Parties To A Crime
A crime is any act or omission of duty resulting in harm to society that is punishable by the state. Often there is more than one participant in a crime, including cooperation in the physical act or assistance before and after. In New South Wales, the roles of people in a party conducting a crime are specified in laws about joint criminal enterprise. A joint criminal enterprise is one in which two or more people conduct criminal activity with a common objective. All parties are held equally criminally accountable even if some were more actively involved than others. All participants are punishable by court and are referred to as the parties to a crime. There are four distinguishable parties to a crime which are classified according to their role in the execution of the crime. Parties to a crime can be classified as:
1. Principal in the first degree
2. Principal in the
…show more content…
The principal in the first degree would be the person that committed the whole or parts of the physical elements of the crime. In order to be prosecuted, it would be a necessity to prove that the principal in the first degree committed the actus reus with the adequate mens rea.
Example: if person A used a gun to rob a store, he would be the principal in the first degree as he committed the crime himself or herself.
In the case Cooper v Regina [2011] NSWCCA 258, the appellant, Bradley Cooper was arraigned on an indictment that on the 22 March 2003, he did murder Dale Kevin Muldoon. In this case, Cooper would be the principal in the first degree as he delivered all blows to the head of the deceased and therefore was solely responsible for the murder.
Though, under a variant of the definition, a person can be charged as a principal in the first degree if they possess the mens rea but causes an innocent person to perform the physical
The term ‘Actus Reus’ is Latin, and translates to ‘the guilty act’ , it refers to the thing that the offender did that wa...
Actus Reus – it is a guilty act i.e. it is an arrangement between two parties involving criminal property;
1st degree murder is murder with malice aforethought. Malice aforethought is a murder that was planned out. 1st degree is also murder with the intent to kill and it is
Generally, the study of crime mainly focused on the offender until quite recently. In fact, Shapland et al (1985) described the victim as ‘the forgotten man’ of the criminal justice system and ‘the non-person in the eyes of the professional participants’. A new perspective was brought with victimology, an expanding sub-discipline of crimin...
A crime being committed is the first event to initiate our criminal justice system. On June 12th 1994 a double murder was reported at the residence of Nicole Brown Simpson the ex-wife of the then beloved Orenthal James (OJ) Simpson. It was discovered that Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman had been brutally murdered and the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) began their investigation, this being the second step in our criminal justice system.
The Major Crimes Act was an important piece of legislation regarding the jurisdiction of Indian tribes on U.S. soil, and was passed on March 3, 1885. It was one of the concluding sections of the Indian Appropriations Act of 1885, which sought to deal with Indian American relations of the latter-19th century. The Major Crimes Act law was passed by Congress, following the General Crimes Act of 1817. The Major Crimes Act expanded on the General Crimes Act by detailing what could constitute as a crime under the federal jurisdiction of the United States if they were to be committed by a Native American in a Native American territory. It also added the caveat that crimes committed between two Native Americans would also count under federal jurisdiction
A general intent is the most usual modus operandi for most of the misconducts. Under the general aim, the prosecution requires proving that the offender intended to commit an act in question (Herring, 2014). They are those offenses that have no particular mens rea component in them. The defendant’s act’s results are irrelevant in a general intent crime.
The “mens rea” of first degree murder is that the person, with time and intent, planned out or premeditated the murder. The “actus reas” of first degree murder is the actual act of committing the murder after planning it (Lippman, 2006).
The offender urinated on his victim during the sexual assault which instigates
Crime is not something unique to one country or culture, it can be found all over the world and has been present for as long as history goes back. There are many theories on why crimes happen ranging from individual responsibility to responsibility of societal influences. However, some countries suffer from much higher crime rate than others and the United States of America happens to be such a country. This paper will look at how societal influences, more specifically, the concept of the American Dream, affect crime rates in the country. It is the idea that the basis of striving towards economic success, seen in the foundational ideas of the American Dream, is the very same factor that allows the nation’s crime rate, such as in white collar
After a person suspected of murder has been the trial process begin. During this stage the police will give the evidence they have complied to the prosecution. The prosecution will make a determi...
...e is not served. Also, the family of the victim must be taken into consideration. The family has suffered greatly and deserves to see justice served.
Crime will always surround us, but it often avoids the attention of monitoring systems which are established to measure the amount of crime and its victims (Skogan, 1977). There is truth in the fact that many crimes are not reported to the police, while other crimes are reported but never recorded. There are many reasons as to why this occurs. Firstly, the phrase “The dark figure of crime” is a concept used by criminologists and sociologists alike. It is a concept used to describe the crimes that remain undiscovered, unrecorded or unreported. It is believed that there is no complete way of identifying how much crime is actually out there, therefore, there is always questionability and doubt in regards to crime statistics as they cannot ever be accurately represented. (Skogan, 1977) This essay will aim to explain some of these reasons why not ally crimes are reported or registered.
In the case of R v Maloney (1985), the defendant and the Victim (stepfather of the defendant), were drunk when they decided to have a contest of who can load and fire a gun more quickly. The defendant shot the victim without aiming as the victim taunted the defendant to fire the gun. Lord Bridge held ‘Foresight of consequences as an element bearing on the issue of intention in murder... belongs, not to the substantive law but the law of evidence’ (Molan, 2001: 95), oblique intent here is held ...
We are all affected by crime, whether we are a direct victim, a family member or a friend of a victim. It can interfere with your daily life, your personal sense of safety and your ability to trust others.