeline for resolutions and adoption’s on how to bring about, to halt and reverse mans overuse of mainly fossil fuels. Al Gore wrote on June 25, 2013, an article titled, “The Best Presidential Address on Climate Change Ever”. Al Gore said it was a “historic speech”. President Barack Obama in a State of The Union Address on June 25, 2013, spoke about the global warming and his plans for a new
“At present, the global system for carbon emissions trading is embodied in the Kyoto Treaty,” said Al Gore, which points out that Global Warming is not a national problem, but global problem. The Kyoto Treaty states that parties involved will reduce greenhouse emissions in their nation (United Nations). These facts introduce the idea of transforming this perilous world into an innocuous one. It supports his claim for having a preferable future for all, where there will be no droughts, devastations, deaths, or poverties due to global warming. His repetition of the word “reduce” engages the audience of having a solution to climate change. Mr. Gore continues with his ideas to reduce Global Warming by saying, “...Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CSS)...will play a significant...role as one of the major blocks of a solution to climate crisis.” This fact is an example of a paradox as before this statement he mentioned that CSS, a method to capture the CO2 burned from the burning coal, is an expensive method which most companies resist from using. His use of paradoxes throughout his speech makes the audience rethink their opinions. These statistics are part of many other logically statements that Mr. Gore used to support his claim. Some of these logical procedures include; electronic cars, reduction of renewable
It is very scary that there are representatives elected into Congress that reject climate change or its degree of severity, and won’t listen to the scientists who have dedicated their research to this problem. Even some of those who do believe about climate change to a degree, say that it is too expensive of a problem to handle or that we shouldn’t worry about our country instead we should be worried about China who is more of an offender. This relates to the “Up and down with ecology – the “issue-attention cycle” “ article that we went over in class; in that once people discuss the cost of something it deters people’s interest (Downs, 1972). This is what some of the Republicans in Congress are trying to do – take the focus off of climate change by saying that it is too costly or deflecting the
For these reasons, global warming stands as one of the most daunting policy issues facing our world today. This is compounded by the debate over the very existence of climate change. While countless sources of empirical evidence testify to the very real presence of climate change the world over, considerable denial of the phenomenon still exists. The argument has been made that evidence about climate change is a gross overstatement, or in some cases, a complete fabrication. Despite the evidence to the contrary, many interest groups with considerable political clout have successfully perpetuated the argument that documented changes in the environment are a product of natural cyclical changes in climate, and are not associated with human activities. However, even the acceptance of this particular brand of reality is no grounds for the disregard of environmental consciousness. Even if one accepts the premise that recent climate change is not resultant of human activity, the rationale behind environmental conservation remains ...
There is a lot of ambiguity surrounding the theory of 'global warming' and the proper political response to it. At the very center of the scientific debate on the variability of global climate is to what extent human activities influence climate change. Another unforeseeable is whether the potential impacts of climate change will be harmful or beneficial for humans, managed agriculture, and natural ecosystems. Some question the authority with which current scientific data has been given in international negotiations on the regulation of greenhouse gases. Others are convinced that immediate actions must be taken to limit the potential effects of excess greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere since the beginning of the industrial era.
Climate change crisis has received numerous attempts to falsify or theorize its mere essence. Deniers are wholeheartedly fighting against it and the majority of the confused public is claiming doubt about the severity and the factuality of it. Yet, a question of personal integrity arises, are people in denial about climate change because they are genuinely confused or because they are afraid of the consequences of facing it? The answer may not be simple to state, especially since inner motivations and reasons can vary significantly from one person to another. The authors, Al Gore, Schulman and Klein, take a definite stand agreeing on people’s denial as fear of the consequences related to addressing climate crisis are discussed in their articles
Background and Audience Relevance: There are always conversations about our planet. We see our earths glaciers melting, weather temperature rising, and pollution affecting our resources. But for some reasons we tend to look away. We should be more aware of this potential event and I’m here to inform everyone about what actually is global warming and the effects of it.
(Gibbs, 2014). Society feeds off each other and builds a large concern through judgment. Similarly, climate change has had an impact on our planet for many years and concern is displayed by scientists and humans. One has the choice to judge and take action by raising awareness, and as Obama states in his speech, “Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires, and crippling drought, and more powerful storms” (Puschak, 2013). An issue all must set their differences aside and consider to do something about.
