Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Development of the Persian empire
Development of the Persian empire
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Development of the Persian empire
Persia’s advanced economic system paved the way for future economies, including our own. For instance, the introduction of gold and silver coins throughout the empire, including the daric (named after Darius I), lasted for an immense amount of time. The reason for this was its reliability over the previous trading system of economy, as the “use of gold coinage was especially important because it dominated the world as the most trusted currency thereafter for more than 2,000 years” (Miyahara). Bartering—the previous system of economy based on trade—though universal, was very inconvenient, as well as unreliable. The new money system allowed for a simpler “comparison of items being considered for purchase… because all items are given exact values”
(Ellis & Esler 42). This is how the economy works in most advanced, thriving civilizations today—goods and services are given an exact value, which is much more efficient than the alternative of the buyer and seller going through the process of arranging an exchange. Lastly, the economy of the Persian Empire was regulated by their government, as part of the bureaucracy was an economic branch in which “accountants, hamarakaras, and treasurers, ganzabaraz, were carefully selected” (Farazmand). This governmental regulation of the economy is used by nearly every advanced civilization today. In conclusion, the Persian Empire established a system of economy that would last far into history and impact a vast number of subsequent societies.
Two of the most powerful powers in the post-classical period were the Arabian and Byzantine empires. Each had different political, religious, and economic differences that defined their respective cultures, and managing to create vast empires that greatly rivaled each other.
The second economic reform initiated by Lycurgus changed the currency of the country from gold and silver to a type of money made out of heavy iron of very little worth. The enormous size and weight of the new currency required a large area of storage space and a great deal of strength in order to remove the money from the storage area. This strategy implied by Lycurgus was brilliant because for the first time having an abundance of money was more of a hassle than a convenience.
The Persian Empire was ruled by Darius the Great from 522 to 485 BCE. He spent years improving administrative organization then worked on expanding the empire. This empire lasted longer than all the others because people could keep their own laws as long as they pay their taxes. The Persian army also allowed more protection from invasions. They used cuneiform writing borrowed from Summerians. More unifying forces they use was Universal System of Weights and Measure, Highway System, Postal service, and Zoroastrianism which was based on individual
During the era known as the time of the classical civilizations, there were numerous noticeable changes occurring in many civilizations and city-states around the world. In India, China, and Persia in particular, one could see the influence of religion and philosophy on the political and social structure of the time.
Within 21 years of Xerxes reign to the Persian empire, Xerxes impact and legacy to is questionable from the successes and failures of: the military and administration contributions. From the use of sources such as the Harem inscription “When my father Darius went away from the throne, but the grace of Ahuramazda, I became king on my father’s throne. When I become king, I did much that was excellent. What had been built by my father, I protected, and I added other buildings” is essential and useful in assessing Xerxes’ legacy.
What this did was create an abundance of currency in Sparta, rather than relying on gold and silver, it created a system where accumulating massive wealth was nearly impossible. This reform was met with resistance from Spartan notables, the new currency essentially eliminated large personal wealth. The currency reform effectively eliminated external trade and commerce and created a system where Spartans were dependent on one another. The nature of the economic reforms would have ever-lasting consequences for the nature of the Spartan economy. Lycatius’ political reforms were to bring stability to the Spartan political system.
While Persian financial support undeniably contributed to the Spartan’s victory over Athens in the Peloponnesian War, modern historians have over-emphasized the importance of that assistance to their eventual victory. Persian money allowed the Peloponnesian forces to stay in the fight, which had quickly dissolved into a war of attrition after the Athenian’s defeat at Syracuse. However, there were several negative aspects of the Persian/Peloponnesian alliance which detrimentally affected Sparta’s ability to effectively wage war against Athens. Included in this was the tendency for Persian Satraps to withhold pay and reinforcements, or to provide that pay irregularly. Additionally, Persia’s insistence that Sparta recognize their control over all Ionian cities prior to any treaty being completed led
Greece and Persia are two of the four great empires that rose to the top rapidly. Both empires have well organized political systems that greatly influenced the way later governments were structured in the United States and Europe. Greece and Persia empire’s structures weighed greatly on their development and growth, but the diverse topographies of Greece and Persia also made a vast impact. These features affected the cultures and even how the political government changed overtime.
