Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Is voting a right or privilege
An essay on rights of voting
An essay on rights of voting
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Is voting a right or privilege
The right to vote is a right that according to law is entitled to everyone once you have reached the age of 18, but what happens if you break the law? Do you still have the right to vote for upcoming officials, or once the law has been broken has your right to vote been forfeited? Voting is a privilege and a privilege only. Ignorance is not an excuse and individuals should know better but what if when felonies have completed their time or still is doing time, should they still be allowed to vote? No, but when their debt is paid it is important to bring their rights back and allow them to vote again. The United States is one of the strictest nations when it comes to rejecting the right to vote to citizens that have been convicted of multiple of serious crimes. Thousands of Americans are forbidden to vote because of what philosophers call “felon disenfranchisement,” referring to those people who banned from voting otherwise eligible due to conviction of a criminal offense usually restricted to serious class of crimes …show more content…
Committing such a serious crime usually portrays an image of poor judgment. Roger Clegg, president of the advocacy group, believes that, “If you are not willing to follow the law, you cannot claim the right to make the law for everyone else.” (Holdings). By breaking the law and using poor judgment, they have proven themselves as being unfit to participate in major decisions and those who are against felonies voting believe that those that are convicted of crimes have portrayed poor judgment, which proves to them that they are not eligible to make good decisions especially when its time to choose the upcoming leaders this is the way society punishes those who break the law and when convicted felons complete their prison sentences their freedom and rights are restored well that’s the way it should
What if one day you weren't allowed to voice your opinion about the people who run our country, your country, in other words, if you couldn’t vote? A lot of people don’t vote, but what if you didn’t even have the right to do so? In 12 states, ex-felons aren’t allowed to vote even after serving their prison time. When you think of a felon you probably think of someone that has done terrible things and shouldn't have a voice in politics, but that figure should be changed. One lady, by the name of Leola Strickland, isn’t allowed to vote because she has a felony on her record for postdating a few checks and having them bounce because she lost her job(1).
“Many people say that serious crime committers have shown they aren’t trustworthy” (Clegg). After a felon is released from prison, the expectation is that they will shape up and return to their lives, however most of their lives are completely changed. When a felon is released from prison, they should retain their same rights as a US citizen as well as their right to vote and serve in Jury Duty, because they served their time and cannot be held in double jeopardy, and are valuable assets to the country for work and less homelessness. When felons are released from prison, they should retain the same rights as the average US citizen as well as the right to vote. Nonviolent felons who have served time for more than a year for misdemeanors are unable to vote because their judgment can no longer be trusted.
Throughout the nation there are 5.3 million Americans who are denied their right to vote because they have a criminal conviction on their record (“Felon Voting Rights”). In the state of Florida, a felon can’t apply for his right to vote to be restored until at least five years after he has completed his sentence, with no guarantee of his rights being restored. Violent and repeat felons haven’t proved they are good citizens; however non-violent felons, who have committed victimless crimes, should be allowed to have their rights restored when they have served their time and paid off their fines. Non-violent felons would have a better chance of readapting into society because they would be able to vote in elections, be rehabilitated, and return to fully contributing members of society.
The feelings of allowing felons to vote is chilling; those who have been to prison have committed crimes and are out to get their rights back. But it is clear that felons should be “disenfranchised because they have broken the laws,” says Edward Feser, a philosophy professor and writer. Yet people are still questioning whether it is moral to keep felons from getting the rights to vote. Disenfranchising felons is unintentional in racial issues, and is used to punish felons to teach them that once they've broken the laws, they have lost their voting rights as well, and it would also keep felons from violating fellow citizens' voting rights.
In the United States 2.2 million citizens are incarcerated on felony charges. Laws in America prohibit felons from voting. As a result, on Election Day 5.3 million citizens of America are disenfranchised because of crimes they once committed. Though they once broke the law, they have served their time and have been punished adequately in accordance with the American Justice System. Felons should regain full voting rights after their stint in prison.
Many people believe that felons do not deserve the right to vote. For these people, voting is not an inherent right; rather it is a privilege given to deserving people that wish to make a positive change to their lives. Some believe that, “…there is no reason for a felon to vote or to debate about whether or not they have that right…they made the choice to break the law, so why should they have any say in making it?” {Siegel} In this point of view, giving felons the right to vote is similar to rewarding them. With the right to vote, felons are still able to sway decisions regarding the lives of a society they are no longer a part of. Felons are meant to be punished, stripped of numerous rights including that of voting. Punishments, then, are made to restrict a person, not give them more freedom and decision.
