Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
U.S. use of drones to fight terrorism
Drone warfare pros and cons
Drone warfare pros and cons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: U.S. use of drones to fight terrorism
Danger Drone Today, more and more people are using drones. Drones are fairly new and so there are not many restrictions on them. For avid hobbyists, drones are a fun way to pass the time, however, criminals can easily manipulate drones and cause panic to the public. One concern of the public with drones is that drones have the ability to invade people’s privacy. The government uses drones to carry out airstrikes on suspected terrorists although it’s a useful tactic, the airstrikes can easily kill innocent civilians. Drones can be a fun way to pass the time, but in the wrong hands can cause a lot of problems. The government needs to keep a close eye on drones and put regulations in as needed. Drones are becoming a big deal to an increasing …show more content…
The U.S has sent these UAVs into Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen, which is far away from where any American troop has been. engaged. The U.S has been using drones to diminish the al Qaeda forces. Despite the Obama administrations call for limits on drone strikes, Washington still uses them to kill off Al Qaeda leadership. “In Pakistan, the approximately 350 strikes since 2004 have cut the number of core al Qaeda members in the tribal areas by about 75 percent, to roughly 50-100.” (Kurth para. 2), which has resulted in a decrees of attacks in the area the drones hit. Al Qaeda proved remarkably adaptable to the drone attacks. In February a document was left behind by Islamist fighters fleeing Mali, the document detailed tips for avoiding drone attacks, twenty-two tips in total. Ranging from using trees as cover, to placing statues and dolls outside to mislead aerial intelligence, and covering vehicles with straw mats. The drone strikes have not hindered al Qaeda’s ability to replace dead leaders with new ones. The drone strikes have proven to be affective, but has made the organization angry in the process. Al Qaeda has been able to attract new recruits and resources by broadcasting footage of drone strikes, portraying them as acts of violence against Muslims. With the drone strikes that result in civilian deaths, al Qaeda uses them to frame Americans and show …show more content…
The U.S Air Force trained 350-drone pilots in 2011 and only 250 bomber and fighter pilots were trained that year. There are a total of 16 drone operating and training sites across the United States with a 17th site in the works. There are also twelve U.S drone bases outside the U.S. More time and money are being spent on drones than on other capabilities, and can sometimes be useless with certain threats. Drones are very easy to shoot down, Drones must have clear airspace to operate, which would be useless against enemy’s like North Korea and Iran. Drones also require extensive maintence and have a high crash rate. Drones rely on cyber-connections to operate, which are increasingly vulnerable. Another problem with drones is that they destroy crucial evidence that could really benefit the U.S with counterterrorism. Whenever the U.S uses drones to kill suspected terrorist, they lose the chance to find out what he was planning, whether anyone else was involved or if he was even a terrorist. Drone attacks distinguish the chances of arresting and interrogating the suspected terrorist. Its important to note that drones don’t seize hard drives, organizational charts, strategize plans or secret correspondence, and the effectiveness of the drone is based on human operating. And humans are far from perfect, which just opens up a whole new door
Byman’s first argument is that US drone strikes are extremely efficient in their purpose: eliminating high value targets in foreign countries that pose a threat to national security. He cities a study done by the New America Foundation, which found that “U.S. drones have killed an estimated 3,300 al Qaeda, Taliban, and other jihadist operatives in Pakistan and Yemen” (Byman 1). Of these 3,300 militants, over 50 were senior leaders of either Al Qaeda or the Taliban. Additionally, drone strikes indirectly hinder communication between terrorist leaders and their operatives. In an effort to avoid detection, many foreign militants have stopped using cell phones and other electronic forms of communication. Although the elimination of technology makes it harder to find high value targets, it also significantly impacts their ability to communicate, which reduces the amount of organized attacks. Without considering the cost of civilian casualties or other negative impacts associated with the drone strikes, it is clear that UAV drones have been effective in eliminating foreign threats.
