Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Offences against property law
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Offences against property law
INTRODUCTION:
This case involves the suspect using a hatchet to smash the rear passenger window of the victim’s vehicle in violation of PC 594(b)(1)-Vandalism.
LOCATION DESCRIPTION:
The location was at the intersection of Fair Oaks Avenue and Mountain Street in the city of Pasadena.
EVIDENCE:
1) Hatchet, chrome in color with a black handle, found in the suspect’s possession.
2) Photos of the damage to the vehicle.
INVESTIGATION:
On 01-05-16 at 1042 hours, Officer Cass #2067 and I responded to 881 N. Raymond Avenue for a female yelling and hitting vehicles with an axe. Sergeant Villalovos #9034, Officer Allen #0311 and Officer ???? responded to assist.
Officer Allen was contacted by Victim Jeff Eugene Zhorne, who directed him to the
…show more content…
female, later identified as Suspect Ashley Owens, who smashed his rear window. Officer Allen located and detained Owens in the center courtyard of 881 N. Raymond Avenue pending further investigation. Officer Allen also retrieved a hatchet which was located hanging a rod iron fence behind Owens. Officer Allen retrieved the hatchet as evidence. Officer Cass and I arrived at the location and met with Officer Allen. I removed Owens from his patrol unit and walked her to my unit. Owens spontaneously stated, “He hit my right leg with his car!” I asked Owens if she needed paramedics for her injury. Owens declined medical treatment by saying, “No. It doesn’t hurt.” Owens did not make any other statements. I placed Owens in the rear seat of my patrol unit. I then retrieved the hatchet as evidence. I met with Victim Jeff Eugene Zhorne who told me the following information in summary: On 01-05-16 at about 1020 hours, Zhorne was traveling east on Mountain Street approaching Fair Oaks Avenue. Zhorne was behind another vehicle that was attempting to make a right turn onto southbound Fair Oaks Avenue from Mountain Street. Zhorne heard the vehicle’s horn and saw Suspect Owens standing in the street, which blocked the path of the vehicle. Zhorne also began using his horn to gain the attention of Owens, so she would continue walking. Zhorne saw that Owens became agitated and began walking toward the vehicle in front of him with her hands balled up into fist.
Zhorne reportedly saw the vehicle make a right turn on Fair Oaks Avenue. Zhorne then drove left around Owens and began to make a right turn onto Fair Oaks Avenue. Zhorne heard a loud smash at the rear of his vehicle and saw that the driver side rear window was broken. Zhorne then saw a hatchet in Owens’ right hand as she began walking east across Fair Oaks Avenue and Mountain Street.
Zhorne made a U-turn and began following Owens as he telephoned the police department to report the incident. Zhorne followed Owens as she walked east on the south sidewalk of Mountain Street and south on the west sidewalk of Raymond Avenue. Zhorne reportedly saw Owens walk into 881 N. Raymond Avenue and out of sight. Zhorne saw a police unit and notified Officer Allen of Owens location.
I saw that the passenger side rear window to Zhorne’s vehicle was smashed open. I took a photo of the damage (see attached photo).
I arrested Owens for PC 594(b)(1)-Vandalism. Sergeant Villalovos approved the arrest. Officer Cass and I transported Owens to the Pasadena City Jail for booking. Upon our arrival, I read Owens her rights per Miranda from a department issued card. Owens understood her rights by stating, “Yes.” Owens invoked her right and stated she wanted a lawyer present before answering any
questions. I then placed the hatchet into evidence (see attached property sheet). DISPOSITION: Case to Detectives.
On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at approximately 1956 hours, Officer Reinbold #7400 and I (Officer Guerrero #3310) were dispatched to 1113 Marengo Avenue, in regard to a vandalism that just occurred. Dispatch advised the victim (later identified as Kristyn Cota) saw two male juveniles spray painting her fence. Cota advised dispatch she was following both subjects and they were last seen running southbound on Marengo Avenue, from Hammond Street. The first suspect was described as male Hispanic, approximately 15 years old, wearing a gray shirt and dark colored shorts. The second suspect
I felt that this case was handled well, but only to the point of where the officer began to move the stereo equipment and search for the serial number and write it down. He had no right to move Mr. Hicks’ items, the officers where there to make an arrest not to search the area or to touch Mr. Hicks’ p...
On 01-01-17 at 0023 hours I was monitoring the radio and heard that Officer Harrell #3441 and Officer Thebeau #8402 were involved in a vehicle pursuit in the area of Fair Oaks Avenue and Corson Street. I responded to the above location to assist. They advised responding units that the suspect was involved in a traffic collision on the eastbound 210 Freeway Fair Oaks Avenue off-ramp.
The first eyewitness, Kevan Baker had stopped for gas he saw an unknown man in a flannel shirt inside the gas station approaching Mrs. Lopez and trying to strangle her by the hair and taking her to the back room of the station. The man suddenly saw Baker witnessing and released Wanda’s hair and went up to Baker warning him “ I got a gun. Get back, Don’t mess with me.” After that the man ran away and Baker reported that the man ran in an east direction from the store. Before Lopez was on the ground she yelled “help me, help me” and Baker attempted to help and ran in the back of store to get paper towel to stop the bleeding, until the police and paramedics arrived. The second eye witness was George Aguirre. Aguirre had stopped as well for gas exactly at 8 pm. As he was filling up his van with gas, he saw a man standing outside of the gas station store, wearing dar...