The United States is one of the only few democratic countries that disenfranchises convicted felons. An estimated 5.85 million people charged with a felony are banned from voting. Moreover, felon disenfranchisement laws are a form of racial discrimination because a large percentage of felons are Hispanic, Latino or African American that have been incarcerated as a result of racial profiling. Denying felons from voting is unconstitutional since the right to vote and cast a ballot is supposed to be the cornerstone of democracy. Felons who have completed their sentence should be restored their right to vote as they should be able to participate in elections just like every other citizen. Despite being charged with a felony, felons are also American
26, 2007 editorial "Another No Vote on Felons," published in the Washington Times: “Even in nearby Massachusetts, no stranger to progressivism, voters in 2000 supported a constitutional amendment to bar inmates from voting. The reason is clear: Most people think perpetrators of serious crimes have violated the public trust and cannot be permitted to help determine the future of the communities they harmed”. This view point is helpful to help undecided people see the potential harm of letting free convicted prisoners vote. Also, it is interesting how the very thought of convicted felons vote places such concern in the law abiding citizens’ thoughts. One may notice that particular past criminals may not have the best interest in what best for the community. Furthermore, one may notice that prisoners may be cut off from the events of the world, and wouldn’t have information to help them elect officials for the communities they may harmed. In, addition this may be true under the circumstance that some felons are not capable of making great choices for the community as a whole. As well as, if they have harmed the community they shouldn’t be able to vote on the wellbeing of the people they have
voting because they have been convicted of a felony. A felony is usually considered any crime
Criminal disenfranchisement is defined as the loss of the right to vote by a person convicted of or sentenced to imprisonment for a felony. Since before the civil war, this practice has been a part of the United States justice system mostly as a means to handle the racial issues with voting but then also in regards to the felons and rebels that participated in the Southern “rebellion” during the Civil War. This practice has recently gained some popularity since a debate has developed as to whether it is unconstitutional or not. Is voting a right or a privilege?
I want to ask you a question, what do you think was going through their mind when they committed their devious acts towards the community? If a convicted felon cannot even be trusted to live normally in society then why would we trust their judgment in a presidential election? "We don't let children vote, for instance, or noncitizens, or the mentally incompetent. Why? Because we don't trust them and their judgment...” (Roger Clegg, JD). If somebody commits crimes against The United States then they are not trustworthy whatsoever. As convicted felons have shown with their crimes, they cannot handle being a good citizen and following the rules. So what gives other citizens of America the right of thinking their opinion must be heard? "Now why would we, as citizens, as non-felon citizens, want felons helping to pick our representatives?” (Tucker Carlson, MSNBC television host). So I have shown you, with expert details, that we cannot trust convicted felons with the right to vote for our major representatives.
A felon is a person who commits serious, sometimes violent crimes that are punishable by several years of imprisonment or death. Once they have finished serving their sentence, ex-felons return to the world under a set of regulations designed to limit their interaction with certain parts of society, which aims toward keeping the public safe. Recently, many individuals have begun questioning the constitutionality of some of these rules, such as the taking away the right to vote. Those in favor of letting ex-felons regain this right argue that they have already served a long enough sentence, and returning this privilege may help them become more involved in society and prevent relapsing behavior.
Cory N Steinle, educator for the Penn State Presidential Leadership Academy, recently published her beliefs on disenfranchisement. “To me, all felons should not be allowed to vote. It’s not because they’re incorrigible. It’s not because they can’t be reformed. It’s because disenfranchisement is an effective deterrent on crime.” (Steinle, Cory N, Felons Shouldn’t Have the Right to Vote) Though banishing those convicted of a felony is a potential way to eliminate the disenfranchisement problem in the United States, it does nothing but sweep individuals rights under the rug. “I also believe that once an offender has fully paid his debt to society, he deserves a second chance…” (McDonnell, Robert F., Felon Voting) Citizens must understand the importance of maintaining voting rights within all race, age, and gender populations. Voting rights are not being “handed back” to the ex-convict. There are steps, and procedures they must follow in order to regain their rights as a civically engaged citizen. But, having the 90-day waiting period, and enforcing that felons partake in the renewal of their rights, this guarantees that the individuals actually want to have their rights restored, and they want to partake in society once again. Reentry into society can be a difficult part of rehabilitation. Getting a job, finding a place to reside, paying court fees, regaining the trust of friends and family can all be discouraging processes. Studies show that by reentering society and participating in elections and polls, ex-convicts are significantly less likely to fall into recidivism. Participating in an election can make an individuals voice feel heard. Hans A.von Spakovsky, law reform initiator and senior legal fellow spoke on felon restoration rights for The Heritage Foundation. “Recidivism among felons is extremely high. The U.S. Justice Department reports that over
This brings up the question, should criminals be allowed to vote? I will tell you why I know they should not. Criminals should not be allowed to vote as they cannot be trusted to make a logical decision on a matter that will affect the lives of others. Since criminals have broken the law, they have made a series of bad judgement calls to end up in prison, therefore have shown that they cannot be trusted to vote on who will be the future leader of the country or other important matters. This point is emphasized by Roger Clegg, the President and General Counsel of the Centre for Equal Opportunity and the former Deputy Assistant Attorney General to Ronald Reagan and George Bush.
According to a justice ministry spokesman (The Guardian, 2010) the issue of voting rights being given to convicted criminals is still a controversial topic amongst government authorities, however, it is being considered seriously and under careful supervision. The governments view on the voting rights being related to criminal offences against the democratic