Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical dilemmas
Cheating causes, consequences and solutions
Ethical dilemma animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical dilemmas
Throughout our lives we make many choices, all having effects. The choices we make might not always affect us. Out of which, some of them might affect other people and those choices are which the person has to decide on what they believe is right and wrong and this is referred as ethical choices. For example, if a person sees someone getting beaten up by a group of people, should he either walk away or take action and if he does take action, there is a chance that harm might come his way. In this scenario the choice he makes can be called an ethical choice. This raises the question of what is ethically right and what isn’t. Similarly, writers often call for change by framing their argument in terms of ethical choice. Writers such as Claire …show more content…
McCarthy faced an ethical choice of performing an operation on a living dog. She had to choose between two sides. One which favored the dog lab because it was an excellent learning opportunity. She believed that “learning about the cardiovascular system on a living animal would make it more understandable and would therefore make us better doctors” (McCarthy 727). Another, where they valued the importance of life and did not want to kill a dog for their benefit since they could just learn the material by other means. McCarthy unable to dedicate herself to one side said “I didn’t want to kill a dog, but I certainly wanted to take advantage of every learning offered me” (McCarthy 727). She chooses to do the lab because it would have led her to become a better …show more content…
McCarthy went against the societal values by performing an operation on a living dog. Most people in society would view this as animal cruelty just because the animal being used is a dog. Why is there a difference in using monkey’s whereas to dogs for experimentation for the advancement of humankind? She performed the operation because she wanted to be indifferent to animals used in experimentation and said “Maybe it’s not a matter of deciding which animals I feel comfortable killing” (McCarthy 731). This displays that society itself is never indifferent to others. It always favors one and looks down upon another. Who should decide on the ethical question of what animal experimentation should allowed and by what means can that person justify his decision. Callahan agrees that cheating has become a social norm that is accepted by everyone. Everyone has taken shortcuts at least once in their lives. That is why he says “Their best hope is to cast cheating as an issue of justice” (Callahan). Students may do what it takes to be successful, but they still do about fairness. Hence he believes that cheating is nothing if not unfair. If educational systems want to eliminate cheating, they should caste this as an issue of justice and make the students realize that some else is taking their equal chance of success by cheating. By this cheating will be
Is killing a dog really the best choice of gaining knowledge? In Claire McCarthy’s article, Dog Lab, she explains why determining right from wrong can sometimes be challenging. She tells her readers her experience as a medical student allowing her to perform cardiovascular surgery on a dog. She explains her journey through acknowledging personal experience, creating a tone, and implying diction. The tone of the story never the less, changes drastically as you read. It goes from sadness, to discomfort, then, eventually, disappointment. Throughout the article, McCarthy has to make some the hardest choices, and most challenging decisions despite her preparation in her field. In order to gain more knowledge McCarthy has to choose between stepping
Sometimes one must make a decision that puts to question what they believe is right, what they believe is wrong, and what they are willing to give up to make the decision. In the essay “Dog Lab” by Claire McCarthy, she recounts a story from when she was in medical school and her teacher gives them a choice on whether or not to participate in an experiment to learn about the vascular system. This experiment involves taking a perfectly healthy dog and putting him under anesthesia, cutting them open and pumping them full of different chemicals to see what they do to the heart. And then putting the dog down. Some would say that the decision is very cut and dry, either you do the experiment or you don't. But a very important thing to factor in is ho incredibly dedicated to her school work she was, in beginning of the essay she tries to explain why she became so focused in school with the phrase “My study now carried responsibility”. And she was correct, if there was ever a time that she wouldhave needed to buckle down and focus on her studies it would have been then. But she also tells ...
Students separated into groups, one of the groups are the ones who saw this is a decent chance to get information. McCarthy is one of the general population who can't choose what to do. According to McCarthy, “I didn’t like the idea of doing the lab; it felt wrong; yet for some reason I was embarrassed that I felt that way, and the lab seemed so important. The more I thought about it, the more confused I became” (727). Many of the students made their minds up and chose to do the lab, however for McCarthy was difficult to choose to do it or not. The general population who decided to do the lab, they figured out it was the wrong way. As the understudies completed the lab, they searched so bleak for murdering the dogs. McCarthy place in a spot where she didn't recognize what to pick paying little heed to having the force of decisions. She decided to do the lab and volunteers to anesthetize the dogs, so they would not feel the pain of descending them. According to McCarthy, “I made my decision I would do the lab, but I would go help anesthetize the dogs first” (728). As she decided to do the lab because she thought that it will be a good experience, but at the same time she feel not comfortable. She also mentioned that doing
Assisted suicide should be legalized nationwide in the United States, because every human deserves a peaceful death. Assisted suicide is when person that has been told they are terminally ill and won’t survive, they can go to a doctor and get prescribed a medication that results in death. It’s not murder, it’s giving the person a chance to say their good byes and leave this world when they are ready to go. Not making them suffer and go on when they don’t want to.
Atwood-Harvey, Dana. "Death or Declaw: Dealing with Moral Ambiguity in a Veterinary Hospital." Society & Animals 13.4 (2005): 315-342. Academic Search Premier. Web. 9 Dec. 2013.
