Perks Of Being A Wallflower Analysis

1205 Words3 Pages

Alex Eubanks
Mrs. Hallstrom
Honors English One
9 May 2016 Within The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky, subtle criticism is brought to the changes in education brought about in the 1990s. According to The American Federation of Teachers, the 1990s was a time in which “State-mandated testing exploded” in order to “…measure school performance with respect to the nascent ‘standards’ movement.” (Nelson 12) Chbosky uses Charlie’s relationship with his advanced English teacher Bill in order to critique the one size fits all mentality of education. Bill becomes more than merely an educator to Charlie, he becomes a mentor and a friend. Bill doesn’t make Charlie read books to pass a test or write an essay, he gives them to Charlie because …show more content…

Charlie shows his discontent with the role of education when describing Mr. Carlo’s class saying, “I almost didn’t get an A in math, but then Mr. Carlo told me to stop asking ‘why?’ all the time and just follow the formulas. So, I did. Now, I get perfect scores on all my tests. I just wish I knew what the formulas did. I honestly have no idea.” (165) Chbosky’s use of the first person point of view allows him to illustrate the problems with educational reform effectively through the eyes of a student. Attention is also brought to the arbitrary nature of grading systems when Bill gives Charlie straight A’s on his report cards but in private gives him the grades he earns feedback (46). Bill does this because he personally went to “some college in the West that doesn’t give grades” which he described as “the best education he ever got.” (107) This nostalgia for a previously education that seeks to do more than to rank students based on arbitrary grades is indicative of the problems with the new wave of education that came about in the 1990s. Chbosky’s views on education presented throughout the …show more content…

Take for example Charlie’s commentary on something as simple as a magazine cover: “Each [magazine] had a smiling face, and every time it was a woman on the cover, she was showing her cleavage. I wondered if those women wanted to do that to look pretty or if it was just part of the job. I wondered if they had a choice or not if they wanted to be successful. I just couldn’t get that thought out of my mind.” (117) Charlie’s opposition to hypersexualization and objectification in the media is consistent with feminist viewpoints and his empathy shows that he himself is not objectifying the women pictured. Charlie notices the same problem with objectification in the world around him saying, “In the hallways, I see the girls wearing the guys’ jackets, and I think about the ideas of property.” (23-24) Chbosky’s purpose for including sections such as these was likely to criticize the media and its

Open Document