Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Mutual relationship between teachers and students in education
Impact of teacher and student relationship
Relationship between students and teachers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Education should provide lifelong learning and a variety of learning styles for students to obtain from the teacher. Education is the foundation for all aspects of life. Education to me is more than textbook knowledge; it is also personal life skills gained in the classroom. I know that it is a teacher’s job to cover the curriculum but I also believe that it is the teacher’s responsibility to develop the whole child. By this, I mean that the teacher should be concerned with a child’s emotional, mental, physical and cognitive abilities. School is more than just a building where the fundamental subject areas are taught, it is a place of growth and learning. Here is where a child learns to socialize, respect others and develop a sense of high My personal ideas are similar to Piaget’s because I believe that learning is active. Students should be inclusive in their learning process by giving input on ways that are best for them to learn. This can include the different learning styles such as auditory, visual or kinesthetic. I also believe that although students should be included in their learning experience, the teacher should be the one to facilitate the actual learning activities by providing the students with engaging and encouraging activities. I believe that teachers should keep their students engaged by providing them with different activities such as hands on lessons and learning centers to include interactive learning. Piaget believed that teachers should offer real world experiences and relevant and engaging lessons. He proposed that children 's thinking does not develop entirely smoothly: instead, there are certain points at which it "takes off" and moves into completely new areas and capabilities (Atherton, He felt that students and people should have their own choice of what they want to learn and that what people know in life was never taught in school. He felt that the schools infused children with boredom and fear but if an educator includes a child in creative lessons and a means for learning, this can turn an entire classroom around (Holt, 1967). Holt’s ideas are different from mine because I feel that students and people in school need to meet baselines in school and have standards. There needs to be standards in place so that everything across the board is equal. If students chose what they wanted to learn, there would be chaos around the world and no means for one to establish a cutoff point or even a starting point on
Piaget’s theory is consistent and has contributed to how we think about education. The theory supports the child’s need to explore and to practice trial and error in the process of learning (Mooney, 2000, p. 62). Piaget’s theory is weakened by his lack of rigorous scientific research methods and the lack of diversity by using his own children as test subjects. Piaget’s instructions for his tests were complicated and limited the possible outcomes (Lourenco & Machado, 1996,
The way he emphasizes the difference between acquisition and learning, brings a whole new level to education. Using this knowledge, we can develop an education system that will help our youth stay on track and understand what they’re learning and why they’re learning it. This could be particularly helpful with elementary education, when the children are still developing what it means to learn. By redefining the education system, we’ll be able to help our children reach their real potential. If we understand how to teach, it will be a million times easier to connect with the children. We can help our next generation become properly educated about the world that they’re
...s that you develop a way of regarding the information that you receive to the society that you are living in. He also believes that a quality education develops a students moral views and ability to think. And that these qualities are best developed in the traditional classroom setting by interaction between the student and their professors, and the student’s social life on campus, that is, their interaction with fellow students.
What is the purpose of education? A question that has been asked for centuries and defined in many ways; each theorist will argue their views on education is unsurpassed, yet it remains a question, that the future of our children depends upon. My personal philosophy of education is to create an environment that allows every child the freedom and ability to discover, create and pursue their interests; ultimately becoming the best they can, for an evolving and unpredictable future. Within this framework, the purpose being to encourage learning through children’s interests, by personalising education for the individual and interlacing subjects to engage and entice learning. While discussing my personal philosophy of education, I will explain the aim of education, consider the role of the teacher and the learner and present effective teaching methods and practices for within the classroom. This essay will demonstrate that Dewey, Friedman, Neill, Noddings, Robinson, and Zhao, support my personal philosophy and prove in contrast with the theories of Skinner and Rousseau.
