Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical principles of clinical mental health
Ethical issues in the mental health professions are regulated by both professional and legislation
Ethical issues in the mental health professions are regulated by both professional and legislation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical principles of clinical mental health
MAIN POST:
The Case of a Patient’s Suicide Attempt
The suicide attempt case in this article by Jie. L(2015) is based on an incident that occurred in Australia .A patient named Mr. Green who was terminally ill with an aggressive form of prostate cancer was informed that he only had 4-6weeks to live and Mr. Green deciding to confide in a nurse that he had suicide ideations and thoughts. The patient however asked the nurse to keep his suicide ideations a secret putting the nurse in the most ethical of dilemmas. Ethically she was bound to respect the patient’s right, but was this a case of morally doing the right thing or ethically doing the right thing?
The nurse is faced with making the ethical decision to share the patient’s suicide ideations
with the physician and team members involved in the patient’s care without consenting with the patient. Nurses encounter many situations, which put them in ethically compromising complex positions everyday but according to the American Nurses Association (2001) The Nurse’s code of Ethics Provision 4 describes that “ The nurse has authority, accountability, and responsibility for nursing practice; makes decisions, and takes action consistent with the obligation to promote health and to provide optimal care” in a safe environment (pp. 15). The nurse in this situation could have decided to maintain confidentiality, as it is a violation of the patient’s right that she share any information divulged to her in confidence. But had she kept quiet, the necessary measures would not have been initiated to prevent the patient from actually committing suicide. (Polit & Beck. 2017) describe that “ not all problems are amenable to research inquiry, Questions of moral or ethical nature cannot be researched” (pp.73) The article by Jie .L (2015) also goes on to mention that, when the suicide attempt ideations were shared with the health care team involved in Mr. Green’s care, the nursing team was able to put in place a suicide protocol which consisted of strict hospital monitoring of Mr. Green to prevent self harm on his part, nursing staff assessing and identifying the possible reasons why Mr. Green may have thought about suicide. My recommendation would have also been to provide Mr. Green with ongoing nursing intervention and communication to deal with the possible risks associated with his thoughts of suicide. Eventually, a collaborative intervention from the healthcare team to provide Mr. Green granted him good nursing care where he later transitioned into palliative care services with no attempts of suicide. The patient later died peacefully with no intentions of self-harm 76 days post discharge in the presence of his loved ones and pastors. In my opinion, though difficult to research such a sensitive topic, a starting point of gathering confidential quantitative data on how many terminally ill patients have had suicide ideations, how soon most have died after finding about their terminal diagnosis, how effective communication and intervention helped minimize the thoughts of suicide.
During week 4, we became familiar with the application of ethics in the nursing practice settings. We learned about ethical theories and principles, which are crucial when practicing in any clinical settings during ethical decision-making and while facing one or multiple ethical dilemmas. Also, we were introduced to the MORAL model used in ethical decision – making progress. The MORAL model is the easiest model to use in the everyday clinical practice, for instance at bedside nursing. This model can be applyed in any clinical settings and its acronyms assist
There are many convincing and compelling arguments for and against Physician Assisted Suicide. There are numerous different aspects of this issue, including religious, legal and ethical issues. However, for the purpose of this paper, I will examine the ethical concerns of both sides. There are strong pro and con arguments regarding this, and I will make a case for both. It is definitely an issue that has been debated for years and will continue to be debated in years to come.
When a death occurs suddenly, unexpectedly and from unnatural or unknown causes, a forensic scientist has the duty to gather and analyze evidence to determine whether the victim died from a previously undiagnosed disease or infection or from a homicide, suicide or accident (Lurigio, 2009). When considering suicide as the probable cause of death, we are looking at the act of intentionally killing oneself through one’s own effort or with the assistance of another (Sever, 2009). The resolution of the manner of death by a forensic pathologist as suicide is based on a series of factors which eliminate natural causes of death, homicide and accident (Geberth, 2013, p.55). The cause of death is also determined by the medical examiner in conjunction with the crime scene investigator; however, it can only be determined after a thorough investigation is concluded. Therefore, in the complicated process of doing a death investigation there are several mistakes that should be avoided, which are discussed in Geberth’s article, Seven Mistakes in Suicide Investigation (2013). Mistakes in doing any death investigation affect the integrity of the evidence in determining the cause of death and in its admissibility in court.
The ongoing controversy about Physician assisted suicides is an ongoing battle among physicians, patients and court systems. The question of whether or not individuals have the “right” to choose death over suffering in their final days or hours of life continues to be contested. On one side you have the physicians and the Hippocratic Oath they took to save lives; on the other you have the patients’ right to make life choices, even if that means to choose death to end suffering. The ultimate question “is it ethical for a physician to agree to assisted suicides and is it ethical for a patient to request assisted suicide?
The purpose of this paper is to discuss nursing ethics. The paper will discuss: the history of ethics, definition, doctor/nurse being education about ethics in college, code of ethics, futile care and the confusion with DNR orders. Ethics needs to be recognized on all levels of healthcare such as doctors, nurses, patients and families. CINAHAL and PubMed search engines were utilized for . Many articles were presented with the initial search, expansion on keywords assisted in generating more specific articles.
