Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Identify your personal leadership style
Leadership styles for self
Leadership styles for self
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Identify your personal leadership style
When leadership style in the team is analysed from the perspective of the connection to the power that the leader exerts over his followers, three main leadership styles emerge: autocratic, democratic and laissez-faire. (Barr & Dowding, 2012) In the democratic style, the leader encourages followers to interact and contribute to the decision making process; on the other hand, in an autocratic style, the leader exercises ultimate power in decision making, controlling rewards and punishments. (Barr & Dowding, 2012) Elements of democracy style: When asked about his approach to decision making and communication, Hamilton states that he tries to involve everyone he leads in the decision making process and that he is actively encouraging a bottom-up approach to communication. He states that not many …show more content…
Hamilton also provided two specific examples in which through his clinical work, research, and his accomplishments inspired two of his staff members, whom I personally know, to follow his career trajectory. One of them returned to school to complete his master’s degree and now has been accepted to the medical school, and the other has completed his master during his urology residency, and now started a PHD program. (Hamilton, 2015) There many other examples reflecting intellectual stimulation in his field of clinical and research work that I will not have the space to discuss here, but I would like to touch upon Hamilton’s moral foundation and ethical construct. Everything he does is guided by the principle “do unto others what you would have them do to you”, applying this concept into his decisions about patients and research, and his interactions with his colleagues. Another supporting fact is that he volunteered to sit on the UHN ethics board, ensuring that only ethically sound projects are approved. (Hamilton,
Of the many figures in American History, Alexander Hamilton has proven himself one of the most versatile and influential. His policies and ideals have helped the United States blossom into a prosperous world power. Through his power as secretary of Treasury and his convincing intellectual efforts, he was able to dominate the nations early political environment. Hamilton’s patriotic endeavors have proven themselves to be durable and in the best interests of the United States.
Chernow always writes Hamilton as a victim in times of conflict, which, at times, doesn’t make sense. Hamilton was a very aggressive man who had an incessant need to defend his honor. He would often challenge other men to duels and write scuttlebutt about his political rivals in newspapers using pseudonyms. Chernow makes these activities sound acceptable when Hamilton did them, but if one of his rivals committed the same acts, Chernow makes them sound immoral. This bias can be very distracting from the biography. For example, when Hamilton has an affair with Maria Reynolds, it is leaked by James Monroe. Chernow makes Hamilton sound like an innocent victim, despite the fact that Hamilton put himself in the situation. Also, when Eliza forgives his adultery, Chernow makes it sound as if Hamilton deserved to be forgiven. After the Reynolds Affair, Chernow seems to attempt to write Hamilton as a family man, which is strange because he really didn’t seem to care about his family until after his sex scandal. It is possible that Hamilton’s guilt led him to care for his family more, but, based on the obvious bias in this biography, it is also possible that Chernow uses this as a strategy to coax the reader into forgiving Hamilton. All in all, Chernow’s bias is just distracting and it seems to weaken the biography as
Alexander Hamilton was born a bastard child in the West Indies and demonstrated great intellectual potential at an early age. He was sent to New York City for schooling and studied at King’s College, now Columbia University. His vision of America took a more capitalistic tone and “he was determined to transform an economically weak and fractious cluster of states into a powerful global force” (Tindall & Shi, 2010). Hamilton advocated a strong central government. He was bold and persuasive and his philosophies quite extraordinary for his time.
Although Hamilton is not a very universally like founding-father, his accomplishments and innovations regarding America's political and economic system were essential to bringing the nation where it is today. Brookhiser does a fantastic job of helping Hamilton shed the skin of a "bastard brat of a Scotch peddler," sex scandal survivor, and notoriously doomed dueling partner of Aaron Burr.
Encarta Dictionary within Microsoft Word defines leadership as,” the ability to guide, direct, or influence people.” Expanding upon that definition, my personal definition is influencing people to follow to achieve a goal, regardless of how unpleasant. Leadership is not something that happens overnight, it needs to be cultivated over time. During that process, it is necessary to identify delinquencies and make adjustments. Reviewing the feedback provided by my LPI/360 assessment, the three areas identified I need to improve on are, praising people for a job well done, actively listening to diverse points of view, and becoming more visible within the workplace.
