Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of freedom of speech
The importance of freedom of speech
The importance of freedom of speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of freedom of speech
With the upcoming elections, personal politics are becoming a popular topic for conversation. I do not know what my earliest memory of politics was, I feel like I grew up with them my entire life. My parents encouraged understanding of political issues in order to pick a stance when it came to them. My parents have also supported my political views even the ones that do not match their own. I have been registered to the independent party for six years now, because I was never sure where I fell between the democrats and the republicans. After taking the online quiz, it was no surprise to find myself closer to the left wing on the political scale. I feel like this only makes sense with the professional career I chose. As a social worker, I want …show more content…
to encourage equality, and I don’t think I would be able to do so if I was on the right wing. I have only been involved in some politics mainly the ones I feel most connected too; such as marriage equality, LBGTQIA+ rights, religious views, and education issues. I feel strongly towards LBGTQIA+ related issues mainly, because of where I’ve spent the majority of my life. My hometown of Afton is not the typical small town people tend to stereotype. Not everyone is flying confederate flags and blowing up washers with Obama’s face on them. It is predominately republican, but it is also progressive when it comes to LBGTQIA+ related issues. The superintendent and former principal of Afton Central School is a lesbian woman, who is married and adopted six children. This meant there was a no tolerance policy when it came to bullying for their sexual identity. The word ‘faggot’ led to a detention if someone was caught using it. While living in Afton; I was taught that your sexuality did not make you less of a human. One of my earliest political memories happened in middle school, when I learned that same-sex marriage was not legal in throughout America. This perplexed me, how could two people not be able to marry, if we’ve been taught that they are the same as everyone else? I believe this is one of the reasons I feel so strongly about equal rights not only for the LBGTQIA+ community, but also for all people. This will be a strength when it comes to the social work practice. Most of the issues I was in most support for throughout the online politics test were the equality issues. Another theme that the test picked up on for me was my feelings towards religious issues.
I personally identify as an atheist. I do not think that everything in the United States should be centered on the Christian ideals of God. Such as the pledge stating: “…one nation, under God” or money reading “In God We Trust”. In America there is freedom of religion, meaning that people should not only have one form of religion staring them in the face. This is the foundation for my beliefs when it comes to separation of church and state. I feel like there is a huge gap when it comes to understanding other religions. I will not pretend to fully understand every religion in the world and the foundations on which they are built, but I feel like this is because so much of life here in America is focused around Christianity. I do not allow my own religious beliefs to influence others. I feel like this will be key when it comes to social work, because so many people turn to God, or some higher power when it comes to seeking answers and help. I am a full supporter of freedom of religion, and it is my personal choice to be an Atheist, why should this be any different for anyone else? People are allowed to choose what they believe in and because of this I will not allow my own personal religious beliefs to cloud my vision and force them on others. Whatever someone prefers to believe in is his or her own personal choice and I will not allow myself to stand in the way of …show more content…
that. Another way I participated in relation to education issues was I joined in with the Oneonta parents to help protest standardized testing of students.
My personal feelings on this matter is that a child should not be taught in order to take a test to tell if they fully understand a subject matter. I feel this way do to my own personal experiences with standardized testing. When I was in second grade I was assigned to AIS English, because of the scores I received on the state test were lower than recommended for a child my age. I remained in AIS English until High School when my parents signed a permission slip allowing me to no longer be a part of it. Throughout all of my schooling my best grades were always in my English classes, I even went on in college to become an English Major and I graduated with honors from my program. I do not feel that I belonged in AIS English, because of one test that I did poorly on. Clearly given my personal relationship with English, the AIS English classes were not needed. How I personally feel towards standardized testing may cause conflict if I decide to work in a school setting that promotes standardized testing. I would have to put aside my own personal beliefs in order to help students to succeed in their
schooling. None of the results from the test surprised me, other than the fact that I had 21% in common with Donald Trump. This does not make any sense to me, because the top three scores I had were in multiculturalism, regulation, and progressivism. This does not make sense to me it seems like all of these are things that Trump does not support. He wants to build a wall to prevent immigration, I want to help immigrates to find better lives. He does not want to regulate big business, and I feel that big business should have to follow the exact same rules and regulations as mom and pop shops. This was the only surprising item that I came across with my political views. When it comes to social work, we as social workers have to be able to separate ourselves from our own personal beliefs. It is important to be aware of how your own beliefs and ideals may differ from others, but you can never allow these differences to interfere with the relationships you form with your clients. There is a time and a place to discuss your political belief but your work place with clients is not one of them. This is why I believe I will be able to distance myself from my own personal political philosophies to interfere with the interactions I have with my clients.
