Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Give historical context for Physician assisted suicide essay
A paper about assisted suicide
Ethical dilemmas in assisted suicide
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Assisted Suicide
Today assisted suicide is no longer illegal. However, it is forbidden in forty-five of fifty states. One of the only legislation explicitly allowing assisted suicide is Oregon's Death with Dignity act, which allows doctors and physicians to assist terminally ill patients to end their own lives. I believe that assisted suicide should be permitted in at least half of the states because I don’t think assisted suicide is bad, while other people misunderstand it. Many people see suicide or assisted suicide as instinctive, they then think that it would be an act of freedom and assume there are no legal prohibitions. To clarify this topic we will first define assisted suicide and under what circumstances it should be practiced. Then discuss the history of assisted suicide and finally how it has evolved into today.
First, lets define assisted suicide. According to medicinenet.com assisted suicide is the voluntary termination of a persons life by administration of a lethal substance with the assistance of a physician.
…show more content…
Assisted suicide is the practice of providing a terminally ill patient with a prescription to use to end his or her own life. Assistedsuicide.org states that assisted suicide is only practiced in certain states. Assisted suicide is only available to terminally ill patients. So a person with Medulloblastoma brain cancer or any other incurable disease, could have the option to do this in certain states. On November third of 2014, Emily Brone, states in her article, that there are only five states that practice assisted suicide. Oregon in 1997, Washington and Montana in 2008, Vermont in 2013, and New Mexico in 2014. Sandra Norman-Eady, Chief attorney at Oregon’s Health Department, states that most patients requesting an assisted suicide had some form of terminal cancer and had the fear of losing autonomy as their main reason for wanting to end their lives. Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act allows terminally ill patients to obtain and use prescriptions from their physicians for self administered, lethal medications to end one's life. This act is referred to as “physician-assisted suicide” because it allows people to end their lives with prescribed medications for that purpose. To request a physician-assisted suicide, the Death with Dignity Act requires that the patient must be: An adult (18 years or older) An Oregon resident Capable of making health care decisions, and Must be diagnosed with a terminal illness that will lead to death within six months. Wisconsinrighttolife.org, shares the assisted suicide case of Barbra Houck.
In January of 1999, Barbra Houck, age 71, was diagnosed with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, a progressive neurological disease. Almost immediately after her diagnosis, she call Peter Rasumussen, an oncologist and supporter of physician-assisted suicide. She requested a lethal prescription to end her life. He declined because she had more than six months to live. She then contacted him again in March and he wrote the prescription. He was present April tenth, the day she chose to die. He emptied ninety capsules into a bowl of chocolate pudding and her two sons fed it to her. Rasmussen stayed for two hours. She died twelve hours later of ingestion of the lethal drug. This is one example of few legal assisted suicide cases. Now that we have defined assisted suicide and under what circumstances it should be practiced we can discuss the history of assisted
suicide. According to Procon.org, assisted suicide was first practiced in ancient Greece and Rome, as far back as 500 B.C. Ancient Greeks and Romans did not see value of an individual human life, so many physicians performed frequent abortions, as well as voluntary and involuntary mercy killings. Although, the Hippocratic Oath prohibited ancient Greeks and Romans from poisoning anybody even if it was asked for, but few ancient Greeks and Romans faithfully followed this Oath. During the twelfth throughout the fifteenth century the Christians and Jews reinforced the Hippocratic Oath because they believed that a human life was a form of trust from God. By the seventeenth century, suicide and assisted suicide is prohibited in the American Colonies. Then in the late eighteenth century, because of the various religions starting with the Great Awakening of the mid 1700’s, prevented Secularists and Agnostics on either side of the Atlantic Ocean from supporting assisted suicide. Then in the early 1800’s the first U.S. state outlawed assisted suicide in New York on December 10, 1828. During the 1870’s, Samuel Williams begins to publicly advocate using morphine and other drugs for assisted suicide. During this time analgesia was well established, Samuel Williams, who was not a doctor, began to use these pain relievers not only to relieve pain, but to intentionally end a persons life. In the 1930’s, public support for assisted suicide increases as the U.S. goes through the great depression. In 1937, Nebraska Senator, John Comstock introduces legislation called the Voluntary Euthanasia Act. It was never voted on, but demonstrated an interest in legislating assisted suicide. By 1950, the World Medical Association condemns assisted suicide. However, in 1952, the United Nations amend the Declaration of Human Rights to include assisted suicide. Finally in 1972, the U.S. senate holds the first national hearings on assisted suicide. The SCA holds the first national hearings on the Death with Dignity are entitled. The