Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benvolio caused the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet
Romeo and juliet literary analysis
Mercutio's role in romeo and juliet essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Benvolio caused the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet
I enter the room with Petruchio, and see Benvolio, Mercutio, and Romeo all talking. Benvolio chimed in “By my head, here come the Capulets.” Follow me closely, I’ll talk to them, I said to Petruchio. Good afternoon, gentlemen. I’d like to have a word with one of you. Mercutio wasn’t too thrilled, so he made a smirky comment. You’ll find me ready enough to do that, sir, if you give me a reason, I snapped back. “Could you not take some occasion without giving” Mercutio questioned. Mercutio, you hang out with Romeo! Mercutio and I bickered back and forth until Romeo entered the room. Well, may peace be with you. Here comes my man, the man I’m looking for. Romeo, there’s only one thing I can call you. You’re a villain. “ Tybalt, the reason that I have to love thee Doth much excuse the appertaining rage to such a greeting. …show more content…
Villain am I none.
Therefore, farewell. I see thou know’st me not” Romeo lectured. Boy, your words can’t excuse the harm you’ve done to me. So now turn and draw your sword. Romeo would not draw his sword to fight me, however, Mercutio was a different story. “O calm dishonourable, vile submission! Tybalt, you rat catcher, will you walk?” Mercutio drew his sword as I stated, What do you want from me Mercutio? “Good King of Cats, nothing but one of your nine lives, that I mean to make bold withal…” I’ll fight you, I said as I drew my sword. “Gentle Mercutio, put thy rapier up” said Romeo. “Come, sirm your passado” Yelled Mercutio. Next thing you know, me and Mercutio are fighting. “Draw, Benvolio. Beat down their weapons.” Romeo stated as he tried to break me and Mercutio up, but as soon as he reached for me, I went under his arm and stabbed Mercutio. “Away, Tybalt!” Petruchio shouted. Me and Petruchio darted off, but we weren’t finished with the Montages. A little while later I
returned. “Here comes the furious Tybalt back again” snarled Benvolio. “Alive in triumph-and Mercutio slain!” Shouted Romeo. Wretched boy, you hung out with him here, and you’re going to heaven with him! “This shall determine that” Romeo Shouted.
.However,as the play progresses,it becomes noticeable that Benvolio has changed through his character and makes different choices to help his friends,but as the same time deceives them.The text states that,”O noble Prince,I can discover all The unlucky manage of this fatal brawl.There lies the man,slain by young Romeo,That slew thy kinsman,brave Mercutio.”(3.1 144-147) Shakespeare forms him to be a leader when situations are not the best between the Capulets and the Montagues;he portrayed beginning when the “civil brawls”(1.1 92) first started breaking out in the streets.
Mercutio's prankster personality plus Tybalt's hatred of all Montagues instigates the common end to three very different characters. Romeo does not wish to draw a sword, and therefore becomes the peacemaker. "Gentlemen, for shame! Forbear this outrage!" (III, i, 82). Under Romeo's peacekeeping arm, Tybalt thrusts his rapier, and Mercutio curses both Montagues and Capulets. "I am hurt. A plague a both houses! I am sped" (III, i, 86-88). To Mercutio, destiny is not the cause of his death, but rather specific people brought about his fatality. His behavior is static as he teases while being carried away by
Mercutio: Menî–¸ eyes were made to look, and let them gaze. I will not budge for no manî–¸ pleasure, I. This is just a small sampling of crime and violence versus peace and law. Later in this scene, Mercutio challenges Tybalt in a duel, then when Mercutio is slain, Romeo goes on to challenge Tybalt, killing him. If Mercutio, Tybalt and Romeo would have listened to Benvolio, the fights would have not occurred, and the outcome of the play would be changed. An example of love versus hate occurs through the relationship Romeo and Juliet and the hate between their families.
Romeo was very loyal to his friends and family, and it is possible that Mercutio thought that Romeo would help him fight off Tybalt (since he was unaware of Romeo and Juliet’s secret marriage that somewhat united Romeo and Tybalt). However, this argument is easily deemed invalid. Romeo was not in the town square when the fight had first began, so Mercutio expecting his help in the fight would be a far-fetched idea. A person who is not present cannot help or hinder the situation at hand. In addition, Romeo tried to break up the fight when he said, “Gentlemen, for shame forbear this outrage! Tybalt! Mercutio! The Prince expressly hath forbid this bandying in Verona streets. Hold, Tybalt! Good Mercutio!” (Shakespeare 121). Romeo tried to stop the fight and therefore gave Mercutio more time before death, albeit minimal. The blame cannot be placed on Romeo since he did all that he could to stop the fight from
This reasonably light opening contrasts harshly with the sinister end of the scene. The pace of the scene changes rapidly with the entrance of the Capulets. There is a sense of tension between Mercutio and Tybalt from the moment that the dialogue begins, and although Mercutio is still playing the comic character, his words are layered with malice, which becomes apparent when Tybalt accuses him of consorting with Romeo. Mercutio loses patience and draws his sword to fight. Al...