Educators produce a wide variety of experiences, perceptions, prospects, learning and abilities to their education (DEEWR, 2009, p. 9). In my career and through my studies, my philosophy and pedagogy have been closely linked with the constructivist theory from Piaget. Being able to focus on a child’s interests and creating learning activities that are implemented as fun is a big part of my motivation as an educator and teacher. The educational environment needs to sustain every single child along with inspiring significant work that can result in more advanced thinking (Evanshen and Faulk, 2011, p. 225). Following Piaget’s ideas while implementing the EYLF has made for a simple straight forward way of supplying quality learning experiences for children from birth to 12 years old and it has helped me widen the scope of each experience to allow for multiple levels of developmental stages. Using a constructivist approach to learning allows for the breaking down of the experience as a whole into smaller parts which brings the focus around to the process of learning (Evanshen and Faulk, 2011, p. 667). Overall I believe Piaget’s Theory to be one of the most important influences in modern teaching, allowing scaffolding of learning in a place that that
Jean Piaget and Carl Rogers were both interested in learning and how people learned throughout life. Jean Piaget was more focused on children, where Carl Rogers was more focused on everybody. Learning for Jean Piaget meant that we took in information and stored it for later use; Carl Rogers believed that learning in an active process. Jean Piaget believed that learning was teacher/facilitator guided, where as Carl Rogers believed that learning was determined by the pupil. The job of the teacher/facilitator was similar and yet different between learning theorist Jean Piaget and Carl Rogers. Jean Piaget believed that teachers played a more active role in learning for children. In Jean Piaget’s theory he believed that teachers/facilitators guided the children into connecting information to schemas. Carl Rogers believed that children played a more active role in their learning and teachers played more of a bystander role. In Carl Rogers theory teachers/facilitators played the role of helping children figure out their own learning strategies to
Children tend to learn more when they know why what they are learning is important and if that material is presented in an interesting way. Take for example a preschool teacher who needs to teach her class about the different shapes. Instead of just showing her students a poster with the different shapes on it, she has her students get out of their seats and begin exploring the classroom for differently shaped objects. Once they have found some objects, have them share with the class what the object is and what shape it is. This exercise will not only help the other students learn the shape of the object, but it will also help the student who is sharing. Piaget believed that children’s cognitive growth is fostered when they are physically able to experience certain situations. By having students share with the class what shapes their objects are, they are fostering their public speaking
Piaget also believed that children would only learn when they are ready. Children's use of language represents their stage in cognitive development, but he didn’t see language as a ‘central’ to children's development, as cognitive development begins at birth and is required for language development. He also states that children are egocentric – they can’t understand another person’s point of view. Criticisms of Piaget’s work = =
Finally, Holt believes the best thing for children is to eliminate school curriculum altogether. In my opinion, many schools have incorporated many of Holt’s solutions into their curriculum. However, Holt’s illustration of what he believes is a real student is in fact is biased, and often factually incorrect. He fails to see the importance of formal education and instead shames the system that helped lead him to get a degree at one of America’s finest universities. A formal education is a vital part of an independent society. When the people of a nation are well educated, they shape the ways to being
The reason why he says that is because most often having a teacher not take a lot of interest in what they are teaching or not having the inspiration in wanting to get students excited for learning. What he means by this is that the education system is not letting students discover what they enjoy doing and instead focusing on the important subjects such as math, English and science to name a few.
I believe children should be encouraged to learn, that as a teacher it is my job to help them find the way of learning that works best for them. I feel that students should be able to explore the world around them and learn from hands on activities. This type of learning style goes along with both Piaget and Vygotsky’s theories on learning. My theory leans more closely to Vygotsky’s theory due to the fact that I believe that the “play and exploration” should be structured and directed so that as a teacher I can help to guide the information that the students are learning. Such as in the case of the students exploring the playground outside, I feel that I should tell them what we are focusing on the insects that we can find in the playground. This directing helps to keep the students on topic and task while
Piaget’s theory was guided by assumptions about how a learner interacts with their own environment and how they integrate new knowledge and information into existing knowledge. Briefly, he proposed that children are active learners who construct knowledge from their own environment. They learn through assimilation and accommodation in complex cognitive development. Furthermore, interaction with physical and social environments is the key and development occurs in stages. An example of Jean Piaget theory carried out in the classroom is that it gives children a great deal of hands-on practice, by using concrete props and visual aids.
The students are building on the knowledge they have gather from their daily routine, and are able to more easily grasp the concept of place value. Furthermore, in Piaget theory “children need many objects to explore so that they can later incorporate these into their symbolic thinking” (Gordon, & Browne, 2010, p. 106). The teacher gave students a variety of materials to understand the lesson in a pleasurable way. Equally important, the students’ scheduling was derived from Piaget as the students had “plenty of time to explore” (Gordon, & Browne, 2010, p.
One hundred years ago, Jean Piaget (1896-1980) was a young man developing new insights about learning. He was one of a handful of constructivist-minded writers and educational theorists of the time. Learning theories open educators up to new ideas. They are necessary to expand our knowledge of how learning works. Piaget’s work is a well-tested and educators around the world should be aware of Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive development in particular because it will improve the quality of their teaching. Once a teacher knows this theory, they can plan lessons appropriate to their students’ cognitive ability and build upon students’ earlier knowledge in a constructivist way.
My Philosophy Statement Education is a very important aspect of our lives. It is our education that makes us who we are and determines what we become. Therefore, education is not something to be taken lightly. As a teacher, my goal is to provide the best possible education for my students. Every student is unique and unique.