Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical decision making and moral judgment
Ethical decision making & moral judgment
Ethics In Medical Profession
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical decision making and moral judgment
Moral agency is the ability to make a moral judgement on the basis of the common perception of good and wrong in the society and have accountability for these actions. A moral agent is the person who takes this responsibility. Since time immemorial, there have been two forces in the world: good and evil that are determined by a man’s virtue or moral character. To possess a virtue is to be a certain type of person with a particular mind set.
Case study analysis Harry, an 80-year old war veteran living in a small townhouse suffered a stroke that paralysed his whole body and was rushed to hospital where he was put under Intensive Care to support his life. He was in a coma and had to rely on life support, to keep his organs functional. For nearly
…show more content…
This situation can be understood when analysed according to Pellegrino’s four-part matrix. Pellegrino (271) explains the moral event regarding accountability and justification require a unified assessment of four elements. They are the agent, act, circumstance and consequences in relation to each other. The agents involved are the physicians and Harry’s daughter. It is a fact, that when treating a patient in a poor physical state, the next of kin must be made aware of the necessary circumstances. It could be devastating if the next of kin later finds out that there was nothing to be done on their sick patients and even the physicians had already given up. On the second issue of the act as identified by Pellegrino (271), the doctors felt the need to inform the daughter. This decision was not only the logical thing to do, but also it served as the best for the benefit of all the parties involved in the situation. According to the physicians, this would lead to better and informed decision concerning the father’s state of health. In terms of overall ethics of the social contract theory as well as the circumstance, Harry’s daughter could have felt that the hospital was not doing things right. As a consequence, the physicians considered the fact that as Harry’s conditions got worse with time, it would be wise in letting the daughter understand the state. All the steps as highlighted by Pellegrino (271) have been followed to prevent a consequence that would have been hard to deal with. Despite the daughter disagreeing with the doctors thus the arising conflict, dreadful circumstances have been avoided. We are however at crossroads with both parties being right in their own views and believing they are giving the better
Quill took two morals decision, to help Diane to commit suicide and lie about the diagnosis of Dianna cause of death. Under the Ethics of cares Dr. Quill did not do what he support to do in Diana situation. Care is a practice of doing an activity consistently over time. A practice need to incorporate standards to evaluate it. Under the ethics of care, helping patients to commit suicide was not constantly being part of his job. Moreover, if we take into consideration doctor standards to evaluate this situation it will not be permitted under doctor’s ethics rules to help patient to take away life. In other words, Dr. Quill actions to lie about the diagnosis of the cause of death is a crime. At that time, helping to suicide was illegal and it was paid with jail. In the ethics of cares, justice is a value and who ever do something wrong under this ethics need to pay for that. In other words, he did not took the best decision to lie about the diagnoses of death and may have to pay with
slipped into a diabetic coma. His body was not agreeing with all the years of
The case of Marguerite M presents an ethical dilemma. Medical ethics play a special role in medicine and is directly concerned with its practice. Its role has continued to evolve as changes develop in
The ethical principle of nonmaleficence demands to first do no harm and in this case protect the patient from harm since she cannot protect. Nurses must be aware in situations such as this, that they are expected to advocate for patients in a right and reasonable way. The dilemma with nonmaleficence is that Mrs. Boswell has no chance of recovery because of her increasing debilitating mental incapability and the obvious harm that outweighs the intended benefits. If the decision were to continue treatment, suffering of the patient and family would be evident. Autonomy is the right to making own decisions and freedom to choose a plan of action. When making decisions regarding treatment of another person, it is important to respect the expressed wishes of the individual. John says that his mother would want to live as long as she could, but questions arise related to her quality of life and perception of prolonged suffering by prolonging the dying process. In BOOK states that quality of life changes throughout one’s life ...
Furthermore, free will has been closely connected to the moral responsibility, in that one acts knowing they will be res for their own actions. There should be philosophical conditions regarding responsibility such like the alternatives that one has for action and moral significance of those alternatives. Nevertheless, moral responsibility does not exhaust the implication of free will.
