Perinchek's The Art Of Rhetoric

1180 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Aristotle contributions in greek civilization

Persuasion is a way of making influence on peoples’ beliefs, thoughts, attitudes or behavior. Greek philosopher and scientist Aristotle was one of those philosophers who determined the term “rhetoric” as a mean of persuasion. According to the philosopher, rhetoric is one of the most ancient arts of discourse, where a writer/speaker tries to inform, motivate or persuade a particular audience in a certain situation. In our days, the art of persuasion is present everywhere: politics, business sphere, social media, and everyday life. Although Aristotle lived thousands of years ago, his philosophical views concerning persuasion and rhetorics are relevant in today’s globalized world.

In the first sentence of his “ The Art of Rhetoric,” Aristotle …show more content…

Turkish politician Dogu Perinchek can be considered as an example of a person who used Greek “tricks” to appeal to the Eouropean Court of Human Rights. In 2007, Perinchek was known as Genocide Denier. After receiving criminal conviction, Perinchek gave an incredigble and life-changing speech in the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights. Although at first sight it might seem that Perinchek was only speaking from the bottom of his heart, knowledge of terms “pathos,” “ethos,” and “logos” would help understand that the speech was fully based on those modes of persuasion. As a part of European liberty and heritage, Perinchek highlights the importance of the freedom of speech. In Perinchek's opinion, with the help of the freedom of speech, we need to rid ourselves from the negative effects of judgements, opinions which date back to the First World War. Perinchek observes "the truth" as one of the most valuable elements of people's freedom. By refering to the subjects such as the freedom of speech and First World War, Perinchek appeals to the European Court with the help of Logos which is based on facts, theories and real-life examples. After giving his point of view about the importance of the freedom of speech, Perinchek with the help of Logos again, turns to the Armenian Genocide. As he states, the events that took place in 1915 do not fit into the legal definition of genocide. As Perinchek argues, along with his fellows, he supported this argument with the help of science. As the speaker mentions, endless number of Russian and Armenian documents with the total weight of 90 kilos have been presented to the Swiss Court. Moreover, Perinchek insures the court that his argumentations were based on Russian reports and court judments. In the continuation of the speech, Perinchek appeals to the fact

Show More
Related

  • Rhetoric By Covino And Jolliffe

    339 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the story, What is Rhetoric by William Covino and David Jolliffe, there are a wide variety of topics discussed that are inextricably interwoven with the concept “rhetoric.” Rhetoric, as defined by the authors, is “the study and practice of shaping content.” Consequently, my first thought was: Ok, this is a rather broad and opaque description; my successive thought, however, was one of astonishment, inasmuch as the authors went on to further elucidated this jargon. In doing so, the authors distilled the most crucial elements of what is rhetoric— the prevalence of discourse community, and how appealing language is often a precursor to persuasion.

    Read More

  • Who Is Frances Harper´s Rhetoric?

    618 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rhetoric is the art of effective or persuasive speaking or writing, and its uses the figures of speech and other compositional techniques. It’s designed to have a persuasive or impressive effect on its audience.

    Read More

  • The Techniques of Persuasion in W.J. Reeves’ “College Isn’t For Everyone”

    1726 Words  | 4 Pages

    Effectively communicating an idea or opinion requires several language techniques. In his study of rhetoric, Aristotle found that persuasion was established through three fundamental tools. One is logos, which is used to support an argument through hard data and statistics. Another is ethos, which is the credibility of an author or speaker that allows an audience to conclude from background information and language selection a sense of knowledge and expertise of the person presenting the argument. The impact of pathos, however, is the most effective tool in persuasion due to the link between emotions and decisions. Although each of these tools can be effective individually, a combination of rhetorical devices when used appropriately has the ability to sway an audience toward the writer’s point of view.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Techniques Used by Michael Moore and Niccoló Machiavelli

    1014 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rhetorical appeals apply to everyday life and the three sections of the rhetoric’s cover all elements of persuasion. Moore and Machiavelli do an outstanding job of explaining their points and why you should believe what they are saying. Both author’s did a great job of educating and informing their viewers although they were two significantly different pieces. Moore and Machiavelli’s work are each their own with respect to purpose and lessons but they also both come together in regards to using Aristotle’s three rhetorical appeals.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis: A Persuasive Balance

    912 Words  | 2 Pages

    In this day and age, persuasion can be seen on almost any screen. The average American views thousands of advertisements every week. Most ads are simply pushed out of a person’s mind, but the successful advertisements are the ones that resonate with people. Some forms of ads are very annoying to those who put up with them constantly. Online pop-up ads, for example, are proven to do worse for products and business than no advertising at all! This is because this form of advertising does nothing to convince or persuade the person viewing the ad, and no effort is put into actually put into proving what it’s worth to make a point. Pop-ads make zero use of something known as “rhetorical devices”. In Julius Caesar, Brutus and Mark Antony both try to convey their point of view to a large audience of Roman citizens. One had a better speech than the other since he used “rhetorical devices” more effectively. Logos (logical; what makes sense), Ethos (ethics and morals; portraying similar beliefs and values), and Pathos (emotions; natural feelings that can be counterintuitive to logos) are the rhetorical devices that Aristotle

    Read More

  • Understanding the Meaning of Rhetoric

    1790 Words  | 4 Pages

    Aristotle believed that rhetoric is a skill habit of mind that is, in itself, morally neutral and can be used for good or ill. He believed th...

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    753 Words  | 2 Pages

    Briefcases: Steps toward Rhetorical Analysis”, she discusses the nature of rhetorical analysis, how it affects our everyday lives and explains the role context plays. Aristotle’s mode of persuasion: Logos, Pathos and Ethos are all components often used to persuade an audience. Logos appeal to logic or stating the facts, Pathos taps into your emotions and Ethos demonstrates the presenter’s credibility. Determining which appeal was used will assist you in having a clear understanding if you should buy into the idea, product etc. Every day we perform some type of analysis, whether we are aware of this or not.

