Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Is genetic engineering ethical
Is genetic engineering ethical
Is genetic engineering ethical
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Is genetic engineering ethical
Perfect Child – Against
Humans are always trying to achieve something they’ll never have, something that is so blatantly unachievable that it’s strange that they’re even trying.
This is- perfection.
Perfect skin, perfect hair, perfect eyes, perfect society, they’re always trying to reach this state.
And now they’re starting to move onto: Perfect Children.
This means that a parent is able to genetically modify their child to meet their requirements for what is considered “perfect”. Whether it be no mental disability or illness, high intelligence, no physical conditions, etc.
This, however, should not be the case.
There is a ton of times where this selective breeding has turned out bad for non-human species. For example: Pugs; this dog breed is susceptible to nasal and respiratory infection and disease because they have been selectively bred to have a short nose. Dachshunds (or Sausage Dogs) are another example of this being the
…show more content…
case, with them now suffering from spinal conditions due to them being bred for shorter and shorter legs. Why should this pain and misery be the same for humans if it ever ends up like this? In other aspects, we should give our children the chance to be truly themselves.
Why should we care if they have more or less chromosomes, if they have or are a carrier of an “undesirable” genotype or phenotype, if they have physical, mental or psychological conditions, about their pedigree or the punnet square? We should let our children be themselves instead of better versions of their parents. We should give them the chance to pick their careers, their education, their lives, instead of it being entirely dependent on their genes, the chance to truly be an individual and stand out from the crowd. This is world we should be striving to create, not a world where everyone is nearly the exact same as each-other. Because perfection is entirely subjective, is it not? An art critique might consider Picasso perfection, while another might consider The Sistine Chapel perfection, and a parent might consider their mentally and physically disabled child to be perfect, while another might consider a perfectly healthy and smart child to be
perfection. We are going to run into a loophole here, there is no set definition of perfection, like previously stated, the idea of perfection is entirely subjective, we will never reach perfect if everyone has a different opinion on what perfect is, it just isn’t the way it works, it’ll never be the way it works. And if we truly reached a state of perfection, we as a species will never go anywhere, there will be no advancements in medicine, in technology, in education, in anything. Because if we ever reached a state of perfection, we’ll not bother to advance anything as we would consider that perfect as well. There’s also the problem with morality. Creating the perfect child is, in essence, the same as animal testing. If this doesn’t end up in humans not advancing further, it will result in scientists cruelly breeding “perfect” children for lab experiments. We will have humans live their entire lives in labs, with no way to go out, and play, and explore, because of us wanting to play god. This is inhumane, and this should not be the case. So in conclusion, we as a species should not be able to genetically modify and/or alter our children in any way. We’ve already seen the negatives of selective breeding in the animal world, the nasal diseases of the pug, and the spinal conditions of the dachshunds. The fact that the entire definition of “perfect” is subjective, and depends on person to person. That if we did reach perfection, we’d either never advance further or scientists will end up using human children as laboratory experiments. And that is why humanity should never strive to ever develop the idea of a “perfect child”.
However, with genetic engineering this miracle of like is taken and reduced to petty “character creation” picking and choosing what someone else thinks should “make them special”. An unborn child that undergoes genetic treatments in this fashion is known as a designer baby (“Should Parents Be Permitted to Select the Gender of Their Children?”). By picking and choosing the traits of a child these designer babies bear similarities to abortion, choosing to get rid of the original child in favor of a “better” one. It is also unfair to deprive a child of their own life. By removing the element of chance and imputing their own preferences, children become treated more as an extension of their parents than as living beings with their own unique life. Parents could redirect a child’s entire life by imposing their wishes before they are even born, choosing a cookie cutter tall, athletic boy over a girl with her own individual traits, or any other choice that would redirect a child’s
After the discovery of genetically altering an embryo before implantation, “designer babies” was coined to describe a child genetically altered “to ensure specific intellectual and cosmetic characteristics.” (“Designer Babies” n.p.). This procedure combines genetic engineering and In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) to make sure certain characteristics are absent or present in an embryo (Thadani n.p.). The procedure also includes taking an embryo to be pre-implementation genetically diagnosed (PGD), another procedure that doctors use to screen the embryos (Stock n.p.). An embryo’s DNA goes through multiple tests to obtain an analysis of the embryo, which will list all the components of the embryo including genetic disorders and physical traits such as Down syndrome, blue eyes, and brown hair, for instance (Smith 7). Although the use of PGD is widely accepted by the “reproductive medical community” and the modifying of disorders or diseases is to a degree, once the characteristics are no longer health related “72% disapprove of the procedure” (“Designer Babies” n.p.). At this point the parents make decisions that would alter their child’s life forever and this decision is rather controversial in the U...
A problem that could arise is a repeat of history. Inequality. Our society would be divided into two groups, the “valids” or “perfect humans” and the “in-valids” or “non perfect humans.” This is just another form of discrimination, whereby people are judged because of the circumstances of they were born, something that they have no control over. "I belong to a new underclass, no longer determined by social status or the colour of your skin. We now have discrimination down to a science." -Vincent. In the film “in-valids were granted less rights than the “valids.” Sounds familiar? In the 1960’s many protests occurred because of the inequality and brutality against African-Americans, who had their rights taken away from them based on the colour of their skin. Introducing the practice of genetically modifying humans to live up to the ideology of perfection could cause protests, violence, chaos and possibly a repeat of the Civil Rights Movement. For many years our society has been attempting to eliminate inequality, but this practice could just as easily re-create
It is human nature to strive for perfection, but we are striving for something that can never be reached. Nothing can be perfect according to Leo Tolstoy, who stated, “If you look for perfection, you’ll never be content”. (Tolstoy) We as humans have strived to reach perfection for many centuries now and we still have yet to achieve perfection, but this is no surprise. Wais, who wrote the paper Does Perfection Exist, said, “Perfection exists as an abstraction of our minds, but is not attainable in the physical world.” (“Does Perfection Exist”, Wais) The struggle for perfection in Aldous Huxley’s book Brave New World demonstrates that humanity can never be perfect.
