Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Guns in usa introduction
Guns in usa introduction
Guns in usa introduction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Guns in usa introduction
Gun violence is a very big topic in the u.s.. some people support the idea of carrying a gun and some people are against it. In the past 5 years many schools have been attacked by criminals with guns and many children and teachers died. So the question is, is it right to carry a gun?
On October 1st, 2015 there was a shooting in Umpqua College, a 26 year old man went into a classroom and killed ten people, and seven were wounded. The killer died when he was fighting with the police. They shot him and he went back to the classroom and killed himself. Ten people died because of this man and it was all because he carried three guns with him. They searched his apartment and found more guns there. They were all purchased legally. Ever
…show more content…
Some people argue that it 's wrong either ways, and that no matter what the circumstance is you shouldn 't be carrying a gun. But according to our constitution, we have the right to carry a gun. A lot of people are trying to protest against Dwidari 2 that law because they think it 's wrong and that there are other ways to defend yourself. They say the police is a better option. Leave it to the police. Both sides have points to this topic.
At some points guns are useful, for example when my mom was younger she used to live in sierra leone, a small country in west africa. There are a lot of rebels there. My grandpa used to sell jewelry and a bunch of rebels came to his house to rob him and my grandpa ran inside and pulled out a gun and started shooting because they had guns and were shooting too. So my grandpa shot them while protecting my family, but did not kill any of them.They all got arrested. So my point is sometimes carrying a gun can be helpful but don 't abuse its power. People who say calling the police isn 't enough, and that guns are the answer, they have a point. If a man breaks in your house and has a gun, the police will not show up to your house right away.
…show more content…
He said that all guns should have background checks. Which is smart because you 'll know if the person is a criminal and what the criminal is most likely going to do with it. He also wants to ban the sale of military weapons, They shouldn 't be selling weapons like that because those are high grade and people can do serious damage with
One of the biggest debates in education is how to respond to gun violence in schools. According to BBC, “There were 64 school shootings in 2015” (BBC). One response to the rise in gun violence in schools is to arm teachers. Even our President has mentioned “giving a bonus” (Davis 2) to teachers that The fact that the idea of arming teachers is even being discussed is disappointing. Bringing more guns into a school is not the answer to gun violence. Most people that defend the idea that guns will “help” keep schools safe have basically three points: (1) teachers will be trained in gun safety, (2) it helps deter potential school shooters, and (3) it will make the students feel more safe. Even though there is some truth to those points, I think that the cons of arming teachers vastly outweigh the pros of arming teachers.
New York Times writer Jeff McMahan argues in his 2012 article, “Why Gun ‘Control’ Is Not Enough”, that the United States should ban gun ownership entirely, or almost entirely. (McMahan, 1) McMahan creates his main argument around the idea that when more and more citizens become armed, “criminals work to be better armed and more efficient in their use of guns.” (McMahan, 1) Ultimately, he argues that although some with guns may be safer than if they were without the guns, but the without guns become much more vulnerable. So why not just arm everyone with guns as gun activists would say, then wouldn't everyone be safer? No. As McMahan points out, “When more citizens get guns, further problems arise: people who would have once have got in a fistfight
This is called the right to bear arms and is guarantee under the U.S. Constitution. The second amendment clearly states that “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The first ten amendments are also known as the Bill of Rights. Therefore, the pro-gun activists are right. The right to bear arms like the right to free speech should be protected. However, the pro-gun activists do not the fully understand the reasons for this right. The right is for protection not from burglars but from Indians and the state. At the time the U.S. Constitution was written, many American families were living on the frontier lines where there would be a continual threat from Indians. The U.S. had a standing army but it was too far and is not readily available to protect these families when Indians would attack. This made it necessary for families to have guns in the home. The Indians were an external threat. An internal threat was the government. In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson wrote that if a government failed to protect its citizen and instead became the enemy, the citizens had the right to overthrow it. After the Revolutionary War, the Founding Fathers did not want to replace an oppressing army which was the British with one of their own. They felt that an armed citizen was the best type of army. This is what was meant by a well regulated militia. The militia would consist of every able-bodied man who was trained using their own arms for purposes of local defense and in actual military events. This local well regulated militia is the equivalent of the National Guard. In present times, we no longer have the need to protect ourselves from Indians. As for an oppressed government, we have our National Guard. The original intent of the right to bear arms does not apply to modern
Take a look at the history of our country and the role guns have played in it. According to the second amendment gun ownership is perfectly legal and guaranteed as a right. There were and are good reasons for this, luckily they are still practiced today. Back in the day guns used to be for hunting and, on the occasion self defense. But when the colonists of this country had enough of British rule, they picked up there own personal guns and went to war and the British saw first hand how powerful the rough band of average American gun owners were. Our forefathers knew that the general population if armed would be key in winning the war. And it was.