His statement means he doesn’t want to cause Tybalt any harm but would rather leave the scene. Mercutio steps in for Romeo, Romeo comes between them, and Tybalt’s sword stabs Mercutio when Romeo was holding Mercutio back. As Mercutio lays wounded and waiting for a surgeon, he blames Romeo for his injury saying,
Such lines can be seen between Tybalt and Romeo before they fight when Tybalt says “Romeo, the love I bear thee can afford, No better term than this: thou art a villain” (III, i, 61-62). After Mercutio’s death, Romeo responds saying “Now, Tybalt, take the ‘villain’ back again” (130). These lines spark a fencing duel between Tybalt and Romeo that is ultimately won by Romeo. All in all, These lines cause the death of first Mercutio for defending Romeo’s name, and then cause the death of Romeo when he defends his own name. Romeo is adamant that Tybalt take “villain” back, and when he does not, Romeo takes matters into his own hands, fighting Tybalt.
The excerpt shows how even Mercutio recognizes the feud between the Montagues and Capulets being destructive, and how it is now gotten so out of hand he has been dragged into it. Mercutio tries to open Romeo’s eyes on how if this feud continues there will be a demise for both families; but by Romeo choosing to ignore this advice and killing Tybalt he is setting himself up for his failure/downfall. Thus, Romeo is shown as a tragic hero because his demise is partly his fault and not an accident.
At the time Mercutio makes his famous "Queen Mab" speech in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, he and Romeo, together with a group of their friends and kinsmen, are on the way to a party given by their family's arch-enemy, Lord Capulet. Their plan is to crash the party so that Romeo may have the opportunity to see his current love, Rosaline, whom they know has been invited to the Capulet's masque that evening.
Tybalt uses gentle expressions such as ‘love’ only to sharply accuse Romeo if a villain. Although somewhat insignificant, this sentence structure adds to the cruelty that Tybalt portrays. Romeo does not want to fight and explains reasons as to why, however Tybalt will not accept that he is not fighting someone and Mercutio gives Tybalt the perfect reason and opportunity to start a fight. Shakespeare seems to want the audience to sees Tybalt’s urge to pick fights as a big reason for the tragedy.
If my origin story was a movie, the opening scene would be my discovery of books. It’d be a wide shot of me as a roley poley toddler, as I reached out to one of my brother’s old picture books. And as I grasped the cardboard cover open, I would be swallowed up by a moment of true epiphany. I can only imagine such a dramatic beginning as being dignant of what would be my lifelong obsession. As I grew up, I ate through books quickly, always craving that fantastic feeling of being completely absorbed into a world outside of my own. Until middle school this love was simple, but then there was my introduction to literary analysis. As my eighth grade English class studied Romeo and Juliet, my teacher directed us to the usage of natural imagery. Here
A Psychological Analysis of Romeo and Juliet Romeo and Juliet was obviously not written to fit the psychoanalytic model, as the theories of Freud were not developed for centuries after Shakespeare. Shakespeare wrote about Renaissance England, a culture so heavily steeped in Christianity, that it would have blushed at the instinctual and sexual thrust of Freud’s theory. However, in order to keep literature alive and relevant, a culture must continually reinterpret the themes and ideas of past works. While contextual readings assure cultural precision, often these readings guarantee the death of a particular work. Homer’s Iliad, a monument among classical works, is currently not as renowned as Romeo and Juliet because it is so heavily dependent on its cultural context.
When you hear the words “Romeo and Juliet”, what comes to your mind? For most people, the mention of these names brings about images of young people declaring their love from balconies and defying fate to be together. Romeo and Juliet is certainly a story of youthful romance. However, the first-time reader will often miss the underlying ideas that the writer only hints at over the course of this play. To fail to realize the subtle political and social themes within the plot is to fail to understand the author’s full intentions. Shakespeare uses complex characterization and pervasive symbols to describe life during the Victorian era.
Everyone is to blame for the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet. Romeo, Juliet, Friar Laurence, and Romeo and Juliet’s parents all played their own role in causing the four deaths of Romeo, Juliet, Tybalt, and Paris. It is not just one of them to blame, every one of them did something to cause the tragedy. Some of them played a bigger role than others, but everyone contributed. Fate had nothing to do with it and it was all the different characters faults. Romeo, Juliet, and Friar Lawrence’s rash decisions where the main cause of the tragedy.
A male character’s narrative voice describes their enthusiastic response to affection for a female character. “Michelle,” a song performed by Sir Paul McCartney for president Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama. The song portrays the story of a young man expressing their love for Michelle, which presumably does not understand English. Romeo and Juliet is a play written by William Shakespeare, set in the 1300s. In Act 1 Scene 5, Romeo expresses his reaction to seeing Juliet for the first time at Capulet’s party. Taking account for what both sources say about how males express their emotions, it can be inferred that when a man has affection for another, the male is drawn to respond verbally in a way that would express their emotions within.