As an orphan, he worked as clerk, a position that enabled him to master several business skills that he would later use to transform America’s finances in the midst of a brutal war. When his native island was devastated by a hurricane, Hamilton “penned his way out of absolute poverty” by capturing a profound description of the event that the local merchants fundraised for his schooling at the King’s College. In the Musical, the narrator wonders how an orphan who grew up in squalor could become a hero and a prominent scholar. This crucial question is answered by Hamilton himself when he tells his future wife “All I have’s my honor, a tolerance for pain…and my top-notch brain.” (III,
Hamilton's boyhood on St. Croix was not that of a typical founding father. His mother took him and fled their home after his father refused a divorce, putting a label on his mother and his family wherever they went. This constant feeling of inferiority instilled in Hamilton a drive to succeed, and his way of feeding this drive was constant study. In fact, when he was deciding on colleges after coming to the United States, a major criterion was the college's willingness to allow him to cram work into a smaller time frame thus allowing him to graduate earlier (Decarolis 125). As a result he would eventually become one of the nation's most learned men; this, he felt, obligated him to publish The Federalist Papers and other works that showed the ideology he had derived from his studies. St. Croix also had an impact on his political views later in life. The island was fueled by the slave trade and sugar plantations. On the surface one might see the basis for Hamilton's hatred for the institution, as a slave on a sugar plantation was subject to the most inhumane treatment of any during that period (Decarolis 77). Also, th...
Hamilton found a job as a merchant’s apprentice with the help of his aunts. By the time he was fifteen, his employers paid attention to his honesty and intelligence and they were impressed. Therefore, they collaborated with his aunts to send him for a formal schooling in New York. First, he attended Francis Barber's Preparatory School in Elizabethtown, New Jersey. Hamilton always displayed an unusual capacity for impressing older, influential men: so he gained his social footing in Elizabethtown with the surpassing spe...
Alexander Hamilton was a great man that will be remembered for being a great major general of the armed forces of the United States of America. As well as the secretary of the treasury. In 1769, at twelve years old he had a job as a clerk in a general store and Alexander dreaded spending the rest of his life there. He wanted something more for his future. He wished for a war to occur. He wanted to prove himself to be more worthy then a clerk. To his thinking, only some brilliant and heroic act on the battle field would give me a chance to achieve his hopes. He seemed to be doomed to a life of clerking. For one thing, he was at the bottom of a social ladder. His parents, who never married, separated when Hamilton was nine, and his mother was forced to support her two sons by running a grocery from one of the rooms in their tiny home. When she died two years later, the boys were all alone. There was not even a cousin who could afford to take them in.
The play Hamilton tells of Hamilton’s prolific writing achievements, his written thoughts about the duel with Aaron Burr, and
Hamilton can only be described as a financially savvy, radical Federalists with the intent on forming a government that mirrors the British system. He wanted
Alexander Hamilton was a political scientist ,government official, economist, and lawyer, from 1755-1804. Alexander Hamilton once said, “May God give you wisdom to see what is your true interest, and inspire you with becoming zeal for the cause of virtue and mankind.”(Alexander Hamilton) Alexander Hamilton was a strong-willed individual, because he overcame so many instances of adversity. Alexander Hamilton was born into a poor family that did not have many chances, but he did become a well-educated man, that played a large role in what the United States of America is today and he was able to overcome his poor childhood. Hamilton participated in the Revolutionary War, the writing of the U.S. Constitution, electing the first president, solving an America debt crisis, and a numerous amount of other things that shaped the future of a young nation. Alexander Hamilton 's story is inspiring to American 's today, and because of Hamilton’s experiences with being a military aid, it was a benefit to him later in his life, and America, he played a significant role in amending the Articles of Confederation, and he also was the most influential Secretary of Treasury. Hamilton was the most influential Secretary of Treasury because, he helped in the founding of the
STYLES OF LEADERSHIP An autocratic leadership style is one where the manager sets objectives, allocates tasks, and insists on obedience. Therefore the group becomes dependent on him or her. The result of this style is the members of the group are often dissatisfied with the leader. This results in little cohesion, the need for high levels of supervision, and poor levels of motivation amongst employees. A democratic leadership style encourages participation in decision making.
Autocratic leadership theory is a part of the behavioural approach. In this leadership theory, leader makes all decisions and uses power to command and control the followers to achieve goal. According to Lewin(1939), “autocratic leaders are associated with high-performing groups, but that close supervision is necessary and feeling of hostility are often present” (p.173). It is incredibly efficient and tasks are completed quickly. Autocratic leadership can be beneficial when decisions need to be making quickly. For example, in emergency situation surgeon uses this theory because the patient’s situation is between life and death and there is no time to discuss with other members. Bass (2008) mentioned in the Leadership styles and theories article, “Autocratic leaders can be effective because they create good structure, and determine what needs to be done. They provide rewards for compliance, but punish disobedience” (Giltinane, 2013, p. 35-37).
There are a few different types of well known leadership styles, authoritarian, delegative, and democratic. To assess my leadership style I used two online tests to help me determine my style. I felt the results were accurate and I fall into a democratic style/participative style. If I am leading I prefer to include the group and get their feedback on solving issues. However, I still make the final decision after listening to the thoughts of the group on a particular topic. This is considered to be a positive style of leadership that is inspiring to the group involved. The leaders decision making tends to be more accurate due to the input of other experts. (Cite)