The issue then becomes how to consolidate the old and the new. Common ground must be found. Sandel provides us with a potential solution, and it comes back to the respect for the giftedness of life. Being a good athlete, a good performer, or a good parent comes down to this idea. It is about accepting and appreciating what life has provided for you. Through discipline and hard work, one can strengthen the body, but with significant respect in hand. For a child, there must be a careful balance between loving and challenging it. The genetic lottery is something we all participate in. Overriding this system nature has provided for us would be a deep moral violation. On what grounds would we be able to judge humanity if take complete control of it? Nobody is perfect. Accepting that opens the door to the appreciation for life.
Julian Savulescu tries to argue on the grounds of Utilitarianism that parents have a moral duty to improve their children’s genetic makeup in the same way that they would improve the child’s “environment” or prevent diseases (The Ethical Life, 443). Julian thinks this is a duty because it will yield the most positive outcomes or consequences. He believes that failure to use genetic enhancements, when a parent has an opportunity to benefit their child, is neglecting the child’s needs which is morally wrong (The Ethical Life, 443). Julian also defends his position by claiming that it would be inconsistent to “train our children to behave well”, but then refuse to seek genetic enhancements for our children so they have the tools to succeed, when
Imagine that we live in a society where you can have a genetically perfect child merely by telling your local geneticist what you want the child to look like, how tall they will be, how smart, how strong, or even how “endowed” they will be. Kind of like ordering the biggest and best burrito you could make from Chipotle. Oh, not to mention that you could make them devoid of genetic diseases or even genetic predispositions such as, cancer, heart disease, mental illness, etc. Now that you are thinking about how great that is, throw this into the mix. What if one’s career, education, social status, economic status, love life, and practically entire life was determined by the genes that your parents picked for you. Gattaca does a beautiful
Child Advocates works with court appointed volunteers to break the cycle of child abuse. Child Advocates works with people of all races and social classes. Since abuse and neglect is not specific to a particular race, gender, age, or social class. Each court appointed advocated is assigned one case at a time. A child advocate is guided by their advocacy coordinator which enables them to perform a thorough investigation of the case.
In brain science today, there are four noteworthy perceived child rearing styles: legitimate, careless, lenient, and tyrant. Every one conveys diverse qualities and realizes distinctive responses in the kids which they are utilized on. It is essential to remember that each guardian tyke relationship is diverse, so there is not one beyond any doubt fire approach to child rearing. Analysts have found four sorts of child rearing styles. Actually, research has uncovered that child rearing styles can impact a tyke 's social, cognitive, and mental development, which influences kids both in the adolescence years, and as a grown-up. This is on account of kids growing through various jolts, connection, and trade, which encompass them. The way that folks
People should not have access to genetically altering their children because of people’s views on God and their faith, the ethics involving humans, and the possible dangers in tampering with human genes. Although it is many parent’s dream to have the perfect child, or to create a child just the way they want, parents need to realize the reality in genetic engineering. Sometimes a dream should stay a figment of one’s imagination, so reality can go in without the chance of harming an innocent child’s life.
The downfall of artificial selection is that it decreases variation in a species. Pure bred dogs are highly susceptible to many different disorders and diseases because of the lack of variation in their genotype. With these two processes, today we have friendly canine companions.
The first two years of a humans life are bursting with biosocial, cognitive, and psychosocial development. In the first few weeks after conception to two years after birth a child’s brain experiences more growth than any other organ in the body. During the first two years of a child’s life the brain is very plastic and malleable. In order for children to continue down a path of success and learning there are certain experiences a child must have in order to develop normally. The First Two years of a child life is responsible for the foundation that is layed.
Science has taken another step forward into the future of mankind by empowering parents to give their children the best start possible. We are now presented the opportunity to decide what personality and features we want our kids to have before their even born. Although at first glance, it may seem amazing and feel as if you’re picking the exact candy bar you want at a convenient store. However, are we ready for mankind to play, what some might call “God”? Is messing with the genetic code in our babies morally right? Or is it wrong? These are questions being brought up towards the matter of genetically engineering our babies. Danielle Simmons mentioned in the 2008 Nature Education that “Genes influence health and disease, as well as human traits and behavior”. Well genetic engineering on human genes has been going on for a long period of time now. It has also been performed on babies of women who were having trouble conceiving to prevent birth deficiency and help produce a healthy baby. As time went on, scientist became more precise and accurate in the genetic engineering of human genes (Simmons). Scientist is now able to help parents make their baby exactly the way, they prefer. Now that we are able to engineer the genetic code in humans to this extent, we can now produce a healthier generation that will have our ideal traits and behavior.
Before learning about early childhood in this class I never realized all the way children at such a young age are developing. From the second part of this course I learned how much children are developing at the early childhood stage. I never realized children learn how about their emotions, having empathy, and self-concept at such a young age. I thought children had it easy. They play with friends, start school, and just be kids. One important thing that stood out to me in this chapter is that children’s self-esteem starts at this stage. According to Berk (2012), “self-esteem is the judgments we make about our own worth and the feelings associated with those judgments (p. 366)”. Self-esteem is very important for a child to have and it can
This is why the Amish people have begun to set up arranged marriages between other Amish people so they can have different kids with different genetics. Ethically, who gets to pick what genes, characteristics, personality traits? It is not OK for scientists to play God. It is morally wrong for people to make decisions to change nature. People like me who are not good in school, but may have other talents to offer like art and music would not be picked and then those genes would eventually die off.