Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Position of egoism in society
Ethics on stealing
Importance of selfishness
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Position of egoism in society
Theft is widely regarded as one of the most morally unjust crimes to commit. Stealing is prohibited in almost every nation around the world and also forbidden in one of the most influential writings of all time; The Bible. Almost everyone can agree that stealing is frowned upon and morally wrong; however, often times stealing can be a product to a deeper problem. Thieves all have some reason to steal, to them whatever is worth stealing is more important than making the morally correct decision. This ethical flaw is a personal issue and not something that negatively affects me in that situation. Therefore, in the case of witnessing a young mother stealing, I would not report the mother to store security because selfishly speaking, her actions …show more content…
Laws try to capture the ‘Do’s and Dont’s ' of that specific nation. Each country has a different culture that creates a completely different set of ideals and principles. Therefore, laws are not universal to everyone and are extremely arbitrary. Similarly, religion is separate from ethics because religions give you some guidelines to live by, but they can be very contradicting and outdated. For instance, a common belief written thousands of years ago would not apply to today’s society. After realizing the differences of ethics to religion and laws we can begin to admit to ourselves that stealing is wrong in almost every ethical situation. However, people are not always morally correct. Contrary to popular belief, people are rarely morally strong. For example, as Nietzsche says, about 95% of people are followers; people with deer in the headlights expressions. The remaining 5% are strong-willed leaders. This is a concept that my father has instilled in me my entire life; he is passionate on the topic of being a leader, rather than a common follower. Although in the occasion of witnessing a young, clearly struggling mother steal for food, I believe that most people, including myself, would not report her. This is due to the fact that people are “sheep” who do what they are told when told; but also because we are inherently self-interested. I strive to be a leader in …show more content…
However, I would argue that it is not our responsibility to report the mother because we are not involved and not affected by her act of stealing. If that struggling mother wants to steal in order to feed her family, she may do so in my eyes because I am not promoting or prohibiting any of her actions. I may be bystander and witness of the crime but honestly, I could care less because my own self-interest is not harmed in any way. I believe that the reason for this is because we are all hardwired at birth to act in our own self-interest. That is the whole concept of psychological egoism, that everything we do is always meant to benefit ourselves in the end result. The mother is blatantly ignoring the moral perception of stealing in order to do what is best for her and her family by stealing food. This is her own personal decision to act in her own self-interest. Selfishly speaking, I am neutral on her decision to steal because she is simply doing what is best for her in that
No matter what she thinks or does, shoplifting is not a healthy lifestyle, but a dependable life style. "I used to steal, I mean I had to." (p.55)She is not independent, but dependent. She is very promiscuous and shallow because she only uses men for their money, like Rusty Trawler. She used Rusty Trawler for his money because he was supposedly the 6th richest man in America. Holly later finds out that he is broke and is buried in debt, and because of that she doesn't want anything to do with him anymore. Even though she believes that she is independent, she unknowingly admitted that she wanted to use Rusty Trawler.
The United States is one of the only few democratic countries that disenfranchises convicted felons. An estimated 5.85 million people charged with a felony are banned from voting. Moreover, felon disenfranchisement laws are a form of racial discrimination because a large percentage of felons are Hispanic, Latino or African American that have been incarcerated as a result of racial profiling. Denying felons from voting is unconstitutional since the right to vote and cast a ballot is supposed to be the cornerstone of democracy. Felons who have completed their sentence should be restored their right to vote as they should be able to participate in elections just like every other citizen. Despite being charged with a felony, felons are also American
I believe that we can be morally justified in disobeying laws, which we consider to be immoral and there are several reasons for this. I believe that it is only possible to happily live in accordance with our own moral code, it may also be possible to live without too much dissatisfaction within the bounds of laws, which dictate a stricter moral code than our own. However I do not believe that it is possible to happily exist under a system of law whereby we are obliged at times to break our own code of morality. In this situation we are likely to find ourselves in a constant struggle ...
When are getting ready for work and at the door you realize that your keys are not with you. You searched everywhere and you didn’t find them. Without your keys you will not be able to open the car locks and get into the car. To open your car lock you have to contact your near by locksmith in phoenix. Locksmith doesn't only work for car lock but for all types of lock repair, you can contact your near by locksmith.