My parents grew up in small town in Mexico. There was a little river that went through part of the town when they were growing up. Every weekend or so they would go out and would go swimming with their families, it almost became a tradition to go swimming there until they noticed that the river 's water level was becoming smaller and smaller. Today there is no river anymore, instead it 's a road that travels through the town. Every time I visit my family in Mexico it would alway be nice and warm up until this year when I went in December. I remember waking up and getting ready to go to my aunt 's house in clothes for warm weather. As I open the door, the cold air punch me and I saw snowflakes falling down. It 's not supposed to snow in that
Even if the reason of climate change may be the natural cycles, we humans are the major determinant to it. The huge amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is causing the climate change and this amount is rising day by day, as a result of our actions. Greenhouse gases, like carbon dioxide, generally absorb and emit the heat in the atmosphere to keep the Earth’s climate habitable. However, as we continue to burn fossil fuels, this habitable Earth’s temperature will blow up, and as a result, some species will die out due to various problems which are caused by climate change. According to EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), the most obvious consequence of climate change is the rising sea levels, which will cause some seashore habitats to become unavailable to live to its species.
Anthony Giddens believes that the main reason why we ignore the problems of the climate is our obsession with immediate problems. He believes that we do not care about what will happen ten, twenty, or fifty years from now, and that we rather worry about what is going to happen today (Giddens, 2009). He claims that the international community does in fact see that the future of the world is at risk due to climate change, but other impeding problems like war, poverty, and economic status is more important to them. He does not see the world as having a “systematic politics of climate change” hindering any chance of significant climate change measures to be done (Giddens, 2009). He concludes by claiming that politics will hold up the bill indefinitely and that energy security is the most valued entity that these governments protect.
I am writing to you in regards to addressing the serious problem of burning coal. Coal burning has become a serious problem all around the world, and it has a major effect on our global climate. Firstly, the process of burning coal gives off nitrogen oxide, sulphur dioxide and carbon dioxide, among other gases. Not only is coal burning the leading cause of acid rain, smog and toxic air pollution, but coal plants are the leading cause of global warming (Union of Concerned Scientists, n.d.).
"Growing up, I have heard the phrase ""Global Warming"" far too often. I imagine melting ice caps, polar bears frantically swimming to find safe ground, and increased frequency of natural disasters ranging from hurricanes, to floods, to tsunamis, to earthquakes. However, despite the constant talk about this ecological doom, people go on with their days as if it weren't a serious subject. The generation that I have grown up in cares about nothing more than what is right here and right now. Our mindset is that, if it doesn't directly affect us right now, it doesn't pertain to us.
Humans are dumping 1,000 tons of carbon dioxide into the environment every second and cutting down 62 acres of trees every minute. Destroying the natural cycles between the atmosphere and the earth’s surface, humans are slowly wearing away at the environment. And what is the long term effect of this constant wearing? Well, the Earth’s surface temperature is increasing at an unusually rapid rate. Although it only seems to be progressing slowly, global warming will catastrophically affect all life living in the biosphere because of how fast it is happening.
A new Pentagon report mentioned that global warming is one of the urgent and growing threat to “national security”(Nakamura, 2015, para 1). Presidential contender/Senator/ Bernie Sanders also pointed out that “global warming, not terrorism or nuclear weapon proliferation or Chinese hacking, is the biggest threat facing the country”(Follett, 2015, para 1). Global warming contributes to the death of 400,000 people a year and costing the world more than $1.2 trillion, which is about 1.6% of the annual global GDP (Harvey, 2012, para 4). Raising social awareness about the effect of global warming is the first step to avert the damaging consequences.Today, I would like to present to you what causes global warming, the effects of global warming on weather conditions
One of the most substantial problems in the world today is global warming. This gradual warming of the earth is in occurrence at an extremely slow rate but it is happening. Many scientists believe that as human’s work and release greenhouse gases into the earth’s atmosphere, it can become dangerous for the long lasting life of humans and our environment. “Unless we take immediate action, the impacts of global warming will continue to intensify, grow ever more costly and damaging, and increasingly affect the entire planet - including you, your community, and your family” (“Global Warming Impacts”). Everyone should be knowledgeable about global warming and the dangers that it brings to our planet. This essay will examine