My claim: I argue in favor of the right to die. If someone is suffering from a terminal illness that is: 1) causing them great pain – the pain they are suffering outweighs their will to live (clarification below) 2) wants to commit suicide, and is of sound mind such that their wanting is reasonable. In this context, “sound mind” means the ability to logically reason and not act on impulses or emotions. 3) the pain cannot be reduced to the level where they no longer want to commit suicide, then they should have the right to commit suicide. It should not be considered wrong for someone to give that person the tools needed to commit suicide.
Assisted suicide has been a controversial topic for many decades. Today’s society brings up many realistic and ethical questions such as; who owns our lives? Should ending suffering be the highest priority? Who should be allowed to make the decision to end a person’s life when they are unresponsive or incompetent of making decisions? Should suicide be an option? Every answer may vary depending on whom you ask because they are only opinions. The purpose of documents such as the bill of rights and the Constitution were created to give people rights as well as freedoms, but does it include the right to choose when one’s life ends? The legalization of assisted suicide is another right person should have so they have the freedom to make their own choice when facing death. Assisted suicide should become a legal option for those suffering.
At times in a person’s life, they might come across a few situations that leave them with a major decision between two or more options that challenge what they believe or what they might think is wrong or right. These are known as ethical dilemmas. Be it seeing a friend steal something and choosing between being honest and speaking up or letting it go. It can also be getting paid more than you earned and deciding if you’re going to be greedy and keep the money or return it. We run into these situations in our lives, some bigger and more influential on our destiny’s while others are small with no real consequences.
Philosophers started to argue about the existence of free will thousands of years ago. The idea is does free will really exists? Do humans have control over their actions, behaviors, choices, desires and emotions? Some philosophers believe that yes, humans have self-control over their actions, and others say that no, there is no such a thing as self-control. According to determinist there is no such thing self or ego, and everything is out of our control. Let’s say my friend went to restaurant to eat his lunch, but he did not decide what to order. He just thought to get a cheeseburger. While He was ordering a cheeseburger, he saw someone else having steak, and he changed his mind and ordered steak. What makes him change his mind? Is anyone
Dr. Simmonds, a veterinarian who specializes in the care of laboratory animals, is one of many who believe that animal testing is an ethical practice. He and many others see the testing as inevitable and say it must continue to help humans survive. “The elimination of horrible disease, the increase of longevity, the avoidance of great pain, the saving of lives, and the improvement of the quality of lives achieved through research using animals is so incalculably great…”(Cohen 27-28).
A major ethical concern that has been under speculation for many of years is focused around animal ethics, and whether or not certain animal practices are just or inhuman. There are many questions that focus around fundamental issues concerning the moral status of animals. It is critical to understand the difference between a concern for animal welfare and a concern for animal rights. A current issue that is important to understand and analyze is animal experimentation, and although many consider it to be an unethical practice, there are many pros and cons to the controversial topic. Although animal experimentation has been very beneficial medically, the argument can be made that using animals to experiment is not always necessary.
Roe v. Wade: the Supreme Court case legalizing a woman's right to choose abortion has been around our entire lives. In 27 years, memories of back alley clinics have faded - the past is past, right? Wrong. It's too soon to start taking reproductive freedoms for granted. The next president will appoint two or three Supreme Court justices, potentially changing the Court's position on this pivotal case. George W. Bush supports the Republican call for a constitutional amendment outlawing abortions; do you think he, if elected, would appoint pro-choice justices? And why is it that while the majority of Americans support choice, the majority of Congress votes anti-choice? Are we supposed to just stand by and watch as the government tries to legislate our bodies?
In my opinion, ethics give people free will to make right choices. People have free will to make choices that are governed with responsibility, accountability, and liability. We have a responsibility to perform in an ethical manner and be accountable for our choices or actions. Regardless of the circumstances and choices we make, there are consequences if we make the wrong choice. The question of whether an action or choice is ethical or not is fundamentally based on whether something is right or wrong. From an ethical standpoint, unethical choices and risky behavior can lead to increased liabilities. The liabilities result in the loss or damage sustained by a company or other party as result of an unethical and sometimes illegal decision. Although we exercise free will on a continuous basis, we are governed by the decisions we make and my belief is that the decisions we make daily do not just affect us. These decisions affect other people, such as family, friends, coworkers, instructors, neighbors, etc. The most prominent example of ethics can be recognized in the field of technology based on the growing amount of rapidly changing legislation and acts that under consideration in order to protect people from unethical practices.
[2] An Ethical dilemma is defined as “a situation that arises when all alternative choices or behaviours have been deemed undesirable because of potentially negative ethical consequences, making it difficult to distinguish right from wrong” (Samson and Daft, 2005, p.158)
I should receive a passing grade in this class because I can write now. Not just an exaggeration, but after another semester of English I finally feel confident that can write. Three of the reasons behind my confidence is I learned, I experienced and best of all I repeated. These three values helped prepare me for what is in store in English 1302 and here is why.