Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Romantic love romanticism
Romantic love romanticism
Romantic love romanticism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Romantic love romanticism
Romantic Love And Personal Autonomy The one thing most of us hope for, maybe from our early childhood, is that we will find the exhilarating romance with the one and spend the rest of our lives with him/her. From love stories, we obtain the images of two young people, who just started dating, hugging each other closely and whispering sweet nothings. They might even be kissing passionately, or could not get enough of each other as if there is no one else in the world when the heat between them is climbing to the top. There is no doubt that we would envy the intimacy and obsession of them because they seem so happy and satisfied when having each other around. On the other hand, we might find the relationships between our parents are simple and …show more content…
Indeed, romantic love may begin in biology, as Solomon puts it, “the inspiration and exhilaration of sexual attraction” (Solomon 43). However, romantic love is more than just sex or the means that nature uses to ensure human reproduction. It is guided and nurtured by ideas the lovers have about themselves, each other, and the world. First of all, romantic love is exclusive. Although being entitled “restricting”, “not permitting” and “not sharing with others”, exclusivity is considered as a moral norm which enables the people in romantic relationship to have more control and power. Secondly, romantic love is reciprocal. While some people are claiming that they are giving everything to their beloved ones and do not want anything in return, the eventual and essential aim for them is still to achieve the love. This is not surprising since we are all human and have individual self that requires various needs and desires to be satisfied. Thus, romantic love could not be longer viewed as selfless or unconditional. Furthermore, romantic love demand equality. For those givers, they are looking for the same attitudes and emotions as responses. If they do not gain the equivalent love, they may feel tired, no longer have the energy to hold “love” and finally give up. Accordingly, Solomon gives a subtle explanation that “the egalitarianism of love assures a continuing struggle for equal shares and status, a constant tension between demands, expectations, and sacrifices” (Solomon
Robert Nozick’s Love’s Bond is a clear summary of components, goals, challenges, and limitations of romantic love. Nozick gives a description of love as having your wellbeing linked with that of someone and something you love. I agree with ideas that Nozick has explained concerning the definition of love, but individuals have their meaning of love. Every individual has a remarkable thing that will bring happiness and contentment in their lives. While sometimes it is hard to practice unconditional love, couples should love unconditionally because it is a true love that is more than infatuation and overcomes minor character flaw.
Love and affection is an indispensable part of human life. In different culture love may appear differently. In the poem “My god my lotus” lovers responded to each other differently than in the poem “Fishhawk”. Likewise, the presentation of female sexuality, gender disparity and presentation of love were shown inversely in these two poems. Some may argue that love in the past was not as same as love in present. However, we can still find some lovers who are staying with their partners just to maintain the relationship. We may also find some lovers having relationship only because of self-interest. However, a love relationship should always be out of self-interest and must be based on mutual interest. A love usually obtains its perfectness when it develops from both partners equally and with same affection.
"Love can affect you so deeply that it reshapes you from the inside out and by doing so alters you destiny for future loving moments" says Fredrickson but she seems to have forgotten that there always two perspectives to any ideology. It is indubitable that the experiences of love play a crucial role in molding an individual, but it is ignorant to say that only love will cause such change. The reality is that not all relationships and encounters are true "micro-moment of love" and those negative experiences also partake in what creates the identity and thought process of an individual. With the knowledge that an individual 's cell play a crucial role in deciding who to have "micro-moments of love"; such negative experience will be associated with the factual, biological notion of love. Thus causing individuals to feel that the negative experience they had to face and deal with were a result of their body and its biology. The idea that their body and brain, essentially unalterable, were capable of causing them pain and heartache, will hinder them from achieving the love and longing for others that Fredrickson describes. The idea that love is functioning by the orders registered by the individual 's body, makes love uncontrollable. Humans in nature are predisposed
his own life how he wishes, even if it will damage health or lead to
The Symposium, The Aeneid, and Confessions help demonstrate how the nature of love can be found in several places, whether it is in the mind, the body or the soul. These texts also provide with eye-opening views of love as they adjust our understanding of what love really is. By giving us reformed spectrum of love, one is able to engage in introspective thinking and determine if the things we love are truly worthy of our sentiment.