assisted suicide debate continues to gain support in 1987, California becomes the first major public body to support the debate. During the early 1990’s, the public opinion surveys shows that more than half of Americans support physician assisted suicide. In October 1997, Oregon’s Death with Dignity act is passed and is declared the first state to allow the practice of assisted suicide. Now that we know some background knowledge on assisted suicide we can finally see how assisted suicide has evolved into today. Starting in 2000, different countries around the world start legalizing assisted suicide. According to ProCon. org, in the United States, bills are being passed to allow practice of assisted suicide in the states. On November fourth in 2008, Washington’s Death with Dignity Act is passed, making Washington the second U.S. states to legalize assisted suicide after Oregon. About a month later on December fifth, Montana also legalized assisted suicide. Looking ahead a few years to 2013, Vermont becomes the fourth states to allow assisted suicide. And in 2014, New Mexico, assisted suicide bill is passed by Attorney General, Gary King. Today I hope I helped you understand this topic by defining what assisted suicide is, then discussing the history of assisted suicide, and how it has evolved into today. If I had a terminally ill family member or friend who asked to die because all that would happen to them anyways is to continue to get worse and suffer through treatments and procedures that wouldn’t change the fact that their disease or condition is fatal, I would support their decision. I’d rather have someone who is important to me die peacefully when they are ready, rather than having them have a natural death that could be painful.
The controversial act known as the physician aid-in-dying (PAD) challenges us to question our ethical, religious, and cultural values or beliefs. Although it is tragic and perceived as morally inappropriate, suicide is sometimes the only answer. In certain cases this act is a way to end excruciating pain and suffering. The state of Oregon passed a law known as the Death with Dignity Act in 1994. PAD is defined as “a practice in which a physician provides a competent, terminally ill patient with a prescription for a lethal dose of medication, upon the patient's request, which the patient intends to use to end his or their own life” (Braddock, and Tonelli). PAD also raises the question, is it a constitutionally guaranteed right for people to have the power and the medicine to take their own life? PAD, if operating under careful supervision, is an alternative to patients who may have to endure physical, mental, and financial struggles. Doctor Peter Goodwin, a physician from Portland, Oregon campaigned for the Death with Dignity Act, which he called his greatest legacy. Goodwin became a terminally ill patient towards the end of his life. Doctor Goodwin was 83 years old when he took the very medicine that he campaigned so long for. Goodwin was diagnosed with a rare brain disorder, which he had been battling for 6 years prior to PAD.
In this article written by Stephen Barlas, a freelance writer who has worked on many topics in his 30 years of writing, a detailed idea is given about what assisted suicide is. This piece gives information on the requirements that must be met in order to receive the medicine used to end your life peacefully. The first is that you must have a terminal illness or some form of mental illness that makes your life harder to manage; in other words you cannot be a healthy person and ask for a doctor to help you die. The second is that you must attend a minimum of 6 months counseling before you decide to undergo this form of “treatment”. Thirdly, you must mention that you want to go through with this more than once, it doesn 't just happen after the first time you mention killing yourself. I will use this research to show the regulations concerning this treatment.
Imagine, if you will, that you have just found out you have a terminal medical condition. Doesn’t matter which one, it’s terminal. Over the 6 months you have to live you experience unmeasurable amounts of pain, and when your free of your pain the medication you’re under renders you in an impaired sense of consciousness. Towards the 4th month, you begin to believe all this suffering is pointless, you are to die anyways, why not with a little dignity. You begin to consider Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS). In this essay I will explain the ethical decisions and dilemmas one may face when deciding to accept the idea of Physician-Assisted Suicide. I will also provide factual information pertaining to the subject of PAS and testimony from some that advocate for legalization of PAS. PAS is not to be taken lightly. It is the decision to end one’s life with the aid of a medical physician. Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary states that PAS is “Suicide by a patient facilitated by means (as a drug prescription) or by information (as an indication of a lethal dosage) provided by a physician aware of the patient’s intent.” PAS is considered, by our textbook – Doing Ethics by Lewis Vaughn, an active voluntary form of euthanasia. There are other forms of euthanasia such as non-voluntary, involuntary, and passive. This essay is focusing on PAS, an active voluntary form of euthanasia. PAS is commonly known as “Dying/Death with Dignity.” The most recent publicized case of PAS is the case of Brittany Maynard. She was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer in California, where she lived. At the time California didn’t have Legislative right to allow Brittany the right to commit PAS so she was transported to Oregon where PAS is legal....