He was a man who was on a mission, a man who was just resting in a faraway land till it was time to go back on the attack once more. His short stay in this land, led to one of the biggest changes in history. This change marked the Greek period in Egyptian history. Before Alexander entered Egypt, they were under the ruling of the Persians. The Persians made to change Egypt into what they wanted it to be. They held no respect for the people, no respect for the traditions and the old ways, and taxed the people high amounts. Alexander built up Egypt after the Persian rule. The Persians tried to change Egypt to form there laws and beliefs, and Alexander, he did nothing to change the old way, he brought them back, mixed them with new ones the people
Alexander the Great was only 20 years when his father Philip of Macedon died. Even though he was a young man, he had an unusual talent for politics and military tactics. After his father’s death, Alexander moved to continue Philip’s invasion of Persia. In the ten years of his war campaigns, Alexander conquered a large portion of the then-known world. (Judge & Langdon, 2012.)
Iran was included in the territory of what was then the ancient Persian Empire. For centuries Iran (land of the Aryans) was also referred to as Persia, which was the official name until 1935. Fourteen years had passed before the Iranian government allowed the use of both names. Few groups of people today have significant history like the Iranians, descending from the ancient Persians, who possess one of the world’s richest and oldest cultures. Historically, a variety of other cultures and groups had once occupied the ancient Iranian plateau as early as 4,000 B.C.E, with little importance. Beginning by the third millennium, Persia was ruled by some of the greatest kings of all time, from Cyrus the Great to Darius the III, who turned the Persian Empire into one of the world’s greatest civilizations.
While learning about the many rulers of the Archimedean Empire, two particular conquers peaked my interest. At first, I wondered why both Cyrus and Darius where given the honorific title of ‘The Great’ in an empire that produced so many outstanding rulers. However, after comparing the bureaucratic systems established by both Cyrus II and Darius I, it is revealed that their governances drew many similarities to each other. Through this we can see that Persian kings learnt from their predecessors’ successes and failures and used them to refine their own governing strategies. Cyrus II was beloved conqueror, regarded as father to the Persians,the Lord’s Annointed to the Jews and elect of Marduk to the Babylonians few in history have received such
I am here today to talk to you about the Persian Empire. One of the reasons I chose this topic is that I am Persian myself. Another reason for me choosing this topic is that there is a large Persian community in Lower Mainland.
In the sixth century B.C, the land that we now call Iran was the center of the largest empire in the world. The kings of Ancient Persia( such as Cyrus the Great) were the leaders of a great civilization that made amazing advances in laws, goverment and communication. Founded in 550 B.C by King Cyrus the Great, the Persian Empire spanned from Egypt in the west to Turkey in the north, and through Mesopotamia to the Indus River in the east. Unlike most empires at that time, the Persian kings were benovelent rulers, and allowed a diverse variety of diffrent people with diffrent ethnic backgrounds. The Persian empire was split into three diffrent empires with three diffrent time periods but the first empire was called the Achaemenid Empire. It began with King Cyrus the Great and ended with King Darius III.
In the beginning of the human kind, there was no money. The only way to get what you want is to trade what you have for it. This system is called bartering. Sometimes, you will find a person who is willing to exchange your goods. However, most of the time, it is really difficult to find the person who is willing to trade with you. Since, you desperately need to exchange, you will need to travel the whole day until you meet the right person. In this type of situation, it will take a lot of time to find the person who wants to trade with your goods. Economists defined this kind of issue as transaction costs. It is the time and effort people spend before they can exchange their goods. In barter economy, the transaction costs are incredibly high. Another major drawback of barter system is that people cannot measure the value of goods. This usually leads to conflicts since people have to make unequal exchanges. In order to reduce transaction costs and conflicts, people developed commodity money.