Patrick Henry Anti Federalist Argument Analysis

Patrick Henry’s Anti-Federalist argument had a big purpose when it was wrote. It was Henry’s way of talking about his objections to the new Constitution. He listed varies objection to the constitution and stated reasoning behind his objections to make others see his point. Henry was a liberal activist. He wrote his document in first person. The audience for his stated was for the general public. The general public that this would have been in interest to was the government, anti-federalists, the state, and any adult in general.
Henry wrote this document in 1788 when the new constitution was being created. This was the year of the first presidential election. George Washington was elected to be the president. During this time the America Revolution

Henry is arguing to get the people on the anti-federalist side. He wants the people to realize how much the new constitution would hurt the government. The argument is persuasive. This is because he did not just state his objection, he also gave proof and reasoning behind all of his objections. Henry is using emotions and history to get the people on his side. He gets them to feel how he feels. When reading you feel a connection to the document. You feel a sense of power, but the emotion of fear also happens. This is because you don’t want the government to fall. Henry does a good job at hooking the reader to make them understand where he is coming

This is because it is wrote in the native tongue. It also talks about something big that was happening in the United States. The new constitution was a big apart of our history. Having someone like Henry oppose it was a huge apart of history, and gave us a look at the anti-federalists view of the new constitution and their reasoning behind it. This document is condemning a policy. This is because it is giving the people a reason to not approve and support the constitution. An example of this is Henry saying that the constitution is giving the federal government too much power. Since this was supposed to be a new policy, he was disapproving it, and giving the people reasons to disapprove it as