Assisted suicide should be legalized nationwide in the United States, because every human deserves a peaceful death. Assisted suicide is when person that has been told they are terminally ill and won’t survive, they can go to a doctor and get prescribed a medication that results in death. It’s not murder, it’s giving the person a chance to say their good byes and leave this world when they are ready to go. Not making them suffer and go on when they don’t want to.
Euthanasia is the fact of ending somebody’s life when assisting him to die peacefully without pain. In most cases, it is a process that leads to end the suffering of human beings due to disease or illness. A person other than the patient is responsible for the act of euthanasia; for example a medical provider who gives the patient the shot that must kill him. When people sign a consent form to have euthanasia, it is considered voluntary, involuntary euthanasia is when they refuse. When people are not alert and oriented they are not allowed to sign any consent including the consent to euthanasia. When euthanasia is practiced in such situation, it is a non-voluntary euthanasia. In sum, people who practice voluntary euthanasia in honoring other
Physician assisted suicide (PAS) is a very important issue. It is also important tounderstand the terms and distinction between the varying degrees to which a person can be involved in hastening the death of a terminally ill individual. Euthanasia, a word that is often associated with physician assisted suicide, means the act or practice of killing for reasons of mercy. Assisted suicide takes place when a dying person who wishes to precipitate death, requests help in carrying out the act. In euthanasia, the dying patients may or may not be aware of what is happening to them and may or may not have requested to die. In an assisted suicide, the terminally ill person wants to die and has specifically asked for help. Physician-assisted suicide occurs when the individual assisting in the suicide is a doctor rather than a friend or family member. Because doctors are the people most familiar with their patients’ medical condition and have knowledge of and access to the necessary means to cause certain death, terminally ill patients who have made
In current society, legalizing physician assisted suicide is a prevalent argument. In 1997, the Supreme Court recognized no federal constitutional right to physician assisted suicide (Harned 1) , which defines suicide as one receiving help from a physician by means of a lethal dosage (Pearson 1), leaving it up to state legislatures to legalize such practice if desired. Only Oregon and Washington have since legalized physician assisted suicide. People seeking assisted suicide often experience slanted judgments and are generally not mentally healthy. Legalization of this practice would enable people to fall victim to coercion by friends and family to commit suicide. Also, asking for death is unfair to a doctor’s personal dogma. Some argue that society should honor the freedom of one’s choice to take his own life with the assistance of a physician; however, given the reasoning provided, it is in society’s best interest that physician assisted suicide remain illegal. Physician assisted suicide should not be legalized because suicidal people experience distorted judgments resulting in not being mentally equipped to make such a decision, people who feel they are a burden to their family may choose death as a result, and physicians should not have to go against their personal doctrines and promises.
The right to assisted suicide is a significant topic that concerns people all over the United States. The debates go back and forth about whether a dying patient has the right to die with the assistance of a physician. Some are against it because of religious and moral reasons. Others are for it because of their compassion and respect for the dying. Physicians are also divided on the issue. They differ where they place the line that separates relief from dying--and killing. For many the main concern with assisted suicide lies with the competence of the terminally ill. Many terminally ill patients who are in the final stages of their lives have requested doctors to aid them in exercising active euthanasia. It is sad to realize that these people are in great agony and that to them the only hope of bringing that agony to a halt is through assisted suicide.When people see the word euthanasia, they see the meaning of the word in two different lights. Euthanasia for some carries a negative connotation; it is the same as murder. For others, however, euthanasia is the act of putting someone to death painlessly, or allowing a person suffering from an incurable and painful disease or condition to die by withholding extreme medical measures. But after studying both sides of the issue, a compassionate individual must conclude that competent terminal patients should be given the right to assisted suicide in order to end their suffering, reduce the damaging financial effects of hospital care on their families, and preserve the individual right of people to determine their own fate.