An advanced practice nurse (APN), will be faced with different types of ethical-legal dilemmas that in most cases will require the APN to make urgent decisions that will include both moral and ethical attention. Ethical dilemmas are conditions that have to scenarios course of actions to take that will contradict each other (Westrick, 2014, pp 258-265). The APN will have to choose between the two urgent decisions because each of these choices is deemed to be equally right and urgent. This is the reason that makes dealing with ethical-dilemmas very stressful for the APN and other experienced caregivers involved. It is very noteworthy that an APN has many medical responsibilities to provide care, and are also in the position to make urgent medical decisions that is independent because of being the person in authority at that time. Many of the existing ethical dilemmas will fall in with a variety of treatment withdrawal vs maintenance, the quality of life vs the quantity of life, euthanasia vs non-euthanasia, and pro-choice vs pro-life (Westrick, 2014b, pp.77-83).
...endent judgments about their own fate. In keeping with this trend there is now a growing drive to review the current laws on euthanasia and assisted suicide.” (McCormack, 1998) Nurses are faced with various ethical dilemmas every day. If theses ethical decisions are not treated in a professional manner there can be harsh consequences for both the patient and the nurse.
disease that Stephen Hawking has) 5 years ago. This is a condition that destroys motor nerves, making control of movement impossible, while the mind is virtually unaffected. People with motor neurone disease normally die within 4 years of diagnosis from suffocation due to the inability of the inspiratory muscles to contract. The woman's condition has steadily declined. She is not expected to live through the month, and is worried about the pain that she will face in her final hours. She asks her doctor to give her diamorphine for pain if she begins to suffocate or choke. This will lessen her pain, but it will also hasten her death. About a week later, she falls very ill, and is having trouble breathing.
An ethical dilemma is defined as a mental state when the nurse has to make a choice between the options and choices that he or she has at her disposal. The choice is a crucial task as the opting of the step will subsequently determine the health status of the concerned patient, hence it requires a great deal of wisdom along with proper medical and health training before any such step is opted as it is a matter of life and death. Strong emphasis should therefore be on the acquisition of proper knowledge and skills so that nurses do posses the autonomy to interact with patients regarding ethical issues involved in health care affairs and address them efficiently. It is normally argued that nurses are not provided sufficient authority to consult and address their patients on a more communicative or interactive level as a result of which they are often trapped in predicaments where their treatments of action and their personal beliefs create a conflict with the health interests of the patient. (Timby, 2008)
The discussion of physician-assisted suicide is frequently focused around the ethical implications. The confusion commonly surfaces from the simple question, what is physician-assisted suicide? Physician-assisted suicide can be defined as a circumstance in which a medical physician provides a lethal dose of medication to a patient with a fatal illness. In this case, the patient has given consent, as well as direction, to the physician to ethically aid in their death (Introduction to Physician-Assisted Suicide: At Issue,
This is a fascinating case because it presents the distinction between a patient’s right to refuse treatment and a physician’s assistance with suicide. Legally, Diane possessed the right to refuse treatment, but she would have faced a debilitating, painful death, so the issue of treatment would be a moot point. It would be moot in the sense that Diane seemed to refuse treatment because the odds were low, even if she survived she would spend significant periods of time in the hospital and in pain, and if she didn’t survive she would spend her last days in the hospital. If Diane were to merely refuse treatment and nothing else (as the law prescribes) than she would not have been able to avoid the death which she so dearly wanted to avoid.
Another huge ethical topic is the patient’s right to choose autonomy in the refusal of life-saving medicine or treatment. This issue affects a nurse’s standards of care and code of ethics. “The nurse owes the patient a duty of care and must act in accordance with this duty at all times, by respecting and supporting the patient’s right to accept or decline treatment” (Volinsky). In order for a patient to be able make these types of decisions they must first be deemed competent. While the choice of patient’s to refuse life-saving treatment may go against nursing ethical codes and beliefs to attempt and coerce them to get treatment is trespass and would conclude in legal action. “….then refusal of these interventions may be regarded as inappropriate, but in the case of a patient with capacity, the patient must have the ultimate authority to decide” (Volinsky). While my values of the worth of life and importance of action may be different than others, as a nurse I have to learn to set that aside and follow all codes of ethics whether I have a dilemma with them or not. Sometimes with ethics there is no right or wrong, but as a nurse we have to figure out where to draw the line in some cases.
It is obvious to the TV viewer that under the banners of compassion and autonomy, some are calling for legal recognition of a "right to suicide" and societal acceptance of "physician-assisted suicide." Suicide proponents evoke the image of someone facing unendurable suffering who calmly and rationally decides death is better than life in such a state. They argue that society should respect and defer to the freedom of choice such people exercise in asking to be killed. This essay intends to debunk this point of view on the basis of mental illness among those patients involved.
In this case “how nurses respond to ethical problems varies by professional experience, autonomy, and competency. Social and cultural factors can influence nurse’s professionalism and ethical decision making. Thus, it is important to examine the relationship between nurse’s ethical decision making and their professional behaviors from different culture contexts” (Cerit & Dinc, 2013). For instance, an ethical dilemma can be on the removal of life support on a patient who has a poor quality of life, based on the patient’s living will. The family may have different views or reasons not to. At this point the nurse must make the ethical decision to follow the doctors’ orders based on the patient’s status, which shows signs and symptoms of the organs slowly deteriorating. Although individuals have different cultures and beliefs one must make the right decision towards what the patient wanted no matter what are beliefs
Suicide, it's not pretty. For those of you who don't know what it is, it's the