Religion has always been a topic that makes people uncomfortable, it has sparked wars, legal cases and arguments. This is a controversial issue that reigns havoc in many countries and because of this American citizens are afforded religious freedom through the US constitution. The goal of the United States government has never been to make our nation irreligious but to uphold the values of religious freedom.
The United States of America has engaged in the battle known as political polarization since before its foundation in 1776. From the uprising against the powerful British nation to the political issues of today, Americans continue to debate about proper ideology and attempt to choose a side that closely aligns with their personal beliefs. From decade to decade, Americans struggle to determine a proper course of action regarding the country as a whole and will often become divided on important issues. Conflicts between supporters of slavery and abolitionists, between agriculturalists and industrialists, and between industrial workers and capitalists have fueled the divide. At the Congressional level there tends to be a more prevalent display of polarization and is often the blame of Congress’ inefficiency. James Madison intentionally designed Congress to be inefficient by instating a bicameral legislation. Ambition would counter ambition and prevent majority tyranny. George Washington advised against political parties that would contribute to polarization and misrepresentation in his Farewell Address of 1796. Washington warns, “One of the expedients of party to acquire influence within particular districts is to misrepresent the opinions and aims of other districts.” Today, the struggle to increase power between political parties results in techniques to gain even the smallest marginal gains. To truly understand political polarization, we must examine data collected through a variety of means, the effects of rapidly changing technology, and observe what techniques are used to create such a polarized political system.
A key issue raised by the Federalists in their campaign for the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, and by the Anti-Federalists in their campaign against it, was that of factions. In The Federalist No. 10, “The Utility of the Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection,” James Madison defines the dangers of factions and elaborates on the effectiveness of a large, representative democracy in dealing with them. In Essay No. 3, the Anti-Federalist Cato argues that factions are necessary and we must preserve them in a large government if we are to prevent single individuals from corrupting the system. In modern America, we see the influence of factions – parties – growing daily, instigating rivalries and stalling political progress. Despite strong arguments from the Anti-Federalists, this modern evidence proves that factions do negatively impact the government when they are allowed too much power.
The coat of arms. The coat of arms of the US represents an eagle with
Standardized tests have been used to see how much a child has learned over a certain period of time. These tests have been a highly debated issue with many parents and just people in general. In the article “Opting out of standardized tests? Wrong answer,” the author Michelle Rhee argues that people should not be trying to opt out of standardized tests because it allows the country to see how much a child has learned and the things they need to improve. On the other hand, in the article “Everything You’ve Heard About Failing Schools Is Wrong,” the author Kristina Rizga argues that standardized tests are not an efficient way to measure a student’s intelligence.
A report by Pew Research last year showed, “The majority of Americans would be less likely to vote for a presidential candidate who doesn 't believe in God. Unsurprisingly, this is higher among Republicans – 70 per cent of whom would be less likely to vote for an atheist, in comparison with 42 per cent of Democrats” (Christian today). These statistics show that faith really does matter when voting for the next president. All of the individuals running in this year’s presidential election either identify with the Protestant or Catholic faith. These different faiths effect the presidential candidates’ views on abortion, taxes, gay marriage, etc. As the Christian Church and presidential election relate it is important to remember your standards and views, when considering who to vote for. The current presidential election will test the strength that the Christian Church still has in America. “America 's faith and culture leaders agree that what makes 2016 possibly the most important election in American history is not the severities of its socioeconomic problems, but rather the depth of spiritual decay into which the American people have fallen (Christian
Growing up in a very conservative home could have led me to carry on the political beliefs of my parents, but for me that is not quite what happened. My parents were very good people who worked hard for what they had. Both my mother and father were deeply religious, and church was always mandatory for all five of their children. Through their faith, they developed an often benevolent disposition with others, but I noticed at a very young age that judgement seemed to accompany their actions. My parents were the type of people that would offer a ride to a stranger, or give a few dollars to someone standing on the corner with a “will work for food” sign. Those actions always made me a very proud daughter, but when they would discuss their
Standardized testing is not the best way to measure how well a teacher teaches or how much a student has learned. Schools throughout the United States put their main focus on standardized tests; these examinations put too much pressure on the teachers and students and cause traumatizing events. Standardized testing puts strain on teachers and students causing unhealthy occurrences, Common Core is thrown at teachers with no teaching on how to teach the new way which dampers testing scores for all students, and the American College Test determines whether a child gets into college or not based on what they have learned during high school. Standardized tests are disagreeable; tests should not determine ranking of people.