¨ If I cannot give my consent to my own death, whose body is this? Who owns my life?- Sue Rodriguez. If one cannot choose when they die and how they go out, then are we really the owner of our life and body? Physician assisted suicide is the practice of providing a competent patient with a prescription for medication for the patient to use with the primary intention of ending his or her own life. When the patient is terminally ill and is in a lot of pain they should be able to end their own life instead of waiting for it to end itself. Even though some argue that physician assisted suicide is not a humane way of dying it still stops the patient´s suffering and gives them peace of mind.
Smith, Wesley J. "Assisted Suicide Will Not Remain Restricted to the Terminally Ill." Assisted Suicide. Ed. Sylvia Engdahl. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Current Controversies. Rpt. from "Death on Demand: The Assisted-Suicide Movement Sheds Its Fig Leaf." Weekly Standard (5 July 2007). Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 9 Feb. 2014.
Assisted Suicide, also known as mercy killing, occurs when a physician provides the means (drugs or other agents) by which a person can take his or her own life. This assistance is one of the most debated issues today in society followed by abortion. Physicians are frequently faced with the question of whether or not assisted suicide is ethical or immoral. Although assisted suicide is currently illegal in almost all states in America, it is still often committed. Is assisted suicide ethical? Studies have found that the majority of Americans support assisted suicide. One must weigh both sides of the argument before they can decide.
Physician -assisted suicide has been a conflict in the medical field since pre- Christian eras, and is an issue that has resurfaced in the twentieth century. People today are not aware of what the term physician assisted suicide means, and are opposed to listening to advocates’ perspectives. Individuals need to understand that problems do not go away by not choosing to face them. This paper’s perspective of assisted suicide is that it is an option to respect the dignity of patients, and only those with deathly illness are justified for this method.
The discussion of physician-assisted suicide is frequently focused around the ethical implications. The confusion commonly surfaces from the simple question, what is physician-assisted suicide? Physician-assisted suicide can be defined as a circumstance in which a medical physician provides a lethal dose of medication to a patient with a fatal illness. In this case, the patient has given consent, as well as direction, to the physician to ethically aid in their death (Introduction to Physician-Assisted Suicide: At Issue,
Throughout the course of history, death and suffering have been a prominent topic of discussion among people everywhere. Scientists are constantly looking for ways to alleviate and/or cure the pain that comes with the process of dying. Treatments typically focus on pain management and quality of life, and include medication and various types of therapy. When traditional treatments are not able to eliminate pain and suffering or the promise of healing, patients will often consider euthanasia or assisted suicide. Assisted suicide occurs when a person is terminally ill and believes that their life is not worth living anymore. As a result of these thoughts and feelings, a physician or other person is enlisted to “assist” the patient in committing suicide. Typically this is done by administering a lethal overdose of a narcotic, antidepressant or sedative, or by combining drugs to create an adverse reaction and hasten the death of the sick patient. Though many people believe that assisted suicide is a quick and honorable way to end the sufferings of a person with a severe illness, it is, in fact, morally wrong. Assisted suicide is unethical because it takes away the value of a human life, it is murder, and it opens the door for coercion of the elderly and terminally ill to seek an untimely and premature death. Despite the common people’s beliefs, assisted suicide is wrong and shouldn’t be legalized.
Assisted suicide brings up one of the biggest moral debates currently circulating in America. Physician assisted suicide allows a patient to be informed, including counseling about and prescribing lethal doses of drugs, and allowed to decide, with the help of a doctor, to commit suicide. There are so many questions about assisted suicide and no clear answers. Should assisted suicide be allowed only for the terminally ill, or for everyone? What does it actually mean to assist in a suicide? What will the consequences of legalizing assisted suicide be? What protection will there be to protect innocent people? Is it (morally) right or wrong? Those who are considered “pro-death”, believe that being able to choose how one dies is one’s own right.