On Thursday, 11/12/2015, at 17:01 hours, I, Deputy Stacy Stark #1815 was dispatched to a domestic disturbance in progress located at 66 Paper Lane, Murphysboro, IL 62966. It was reported that a 15 year old female juvenile was busting out windows on her mother’s vehicle. Deputy Sergeant Ken Lindsey #2406 and Deputy John Huffman #2903 responded as well.
...e police officers. Miranda established the precedent that a citizen has a right to be informed of his or her rights before the police attempt to violate them with the intent that the warnings erase the inherent coercion of the situation. The Court's violation of this precedent is especially puzzling due to this case's many similarities to Miranda.
You have the right to remain silent, anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney, and to have an attorney present during police questioning, if you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to you by the state. These words have preceded every arrest since Miranda v. Arizona 1966, informing every detained person of his rights before any type of formal police questioning begins. This issue has been a hot topic for decades causing arguments over whether or not the Miranda Warnings should or should not continue to be part of police practices, and judicial procedures. In this paper, the author intends to explore many aspects of the Miranda Warnings including; definition, history, importance to society, constitutional issues, and pro’s and con’s of having the Miranda Warnings incorporated into standard police procedures.
On October 3, 1974, around 10:45 pm the Memphis Police got a call about a "prowler inside call." Police officers Elton Hymon and Leslie Wright were dispatched to answer the call. Upon arriving at the scene, there was a woman standing on her porch and gesturing toward the house next door, she told them she had heard glass breaking and that "they" or "someone" was breaking in next door. While Wright radioed in, Hymon went back behind the house. He heard a door slam and saw someone run across the backyard. The fleeing suspect, who was Edward Garner, stopped at a 6-feet-high chain link fence at the edge of the yard. With the use of a flashlight, Hymon was able to see Garner's face and hands there was no sign of a weapon, although Hymon was not certain that Garner was unarmed. He thought Garner was either 17 or 18 years old and about 5' 5" or 5' 7" tall. While Garner was crouched at the base of the fence, Hymon called out "police, halt" and took a few steps toward him and Garner then began to climb over the fence. Convinced that, if Garner made it over...
The decision requires law enforcement officers to follow a code of conduct when arresting suspects. After an arrest is made, before they may begin questioning they must first advise the suspect of their rights, and make sure that the suspect understands them. These rights are known as the Miranda Warnings and include:
In 1966, American police procedure was changed by what is known today as the Miranda Rights. In 1963, Ernesto Miranda, a twenty three year old Hispanic American with an eighth grade education was arrested for kidnap and rape. (Paddock) He was identified by the victim of the crime in a police lineup. After he was identified, he was taken into police interrogation for two hours. When he was arrested, he was not informed of his Fifth Amendment right to not incriminate himself. He was also not informed of his Sixth Amendment right to have the assistance of an attorney. In the first part of his interrogation, Miranda denied having any involvement in the crime, but after two hours he confessed to the crime in writing. (Street Law)
The case of Miranda v. Arizona (384 U.S. 436 [1966]) is one of the most important cases in history. It brought about prominent rights that are still existent today in 2015 regarding interrogations and custody. The results of this case are still seen in the current criminal justice system. However, even though the rights that were given to the system by the court, there are still instances today in which these Miranda rights are violated. The concept of Miranda has evolved a lot from a court case to a code used by law enforcement during custodies and investigations.
In this paper I am going to be discussing the Miranda rights. What they mean to you, what they entitle you to, and how they came to be used in law enforcement today. I am discussing this topic because, one it is useful to me as a police officer, two they can be very difficult to understand, and three if they are not read properly to you when you are placed under an arrest it could actually get you off. I will start off by discussing the history and some details of the Miranda case.
This case involves the suspect being in violation of PC 148(a)(1)-Resisting/Delaying a Peace Officer and PC 404.6(a)-Incite crowd to commit acts of force or violence.
The Miranda warnings stem from a United States Court’s decision in the case, Miranda v. Arizona. There are two basic conditions that must be met for Miranda warnings to be required: the suspect must be in official police custody and the suspect must be under interrogation. The suspect goes through a booking process after an arrest. The suspect will have a bond hearing shortly after the completion of the booking process or after arraignment. The arraignment is the suspect’s first court appearance to officially hear the charges filed against him or her and to enter a plea. The preliminary hearing or grand jury proceeding determines if there is substantial evidence for the suspect to be tried for the crime charged. In this essay, I will identify and describe at least four rights afforded criminal defendants at the arrest stage and during pretrial. I will analyze the facts presented and other relevant factors in the scenario provided. I will cite legal authority to support my conclusions.
The NYPD chief of Manhattan South Detectives William Aubry said that they are looking into the suspect’s state of mind and psychological history in an attempt to determine the suspect’s motive. Rojas says that he had spoken to a mental health counselor at a local veteran’s center days before the tragedy. When he didn’t receive a callback, he reacted by plowing down pedestrians with his car in one of the busiest streets in the