American democracy was built on the foundation of compromises. For example, the Constitution would have never been ratified if the Bills of Rights was not part of the compromise. In a system that is built on making compromises, it is dangerous to have high levels of political polarization. The Republican-controlled House and the Democrat-controlled Senate are constantly at a gridlock and are on the path to becoming the most unproductive Congress since World War II. Despite the “growth” of self-proclaimed Independent, a quick look at their voting history would show that they are usually weak Democrats or weak Republicans. In American politics, party identification is still the single best indicator of how a person will vote. In recent years, both parties have become smaller and more ideologically homogeneous; Republicans are dominated by conservatives, while a growing number of Democrats call themselves liberals. Most Americans claim that they see important differences between the parties and many feel that they must stay loyal to their party especially during presidential elections.
I am an athlete, and also enjoy reading and watching political sitcoms. My parents are teachers who have raised me to work hard and have shared with me a lot of their political ideas and morals. Coming into this class I like to think I have a good idea of my Political Ideology and have a decent idea of the news that was happening around me. Through this class I hope to become more informed about the “Hot Button Issues” so that I can know exactly where I fall politically and become an informed voter. I hope these things will help shape me and maybe change my mind on some issues. Through all of this I am a liberal, socially and especially economically, considering both of my parents are teachers which is an underpaid profession ;this has influenced me to side with liberals on major issues or talking points such as abortion, same sex-marriage, and higher taxes on the rich.
Argument Against Standardized Testing President Bush is promoting annual standardized testing for all students in grades three through eight. This bill is currently being considered in Congress, and has garnered much support. As of right now, 15 states test students in those grades, and more than 20 have high school exit exams, which look only at the test score of a student, not at his or her academic achievements. Standardized testing is an unfair and inaccurate form of judging a person’s intellect. In many cases, people are either over- or underrepresented by their test scores, partly because America does not currently have the capabilities to fairly score the increasing number of tests.
Standardized testing shows that it takes more than just giving students test to see who has the higher grade. Students must be allowed to grow and take an interest in education by guiding them and not forcing them to have higher test grades. Taking standardized testing is like how Stephanie Schneider puts it, its “like checking if a plant was growing by ripping it out and checking” (Schneider, and Christison 30-32). The United States used to be a country of originality, but now they have swapped it out to have a competition on who can have a higher score.
Standardized testing is not an effective way to test the skills and abilities of today’s students. Standardized tests do not reveal what a student actually understands and learns, but instead only prove how well a student can do on a generic test. Schools have an obligation to prepare students for life, and with the power standardized tests have today, students are being cheated out of a proper, valuable education and forced to prepare and improve their test skills. Too much time, energy, and pressure to succeed are being devoted to standardized tests. Standardized testing, as it is being used presently, is a flawed way of testing the skills of today’s students.
The American Political System The American political system is a federal system, which consists of
A parent generally always wants what is best for their children. When schools simple explanation of standardized testing is “it helps teachers to know a student’s level of understanding of the material that is being taught” parents believe in this. Parents always assume that schools are looking out for the benefit of the students. Standardized testing has been around since the 1800s. However it was not until the “No Child Left Behind Act” was passed in the early 2000s that standardized testing was dramatically enforced in public schools across the United States. Since standardized testing has been majorly implied on students’ education there has been no improvement, actually the complete opposite has been