Agents vs Acts Louden opens this section with this statement: “… it is commonplace that virtue theorists focus on good and bad agents rather than on right and wrong acts.” This is a good th... ... middle of paper ... ...
My initial response to the issues was only based on the hospital policies regarding the care of the patients within the hospital. However, when I was guided down the different paths and made to look through the different ethical lens, I found it tough to do so and seem to resort to my core values of autonomy and rationality. By putting the patients’ first, hospital policies, and then their loved ones in the first scenario, I determined that a compromise was necessary. Whereas in the second scenario, I feel as no agreement was needed just staff education (EthicsGame Simulation, 2016). In this particular case, Carlotta, the RN shift supervisor, needed further training to understand the hospital policy on who is or is not considered to be family (EthicsGame Simulation,
Engelhardt Jr., H. Tristram. “Ethical Issues in Aiding the Death of Young Children.” Intervention and Reflection Basic Issues in Medical Ethics. 8th ed. Australia: Thomson Wadsworth, 2008.
For the Kantian philosopher, free will is key to morality, especially moral responsibility. For her, an individual cannot be considered morally responsible for an act, unless the act was performed after freely deciding upon it, and that the decision came about via the process of reasoning. That is, the individual reflected on a course of action and then decided to act, without being directed by alien causes, passions or impulses (Spark Notes Editors 2005). Furthermore, the individual must have had the...
In this essay the author will rationalize the relevance of professional, ethical and legal regulations in the practice of nursing. The author will discuss and analyze the chosen scenario and critically review the action taken in the expense of the patient and the care workers. In addition, the author will also evaluates the strength and limitations of the scenario in a broader issue with reasonable judgement supported by theories and principles of ethical and legal standards.
Charlotte’s parents thought otherwise, the Ethics Advisory Committee had to get involved. The debate surrounded if the doctors were in the right to control the life of someone who were incapable of deciding themselves, or is it the parents right. The Ethics Advisory Committee, stated that the parents were superior to those of the hospital and the hospital should conduct with less painful test. Charlotte’s parents wanted the doctors to continue testing until it was determined that her life diffidently had no chance of remaining. Because, of Charlotte’s parents’ desires unfortunately caused Charlotte to die a painful death without her parents. If the patient is unable to speak for their selves, the family should be able to have some say in the medical treatment, however; if the doctors have tried everything they could do, the hospital should have final decisions whether or not the patient dies or treatment
In critical and complicating medical cases, family members often find it tedious to decide as to what mode or procedure of treatment is idyllic for the recovery of their patient. In such cases, well-qualified and medically educated can play a pivotal role in deciding the kind of treatment that should be given to the patient to enhance its recovery. In a contrary situation a nurse may know that administering a particular drug may improve the patient’s condition, but may be refrained from conducting the required action due to doctor’s absence or non-permission. There are numerous cases through which ethical dilemmas in the profession of nursing can be discussed. Nurses in order to remain within the defined boundaries ...
Both Kantian and virtue ethicists have differing views about what it takes to be a good person. Kantian ethicists believe that being a good person is strictly a matter of them having a “good will.” On the other hand, virtue ethicists believe that being a good person is a matter of having a good character, or being naturally inclined to do the right thing. Both sides provide valid arguments as to what is the most important when it comes to determining what a person good. My purpose in writing this paper is to distinguish between Kantian ethics and virtue ethics, and to then, show which theory is most accurate.
...rameters and all the aspects of the law that appear in our given scenario we can safely say that any claim that is being made by Tom’s representative by Daria and Samira on the grounds of negligence – breach of duty of care and psychiatric injury would be successful and that even though Harry suffered psychiatric injury his claim won’t be successful since he doesn’t fulfill the necessary parameters in order to make a successful claim.
Moral responsibility is when an agent does something good or bad morally for a specific event. For example, Donating money would be something you would be praised for in a moral sense, where as stealing would be seen as immoral. Free will would be required in moral responsibility. Without Free will, People would not be accountable for their actions, such as stealing a car or vandalism.