This passage marks the first of several types of love, and gives us an intuitive
Bodily autonomy is a concept that is considered to be a human right. Bodily autonomy means that a person has control over who or what uses their body, for what, and for how long. Bodily autonomy is why you cannot be forced to donate your blood, tissue, or organs, even if you’re dead, even in the circumstance that your blood, tissue, and organs would save fifteen lives. Bodily autonomy is why someone cannot touch you, have sex with you, or use your body in any way without your continuous consent. A fetus is using and surviving from somebody else’s body parts. Therefore, under bodily autonomy, the fetus is in that person’s body by permission, not by right, and requires a person’s continuous consent to remain in that position. If the person
The article, “Measurement of Romantic Love” written by Zick Rubin, expresses the initial research aimed at presenting and validating the social-psychological construct of romantic love. The author assumed that love should be measured independently from liking. In this research, the romantic love was also conceptualized to three elements: affiliative and depend need, an orientation of exclusiveness and absorption, and finally a predisposition to help.
“Love interrupts at every hour at the most serious occupations, and sometimes perplexes for a while even the greatest minds.” – Schopenhauer1 All of us that have been in love can identify with this quote, but the real question is how do we find, and choose our lovers? Schopenhauer would argue that making a decision, about an ultimate lover is merely biological. He believes in something he calls the will to life which he defines as “an inherent drive within human beings to stay alive and reproduce.”1 We sometimes even ask ourselves why him, or why her? We have absolutely no conscious say in the partner we pick, and that our animalistic subconscious picks our lovers. Yes, humans do romantic things with their lovers, and for their lovers to strengthen the connection like: picnics, expensive dinners, and rose petals on the floor. But the main decision is ultimately based on biological factors alone. The last thing you’re thinking about when getting someone’s number at a club is having a baby, but subconsciously that’s the truth .1 I will analyze Schopenhauer’s ideas of love, giving modern evidence, as well as stories of personal experience throughout the next few paragraphs. I believe Schopenhauer hit the nail right on the head when it comes to love (besides his idea of polygamy.)
As any romantic will assert, love is by far the most powerful force known to human hearts and minds. This sentiment is espoused throughout history, almost to the point of cliché. Everyone has heard the optimistic statement, “love conquers all,” and The Beatles are certain, however idyllic it may be, that “all you need is love.” Humanity is convinced that love is unique within human emotion, unequalled in its power to both lift the spirit up in throws of ecstasy, and cast it down in utter despair.
Love defines as an intense feeling of deep affection to a someone or something. It allows two people to continue growing with each experience encountered and thus shaping them into what and who they are. This connection is the escape from loneliness and boredom that burdens everyone because humans vye for attention from one another. Sustaining a relationship of love demands work, cooperation, and commitment. Romantic love is an emotionally, spiritually, and physically intimate relationship shared with a partner. This type of love provides a profound jubilation as well great pain when falling apart. It is a source of pleasure and inspiration that is worth pursuing because of its various powerful ways to express the capacity of love. Though romantic
This class has enlightened me to many topics that make up the subject of organizational behavior. However, there is one topic that has gained my attention, and that is Autonomy. Autonomy gained my attention because it is when management lessens its controls on the way employees complete their tasks, sometimes even allowing employees to do their jobs without any supervision at all. Autonomy is interesting to me because it is breaking the traditional mindset of micromanaging and that it was the only way to improve productivity.
Love is a mysterious force that controls people as well as their actions. It is important to note that love has great power over our life decisions and thoughts. Love requires us to be loyal so we just find ourselves complying to it. There are those people who believe that love solves a lot of relationship problems while there are those who think that love creates uncountable problems between partners. Both sides of the arguments are correct depending on the type of relationship between two individuals. The difference is that either the benefits of love outweigh the disadvantages or vice versa. According to Kipnis, love is a major cause of most challenges among individuals in a relationship. This paper supports Kipnis in her argument that love
Love is arguably the most powerful emotion possessed by mankind; it is the impalpable bond that allows individuals to connect and understand one another. Pure love is directly related to divinity. Without love, happiness and prosperity become unreachable goals. An individual that possesses all the desired superficial objects in the world stands alone without the presence of love. For centuries love has been marveled by all that dare encounter it. Countless books and poems have been transcribed to explain the phenomenon of love, but love surpasses all intellectual explanations and discussions. Love is not a definition, but rather a thought, an idea. This idea, the idea of love, burns inside us all. Instinctually, every soul on Earth is
However, the concept of Romantic love (also known as passionate love) has been less researched (Lindholm 2006: 7). This is perplexing, considering how often Romantic love is portrayed in popular culture. As such, these influential imageries of romance inexorably overrun, influence and drive our everyday lives (Lindholm 2006: 5). Except, what is Romantic love? Romantic love itself is an ambiguous emotion (Sarsby 1983: 16). At best, it can be defined as the feeling of powerful attraction that encompasses the idealism of the other, within a sexual situation, and is expected to be long lasting (Jankowiak & Fischer 1992: 150).