    Read More

  • The Iliad Rhetorical Analysis And Persuasion

    1710 Words  | 4 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis and Persuasion Every day we are victims to persuasion whether anyone can notice it or not. Logos, pathos and ethos are the types of persuasion. Logos persuades by reason, pathos by appealing to emotion and ethos by the credibility of the author. The characters in The Iliad employ the use of these techniques to sway another character into doing or feeling something else.

    Read More

  • Aristotle Rhetorical Analysis

    1834 Words  | 4 Pages

    Aristotle looked at and defined communication as Rhetoric (Griffin 2012 PP. 289-298) rhetoric is defined as the art of discovering ways truth seem more probable to an audience that is not completely convinced through persuasion. He argued rhetoric is a counterpart of an offshoot of dialectic (one on one discussion) in search for the truth, answer general philosophical questions certainty, whilst rhetoric is one person addressing many, trying to demonstrate truth that’s already been found, or addressing specific practical question with probability. This skill according to Aristotle is vital in leadership, management as argued by sophists in the early Greek civilization who were travelling speech teachers in Athens training lawyers and politicians oratorical devices. Rhetoric is useful firstly because without rhetoric the truth can be easily be defeated in a debate for true knowledge alone may not be enough to persuade certain audiences who rely on unconstrasted opinion and feeling. Secondly rhetoric helps the speaker understand the real...

    Read More

  • Aristotle on Rhetoric

    1889 Words  | 4 Pages

    Aristotle (384-322 B.C.) was a Greek philosopher, educator, and scientist. He was able to combine the thoughts of Socrates and Plato to create his own ideas and definition of rhetoric. He wrote influential works such as Rhetoric and Organon, which presented these new ideas and theories on rhetoric. Much of what is Western thought today evolved from Aristotle's theories and experiments on rhetoric.

    Read More

  • The Nature of Rhetoric

    1390 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Plato’s Gorgias, Socrates discusses the nature and uses of rhetoric with Gorgias, while raising moral and philosophical perspective of rhetoric. Socrates believes that rhetoric is a kind of false knowledge whose purpose is to produce conviction, and not to educate people about the true extent of knowledge (Plato 15). On the other hand, Gorgias argues that the study of rhetoric is essential in any other professional fields, in order to provide an effective communication (Plato 19). After their discussion of rhetoric, Socrates seems to understand the true extent of rhetoric better as compared to Gorgias, as he is able to use rhetoric appeals as a device to dominate the conversation. During their discussion, Socrates seems to have use rhetorical appeals, such as ethos appeal and pathos appeal to connect and convince the crowd of audiences, and logos appeal to support his claims. His speeches seems to have shown sarcastic aspects and constantly asking questions in order to keep Gorgias busy, at the same time preparing an ambush. Since rhetoric is the art of effective communication through the form of speaking and writing, with the appropriate knowledge and virtue, it can be used for good purposes. On the other hand, rhetoric also can be used as an act of conviction because rhetorical appeals can be defined as an act of persuasion as well. Learning the true extent of rhetoric can help an individual strengthen their verbal communication skills. Socrates uses rhetorical appeals of ethos, pathos and logos appeal to win his argument against Gorgias, as he is able to get the audiences’ attention through rhetoric and cornered Gorgias into revealing the true extent of rhetoric.

    Read More

  • Friendship in Oroonoko and Gulliver’s Travels

    1291 Words  | 3 Pages

    Aristotle. On Rhetoric. The Rhetorical Tradition: Readings from Classical Times to the Present. 2nd ed. Ed. Trans. Patricia Bizzell & Bruce Herzberg. New York: Bedford/St. Martins, 2001. Book I, Chapter V. Print.

    Read More

  • Gorgias: The Nature Of Rhetoric

    668 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Plato’s Gorgias, Socrates and the title character participate in a discussion that aims to discover the nature of rhetoric. Gorgias declares himself to be a rhetorician and one who practices rhetoric. Socrates wants to know what exactly this means. Gorgias distinguishes between the art of rhetoric and other crafts and arts by stating that what rhetoric produces is persuasion. He claims that rhetoric enables one to persuade judges, members of the assembly, and others involved in governmental issues.

    Read More

  • Comparing Aristotle And Plato's Discussion Of Rhetoric

    886 Words  | 2 Pages

    If untrue and unjust prevail, it is due to the poor use of rhetoric, not the art of rhetoric itself. While Plato’s Socrates claims that all rhetoric is inherently bad and Aristotle claims that rhetoric is unjust if used wrongly, they both suggest that there should be a clear connection between rhetoric and truth and it must do justice to its origin. In a democratic setting, the most desirable rhetoric comes from Aristotle’s point of view who gives all citizens of a democracy the right to engage in rhetorical deliberation by using the three persuasive appeals, logos, ethos, and pathos. These devices remain powerful tools in a democracy and depending on the purpose, the audience, and the time and place, a successful orator can assess the probability of convincing an audience and can mutually coordinate and interact all three appeals of persuasion.

    Read More

  • Are Human Rights Universal?

    1599 Words  | 4 Pages

    There have been individuals and even countries that oppose the idea that human rights are for everybody. This argument shall be investigated in this essay, by: exploring definitions and history on human rights, debating on whether it is universal while providing examples and background information while supporting my hypothesis that human rights should be based on particular cultural values and finally drawing a conclusion. A general definition of human rights is that they are rights and freedoms to which all humans are entitled, simply because they are human. It is the idea that ‘all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.’

    Read More

More about Perinchek's The Art Of Rhetoric

Open Document