Evidence: Drones have many beneficial uses, including in search-and-rescue missions, scientific research, mapping, and more. But deployed without proper regulation, drones equipped with facial recognition software, infrared technology, and speakers capable of monitoring personal conversations would cause unprecedented invasions of our privacy rights. Interconnected drones could enable mass tracking of vehicles and people in wide areas. Tiny drones could go completely unnoticed while peering into the window of a home or place of worship.
One of the benefits of the Drone is preserving U.S. life. Drones can now replace surveillance missions inside enemy territory without risking the pilots capture and death. Drones are able to slip across borders without risking lives of pilots. They can linger in foreign countries and scout potential threats for a long period of time. They can then decide when to strike the target with minimal civilian casualties. (E-IR) Drones are also able to strike a target with better targeting strategies due to the pilot being removed from the cockpit. (E-IR) Besides the capability for a drone to just hunt down a ...
The FAA works on the gradual incorporation of rules and considerations in order to guarantee security and privacy. The U.S. Congress expects that in 2015 commercial drones will be ready to fly under regulated circumstances, but experts said that it would be until 2020 that unmanned aerial system are fully integrated. Nevertheless, laws will be published step by step according to their complexity and grade of autonomy. First small drones will be allowed to fly than larger ones, first drones operated by a ground-based pilot than automate long distance flights, and areas wi...
The US military has used drones in the war against terrorist for years now and the use of drones for domestic use has become a popular dispute. A lot of Americans consider flying drones over private property violates the fourth Amendment and the only time a drone should be used is if the drone operator has a warrant and probable cause. It is considered trespassing by some if a warrant is not obtained. In 2013, 43 states debated 96 different drone regulating bills but only 8 of them passed. Along with legislatures, the FAA has also had trouble regulating drone flight. The government has manipulated the rules of privacy for years. In two separate but similar court cases, the police department used aerial surveillance to get Intel on marijuana farms. The owners of the farms declared that the method was unconstitutional and took it to court. The courts ruled in favor of the government, in saying that the helicopters were above a certain height of 1000 feet and it was not invading their
In movies, aliens are always seen and monsters shooting innocent people and taking over their land. Since 2001 this has become reality, but the alien ships have turned into military drones shooting down civilians, and the monster turn into the country in control of these machines. Drones are unmanned aircraft which may be armed for hazardous missions that endangers many lives; this has impacted our military in many ways. The usage of drones was the results of the attacks on the world trade center of Sep 11. 2001. The United States has used drones to kill terrorists in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia, among countries. This has ended many innocents’ lives and has provoked more issues than have solved. Drones should be removed from our military services. America would be safer without drones; they create more enemies than they destroy. Drones have also caused numerous civilians casualties, which violates international laws. Not to mention that this
In comparison to the f35 jet the article “The Coming Revolution of Drone Warfare” states “drones are low budget when being compared to jets, the price of a drone is about 14 million, and an f35 jet is 148 million to 337 million” (Zergat 15). The drone is just as capable of killing as an f35; the biggest difference between the two is that drones can kill just as effectively but for a much lower cost compared to the f35. An example of how capable drones are at killing is, “Al Queda has lost over 40 loyalists, of all ranks, to American drone strikes in the past six months” (Walsh 1). Drones are just effective as jets due to their very high killing track record, and can be as effective as a jet. Not only that, but Secretary John Kerry announced that the drone program has killed 1/2 of ISIL’s top command (Cockburn 7). Drones are extremely powerful especially considering their low cost compared to the f35 jet, and considering their high track record for success. Altogether a drone is extremely powerful, it has a very high track record which is impressive considering its low cost when being compared to
The use of drones as weapons of war and delivery and surveillance systems should not be dismissed because many people do not realize the real capabilities of drones and how they can be used to better the world through efficient air strikes, faster delivery times, and useful surveillance. Some of the most common misconceptions about drones arise due to the lack of knowledge about what drones are. A drone is a remote controlled, pilotless aircraft that can be used to survey an area, conduct stealth missions, and deliver supplies into difficult to reach areas (Drone). Unmanned aircraft are also, contrary to popular belief, not solely machines that kill without even a thought to who is being fired upon. They have proved to be effective surveillance units in areas that may be dangerous for manned aircraft to fly, along with the potential to be reliable delivery units (Drones).