Empowered figures in this great land speak of equality. Of fairness under the laws, or of liberty and justice for all, or that all men, as far as governmental jurisdiction is concerned, are created equal. But I say to you – This is far from the truth, though perhaps it is an untruth many would presume necessary for the good of society. Good people sharing my race are condemned to nigh infinite torment that departs only in death. Why must my children live in a society that dictates one’s fate on the basis of appearance over heart? Why, after having become forty years of age, is this a piece of the very fabric we have constructed our society upon? This must not be, for it goes against the very ideas of equality that
Throughout human history, society tries to find the right way to deal with juvenile delinquency and problems of children who are abandoned, left without parental care, or abused. In the 19th century, the United States began to move in the direction of important social reforms that ultimately led to great changes in the ways of solving these problems. Various states have passed laws on child labor, which protected children from heavy-duty, the laws on social assistance to children who were working when the parents abused the children and did not care about them, the laws on education, which guarantees the right of every child to receive education.
Imagine having 10 students fail an exam in a class of 15 people. If over half of the students don’t grasp the content than the root of the issue must be on the way they are being taught. If this was the case the teacher will probably have to take a different approach on the way he/she is teaching in order to ensure the success of all students and not just a few of them. If the educational system fails students, then hope of a better future is very unlikely. Likewise, when the system fails to guide prisoners on the right path, they are not only failing inmates individually, but they are also failing society.
Martin Luther King Jr. states “the law cannot make a man love me, but it can restrain him from lynching me, and I think that 's pretty important also." In this quote, Dr. Kings is referring to how biases the legal system is in the United State. His hope that one day the justice system will treat all man equal and race wouldn’t be a factor. However, African American and Hispanic are still being suppressed by the justice system. Police officers are still discriminating against minority and getting away with it. One can argued, that police are to be blamed for what is transpiring nowadays in our society. Furthermore, most of the riots emerged after an officer killed an individual and gets acquitted.
Going to college has been getting more expensive every year since colleges started. Going to college gives a student a chance to find a career in their major of choice. The only problem is that it isn’t always guaranteed. There are millions of graduated students that can’t find jobs in their major. Most of those students have student loans that they still owe and can’t afford to pay off. The average student with student loans owes over $25,000 and that doesn’t include all that interest that piles up every month. The United States should make college tuition free for everyone that has a high school degree. That can be achieved by making colleges give free tuition, changing the way interest piles up, and by lowering the military budget.
It is important to first understand the difference between law and ethics. Ethics examines the values and actions of people. Often times there is no one right course of action when one is faced with an ethical dilemma. On the other hand, laws
Over the last ten years people in the United State and around the world have heavily relied more on their debit or credit cards to process transactions of their purchases. In the old days it used to be when you would get your paycheck on Friday and rush to the bank during your break or lunch in order to cash withdraw your funds or deposit them into your account. It used to be where you carry cash to buy groceries, pay bills, and go shopping. Now some people don’t even set foot inside their bank branch because they are paid using direct deposit or the funds are loaded into a debit card provided by their employer. Many employers from around the globe don’t even issue paper check anymore. Bills are often times paid online, babysitters are accepting electronic payment such as PayPal and even food trucks now take electronic payments. According to a Washington Post column by Michelle Singletary society and businesses embrace using cashless ways to pay for things than the old time traditional “cold hard cash”. In my opinion there should still be cash circulating out in the world. My first ...
I should receive a passing grade in this class because I can write now. Not just an exaggeration, but after another semester of English I finally feel confident that can write. Three of the reasons behind my confidence is I learned, I experienced and best of all I repeated. These three values helped prepare me for what is in store in English 1302 and here is why.
Poverty is in our own backyard. Poverty isn’t turning around a globe and looking toward third world countries for an example. Poverty is everywhere. Poverty is the children down the street who go to bed hungry each night filled only with emptiness. Poverty is my neighbor who had her heat shut off this past winter. However I believe that poverty is preventable.
Both law and morality serve to regulate behaviour in society. Morality is defined as a set of key values, attitudes and beliefs giving a standard in which we ‘should’ behave. Law, however, is defined as regulating behaviour which is enforced among society for everyone to abide by. It is said that both, however, are normative which means they both indicate how we should behave and therefore can both be classed as a guideline in which society acts, meaning neither is more effective or important than the other. Law and morals have clear differences in how and why they are made. Law, for example, comes from Parliament and Judges and will be made in a formal, legal institution which result in formal consequences when broken. Whereas morals are formed under the influence of family, friends, media or religion and they become personal matters of individual consciences. They result in no formal consequence but may result in a social disapproval which is shown also to occur when breaking the law.