Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of protests
Violent protest in america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of protests
I would say that peaceful resistance to laws does not impact a free society positively, nor negatively. There have been many examples of resistances in the modern day, and there are some that are peaceful, as well as some that are not. A good example of one peaceful protest is when you look on television and you see athletes using some element, whether raising fists or wearing "Black Lives Matter" shirts, to show the public how they, too, are protesting issues in today's society. An example of a violent protest would be in Charlotte, when people were aggressively storming the streets, vandalizing as they went. For one, it is a right as an American to have free speech, which is to express your thoughts in any way that does not involve violence. As long as the resistance is purely …show more content…
Another reason they are good is because it is a easy way for the government to hear the cry of certain problems that American citizens have, whether it is with the economy, the environment, or even just everyday life. On the other hand, if a peaceful resistance did occur, without somewhat of control by the government; there would again be chaos. People's tempers would just escalate until things got out of hand, and violence begins to spread like a wildfire. So, to protect the safety of everyone, the government has to make sure they are able to allow for their voices to be heard, but also contain the actions of the group to ensure everyone's safety is secure. Like in Charlotte when the people were attacking cars, and breaking windows, the police had to use force to try and contain the situation as best as they could. Afterwards, because of their use of force, the government was able to calm the citizens of Charlotte down and use a more peaceful way to express how they
In conclusion, the Constitution guards against tyranny in many several ways. The framers of the Constitution have established a very efficient government system that still protects America today.
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society because if there isn't, how will people hear the voices of the oppressed and mistreated? Peaceful resistance comes a long way in trying to advance the rights and customs of the oppressed today. For example, The Salt March of 1930 was based on the Salt Act of 1882, which excluded the people the India from producing or getting salt, only British officials. Mahatma Gandhi was the leader of this protest. According to an article by time.com, it says that "The protest continued until Gandhi was granted bargaining rights at a negotiation in London. India didn’t see freedom until 1947, but the salt satyagraha (his brand of civil disobedience) established Gandhi as a force to be reckoned with and set a powerful precedent for future nonviolent protestors, including Martin Luther King Jr.(Sarah Begley,2015)" This means the salt march was a start for India's independence. Also, Gandhi's brand of civil disobedience set precedents for future nonviolent protests. Another Example of how peaceful protests
Clarence Mai Mrs. Chaid ERWC 12 February, 2014 Peace Through Strength No matter how oxymoronic it seems, I strongly agree with the phrase “The only way to prepare for peace is to be prepared for war”. I feel that this relates back to the adage that “the best defense is a good offense”. For me, I view the Cold War as proof that the weapons of war can also be used as instruments of peace. To start off, one of the key ideas behind the tense, yet somewhat stable peace between the Soviet Union and the United States during the second half of the 20th century was the concept of Mutually Assured Destruction, or MAD.
(Common Sense) Then read what Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence which states “These rights include the right of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. When a government fails to protect those rights, it is not only the right but also the duty of the people to overthrow that government.” (Declaration of Independence) In both of these it states that they were doing what was in the best interest for the people.
We often wonder about the importance of government. Is it necessary? Does it really benefit society? The answer is yes. Many countries have diverse forms of government such as totalitarian, monarchy, theocracy, and much more. The United States of America specifically runs a democratic type of government. A democratic government gives power to the people. Citizens over the age of eighteen are allowed to elect leaders based on their individual opinions through voting rights. The main purpose of the American government is, to protect people’s inalienable rights to life, liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness as our Founding Fathers intended.
The aftermath of the attacks on September 11 demonstrated that this was necessary. The Constitution is not designed to render the nation defenseless against people who have no value for human life, and who will use whatever means necessary to harm others to advance their goals. In conclusion, the Patriot Act gives the government the tools in which are necessary to keep America and its citizens safe.
Peaceful resistance itself does not affect a free society. A people-group can protest any number of laws: voting rights, taxes, and the legality of murder. A majority of society must determine what is best for itself. If the principles of a resistance aligns with the ideals of the society, the pursuit of betterment positively impacts that
Throughout history, there has been countless times where a country is ran by tyranny, and countless times where tyranny negatively affects the country. Our country, the United States of America, was one of those countries at one point, but we thankfully got out of it from war. Since our country didn’t want to go back to tyranny, people had to create a system, and a set of principles that would prevent that from happening. So, the Constitution was made. Tyranny is a government ran by one person, or a small amount of people, and the United States got out of it, but we still had to establish a way to prevent it from happening again. The constitution did it’s job and protected against tyranny by the small states vs. large states, federalism, separation of power, and checks and balances.
The peaceful resistance of laws positively affects society as a whole. Throughout history, many men have shown this remark to be true. From the likes of Henry David Thoreau, to Martin Luther King Jr., to Mahatma Gandhi, the world has learned civil disobedience does work and positively affects everyone as a whole.
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. Even in a democracy there are unjust laws, the question comes down to how we handle these laws. Should we be content to obey these laws, or should we try to change them? Most people in a democracy would agree with the second course as the best. There is a right to "revolution" against injustice and one must refuse to support something that is wrong. People should try to change these laws one way to do that is through peaceful resistance.
The United States of America was founded and has been built on the principles of freedom. From the very beginning, the nation has been working towards equality for all. As such, it allows for peaceful protestation of laws that are considered to be unfair or wrong by some. Thus, peaceful resistance to laws has a positive impact upon a free society.
It does not keep the country free. It does not settle in the West. It does not educate you. The character inherent in the American people has done all that has been accomplished; and it would have done somewhat more, if the government had not sometimes got in its way.
A fundamental aspect of the US Constitution is the right of “Free Speech”. Although all Americans have this right, it does not allow for civil disobedience or violating the law, thus violating another person’s rights. So in the question posed, if peaceful resistance is interpreted as peaceful protest then this is in line with our Constitution and can have a positive impact on a free society. If peaceful resistance is interpreted as a “right” to riot, violate the law, destroy property or similar acts, then this can have a negative impact on a free society. This is a topic that is quite relevant today. Although there are many to choose from, I will compare a few recent examples.
In the first amendment of the United States’ Constitution, citizens are granted the freedom of several essential rights that allow the United States to be the country it is today. When the Founding Fathers of the United States decided to create this document that laid out the laws of the land, they kept in mind all of the rights that Great Britain did not allow them to possess due to the country’s strict monarch. Included in the first amendment is the freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and the right to petition the government. With these three essentials, citizens are allowed to protest and stand up for what they believe in. Though, in today’s world, many think of doing such is frowned upon and those who oppose should
Justice is a vital part of governmental systems. Justice is a way to control the activities of citizens without infringing on their rights. Without justice, the acts of the citizens living under a government could not be very well controlled. There would be no punishments for bad behavior with would make this type of behavior more common. Even though justice acts as a way to loosely control the acts of citizens, it doesn't affect their liberty. Liberty is freedom. No one would want to live under a government under which they have no freedom and are controlled. Defense is also very important in a government. The protection of the people should be in high priority of the government. The government is there to serve the people and make life better for everyone. If they don't protect the people then there is no point in the government.