California does not have enough gun laws, they need more restrictions! Guns have been around our country for a long period of time. Serving its purpose in the battles United States of America has fought in. Thanks to the Bill of Rights and the Second Amendment it gave United States citizens to own and practice the right to bear arms. In other words James Madison gave people the right to protect themselves then and ourselves now from any militia or these days our self-defense. Unfortunately our right to bear arms has begun to be infringed upon not long after the Second Amendment. Throughout the years most restrictions and new laws to purchase and own a gun were reasonable, given the certain circumstances, such as passing a test showing as the
Regulation of guns is a necessary action that needs to be taken in order to
The problem with guns is fairly obvious: they decrease the difficulty of killing or injuring a person. In Jeffrey A. Roth's Firearms and Violence (NIJ Research in Brief, February 1994), he points out the obvious dangers. About 60 percent of all murder victims in the United States in 1989 (about 12,000 people) were killed with firearms. Firearm attacks injured another 70,000 victims, some of whom were left permanently disabled. In 1985, the cost of shootings was an estimated $14 billion nationwide for medical care, long-term disability, and premature death. In robberies and assaults, victims are far more likely to die when the perpetrator is armed with a gun than when he or she has another weapon or is unarmed.
Bam! Bam! Guns are everywhere in the US. It can be in a strictly enforced federal gun store, or a private dealer selling guns left and right. Through anguish and pain, many Americans are suffering through the overuse of guns. This can be through either by losing a loved one, or being permanently impaired, mentally and/or physically for life (as many innocent Americans are victims of Gun Violence).
Gun rights are the source of much controversy in today’s society. People have been skeptic after the multiple shootings that happened in the past few years. Recently, the NRA has been under constant threat by Congress. Background checks are not effective as planned. In order to keep the gun rights, changes need to be made in order to prevent gun control from being created.
American citizens have the fundamental right to defend themselves. Americans also have the right to resist any crime that as the potential to cause great bodily harm or damage. To ignore these rights would be completely ignorant. Here in America, the right to carry weapons to defend oneself is a huge privilege that citizens of some other developed countries do not have. Healthy American citizens should rightfully carry weapons to defend themselves from any act of violence committed against or directed towards them.
Gun laws in the United States of America regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms. State laws vary and are independent of existing federal firearms laws, although they are sometimes broader or more limited in scope than the federal laws. Per former President George W. Bush, “A teenage is more likely to die from a gunshot than from all natural causes of death combined. This is unacceptable in America” (Parnell, 2009). I do agree with his statement; however, I do believe we as citizens should have that right to protect ourselves against criminals. Guns get from dealers to criminals in part through trafficking. According to the ATF reports, trafficking investigations show that trafficked firearms are diverted to prohibit people and are subsequently used in serious
Law-abiding citizens should have the right to protect themselves against danger. One way citizens can protect themselves is through concealed carry permits. A concealed carry permit allows the permit holder to carry a gun (concealed) in most public places. If an applicant meets a set of requirements, a concealed carry permit is issued. These requirements may consist of a licensing fee, safety training course, fingerprinting, a clean record and no history of mental illness. This is also known as “shall-issue” laws. Thirty-two states have enacted "shall-issue" concealed carry laws (New Mexico being the most recent in April 2001), and one state, Vermont, does not require any permit of its residents....
Third, carrying a concealed firearm is a human right. According to a 2014 study in George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper by Nelson Lund, Ph.D., Professor at George Mason University School of Law, stated that “the right to self-defense and to the means of defending oneself is a basic natural right that grows out of the right to life” (1). The right of self-defense is the first law of nature; it is a right that government ought to respect. The law-abiding citizens should have the right to defend themselves and their families. Firearms ownership is widespread in the United States. Many citizens view gun ownership as a fundamental right. There are a huge number of permits issued every year. According to a report from the Crime Prevention
Carrying a firearm or weapon can make one feel far more at ease should a hostile situation arise. There are places in which firearms are not permitted with or without a permit; these locations normally have signs posted on the entry ways to ensure that the public is aware of their policy. More than 6,500 people each day use firearms defensively. Just think of how differently each of these instances would be if civilians were not allowed to carry a firearm. Even government officials, who so often are known for opposing gun rights to citizens, estimate that 235,700 people defend themselves with a gun each year.
Guns are something which gives people safety and protection. Guns are a way for people to defend themselves when no one is around. They can help you from getting mugged, raped and attacked. They are there for defense. “Chicago which has some of the strictest gun laws, yet their murder rate has gone up 25%.”