Another name for drones are Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVS). These are “aircraft either controlled by ‘pilots’ from the ground or increasingly, autonomously following a pre-programmed mission” (Cole 4). Even though there are many unique types of drones, but they usually fall under two main categories: ones that are armed and equipped with missiles and bombs and others that are used for surveillance. In the past couple of years the use of drones has increased dramatically. The reason being because “unlike manned aircraft they can stay aloft for many hours and are flown remotely so there is no danger to the flight crew” (Cole 13). There are drones that can actually fly over more than fifty hours. In countries such as Afghanistan and Iraq, the Predator and U.S Reaper are physically there. Cause of the power of technology th...
A couple of people say that drone will increase the number of terrorist, but that will only happen if the army of the United States inhuman, incorrectly, and carelessly. It is true that if a person sees a loved one get murdered, they will want to join the opposing force, but many of them will try to seek peace, so no more people die, or get injured. To avoid the situation where a pilot miss use a drone and hurt people on purpose, they should have some sort of higher rank watching them, or they can different training courses when it comes to using
In the United States, people worried that drones would be used near their home because they equip with a camera and that make people feel restless or uncomfortable when a drone nearby. A lot of people don’t realize that drones flying around neighbor are not much,
Three months earlier, 18 male laborers, including a 14-year-old boy, were killed in a series of drone strikes on the remote village of Zowi Sidgi. The first one struck a tent where the men had gathered for an evening meal; others struck those who came to rescue the injured.” (“The Death of Innocents” 26) This incident shows one of many times where drone strikes have failed to do their job and the outcome was devastating. Drone strikes are inhumane and leave civilians wondering if death is around the
Living in the digital age where we enjoy the various fruits of latest technological tools and advancements, then at the same time we cannot escape from their hidden or apparent harms. Also, it is a fact that some gadgets supported by these technological advancements are much capable to bring destruction and disaster then construction and convenience. The same goes for the Drone Technology which since past 200 years is being used to create turbulence at the global level. It has proved to be a powerful investigator and bomber at the same time. Drones are specifically associated with military actions and the countries having used them for surveillance purposes include UK, USA, Italy, Japan, Austria, Australia etc. The list of victim counties or nations is much bigger in contrast. Some prominent victims of Drone Air Strikes include Congo, Venice, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. However, it is also an undeniable fact that the massive production and usage of Drones got multiplied in the 21st century.
There are many different types of drones, with them comes various names that show exactly what the drones priority is. Assault drones, spy drones, UAV’s etc. The reason drones are becoming much more popular and used now is due to its cheap pricing of fuel, its efficiency in its ability to complete a set task. But using drones to deliver mail may be another story. The issue between these new ideas by the Australia Post is a simple low key fact that people are afraid of the drones because of its usage in the past, its reliability and as an unmanned machine in general.
According to Dr. Byman “The drones have done their job remarkably well: by killing key leaders and denying terrorists sanctuaries in Pakistan, Yemen, and, to a lesser degree, Somalia, drones have devastated al Qaeda and associated anti-American militant groups. And they have done so at little financial cost, at no risk to U.S. forces, and with fewer civilian casualties than many alternative methods would have caused” (1). Any alternative action such as dropping bombs or putting boots on the ground is more dangerous to U.S. soldiers and to innocent people of that country. Bombings by F-16s or Tomahawk cruise missile salvos, for example, pack a much more deadly payload. In December 2009, the United States fired Tomahawks at a suspected terrorist training camp in Yemen, and over 30 people were killed in the blast, most of them women and children.