Pearl Harbor Dbq

1285 Words3 Pages

On December 7, 1941 the American public was shocked to hear of the events of a Japanese attack on American soil in which a total of three thousand Americans were either killed or wounded (Stinnett 4). Looking back on this disaster, people have found it just as shocking that the United States government, as well as the Army and Navy Intelligence units, could have been so taken by surprise at a time when they should have been most vigilant. In view of how tensions had increased between Japan and the U.S. leading up to the Pearl Harbor attack, historians have speculated as to whether the United States government knew of the attack, yet allowed it to happen so as to manipulate the public opinion and increase pro-war sentiments. Due to public opposition …show more content…

Despite the strong opposition to war amongst the American public, government leaders including Roosevelt agreed that “a victorious Nazi Germany would threaten the national security of the United States” (Stinnett 7). If Nazi Germany were able to triumph over Great Britain, as it already controlled almost all of continental Europe, Nazi forces would advance toward the Western Hemisphere and the United States (Stinnett 26). The Nazis would have seized control of Canada and British territories in the Caribbean and South and Central America, thus posing an imminent threat to the United States. Roosevelt therefore was a strong proponent of helping Great Britain and the Allies to defeat Germany before they were a direct threat to the U.S. This is evident in how Roosevelt supported actions such as Cash and Carry policies, the Lend Lease Act, and even started a peacetime draft. All in all, Roosevelt had been skirting around directly declaring war so as to not lose public support. An event such as Pearl Harbor that increased pro-war sentiment would have been very helpful to Roosevelt by allowing him to further his aid to Great Britain. Therefore, to serve his own motives, Roosevelt would have been willing to permit an attack such as the attack on Pearl …show more content…

These critics would argue that U.S. Intelligence units actually had no prior knowledge of the attack since they did not have the most accurate technology to observe the Japanese military. Admittedly, it has been documented that on Oahu, “communication between the radio operators and the information center from the outlying islands was by radio and ‘unsatisfactory’” (Wohlstetter 8). However, the suspicious ways in which the relentless radio codes from Japan were documented and disposed of demonstrate that people had knowledge of a potential attack, yet withheld such knowledge. An original radio log documenting the location of Japanese warships in the Pacific was confiscated shortly after the attack and disappeared. The Navy has since said there was “no record of such a log, although a withdrawal slip in the National Archives exists” (Stinnett 197). If there truly was inaccurate or inconclusive data that the U.S. obtained from radio codes, then they would not have been destroyed or hidden after the attack. On the contrary actually, the radio codes were able to attain enough viable information to send reports to the government. Recent research has shown that the “most conclusive evidence of the upcoming Japanese attack did reach the White House but has been withheld from public discussion” (Burtness and Ober). Therefore

Open Document